Latest Posts
Showing posts with label feminist agitprop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminist agitprop. Show all posts

1 in 4 People say " What 3 in 4 Did Not "..



As an expert on Feminism. We now have in our possession a study undertaken in 253 Countries. We have carefully questioned, interviewed and received responses to our questionnaires from four people in each country. According to precedence, this makes the study not only totally acceptable but also beyond question as being factual and completely beyond dispute.

The study "A Non-conventional Actuation of Societal Comprehension of Agitprop and Misinformation: The Difference between Mythology and  Hearsay", Christian J et al (Stalwart Press 2012)..

The questionaire consisted of the following..

Do feminists lie..yes or maybe..
Are feminists dishonest... yes or probably..
Have feminists been caught out lying... yes or absolutely..

Due to copyright issues, we are unable to show the actual questions asked..


The outcome of the study was that 1 in 4 people found that feminism is in fact a movement, who are not responsible for telling untruths or even half truths. As studies have demonstrated in the past by Steinem et al 1989(Telling the half truths), Dworkin et al 1985(The Art of Fibbing).  

This unbiased study was then made available to some learned people whom I cannot name and we have also made the exception of actually stating what the questions are not, in order to demonstrate how unbiased they are, which in the majority of cases, we normally do not do anyway. We respond to such queries with the usual vacant and irrelevant commentary about those responses being unsolicited and unbiased..

We will ofcourse be sending the result of this unbiased report to all representatives of our movement and they will take care to just include the 1 in 4 number without sullying it with facts or any indication where or how the information was obtained. As with all previous studies that we have undertaken and presented, in this honest and noteworthy, deliberate way. We have also taken the rare steps of ensuring that the author and publishers are either out of the country, incognito or just not available.

The funding for this project was also disguised as a "sexual harassment" study to further our claims at ensuring that bias and discrimination is forthcoming and is at it's worst stage, ever. As is also normally the case, taxpayer dollars used in this study, plus the costing of which will not include any totals or amounts used, (as that would be an invasion of privacy), and must be resisted and protected at all or more cost to the taxpayer..

We have also used our own favourite people to summarise and claim the study is honest and completely unbiased and the facts entertained are beyond question. Those same people will ofcourse be heavily compensated for their effort..

As copies of this study are behind a pay wall and well hidden in some academic database that would take days to find because we have disguised the title. We offer the study to anyone interested at the cost of only $ 250.00 per article as costs must be recovered for our next study which will be released over the next few months as we are currently applying for more taxpayer funding for even more exposure of true and honest, factual interpretation of reality..

Anyone requiring further information can contact us via mail or phone between the hours of 3 - 4 am on non holidays and or via messenger at this address .................

How to Promote Apartheid and Discrimination..

The most suitable poster applies..

I am completely fascinated by the comparisons of the feminist movement and the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) hoax that all and sundry have now been thrown into via some outright lying and the dishonesty demonstrated of the last few weeks..
The fact that feminists have been undertaking that same path for decades does indicate that it is an effective way to make claims that otherwise would be so comprehensible, that you normally would not in your wildest dreams entertain any part of that nonsense..

But it continues just as Girlwriteswhat states in her video and especially in regards to male feminists who seem to live in a constant realm of fantasy as they make up stories that are along similar as the great lies told by the AGW fanatics. Reality and factual provable evidence is apparently all besides the point as they introduce one strawman argument after another. In order to straighten out those lies and erroneous stats, one would have to constantly monitor their sites to even get within a bull's roar of countering them and calling them to account. But that would require them to have a conscience..

But on and on it goes as more fallacies and inventions are introduced and those enablers are left to continue without any chance of prosecution or being held accountable for their brazen behaviour. Unlike Gleick, another Global Warming fanatic, who decided that lying and cheating was the best way to win against his self invented enemy, so it is with feminists of all sex, colour and sizes. It would appear that honesty and integrity are the first to suffer while they take the same steps to try and malign and denigrate the MRM as well as MRAs..

Some great examples of their hubris and agitprop is constantly on show without apology or facts to back it up. A prime example is from this usual feminised delusionary - Shani Hilton and it's article on "Street Harassment". These women are laughable. Incredible claims made and followed up with questionable studies as usual..
Kearl, the author of Stop Street Harassment: Making Public Places Safe and Welcoming for Women, is an expert who's surveyed more than 800 women in 22 countries on the kind of threatening, persistent harassment I wrote about a few days ago. One of her findings? That 1 in 4 women say they were harassed by a strange man in public before the age of 12.
Bear in mind as well that those Transit companies have installed security guards and every female has in their possession a mobile phone, which they can use at any time(mostly have it attached to their ear as it is) plus there are hundreds of people around who would help at the drop of a hat should anyone demonstrate they were even annoying anyone, plenty of white knights about. All any of those women would have to do is raise their voice or make some hysterical response as they usual do when they "feel" threatened. Also bear in mind that most of those claims have been made in cities like New York where feminists abound and are well versed in their discriminatory methodology..
 Toward the end of her testimony before Councilmember Muriel Bowser yesterday, Holly Kearl made a point to note that "sexual harassment is not mutual flirting or compliments."
Nope, sexual harassment is whatever a feminist determines it to be..

The entire event is ofcourse to ensure that women are given even more privileges along the lines of what they are doing in India, where they have their own Privileged Princess Carriages, which only the PP are permitted to use (Animal Farm anyone?) and they will be thrown off as has been the case by one man who accidentally strolled into one. It is another opportunity that feminists use to slander and malign all men and lob us all into one basket by claiming that all men behave in that fashion and that it is only females who have to run the gauntlet. This is typical feminist agitprop at work and sums up precisely what feminism is all about, detect any "equality" in their aims and goals, anyone?

The sexism and hypocrisy is right there for all to see, it's palpable and so obvious and yet we have these women claiming segregation is the only answer and apartheid it's only goal. Talk about dragging the world back to the 1800s. It demonstrates how retarded and destructive it really is while at the same time make the claim that it's for equality. I mean really. Daily they demonstrate their obvious sexism and discrimination on a world wide scale and still they have the ear of the law makers who are more than happy to reintroduce the Animal Farm at the behest of those sexist individuals..

I am Woman: Hear Me Whine, Bitch and Moan..

Even with the feminist penchant to lie and exaggerate consistently about everything, they do on the odd occasion, accidentally state some home truths, probably in the mistaken belief that it's irony and we already know how that effort spans out..One would have to have an agitprop switch installed to comprehend or try to understand the typical feminist rudimentary jargon they claim has merit and identifies them as normal productive members of society but in reality it just demonstrates beyond doubt that their habitat is not of this world and neither are their wish lists..Here is a good example of both as she wanders into self induced hallucinations.. 
Also, check her and other feminist's effort at constantly denying the smearing of all men and boys which now appears to be another aim feminists have disavowed, which has about as much reality as the ocean rising by 100 meters next week, next year, next century. If there is one thing that we can count on it's the vitriol that feminists will heap on all things male and if in doubt have a read of the latest statement from Lynne Featherstone (Equality Minister, England), another male hating feminist who couldn't wait to blame all men for all things going wrong (Previous Posting). This is feminism in action, today, right now and yet they live in denial.. 

 How stupid do they think you are ?
A feminist story of heroic strength has gotten re-written into a sensibility of weakness — as if to be a feminist is to be a whiner, buffeted passively by circumstance and mean men that we dully condemn and vilify at every chance.Somehow the feminist rallying cry of the 1970s, “I am Woman, Hear Me Roar” has slipped into the misperception, “I am Woman, Hear Me Whimper.”
The whimper should be termed whining as they are whimpering at the moment in England as the privileged princesses also found out that they could not retire earlier than anticipated regardless of the fact they retire five years earlier than men and yet live 7 years or so longer in the process. But the cowardly politicians will ofcourse cater to the vagina-vote as usual and clear it all up for those little victims..


Feminists Bemoan Loss of Status Amongst Liberals

by W.F. Price

Pamela Haag, writing for the Huffington Post, reminisces about the glory days of feminism back in the 1970s, when, as she puts it, “feminism was the muse of the liberal conscience writ large.”
If my vague and hazy memories of that time are accurate, she was right. The 1970s and early 1980s were distinctly pro-feminist, and much of the popular sentiment at the time reflected this. Although traditional culture, which has largely vanished today, still existed back then, the liberals and hip cultural icons were all self-declared feminists. I remember most men openly called themselves feminists in those days. It was fashionable and the “right thing to be.” As a little boy, I didn’t really understand the implications of this, so I simply kept my mouth shut and assumed it was one of those grown-up things, then buried myself in classical literature and natural science books in which the term didn’t exist.
As Haag, writes, one gets the sense that she feels as though feminists have been dumped:
The tactical purging of the feminine in pursuit of liberal muscularity has diminished the place of feminism along with it. The skirmish in October, 2009 over President Obama’s all-male basketball games and all-male golf outings seemed a relatively trivial intimation of the larger and more consequential trend that Suskind’s work is now describing: it illustrated visually that liberalism and feminism aren’t as close as they once were.
Maybe, as with any other long-term relationship, feminism and liberalism simply grew to take each other for granted. Maybe we feminists got lulled into a false sense of security that liberals are our natural, stalwart and obvious allies, and wouldn’t display misogyny or old boys’ tendencies. It’s understandable, but a gravely simplifying loyalty and trust, if so, because misogyny is something that all of us can struggle with or exhibit — whether male or female (women engage in women-hating, self-loathing, and sexuality-hating behaviors, too), and whether liberal or conservative.
Then, she brings up one of the more damning contradictions of feminism as though it is a good thing:
It’s all sadly ironic, this quest for Democratic toughness, because second wave feminism was a very muscular thing. It’s one of the most successful anti-feminist gambits of the last three decades that it gets associated today with a sensibility of victims and not with the feisty, sexy heroism of the Gloria Steinem generation.
The opposite of victims, second wave feminists audaciously did something and, in the frontier spirit of American self-reliance, claimed responsibility for their own lives and happiness. A feminist story of heroic strength has gotten re-written into a sensibility of weakness — as if to be a feminist is to be a whiner, buffeted passively by circumstance and mean men that we dully condemn and vilify at every chance.
Somehow the feminist rallying cry of the 1970s, “I am Woman, Hear Me Roar” has slipped into the misperception, “I am Woman, Hear Me Whimper.”
The new generation of self-respecting young female liberals don’t want to appear flaccid any more than newly-muscularized liberal males. Who would? Two very disparate sources — one a woman in her mid-20s, and the other a liberal man in his 50s — explained feminism’s diminished urgency among liberal women in almost exactly the same terms to me: young women want to show that “they can take it” instead.
If feminists were not victims, then why did everyone treat them as such, and why did they so eagerly use victim status to advance their agenda? This is what is at the root of the political decline of feminism — people don’t like a self-pitying tyrant. If the left wants to preserve any support amongst people who don’t occupy any official victim class, then certain concessions must be made, and it looks like feminism is one of them.
Finally, we’re starting to see the movement that went from victory to victory over the last 40 years run into a few obstacles, and now it’s major proponents can do little more than whine that they are not being invited to the party.
The Spearhead is a reader-supported site, so if you enjoy our content please consider a donation to keep us online now and in the future. Thank you, your support is appreciated.