The Reality Blog

I must admit that when I originally read that feminists had a preference to being called sluts, It was somewhat of a "say what" situation for me. I mean, why would anyone want to be called a swear word and why pick that particular one when there are so many to choose from. One would have imagined using a kinder, less erotic or gentler version, rather than one that drags up a particular set of offensive behaviours, as well as a lifestyle or an alomost horizontal activity..

In order to be able to use the word correctly and use it in it's proper context. We should have a look at it's meaning before we apply it to those much maligned members of that hate movement. The last thing they need, I would imagine, is another term or description that explains their behaviour a lot more succinctly than the word feminist actually does, they have already abused that one as to have no particular meaning at all apart from undertaking lunatic behaviour that is..

My own laptop dictionary describes it as the following -

slut |slət|
noun
a slovenly or promiscuous woman.

A rather limited explanation but my thesaurus waxes lyrical -

slut
noun
she dressed like a slut and didn't act much better: promiscuous woman, prostitute, whore; informal tart, floozy, tramp, hooker, hustler; dated scarlet woman, loose woman, hussy, trollop; archaic harlot, strumpet, wanton.

In other words it really does explain the activities of well indoctrinated feminists. They should really adopt it..

Now I am even more confused than before. What are feminists really saying or getting at, when they say they are reclaiming the word "SLUT". I was not aware that it had somehow been lost, or even lost it's meaning or it's explanation or it's way. Reclaiming anything always meant what the dutch did to increase their land size..

What are the girls going to call each other now when they are competing for favours ? Naughty !
Sandra is such a "naughty" girl while she was trying to steal my boyfriend. It's just not the same, it looses it's meaning and just does not roll off the tongue as that magic put-down always did..

To my way of thinking, feminists wanted that word to be used without it's obvious  and varied connotations and also to loose it's meaning or expressiveness. They wanted it to be able to be used without it being offensive. Am I right ?

So they do not want to reclaim it but re-adjust it's meaning, deconstruct and reconstruct, like they want to do with everything else without it having any additional benefit or advantage. Good luck with that..

So why are they complaining about that term being used ? Fluke (I prefer Flake), a 30 year old female slut-feminist was intentionally and especially wheeled out for the occasion, was offended when Limbaugh called her a slut, she was offended ?. Hang on a minute, WHAT!!

Feminism and cognitive dissonance wander hand in hand like twins, of this we are already well aware and here we have another one of the endless unrelenting examples that we come across on a daily basis. It's like the door joke, being reborn, reincarnated. When is a door not a door ? When it's ajar, get it "a jar", har, har, har. That is almost as funny as asking "When is a feminist a slut, the answer would be "When she demands it". But hang on a minute, didn't we just cover that. I get that sense of dejavu setting in..