The Reality Blog

Please, spare us the 'women’s politics' 

The Left's vision of feminism and women's issues, treating women as a homogenous group, is ridiculous, argues Ruth Porter.

Gee, if only that was possible. We have been bombarded by that endless sickening "What women want" hysteria for so long that the majority of generations on this planet was raised up with it. They actually know of nothing else. The endless hype, screaming rhetoric and demands, that we have had over the years were purely generated by marxist feminists in order to achieve their own fantasised Utopia. The marxist version which has over the centuries never eventauated to begin with. That marxist dream consists of seeing who could murder the most amount of people within a given time limit. More people died while marxists reigned than did all the wars combined and you could probably thrown in the additional headcount from death by disease as well..

But that did not stop feminists from having another go at it nad probably with the help of the global warmist movement, they were seeking that same outcome. Strangely enough, they were actually trying to outdo each other in finding ways to disperse as much money as possible onto the least deserved..

So we have that tired old boring and in this day and age, inane bickering over feminism and that tired, well trodden or bled to death topic, "women"..

Is there no end..

Obviously not. Out they drag the narcissists to once again raise that old topic but this time with a difference, it's actually got two females debating it, for a change, gee, which basically means that they both get to argue, and thrash to death, that same old tired topic once again and keep it insanely alive..

Well, how affective are we when the Leader of the Opposition and from the look of it, the next Prime Minister of Australia Tony Abbott, makes this comment -

"It's those man-hating femo-nazis," he told talkback radio. "They've never had a real man in their ballot box!".
Link..


So, there we have one of the tags that was introduced by the MRA's as a deliberate explanation to what feminism is all about and it can only be compared to Nazism as it's doctrine, mantra and intrusion into the law and eduction indicates that they are followers of that holocaust inducing doctrine which can be matched almost word for word to their brain-rinsing methodology which they have done so well..


Meanwhile, Australia wallows in feminised female stupidity as they make every effort to try and destroy it. We have a feminist based Government led by a load of neurotic women determined to demonstrate clearly that any country run by women and influenced by the disease that feminism is, it clearly reduce the brain's power to exclude the cognitive thinking process, while their tunnel visioned, myopia is introduced into policy without so much as any opportunity of long term thought process or even considering short term benefits as this government has already clearly demonstrated..

Then we have Christine Nixon, another feminist and former police commissioner, demonstrating it's total incompetence and lack of leadership qualities, she dined in a restaurant while Victoria was burning and hundreds of Men, women and children died in the process. Here she is claiming in her book, that the reason she was sacked was because it was "fat", cognitive dissonance is a required precondition for feminism as feminists suffer from this affliction because their doctrine cannot be accepted by the normal functioning mind. It would and does reject it's downright hypocrisy and female supremacist mentality, it is akin to claiming copper is gold. The normal, average, human being capable of reasoning and able to realise that one cannot introduce a new dysfunctional, societal changing thought process without destroying the society that we have created over centuries. They demand it be expunged, totally replaced with their inane, socialist, Marxist influenced stupidity designed to replace it without people even noticing as they hide their manipulations to ensure that outcome..

For those of you who have read George Orwell's 1984, would recognise how feminists have copied his thought comparing processes and insane methodology, with which he demonstrates (in parody form) how communism works, like "Hate is Love" and "War is Peace" from that book can be directly compared to the same lie feminists tell, lies like they are for "Equality" when in reality everyone knows they are not and also utilise the "war is peace" method by waging a war on all men and boys and declaring that to be either just some side affect or claim that it was not what they intended which ofcourse is another lie..

They claim continuously that they don't hate men, that is in public, but their minions continually demonstrate the direct opposite on their hate sites and forums, see for yourself..

 If you have not read it "1984", do. It will definitely open your eyes to show you precisely what feminism has copied and how they will try and achieve a new world order via their doctrine as we can already see in the United Nations doing as they favour women over men and boys and at the same time have fresh minds to pollute with their male hating message..

In regards to the above journalist comment, she will ofcourse claim that she was only joking..

This is a post from J.Curry's Cimate Etc site where a study demonstrates that white cons. dudes are the ones forcing the scientific community to get their shit together and tell the science the way it is instead of theorising or using manipulated computer models to spread their AGW according to their preconceived religion, which by the way is coming unstuck as I speak..

It is just another condescending study by those learned elites whose comprehension of reality relies on someone else's opinion as they don't get out much. Anaemia is their main complaint and the sun is something they study in their spare time..

Gladly, I can confess and state that there are more guys not convinced that feminism is the utopia that those lying feminists claim it to be, I am glad also to say that the MRM is chock a block full of people from countries all over the world. It's easy to join, confessions held right here. The only request is that you admit how much feminism sucks and how much it has screwed up your life, see, easy..

JC comment:  you think that this relationship would give them a clue about what “denial” is actually about.
It is also important to note the effects of the other social, demographic, political, and temporal variables we employed as controls in our models. Age generally has no effect on climate change denial, but older adults are more likely than are younger adults to believe there is no scientific consensus. Lesser educated adults are more likely than are their more highly educated counterparts to believe human activities are not the primary cause of recent warming and that there is no scientific consensus. Adults with higher socioeconomic status (both educational attainment and annual income) are more likely than are their lower SES counterparts to believe the media exaggerates the seriousness of global warming. Employment status and parental status have no direct effect on climate change denial. For each of the five denial items, more religious individuals, people unsympathetic to the environmental movement, and self-identified Republicans are more likely to express climate change denial than are their respective counterparts. Finally, climate change denial has increased over the time period between 2001 and 2010.
From the conclusions:
The positive correlation between self- reported understanding of global warming and climate change denial among conservative white males is compelling evidence that climate change denial is a form of identity-protective cognition, reflecting a system-justifying tendency.
Our results relate back to earlier work on the political mobilization of conservative elites and organizations in the US to challenge climate science and policy . Conservative think tanks, conservative media, corporations, and industry associations (especially for the fossil fuels industry)—domains dominated by conservative white males—have spearheaded the attacks on climate science and policy from the late 1980s to the present. The results presented here show that conservative white males in the general public have become a very receptive audience for these efforts. When mobilized, these conservative white males may constitute a key vector of climate change denial in their own right via their online and offline social networks and through participation in various protest and campaigning events.
Since the mid-1990s, organized climate change denial has diffused from the US to other Anglo nations with established conservative think tanks that promote free-market conservatism and front groups promoting industry interests, most notably Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand . This spread of climate change denial has been driven to a significant degree by key actors—and their resources, strategies, and tactics—in the U.S. climate change denial machine. Throughout these Anglo countries organized denial seems to be dominated by politically conservative white males, and this suggests that a similar conservative white male effect might be emerging in the general publics of these nations with regard to climate change denial. Clearly the extent to which the conservative white male effect on climate change denial exists outside the US is a topic deserving investigation.
JC conclusion:  This article is notable primarily for coining the term “cool dudes” in the context of climate change “denial.”    My main reaction to this is to question how social scientists, who actually study this, can be so clueless about the whole thing.  Perhaps someone needs to develop a demographic and behavioral theory about social scientists who write about climate change “deniers.”    I look forward to the reactions of the “cool dudes” to these ideas.

The results of the likelihood ratio tests (1 df, x2 distribution) in Table 6 indicate that the confident conservative white male dummy variable improves model fit more than does the conservative white male dummy variable. Further, for each denial indicator, the odds ratio for the confident conservative white male dummy variable is greater than the one for the conservative white male dummy variable. For example, while conservative white males are 1.43 times more likely than other adults to believe the effects of global warming will never happen, confident conserva- tive white males are 3.39 times more likely than other adults to do so. Thus, confident conservative white males are much more likely than are other adults to report climate change denial. Building  upon the results presented in Table 3, the patterns revealed in Table 6 further suggest that climate change denial is a form of identity-protective cognition, reflecting a system-justifying ten- dency.