The standard assessment of feminists would be to have a look at their rantings and behavior over the years. You know, the poison they sprout automatically, like an automaton, fixated like a broken record. It requires tunnel vision and a deep, natural loathing plus it helps to be a lesbian..

We have, in the past, demonstrated clearly, what feminism is basically all about and it definitely is not about the best interest of women or children for that matter. They have poisoned so many people's minds and one already knows what happens. You cannot erase that poison regardless how hard you try. You can't hide it, override it with positive experiences. The memory still festers, it simmers and it only takes one minute incident for that poison to surface. That is exactly what happens when you spend your life fighting for a cause that demands you concentrate solely on negatives and ignore everything else..

It takes a conscious and controlled effort to reduce that vitriol, that burning sensation, that has been roaring at a rate that continually smolders,  that only rage inducing information, can calm..

We have shown you what feminists are all about and we have also shown you what lesbians are all about and in both cases, the sum of the two can only produce a woman of such intense hatred, that one may well wonder how they get through the day without physically harming someone. That is how intense their hate is. Nothing could or can or is, able to change that process after being involved in it for so long..

We have Julie Bindel, a feminist lesbian, which should already indicate that she is going to be a male hater. Contradicting the standard feminist claim that they are not all lesbians. But once again they are caught in that lie they foster and promote so well..

Why I hate men

• 
• guardian.co.uk, Thursday 2 November 2006 15.34 GMT 

Link..
Bindel is the epitome of the current cadre of seething feminists, including the hate they project, a prime example of what they are really all about and yet we have feminists in their myriads of variations, trying to claim that "Hating Men" is NOT what feminism is all about. Judge for yourself..

but in the meantime, I will say loud and proud, yes, today I hate men, and will tomorrow and the day after.

So we have this male hating lesbian feminist, claiming loud and long, exactly what she is all about. She is a male hater and there is no denial of that fact, no one could claim otherwise. There it is in black and white, coming straight out of it's mouth and stated in writing in that anti-male, disgraced, feminist mouthpiece, The Guardian newspaper in England. This comment states precisely what the Guardian is all about as well, and yet it still makes sales and people still buy that trash..

Lesbianism supports and lesbians are of themselves recognised as the greatest abusers of women in the world. They had to create workshops and lecture tours to raise the level of abuse they were inflicting on their female partners. The hypocrisy is there for all to see and witness. Why are they given any credence at all is beyond my comprehension..

Lesbians and their behaviour and abuse levels..

While exclusively being a lesbian has little threat of getting AIDS, lesbians have their own set of problems. Domestic violence among lesbian partners is so high that workshops on the subject are popping up around the country. Source: The National Women's Alliance, " From Silence to Voice: A Conference on Partner Violence in Lesbian relationships," C. Nicole Mason, reported by Winnie McCory, Baltimore Gay Paper, 16 April 1999, p. A2, and " Lesbians Right Summit," National Origination for Women (NOW), Jan Collins, Denise Joson, C. Nicole Mason, Chris Mason, and Lois McKieth, "Partner Violence in Lesbian Relationships," 3:30 - 5:00 pm., 23 April 1999.

As you can see, they themselves live in a continual level of violence and abuse. Bettering the levels that applies to heterosexual relationships and yet they have the audacity to point the finger at everyone else besides themselves. It's the usual feminist hypocrisy at work and it's one they play well..

According to Grishick, many of these women read books about woman-to-woman sexual violence; they went into therapy; they volunteered at rape crisis centers. For people who are part of a small lesbian community, the social implications of speaking out against their abuser can be terrifying. Girshick reports that some women did become ostracized when they told others. " I've heard stories of individuals who say ' My friends turned against me and protected her.'" There are only a handful of groups for women battered by other women in the country. Source: R. Morgan Griffin, " Breaking the Silence: Sociologist Studies Woman-to-Woman Sexual Violence," GayHealth.com; May 10, 2000.

 It would almost appear that violence amongst lesbians is just a standard part of their relationship, for the obvious reasons as one could imagine.We have already witnessed how abusive heterosexual females are..

 Another study of 113 lesbians reported that 41% said they had been abused in one or more relationships. Source: Ristock, J., "And Justice for All?...The Social Context of Legal Responses to Abuse in Lesbian relationships," (1994) 7 Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 420.

"Only 2% of heterosexual women had been in treatment for alcohol or 12-step programs, compared with 17% of lesbians - a large difference. This may be the result of prior heavy drinking among lesbians. Or it may be that lesbians are more aware of substance abuse issues than are heterosexual women. One of the questions in the survey is ' Have you ever wondered if you had a drinking problem?,' to which 47% of lesbians answered yes compared with only 14% of the heterosexual women." Source: Esther Rothblum, " Dyke Psyche - Do Lesbians Drink More Alcohol Than Heterosexual Women? ", Baltimore Gay Paper, September 16, 1999: vol.20, no.24, p. A13.

 In one study, 15% of lesbians engaged in torture for sexual fun (sadomasochism) that included "piercing, cutting or whipping to the point of bleeding" with their lovers. Source: Lemp et al, "HIV seroprevalence and risk behavior among lesbians," American Journal of Public Health, 1995; vol. 85: pp1549-1552.

There is a lot more here, but it's hidden, denied and just ignored now as lesbian feminist take over the feminist movement with their male hating vitriol as other feminists live in denial. Makes the entire feminist organisation guilty of conspiring to keep that all quite..

What fascinates me is this comment made by this male hater in her later article, a confession that she has 'Changed" it's mind, I kid you not..

I've changed my mind about men

Can you believe that. How can a leopard change it's spots at all. You may wonder just as I do. Here we have a professional male hater who has spent her life, hating all men without justification but selectively singling out the wrong doers and applying that to all men and boys as well. Being involved in everything those male haters have achieved like introducing laws that deny men their fundamental human rights and then turn around and confess that she has changed her mind. Is their some advantage to this confession. Is this radical male hating b*tch going to change those laws back so they are "EQUAL", not on your nelly, not in a thousand years..

They are pure hypocrites, nothing will change that and not even some well meant confession that this member of the human race has finally decided to make after realising the hate that she has spread over the decades as well as encouraging and promoting it has finally caused her to reassess her life and attitude.

Give me break. Maybe she should tell that to those maniacs at the RadFem Hub or would that be too much to ask or too much of a challenge. If she is sincere that would be the next course of action but I will not hold my breath.. 

 

Fascinating, finally a single feminist and one of their normally delusional, result enhancing and fact manipulating specialists, admits that "Women Shelters" are precisely what we have been saying all along..

According to Gerhard Amendt, Professor of Gender and Generation Research at the University of Bremen, representatives of the supposedly weaker sex are every bit as violent as their partners. The researcher concludes that women's shelters foster a devaluation of masculinity and should therefore be replaced by familiy counseling centers.

The problem is ofcourse that you cannot continue lying about something that is so obviously untrue  and dishonest, that even one feminist finally has a minor conscience issue and makes a cconfession. I am surprised, as I was not aware they were capable. I was of the opinion that lying to a feminist was akin to a fish needing water without the bike..

 The answers to a number of questions are still outstanding. Have the services performed in women's shelters stood the test of time? Are the shelters operated in a professional manner, and have they moved on from an ideology that views men as the perpetrators of violence and women as nonviolent? Have women’s shelters developed a professional understanding of family conflicts that enables them to extend their efforts and include all members of a violent family?

Err, NO, would be the obvious response ofcourse. The good Professor Carey Roberts has had a good look at the "Women's Shelter", hypothetically speaking ofcourse, but he found that not only were they the "hotbed" of radical feminism, used as training and indoctrination centres, they also shuffled the  supposed victims from one shelter to the next, he found that the women staying in those shelters were vagabonds, drug addicts and someone looking for a bed for the night, just looking for a place to stay. They were some of the better behaved, at those subsidised overnight accommodation centres. The list goes on and on about the blatant dishonesty those shelter managers and staff were indulging in and they treated their "borders" as statistics to ensure the numbers looked right for the next trip to the trough for more taxpayer dollars..




Not one shelter in the US or any other country, as far as I am aware, are regulated or even checked, besides in this one study but this article is from Germany and nothing has changed since as far as I can tell..

As usual, the slated funding guarantees are based on no more than the convenient statistic that "every fourth woman will become the victim of relationship violence at some time in her life." Since there is no comparable data that would apply to men, the number is poorly suited as legitimization for women's shelters. Up until now, reference was made to the role of women as victims, and funding for such institutions was automatically renewed. The effectiveness of the shelters was not monitored. At the same time, the statistic was used to popularize their work. In the pre-Christmas season of 2007, a media campaign was launched in Austria under the slogan “Verliebt. Verlobt. Verprügelt” (In Love. Engaged. Battered). The German lottery also runs public service spots pertaining to the matter. While all this has little bearing on the circumstances under which men and women actually conduct their lives, it couldn’t document more clearly a bias against men.

The radical feminists are in their element right there. As we have already clearly witnessed, radical feminists are the scourge of any male alive or already peacefully buried. Their entire motivation is to ensure that every man and boy is either charged, beaten, maligned or whenever possible, jailed for something he has not done, a false rape charge always works well and as radical feminist Robin Morgan once proffered "A false rape claim would benefit any male" or something similar, that's a radical feminist for you. They would be happier if the entire population of the planet consisted solely of estrogen carriers rather than the ones who know how to deal with it..

The Feminist Ideology: A Hotbed of Misandry

Granted, there may be shelters that have jettisoned their ideological ballast, but even the term “women’s shelter” itself always implies the disastrous ideology of radical feminism, whereby relationships between men and women are characterized by their respective status as victim and perpetrator. According to that, women can do nothing and men are completely in charge. Thus, women's shelters perpetuate the destruction of communication within partnerships as a political project within the gender discussion.
The conclusions are obvious. The concept of ideologically based women’s shelters is no longer needed. What families with violence problems urgently need is a network of counseling centers that can provide unbiased and nondiscriminatory assistance to all of the parties involved.

If there is one thing I cannot stand, it's a confession after the deed has already been done, didn't work out and a lot of people suffered because of it and after 40 years they turn around and finally confess they screwed it up, good and proper. It's a rare confession from a feminist. That rare that it could actually be the first one. No matter, how long before we have the joint confession and admission that they have screwed up everything they promoted and forced onto society..

Well it's a start. Unfortunately, it's dated and nothing has changed..

Link..

Deluded Children..

I was somewhat flummoxed by a response from a comment on one of the men's forums, commenter was a female. She was of the opinion that the release of the 160Mb of information released by Agent Orange was, well, you know, not that bad..
To be honest, my first response was a potential conniption, but then I realised that I had been party to the original release by Agent Orange and that I had spent quite a few hours, days actually, reading what the public would and should not ever be exposed to . That additional information, if released would make it appear that it was managed contrivance of information and nobody would even accept the fact that (gosh), a group of women could congregate, plan and scheme the destruction of an entire sex. How would that be possible, as all women are are such cuddly, caring individuals, so we have been told, and would never ever harm a single hair on anyone's head..

Lies ofcourse, well rehearsed, manipulated propaganda and presented to the public, but still lies fed to the unwary..

They have obviously not read about that female charged with genocide this year (Google it) or all those women who have murdered their children and spouses, especially one that murdered five at one go. Did you read about that female who filleted her husband and fed him to the kids as a casserole (Go ahead, Google it, I don't make this stuff up). Female murderous intent and actions have been hidden from a gullible public, intentionally, who even when faced with the facts, just refuse to believe any of it. The main stream media has also pandered in that direction as they hide the wrongdoing by women to the back pages or tone down the seriousness of their crime and try to justify it or blame their partners as feminists are prone to do..

Sadly, anyone who prescribed to that preferred utopian opinion would require similar treatment to  those lunatics, who wrote, laughed and planned all those nasty male hating options. Bear in mind too that radical feminists are the driving force behind the feminist hegemony. They are the policy makers and if you would like an example on how nasty, biased and sadistic it can get, have a look at Sweden and it's radical feminist introduced laws. To be sickened by the attitudes and articles that radical feminists have presented would indicate that there is still some humanity instilled in your cerebral cortex. But you will not find an ounce of that emotion or humanity in any radical feminist. Nothing exists except hatred, a toxicity that drives them to the edge of insanity in order to extract revenge for some imaginary or legitimate wrongs of the past. It is their only point of reference.

Those psychotic luminaries filter their wanton malice and hate down the feminist chain where their writings, articles and loathing are read by students in Women Studies/Gender Studies classes and groups. Their hate, loathing and malice filters through the feminist network to such a degree that everyone partaking in these subjects will be educated by that mentality. Have a look at the subjects and titles of the books recommended by Women's/Gender studies and ask yourself who have penned those books, who the authors are, and then check on the web for an explanation or resume of the author. I can guarantee that most of those books listed were written by radical feminists..

Those authors are not some benign thought provoking types, no, they are in it to ensure that all man and boy are maligned, denigrated and humiliated, promoted to third class citizenry, they are there to promote a much worse scenario which is why the "fun" delusional feminists have been caught out and do not argue any of the exposed radicalism as they are well aware of the fact that it is precisely what those radicals are stating and our claim is 100% correct, they cannot argue against any of it as the evidence is there for all to see..

Radfem Hub and other major sources for feminist news and commentary have remained curiously silent on the matter. There is no mention of the release either on Radfem, Jezebel, Feministe or Feministing as might have been expected considering the comments on Reddit. It is assumed, however that much attention has been paid amongst the feminist community to this story and its developments. (AVfM)

It makes a mockery of feminist's useful idiots like Marcotte and Valenti who wallow in the minutiae of feminism when in reality they are just skirting it's real intentions. They are both either too stupid to realise that or are smart enough to avoid any mention of it. I am going with "too stupid" but I think both applies..

The other issue is that it totally destroys, is the facade that feminists clones of all colours like "gender feminists" or "equity feminists" have been arguing and promoting. It clearly demonstrates that those naive clowns have been arguing irrelevancies and are just filling in time before the real operators of the feminist hegemony get to work and demonstrate what feminism is really all about..

The only comparison, without going overboard as is it legitimate, is the example of the second world war where a benign dictator voiced what people wanted to hear and once the gullible were convinced, out came the real side of their fanaticism. Feminism to a tee..

It's the cognitive dissonance factor at work. The double-think mentality that other feminists wallow in, has been shown to be just be a distraction..

Here is a list of those women who attended the SCUM Manifesto Conference and note how many are authors also see the list of radical feminist authors attending the 2008 conference in Australia..

Take a look at the speakers and some of the attendees of the 2008 Brisbane Feminist Conference. You also might ask who the speakers were at the 2011 Perth SCUM conference that they would openly associate with people that express a desire for murder and child abuse.Sample of feminist 2008..

Here is a sample of the topics lists and the speakers involved. As you will see, most of the speakers who attended the SCUM Manifesto Conference are listed here as well. They use emotive topics to spread their hate messages and have always done so. One would be of the opinion that women were harmless, law abiding citizens and do nothing wrong but that is also part of the universal presentation that feminists promote. Women do no wrong, so the topics are selected to ensure that message is promoted while at the same time presenting a small selected group of male wrongdoers as promote them as being the sum of all men's activities. There is no exclusion for male feminists either and it's one issue they have ignored totally..


I lifted this straight from their site and there is just way to much coding to change the presentation, so I will leave it the way it is..

	Bronwyn Winter Talked up and played down: The global rhetoric and realities of women's lives Lavender Feminist intergenerational sisterhood: Giving a FIG about AGE difference Deborah Walsh Feminism; The F-word Is feminism as relevant today as it was in the 60's? Ana Borges Feminism in Education Queensland schools and gender issues in education Merci Angeles Feminism Through The Eyes Of Filipina Urban Poor Women

Debbie Kilroy		On criminalized women
	Kim Pate		On criminalized women (live link up to Canada)
	Betty Taylor &		Domestic Violence Death Reviews
	Pam Godsell

Zoe Rathus		Shared Parenting and Family Law
	Beth Tinning		When social policy ignores feminist understandings:
			how responses to DV in the Family Law Amendment
			serve to further harm women victims of violence
	Amanda Shea		Children's Best Interests in Famliy Law: The urgent
	Hart		need to centralise the issue of children's exposure
			to domestic violence
	Elspeth McInnes		Separated Resident Mothers
			Management of contact with fathers who use violence

Betty McLellan		What do Radical Feminists want?
	Melinda Tankard Reist		The sexualisation and objectification of girls in
			Popular culture
	Renate Klein		The harmful medicalisation of prematurely
			sexualized girls
	Dr Lauren Rosewarne		Sexist Outdoor Advertising as Sexual Harrassment
	Kat Pinder		The Pornified Invasion of Lesbian Spaces

Annie Cowling		Plumbers Union
			Women in Plumbing Project
	Holly Patterson		Australian Services Union
			New Award & Industrial Issues in SACS and CASH sectors
	Juliana Virine		Queensland Nurses Union
			Personal Safety for Women at Work,  looking at recent events
			with Queensland Nurses Union in the Torres Strait area
	Kara Touchie		Queensland Council of Unions
			Current Status of Paid Maternity Leave, Parental Leave
			and "pay equity" in Australia
	Donna Justo &		Womentoring "When Women Mentor Women"
	Prosanna Poornachra
	Annabelle Allimant		A critical reflection of feminist management, cross-cultural
			framework of practice and work in the Australian
			multicultural environment

Xris Reardon		Can you name the shape, color and gender of FEMINSIM??
	& Lian Low		Who’s missing from the picture??
	Desi Achilleos &		Feminist Documentary
	Martha Goddard
	TBC		Feminist Zine Making

Gwendolyn Gray		The Australian Women's Health Movement:
			Institutionalised and surviving.
	Kathy Newnam		Abortion Rights: Activating the pro-choice majority
	Amanda Dearden		Feminist Principles for support work in Action: working creatively
			and compassionately with Women with Eating Issues who self
			harm, towards individual and social change
	Michelle Newcomb		Driven to Drink. Drugs, alochol and domestic violence
			How can agencies respond?
	Tamara Lee		Sustainability, Intentional Living
			and Prevention of Violence Against Women
	Marion Tower		Health and Healthcare for women affected by domestic violence.
			Stories of disruption, fragmentation & re-construction

M.Henderson		Feminism in the museum
	Susan Hawthorne		Of Cows and Lesbians: Poetry and Politics