Latest Posts
Showing posts with label female child abusers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label female child abusers. Show all posts


Again, as we only usually only ever hear about male pedophiles, who appear to be as scarce as hens teeth, the main child abusers are just ignored and pretend they don't exists at all. The plethora of examples of women banging or sexually abusing little boys has increased dramatically over the last five years, grown exponentially, while the only efforts to reduce those acts and highlight the problem is just totally ignored, they deliberately ignore the most obvious culprit. Probably due to political correctness plus the fact that no one dares to criticise anything women do wrong..



Once again demonstrating the blatant sexism demonstrated against men and at the same time totally ignoring the abuse and chaos women undertake. But they are still just assumed to be victims, regardless of what they do. Finally, here is an example of justice being applied for the actions undertaken and it is also the first time, as far as I am aware, that any female has ever been sentenced to suit the crime undertaken. First time..

Teacher jailed 40 years for sex with student aged 14

  • 39-year-old woman jailed for sex with 14-year-old boy
  • Sentenced to 40 years jail for child molestation
  • Toughest sentence handed out in US cour
 AN elementary school teacher has been jailed for 40 years for having sex with a 14-year-old student.
Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, will have to serve 20 years in the toughest sentence ever handed out by a US court to a teacher accused of underage sex, the Daily Mail reported.
The jail term compares with one for manslaughter and other serious crimes, legal experts said.
It has been reported the teacher's aide knew the child since he was born and was like a mother-figure to him before the relationship developed.
His distraught mother made an impact statement to the court, saying:  'She was a close family friend. We had gone to the same church together for 10 years. Our children were friends. Our families were friends. We did everything together. It's impossible to describe how we felt to find out this was going on.'
The newspaper reports the boy's parents became concerned when they noticed a change in the relationship between their son and Ms Schmieder. When they viewed their son's Facebook page it became clear something was wrong.
The mother said: 'Never in a million years did I think I would find what I thought was evidence of inappropriate behavior between them. But there it was.'
The sentence was handed out after the mother of  the young victim spoke of her 'heartache and betrayal' at the loss of innocence of her son and that she struggles daily with what went on.
"We were told by investigators that our 14-year-old was a victim of child molestation. This was horrifying and unbelievable. I prayed that this was not true," she said.
"The more evidence that came out the truth became real, and I began to deal with grief, denial, guilt and so many other emotions.
"During this time I still was trying to maintain being a wife and mother. How could I have missed this... what mother can't protect her child? I trusted so much and believed that this friend was a gift from God.
"Words can't begin to explain the heartache we've experienced this past year and the betrayal we've endured. Messages that were recovered showed me more and more evidence and it became a living nightmare. I couldn't bear the thought of my boy trusting someone that had clearly manipulated him."


It has been clearly demonstrated beyond doubt that single mothers are indeed in the majority of child abusers. Reasons for this is obvious as not only do they spend the majority of time with the child but also have endless issues within themselves and society in general. For whatever reasons women decide to have a child on their own, that responsiblity is not fully comprehended until they realise how much effort it takes to care for one child, let alone five children..
It is also assumed that women are normal, compassionate as well as automatic, preconditioned nurturers but this is far from the truth as mothers are the greater child abusers and murderers of children by far. This is completely ignored by feminists as they continue to ensure that mothers are automatically granted custody in the full knowledge that the child is put in harm's way.
Denying Fathers access to his own children only compounds the problem. Feminists are unconcerned about this issue as they fight any effort for joint custody..
 Feminists once again demonstrate how irrelevant the child's health and wellbeing is, as long as their ideological aims of ensuring female supremacy rights are achieved at the risk of physical abuse and long term permanent psychological damage to the child..

 Female Sex Offenders Conceal Themselves Through Societal Misandry

The public tend to be convinced that men are the primary abusers of children, despite data confirming (repeatedly so, year after year) that in fact women (especially single-mothers) hold the top-spot for child abuse. This sexist stereotype encourages people to hold undue scepticism when claims of female child-abusers arise. And to add insult to injury, it creates a suspicion of the nearest man even when he has done nothing wrong. To make it even more deplorable, this attitude serves to offer female abusers a cover to hide themselves under. Despite such misconceptions of men as abusers, there is simply no denying that women are the primary abusers of children and men are not.

The DHHS (the US Department of Health & Human Services) reveal statistics showing that mothers abuse children some 70% of the time compared with fathers (30%).

Perhaps the most taboo abuse of a child by a woman is that of a sexual abuse case. Children in the care of female abusers often grow up with life-long psychological issues. Most of them are unable to openly discuss the abuse they endured at the hands of their mother or female guardian due to the societal ignorance towards female abusers of children. The fact is that most people, men and women alike, not only don't know that women can be abusive but they also don't want to know. It is a truly sad state of affairs when documented reports of rape or sexual abuse of a minor is laughed off by the police. All too often, this is considered by many as 'seduction' or an 'affair'. Worse yet, the main-stream media play along with this by using similar words in the headlines for such cases, thus offering the female abuser more cover for her misdeeds.

A problem we often see is authorities acting with amazement when they encounter a female paedophile. Why the amazement? It's quite unnecessary. By all accounts it should come as no shock that females commit the majority of child abuse as other research indicates that at least 1/3 (one-third) of male rapists and child sex offenders have been sexually abused by a woman. This is similarly found in support groups for male survivors of sexual abuse. It is common in those groups to find that between 1/4 (one-quarter) and 1/3 of the victims were sexually abused by a woman in their life. Most of these men cannot talk about their history as society is so bent on assuming that only men abuse and that women are 'too good' to commit such abuses.

Only in recent times has the NSPCC finally made any legitimate and public acknowledgement of female sex abusers of children. As recently as 2005 the NSPCC released a report stating that the disbelief of female paedophiles existence hindered detection. In a similar document by the NSPCC, it is acknowledged that victims of female paedophiles face unique problems that largely remain unaddressed.

Although it is generally accepted that the victims of female perpetrators manifest symptoms similar to those of victims of other types of sexual abuse, there is evidence to suggest that the victims of female offenders might experience particular difficulties. An increased sense of isolationbetrayal and stigma emerges as a key issue which can act as a barrier to the disclosure of abuse. In some cases victims might disclose being abused by a man, later to reveal that the abuser was, in fact, a woman. Others may disclose abuse at the hands of a male and later, once they have built up a relationship, reveal that a female was also involved. Again professional training on female perpetrated sexual abuse and its impact on victims appears to be a key issue in raising awareness and understanding among professionals who work with this group. It also recommended that therapists and clinicians should routinely ask about sexual abuse perpetrated by females in order to demonstrate that this is an acceptable topic for discussion and that any disclosure will be met with understanding.
The response of the criminal justice system is to marginalize abuse of females at worst and at best, simple disbelief. Instead, the CJS demonstrably prefers to assume that any female sex offender has been coerced somehow by a man and set a higher-bar of evidence for prosecution.

Due to the sexist policies employed by authorities (it is not worded directly as 'sexist', but it plainly is sexist) several recommendations were made after reviewing their data:
  • Identify the gender of the perpetrator.
  • Collate data to identify all forms of sexual abuse instead of only some.
  • Authorities to acknowledge publicly that female sex abusers do exist.
  • Give guidance & support to employees of local authorities pertaining to those dealing with female sex offenders who act against children.
  • Research & examine recidivism rates for female offenders.
  • Consideration to policies & procedures to establish a nationwide work-group to investigate the issue.
  • Training for those in the legal realm who deal with female sex offenders; such as the police, probation, judges, barristers and the like.
  • Ensure the training includes the reality that female offenders exist and to include victim & perpetrators characteristics. Also to focus this training on those who work with or as specialized child protection professionals.
  • To ensure professionals to routinely enquire about female sex offences to those they offer therapeutic services to.
  • Investigation of how child-victims face barriers when abused by female sex offenders.
  • Develop services for female sex offenders.
  • To ensure programmes for female sex offenders take consideration of the differing requirements compared to male sex offenders.
According to the BBC's News Magazine, men who are sexually abused by women in their childhood can manifest the problems as anger toward his wife or girlfriend in later life.

In 1992, Michele Elliott wrote a controversial book, "Female Sexual Abuse of Children". Due to this book's release, Ms. Elliott was contacted by over 800 (eight hundred) victims of female sex abusers.

“One of the issues of controversy is the thinking that if women do this, it’s because men made them do it,” says Ms. Elliot. “I disagree with that. I think there’s no difference in the motivation between men and women, which is sexual gratification and power over a child. It’s very selfish.”
All too often, a female sex offender can cloak herself in the societal presumption of male-guilt and female-innocence. To further abuse society as a whole, these women will occupy positions of care or provider to children, such as a mother, nanny, babysitter, housemaid, teacher and even social workers. Due to their role in a child's (or children's) life they have unrestricted and unsupervised access to children. From this powerful position they can then confuse the children into abusive sex acts by slowly gaining trust and love of the children. In fact, so common is this tactic amongst female sex offenders of minors, it is considered the modus operandi of the female sex offender.

Currently, feminist groups will do almost anything to deny female sex offenders exist - especially where children are concerned. Instead, they prefer to blame the patriarchy or men in general. Until feminist groups take the lead by acknowledging the reality of female sexual abusers of minors, society at large will continue to enable more female abuse upon children. Society must wake up and work to stop all child abuse - not just that which is committed by men, but all child abuse. If we could stop all child abuse as of this day, all child abuse by men that is, the majority of child abuse would continue and those responsible would continue to be given a free pass by society.

Bunting, L. (2005) Females who sexually offend against children: responses of the child protection and criminal justice systems. London: NSPCC. [NSPCC Policy Practice Research Series].
ISBN: 1842280546


Link to Antimisandry

Update Nov 19, 2011..

According to Author and director of the UK Charity Kidscape, Michelle Elliot, over 75% of cases of child sexual abuse by adults were committed by women acting alone or without male participation, and this, according to Elliot, “messes up the narrative”. Elliot was blacklisted following her publication of “female sexual abuse of children” in 1994.

One observation that I have made over quite a few years is that females are not only loathed to admit that their sex are even more devious and damaged than they thought they were but they refuse to believe that that result is reached by just scratching the surface with a sponge. Women apparently live in constant denial about their own sex and will go out of their way, using all their shaming and vilification techniques, normally saved for precisely this type of situation, to beat down anyone who has the temerity to expose the truth. You would have come across this yourself a copious amount of times. Any attempt at criticising a female for any reason, regardless of whatever law she has broken, will defend her actions like she would automatically defend her shopping fixation (don't mention the shoes though)..

Regardless of facts, justification will be forthcoming whenever any topic is raised regarding either murder of husbands, murder of children, theft, divorce, any type of abuse, endless lying in the courts or even wilful injury like severing penises. This Osbourne-esque mentality reigns in the mind of just about any woman and she will find some way to justify it without even knowing the facts and neither do they even have to bother with such trivialities , as they have already been declared to be, the perfect witness in any court case and do not even require any corroboration, witnesses or confirmation at all. Ask any judge in any family court in any western country. If it's uttered via the mouth of a female then it must be 100% correct as they never ever lie..

The current situation and one that is recognised by those astute (have to keep my job at any cost) politicians as well are these two basic rules, two unbreakable, written in stone, fundamental rules that apply to female voters..

1. Never criticise a woman..
2. Never disallow any additional funding for their latest grievance..

I would highly recommend that funds be released to study and expose the following flaws immediately..

The true extent of sexual abuse of children has been
acknowledged only recently. In 1980 Mrazek estimated that
between one quarter and one third of all children have had at
least one sexual experience with an adult.' Much research has
confirmed the traditional view that sexual abuse is perpetrated
by men on women and girls: typically, over four fifths of
sexually abused children are female 2 and over 95% of abusers
are male.`6 But it seems that the numbers of sexually abused
boys and women perpetrators are being seriously underestimated:
found that two fifths of victims seen at
the Kempe Centre were boys,7 and Finkelhor and Russell
computed that women may account for up to 13% of the abuse
of girls and nearly one quarter of the abuse of boys.' Today the
medical profession is slowly and reluctantly having to
acknowledge that the prevalence of women who sexually
abuse children is greater than previously thought. Necessarily
the following discussion may shock some readers, but
professionals should be aware of the salient facts


Few studies have been reported on women sex abusers,
whether paedophiles in general (women who are sexually
aroused by children) or perpetrators of mother-son incest in
particular. Most reports take the form of single case histories,
usually with a psychoanalytical orientation.9 In attempts to
increase numbers within a sample different categories of
women abusers are sometimes grouped together: the
independent offender, the coabuser, and the accomplice. In a
study of 40 women abusers Faller found that their mean age
was 26 and that the mean age of the victims was 6.'0 Seventy
per cent of the victims were aged between 4 and 10, 20% were
younger than 4, and 10% were older than 10. Four fifths of the
perpetrators were mothers to at least one of their victims, and
three fifths had abused two or more children. Of 63 victims,
23 were boys.
In her study Faller found that the most common forms of
abuse perpetrated by women were fondling of a child's
genitals, oral sex, digital masturbation, and actual sexual
intercourse, in that order. In nearly half of the cases there
were at least two perpetrators and two or more victims, often
in polyincestuous family situations, with the abuse usually
initiated by men. "' In a review of 16 cases of mother-son incest
Margolin included examples of oral sex (mothers fellating
sons and encouraging them to perform cunnilingus) and
mutual masturbation. There were eight cases of sexual
intercourse: four of the boys were aged around 12, the
remainder being in their early and middle teens. One of the 12
year old boys was described as having an erection during
intercourse but not experiencing orgasm, while another
attained orgasm without ejaculation." In seven of the eight
cases of mother-son abuse reviewed by Krug the seduction


of prepubescent sons had been continued into early adolescence.'2
My clinical impression is that initial genital fondling
by mothers of prepubescent sons may develop over years into
full sexual intercourse as the boys grow and mature.

Doctors need to become sensitised to the extent of sexual

abuse by women, and research must be undertaken to identify
similarities and differences between men and women offenders
-especially with regard to the motivation to abuse, the
selection of victims, the efficacy of treatment, and the
propensity to abuse again. Despite the feminist tenet "No
penis, no harm," clearly sexual abuse can no longer be
considered the exclusive preserve of men.
ROBERT WILKINS
Consultant, Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1662948/pdf/bmj00177-0009.pdf