The Reality Blog

The most fascinating side of feminist claims for equality always rears it's negative head whenever any group of males make some effort to raise awareness about the onslaught and bias men and boys face in their daily lives. Out come the usual feminist hysterics, so, regardless of the issue raised, they always respond akin to just being mauled and beaten, this imaginary condition surfaces without fail on every single occasion. Hysterics in overdrive and the response tone of disdain and always accusatory. It is akin to a suggestion that someone was forcing sleeping women to have sex with HIV patients. Their response is akin to it..Different issue ofcourse whenever they indulge in their usual hypocrisy, aka - reclaim the night is a good example, that entire program is just a farce and I have no problem at all with them frolicking and stumbling around in the dark. They can do that as often as they like, they do that in daylight..
Here we have a list of legitimate issues and facts, examples of the largesse shown to the privileged sex and the special treatment they enjoy and certainly take for granted. This author is literally taking his life in his own hands by even stating the bleeding obvious. Feminists are not interested in facts as they have always demonstrated, they are interested in the destruction of society and the deconstruction of the male sex and determined to turn him into spineless, irrelevant wimps just like all those male feminists we read about on the odd occasion. They do actually exist although I have never met one, they want to ensure their misery is circulated far and wide as why should they be subjected to endless mirth and hilarity when they can have others to share it as well..

By Roger Lott, Staff Columnist Published on Thursday, September 22, 2011

This Tuesday, I attended a panel discussion called “What I Wish I Knew As A Freshman Girl.” 

PP's preferential Treatment everywhere..

The female upperclassmen speakers talked very frankly about their mistakes as freshmen and offered their warm support to the assembled first-year women. The event seemed highly valuable, and I was left wondering why no similar opportunity existed specifically for first-year men.
Female Dartmouth students have access to more support than their male peers. Female advocacy groups at Dartmouth include Women in Business, the Society of Women’s Engineers, Women in Leadership and the Women in Science Program, which provides faculty mentors and paid internships to freshmen women. Link Up pairs first-year women with senior mentors. It’s unfair that men do not have similar opportunities for mentoring or support.As hard as it may be to believe in light of the historical dominance of males, in many ways modern men are struggling a lot more than their female counterparts. Indeed, men aged 20 to 24 years old commit suicide 10 times as often as women of the same age. Men die younger than women and account for the clear majority of homeless adults. From 1995 to 2002, male college students were twice as likely as female students to be victims of violent crime. Yet, while the College devotes two weeks of every year to V-Time ­— a programming extension of the global V-Day movement to end violence against women — no campaign exists to reduce violence in men’s lives.
On the rare occasions that men publicly unite and stand up for their interests, there is typically a firestorm of criticism. That was the reaction to a University of Chicago student group called “Men in Power,” which was formed in 2009 to raise awareness about the challenges facing contemporary men. People assumed the group was chauvinistic, but the reality is that supporting men does not need to mean opposing women.There is a lot of understandable anger about the rampant male chauvinism of the past, and it is natural that some people want to make amends by focusing attention on the problems of women. However, we must be careful to avoid inadvertently engaging in “reverse” sexism against men.
Men should be able to form advocacy groups without automatically being subject to unfavorable suspicions. Although an all-male “Proud to be a Man” dinner would surely garner a flurry of accusations, Dartmouth hosts an annual all-female “Proud to be a Woman” dinner.Continued male dominance in many areas of society is often used as evidence of past or present sexism against women. Instead of immediately calling for another women’s advocacy group, however, we should try to understand gender disparities in the context of innate gender differences that have resulted from millions of years of human evolution. Men tend to have a strong desire to be able to provide for or “protect” women, so their ability to provide resources is of paramount importance. Such inherent differences may be able to help explain the overrepresentation of men in relatively lucrative fields such as business and engineering.
While there’s nothing wrong with support groups or peer mentoring, the College may be going too far when it provides paid WISP internships to help women become more confident in male-dominated fields. If feminists really want to move away from traditional gender roles, they should be up in arms about women being viewed as needy and deserving of lots of special treatment.Although women in this country face great challenges, they are in many ways doing better than men. Hopefully when people realize how very far we have come from the patriarchal societies of the past, they will accept that the problems of men deserve equal attention.http://thedartmouth....22/opinion/lott 

Does not look too happy does she..

This is the supposed the female version of "robocop", that is, some pre-feminist wimp of a newspaper editor decided that praising women to be just as good as men at everything, is just beyond a good joke, actually it's a bad one..

How many more failed attempts do we have to witness before the endless praising of women in the services and armed forces. In the end we find out that the whole promotion of women outstanding action in the services was just some feminist's wet dream, a work of total fiction and one that was so far from the truth that it actually made matters worse than better..

How many times have we heard about Jessica Lynch who was the main character in the Iraq play acting event..
What about Inspector Diane Bamber who failed her fitness test and carried on like it was some conspiracy instead of her being a fat lazy old bitch who should have been sacked..

when Inspector Diane Bamber, 51, failed to meet the time limit, she claimed she had been left humiliated. She brought a sex and age discrimination case against her force, Greater Manchester Police, and now stands to win up to £30,000 after an employment tribunal ruled in her favour.

Watch how they change the rules to ensure the privileged princesses can further brag about how good they really are not. The pro. female sexism is astounding..

So on and on it goes as they fashion special privileges for women to make their way into other areas that they are not able or capable of working in..

For more about feminism have a look at this current Forbes article "How Feminism Became a Real Joke"

The latest news out of the feminist camp:Gloria Steinem is calling for a boycott of NBC’s “The Playboy Club.”
In 1963, Steinem famously went undercover at a Playboy Club and wrote an expose that painted working as a Playboy Club Bunny waitress as anything but glamorous. According to Steinem, at that time prospective Bunnies were required to be tested for venereal diseases.
“Clearly ‘The Playboy Club’ is not going to be accurate. It was the tackiest place on earth. It was not glamorous at all,” Steinem said, adding, “It’s just not telling the truth about the era.”
Meanwhile, the feminist icon gives “Mad Men” a pass “because it shows the world of the early 1960s with some realism.” 

1. It has no sense of humor.I’ll never forget sitting in a feminist film studies class when I was an undergraduate at the University of California at Berkeley listening to the professor explain the placement of a prop in the movie “Working Girl.” As I recall, a handle on a piece of workout equipment had been situated near Sigourney Weaver’s crotch. This, the female professor explained with grave seriousness, represented Weaver’s symbolic penis, and it was for this that her character would be punished.