Each and every mantra or doctrinal claim included in the Feminist arsenal can be cited as either being blatantly dishonest, exaggerated or a downright lie. Here is one of those downright lies that feminists have been perpetrating for so long that making people believe otherwise or convincing people about the truth will be an uphill battle as feminists will fight this tooth and nail as it would put an end to their falsehood about "all women are victims" claim. A claim that has generated copious laws and unlimited funding thrown into their coffers to continue their fascist, male hating methodology without restriction or opposition from any of those elite who were elected to protect the people. They failed and continue to do so..Vote them out..

The Centers for Disease Control recently funded a major study of heterosexual relationships throughout the U.S. and found: "Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases," and both sexes suffered significant injuries.http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/5/941 The same study also found: "More women than men (25% versus 11%) were responsible. In fact, 71 percent of the instigators in nonreciprocal partner violence were women" and "while injury was more likely when violence was perpetrated by men, in relationships with reciprocal violence it was the men who were injured more often (25% of the time) than were women (20% of the time)."http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a Men are less likely to report it (which makes crime data unreliable), but almost 300 studies now confirm "women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners," as California State University Professor Martin Fiebert shows in his online bibliography at http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm For example, a 32-nation study by the University of New Hampshire found women are as violent and controlling as men in dating relationships worldwide. http://www.unh.edu/news/cj_nr/2006/may/em_060519male.cfm?type=n andhttp://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf When children witness either parent hit the other, regardless of how severe or minor, it becomes a model for them to follow. Domestic violence is an intergenerational cycle, and we'll never stop that cycle without being honest about it rather than following the politically correct gender paradigm that has been totally refuted by serious researchers like Professor Don Dutton of the University of British Columbia and many others.
This Canadian government report also recognizes the above data:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/pdfs/fv-intime_e.pdf

One does have to wonder what the advantage of the feminist movement was for women if not to encourage their total carnal and base animal behaviour. We have witnessed an increase in the offensive and corrupt behaviour in the opposite sex like never before..

Female teachers bonking minors is on the increase while useless courts just give them license while white knight Judges explain and excuse their abhorrent behavior. We have mothers murdering their children like never before which ofcourse has always been the case where mothers were always the greater abuser and murderers of children but that is laid wayside as judges just keep pilling on those children's misery by automatically allocating the care of children to the sex that will abuse them the most. You work that out, it is beyond my capacity..

But they continue just like there is no tomorrow or they are of the opinion that the lenient courts will just give them the usual pussy pass where all they have to do is lie about some type of abuse they supposedly suffered and the facts or witnesses or doctors reports do not come into it at all. The claim, according to feminists, is sufficient to be factual and should not be questioned as women have clearly demonstrated themselves to be honourable creatures who NEVER lie about anything. Have you ever come across such ignorance and arrogance before in your life..

Fiona Donnison

A mother convicted of murdering her two young children had also been charged with the death of a third child, it has emerged.Fiona Donnison, 45, was yesterday found guilty of suffocating Harry, three, and Elise, two, after a bitter split from their father Paul.Self-obsessed and controlling, she used them as the ‘ultimate weapon’ to take revenge on her former partner for ‘rejecting’ her and starting a new relationship with an old school friend.

Link..

 And so it continues unabated.

Kris claims he was raped by his old girlfriend Jessica Fuller. She got pregnant and had their son Joshua. Kris was never a part of his son's life.

Link.. 

It really does encourage all men to stay well clear of these obviously dysfunctional and self serving..

Woman on trial for raping 10 men

A Russian woman, dubbed the Black Widow for her love of horror films and spiders, is on trial for drugging and raping 10 men. 

Wanna Die ?

No amount of denial will discount it or make it go away. No amount of feminist lies or denial will change that..

Women are warmongers..

 

The Arena - Nato's Women Warmongers 

analysis 

Out of all the Libya Contact Group representatives from 30 states and organisations that met in the Turkish capital Istanbul last Friday, July 15, United States Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton seemed the busiest, with one website describing her itinerary thus: "Secretary Clinton met with too many dignitaries to name. We see her here with several of her counterparts and Spain's Trinidad Jimenez. She gave a Press conference as well as a major address to the organisation of the Islamic Conference."

Apart from Clinton, two other outstanding women at the meeting were Spanish Foreign Affairs Minister Trinidad Jimenez, and the European Union's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton.

Dear reader, welcome to the world of elite and influential women who do not need to be in military garb for them to influence global events. Welcome also to women whose children are not fighting in brutal wars elsewhere, but who still enjoy the power that comes with directing these wars. These female warmongers are slowly destroying the adage that women are victims of war since they fully back and advocate for the wars currently being fought.


To them, it must be an amiable achievement - women who have shattered the glass ceiling, and have proceeded to rewrite the war narrative as policy formulators and decision makers.

The war in Libya has brought this element to the fore more than ever. On July 15 as Nato members met in Istanbul to deliberate on the fourth Libya Contact Group meeting (deposing of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi), it was evident that women were calling the shots - Hillary Clinton, Trinidad Jimenez and EU's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton. It was at this meeting that Clinton announced the US' recognition of the Libyan rebel group.

Incidentally, it was during the Clinton administration in the 90s that we started seeing women who served in government, but who had an appetite for war. Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton's Secretary of State from 1997 - 2001 has a few quotable quotes on war which makes this remark quite fitting:

l "If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future."

l "Iraq is a long way from the US, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

George W. Bush invaded Iraq accusing Saddam Hussein of having weapons of mass destruction and, Condoleezza Rice was among members of his inner circle. She held the posts of chief security advisor and later

Secretary of State, and below again are some interesting quotes from her:

l "We are at war, and our security as a nation depends on winning that war."

l "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

The post-2008 Zimbabwean elections also saw Jendayi Fraser, the US' Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, working extremely hard to have Zimbabwe placed under the UN's Chapter VII, a move that could have given the US and its coalition of the willing the slightest excuse to invade it. And all this at Fraser's instigation!

The Obama era is no different. With Secretary of State Clinton and US envoy to the United Nations, Susan Rice, it is becoming so evident that women are as eager to have people of other nationalities maimed and killed through war, just like their male counterparts.

The reports about how Susan Rice hunted down South Africa's ambassador to the UN so that South Africa, together with Nigeria and Gabon could vote for UN Security Council Resolution 1979, are telling.

Then, on March 20, John Avlon wrote: "That a diplomatic team led by Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power advocated military action against (Muammar) Gaddafi may be a footnote in the Libyan conflict - but it is a significant mark of our nation's evolution.

According to Avlon: "The Libyan air strikes mark the first time in US history that a female-dominated diplomatic team has urged military action. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined with UN Ambassador Susan

Rice and the influential Office of Multilateral and Human Rights Director Samantha Power to argue for air strikes against Libya. Their advice triggered an abrupt shift in US policy, overturning more cautious administrations' counsellors."

Just like Bush and his infamous post-9/11 assertions - if you are not for us, you are against us - Clinton has asked her critics regarding the Libyan conflict, "Whose side are you on?" Matt Welch wrote on the blog http://reason.com/ that Clinton responded to a question raised at a press conference in Jamaica, ". . . But the bottom line is, whose side are you on? Are you on Gaddafi's side or are you on the side of the aspirations of the Libyan people and the international coalition that has been created to support them? For the Obama administration, the answer to that question is very easy."

As she globe trots, week in, week out, Clinton with each Press briefing leaves behind the chilling effects of how power can be used without due regard to its consequences. In her own assessment it's either "yes" or "no" and no compromising.

On July 16 she told CNN regarding the situation in Syria, "The brutality has to stop . . . Syria can't go back to the way it was before" . . . (Assad) "has lost his legitimacy in the eyes of his own people because of the brutality of their crackdown".

That same day, she called for a speedy solution to Cyprus' long-standing dispute: "We don't think the status quo in Cyprus benefits anyone . . . We want to see a bi-zonal, bi-communal federation and we would like to see it as soon as possible," she said. A statement that does not give room for negotiation. Avlon further remarks that passages from Samantha Power's 2003 book A Problem From Hell offer insight into principles that may have led to this women-driven war campaign. Although the final decision was made by Obama, Avlon says: "In the end, that a female-led diplomatic team argued for war will be a footnote in this conflict as it unfolds. But it is historically significant. And that it seems almost unremarkable to contemporaries is a small mark of our constant evolution toward a more perfect union, even within our civilian-led military."

Spanish Foreign Minister Trinidad Jimenez is no different. She has also attended the contact group meetings on Libya. At the Abu Dhabi meeting in June, she proposed implementing an aid plan for Libya, once Gaddafi had been overthrown, with the aim of giving the country democratic institutions and training a new army in collaboration with the Interim National Council which groups the rebels together.

Jimenez also said that the proposal of a "pact" between the international community and the Libyan opposition would be put into effect once Gaddafi left office. "We have seen that diplomatic, political, economic and military pressure is leaving Gaddafi more isolated every day." (Source: Madrid EFE in Spanish - Spanish semi-official independent news agency).

Dear reader, you might argue that Zimbabwe had its own women of war: Mbuya Nehanda. But, is this the same? With remote-controlled fighter jets becoming the in-thing, how many women in Africa will also be advocating for wars in other parts of the world? Is this gender mainstreaming?

Ever wondered where feminists got their wet dream from and why lesbians dominate that hegemony (do I need to explain that?).The feminasties have been wetting themselves over the concept of reducing the male population to 10% and if that was not achievable they wanted to make sure that women would control everything. By that I mean, every business and every position, including all government positions which they have already legislated into being plus turning every thing around so men would become slaves of women as in their opinion, that was the case in the past. One claim they have failed to demonstrate or come even close to explaining ofcourse, but they can dream..

In relation to the feminist psycho Mary Daly, we have this bit of sparkling lunacy..
..the proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the human race,”

 This is what they preach in those lovely "Wimmyn's Studies" courses, hate and malice is the standard prescription and neurosis, the end result..

Other statements made in this movie is, there would be no diseases or wars as they have determined that women are much more inclined to be soft and cuddly and are abhorred by anything that would harm children or kittens. You do not have to look far to contadict those coments as there are plenty of examples on the web from past history..

Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice and Samantha Powers, Trinidad Jiménez,, Catherine Ashton, all pushed for the war in Libya. So don't go saying that women do not start wars as that would be a downright lie..

And ofcourse we have a feminist woman indulging in genocide as well but with this precondition where she demanded that women be raped before they were slaughtered..

Mivumbi, who has confessed to taking part in the slaughter, told me that Pauline goaded the Interahamwe, commanding, ”Before you kill the women, you need to rape them.”

Pauline Nyiramasuhuko, a prominent Rwandan Hutu and former minister of family affairs and women’s advancement, has been sentenced to life in prison by an international tribunal for a variety of heinous crimes, including mass rape, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. 

Here we have a parody produced a few years ago, having a go at feminists and communism which includes the mindless brain numbing propagandised women at that facility who claim that all invention were made by women and Einstein was also a woman..

I think that feminists musts have studied this just to learn a few things. The implications are spot on..

Has English subtitles and made in Poland..

It would not be too often that I would list anything from the prominent feminist moan sheet of Huffington post. In my opinion not only is it misandric to the extreme but if you have a look at the comments you could only witness nasty little feminists and their lunatic supporters waxing lyrical on how everything wrong on this planet is not women's fault..

So I was surprised to read an article even remotely sane and considerate towards our sex and actually not taking the "victimhood specialists" side. It is quite a shock to actually read any article that claims that women are the obnoxious and violent bitches we all know them to be without excuse or denial..

Refreshing to say the least and probably as rare as well..

Are Men Society's Scapegoats?

Vicki Larson

Journalist, mother, thinker

Gabriel Aubry is being a bad dad. Well, we don't know that for a fact; all we know is that actress Halle Berry, with whom the model had a daughter, now 3, is claiming that he's been neglectful. She may be right, she may be wrong, but in the eyes of much of the world, Aubry's already guilty.
People can -- and do -- say anything they want in a nasty custody or divorce battle. And as a society, we often tend to assume the worst about men. But what if we're wrong?
We're used to men being violent. Literature, movies and video games are full of heroes and antiheroes who kill and maim their way into our hearts and nightmares. At the same time, we tell boys to "suck it up" instead of expressing pain, leaving them few emotions but anger. Then we chastise them when they actually get angry -- or live in fear of their anger. And sometimes we use the one emotion we've allowed them to our advantage.
Men, of course, aren't the only ones who can do damage; statistics show that women can be just as violent as men. But while the Violence Against Women Act provides millions of dollars for shelters for abused women, you don't see too many shelters -- any, actually -- for abused men. "It's often been taken for granted that women can't really do that much damage, so it's OK to maybe slap your boyfriend or do something of that nature," says Kellie Palazzolo, an assistant professor at Arizona State University's Hugh Downs School of Human Communication who is overseeing research on how college students perceive female and male perpetrators.
That may be why so many women applauded Elin Nordegren's alleged golf club attack on then-hubby Tiger Woods -- we just don't like to think of women being violent except in self-defense. He cheated on her; he made her do that!
And in the "he said-she said" of so many marital breakups, like that of Hulk and Linda Hogan, where she claims he was violent and abusive and he says she's "delusional," or of actress Meredith Baxter, who claims in her memoir, "Untitled", that she was physically and psychologically abused by ex David Birney, while he says her book's "an appalling abuse of the truth," whom do we believe?
Same when it comes to sexual violence. In the "he said-she said" of former International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who was released from house arrest last week, and the 32-year-old hotel maid he allegedly raped, the maid has a history of lying and Strauss-Kahn has a history of sexual predation. Whom do we believe?
Hélène Périvier, co-director of the gender program at Paris' Institut d'Etudes Politiques, worries the fallout of the DSK case may hurt women; while false reports of rape and sexual violence are statistically rare, she says, "it suffices to cement doubts and discredit the word of women going to the police in the future."
But women, like men, lie, and the results can be devastating. And false reports of rape and sexual violence are not as statistically rare as Périvier and others may believe, according to many experts, including Dr. Warren Farrell, chair of the Commission to Create a White House Council on Boys to Men, who details the results of numerous studies in his books "Father and Child Reunion" and "The Myth of Male Power." In fact, they occur often during divorce.
As Farrell writes:

"Men are about 19 more times more likely than women to say they have been falsely accused of sexual abuse. About 85 percent of these abuse allegations are made by women during battles over parent time, during the throes of divorce, or when a live-in situation is failing. ... "(A) sex-abuse charge -- even if false -- often costs the father his job, his health, his friends, his reputation, and his relationship with his child."

Like the hotel maid who allegedly discussed the possible benefits of pursuing charges against Strauss-Kahn, we're all -- men and women -- able to exploit each other. When it comes to custody cases, however, the odds are often stacked against dads. "Some women are coached to make false allegations of domestic violence, rape and child abuse," says Dr. Tara Palmatier, the no-nonsense founder of A Shrink 4 Men, in an email exchange with me. "Their attorneys may file baseless restraining orders to raise the stakes on men in the divorce or custody cases. These tactics don't just hurt men: they create widespread cynicism about the family court and the efficacy of the justice system."
Oregon took a bold step to address that last week when Gov. John Kitzhaber signed into law HB2183, which comes down hard on anyone knowingly making a false case of child abuse. The key is "knowing," says the bill's sponsor, Rep. Wayne Krieger, who acknowledged that false accusations often arise between divorcing couples.
But, how often is that? The U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Administration for Children & Families says of the percentage of the 3.3 million referrals for child abuse and neglect in 2009 it investigated, "Two-thirds of reports found all allegations to be unsubstantiated or intentionally false (64.3% and 0.1%, respectively)." But child abuse or neglect is just a small part of false claims in custody battles.
Many high-conflict custody cases don't start out that way, Farrell says, because most about-to-be divorced moms recognize that kids need their dads, too. But divorce offers a chance to start over -- maybe move closer to one's parents or to a new love, or relocate for a new job. If a savvy lawyer informs a woman that her ex could get equal custody, thus putting the kabosh on her plans, and then asks if she ever feared him, whether he ever cursed at her, called her names, raised his voice or screamed in a fit of rage, "I'm so angry at you, I could kill you" -- and what marriage doesn't have some sort of anger, yelling or threats? -- well, there's a false case of abuse in the making, he says. Divorces can become high conflict if a dad, realizing that his ex's plans may cause him to lose his kids and he doesn't want to lose them, cries, "No way!"
In the custody battle between champion fighter Chuck "The Iceman" Liddell and his ex, Lori Geyer, over their 12-year-old son, accusations are flying on both sides. Who knows who's telling the truth? But one thing Geyer may have on her side is fear; she says Liddell tried to intimidate her by "pacing back and forth and staring her down." And fear is enough to raise the shadow of a doubt, Farrell says. Most judges would rather take the safe route -- after all, who wants to make a mistake and put a child or woman back in an abuser's control?
And so men walk around somewhat guilty until proven innocent. And sometimes, no one's too interested in proving them innocent.
Farrell is. He gets weekly calls from men who say they're being falsely accused. So is Palmatier. The clinical psychologist has worked with numerous men in abusive relationships who feel unheard. Men, she tells me, are often default scapegoats. A woman hits a man and we assume he did something to her to justify it. A father doesn't see his kids so he must be a deadbeat dad, even if the truth is that his ex has done everything in her power to keep him from them. A woman screams and neighbors call the cops who arrest the husband when it was the wife who assaulted him.
"As a society, we don't typically think of men in the role of a victim. We can't even recognize it when we're confronted by physical evidence," Palmatier writes. "On the other hand, we're inclined to believe accusations about men."
Not only is it unfair and dishonest, she says, but it's "damaging to boys and young men, gender relations, relationships, families and 'the best interests of the children.' And it gives the women who are predators a free pass."
Automatically assuming the worst of men is a form of discrimination, she, Farrell and others say. And they're right.
Halle Berry says Gabriel Aubry is being a bad dad, just as many women say about their exes. Whom do you believe?

Give me a "YouGoGirrrllll"..
Another for the "Women are not violent" file as this canard that feminist ignorantly promote once again demonstrates their "economical with the truth" ability. Their other canard is ofcourse that "women do not lie about rape" and we already have plenty of information, facts and studies which demonstrates clearly that feminists are just plain liars. Feminists have demonstrated already that lying is just a consequence of their efforts at utilising oxygen and thereby it can only be regarded an automatic involuntary muscular response..

from Dr. Tara's site (Shrink 4 Men)..

Woman Physically Assaults Judge During Divorce Hearing
On July 13, 2011, Melissa Harvick, a Wayne County, Kentucky woman, attempted to physically assault Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards during a domestic violence hearing for a complaint filed by Harvick’s estranged husband.
Harvick received the contempt order and accompanying 10-day jail sentence from Judge Edwards because she talked over her ex and continuously interrupted him and the judge during the proceedings.
Upon receiving the contempt order and jail sentence, Harvick leapt over the bench at Judge Edwards. Three deputies were required to restrain Harvick and remove her from the courtroom.
WKYT reports:
Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards was hearing a domestic violence complaint against Melissa Harvick from her estranged husband.
“Things have been escalating since the first of the year,” the woman’s ex-husband is heard saying in the courtroom recording, obtained by 27 NEWSFIRST.
Not long after that is said, Harvick is both seen and heard arguing with the judge.
“That’s got nothing to do with it,” said Harvick during the July 13 family court hearing, referring to her estranged husband’s comments about their personal life.
“Ms. Harvick, you will be held in contempt of court,” Judge Edwards told Harvick, after several profanities were said by Harvick.
“I don’t care. I haven’t done anything to this court,” Harvick said. “Haven’t done anything to him.”
“She’ll be held in contempt,” said Judge Edwards.
Harvick is then seen jumping over the bench, in what appears to be an attempt to physically attack Judge Edwards.
Three deputies are then seen grabbing Harvick and pushing her to the floor. She was then taken away in handcuffs, allegedly threatening the judge as she was being taken out of the courtroom.
“You’ll be sad when it happens, Jennifer!” Harvick is heard saying.
Harvick is in jail on contempt of court charges now, but officials say more will be added.
Harvick seemed to feel empowered enough by the judicial system to argue with a judge, to physically attack a judge and then, as she was being forcibly dragged from the courtroom, to threaten a judge.
Wow. Wonder who created this Frankenstein’s monster?
Here’s some video of the kerfuffle: