Latest Posts
Showing posts with label abusive female behaviour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abusive female behaviour. Show all posts

Just another demonstration of their caring and sharing nature..

Second installment and another example of the repulsive behaviour of the opposite sex, as well as the crap men put up with.  From an ever increasing and growing list of privileged princesses just wanting to demonstrate precisely where they stand on the abuse delivery scale. After viewing these two presentations, one would serious wonder why anyone would ever really bother to make their acquaintance. This is one time that I am glad to say that there are exceptions, thank goodness for that, otherwise it would be a never ending full-on abuse session from breakfast to dusk..

The main problem about all of this is ofcourse the fact that the majority of men had absolutely no idea how bad female behaviour really is. We would see it or witness it but only occasionally, either at a party or outside a nightclub. But now with the advent of that hate movement promoting and giving all women, free license and encouragement to be as abusive as possible without any accountability. This is what women are going to be like on a regular basis, this type of behaviour will be the norm as they know they can get away with it. This will just be the tip of the iceberg, as we will witness more and more of these examples of their obnoxious and abusive behaviour, all due to the existence of the web..

This will definitely identify and demonstrate clearly, who the greater abusers really are and from where I am sitting, it certainly does not bode well for the opposite sex, does it.

Holy mackerel.. 

Might want to add this to a list of illegal activities whilst driving..


I find it amazing that we have heard very little regarding the request by radical feminists to kick all male feminists to the kerb. As I have no particular fondness of those male traitors, It appears to be a reasonable request. I mean, when you are addicted to a philosophy that demands that all men are scum, in the Scum Manifesto sense. Where it demands that all males on this planet be regarded as vermin, in that context, radical feminists are really only acting according to their inner enlightenment. In reality, what else could they possibly say. One decision obviously encourages the next, it's simple really. It's akin to Garbage Collectors or should that be Garbioligists (that job description went south as it was indeed a  bit like, you know , too trashy, ahem!) a name introduced by those politically correct infidels determined to rename all and sundry.Those same infidels then failed to comprehend that there would   be a backlog of rubbish piling up but then commence complaining about that rubbish..

It was that same mentality the radfem's faced and it was simple to just foist that same mentality onto all men and the elimination of all men, including male feminists ofcourse. But the problem with that request was that they would in return have no breeding stock to ensure only females(murder the males) were incubated in order to grow their Utopia, that also meant,  in order to fulfill their version, the complete and total razing of everything, buildings and all (I am not quite sure where they will house the 3.9Bil yet). Their total hypocrisy and it demonstrates exactly how their mentality works, is the fact they would have to have some sperm donors. Now in their moment of brilliance, they decide that "Alpha Males" would have to be preserved for that privilege, tamed by force and indoctrinated ofcourse, kept around as they actually realised that Alpha Males are the preferred sperm donors option, female  intuition at work again. I have explained that level of cognitive dissonance before I think, that mentality that feminists generally rely on to justify their lunacy..

So we have on one side of their much thought out argument, that all men need to be removed from the planet but on the other side of that same coin, they would require to keep Alpha Males around to be able to breed with the remaining women. Yes I know. But apparently it makes sense to them, we the unbleached, unwashed and rational members of the human race just don't get it. They do not consider themselves to be the end product of several conditions that one would find on the Psychology Today website, their severe conditions requires treatment, but that's another study. Again, that is not obvious to radical feminists..

On my travels on this planet among the myriad of people whom I have met, been involved with, in conversation and worked with. I have yet to meet an Alpha Male who would consider their wish as a viable option. Most, if not the majority of Alpha Males are self reliant, solid and no-nonsense individuals, who would not even spare a minutiae of thought on this triviality, yet entertain any idea of being dominated by any female, let alone a radical feminist version, as in the majority of cases, the women they automatically attract, line up at their door just for some attention and in return offer whatever they want. They pick and choose whoever they want and are not limited in any way. They have no time to accommodate the wet dreams of radical feminists, let alone be held prisoner by them just to be used as breeding stock. They would take over in no time at all and have them so wound around their finger that they would not have time to breathe, let alone carry out their "female superiority/majority fetish"..

It is just so laughable and impracticable, one can only glance at this type of dreaming as being the ludicrous nonsense that it really is..

I had the fortunate experience of working with one fine example a few years ago on a one year contract as a consultant. This Alpha was a millionaire in his own right, an individual focused and fixated on doing everything right and in order, which is where I came in. He had a string of customers of which quite a few were women, who would fawn over him and practice their well honed flirting procedures with abandon even though the majority were married. It was a sheer joy watching him operate. He had a huge selection of females in his little black book who were always on call, regardless of the notice and would erase any who did not comply. He would go out on about three nights a week with a different female, so let's do some sums --

Those radicals want to dispose of 70% of all males and keep 30% Alphas as breeding stock. So in today's figures we are looking at about 900 Million (3Bil Men @ 30%, Simplified 10% @ 3Bil=300Mil x 3).

One Alpha @ 3 females per week = 144 per year, means 6,250,000 Alphas would complete their quota in one year. Now try and convince me those girls would not be eating out of their hands in no time at all, lead the revolt and eliminate those radfems for screwing up their pleasure, and totally eliminate the rafems's Utopian dream. Easily..

It's back to the drawing board..

Which leads me to male feminists and their assumption at being the possible future breeding stock and I ask if you can identify one single male feminist who could be regarded as being within a bulls roar of being an alpha. Show me one who is above the whiny, self absorbed, female worshipping, self delusional stage and wonder if they stand, even a remote possibility of being included as breeding stock. Male feminists are party to, and promoters of, that radical feminist outcome and heartily agree that it should be the outcome. They promote feminism's Utopian concept with all their heart and whining, promoting a male hating doctrine that will eventually, if they get their wish, destroy the majority of males but at the same time demand by their actions, that they should also be part of that  Utopia. They actually stand no chance whatsoever. The writing is on the wall for their own destruction and yet they continue to promote a doctrine that will eventually eliminate themselves..

What does that tell about the mindset of male feminists. Better still, why have they totally ignored the claims made by radical feminists and thereby the general cadre of feminists, concerning their own sex and why have they ignored the wishes of the radical women they so heartily promote..

They have been told to get out, mind their own damn business and told to stop interfering in the serious female feminist business of abuse and annihilation, it's their "female only" hegemony, but yet they persist, ignore their own doctrinal leader's commands and continue their actions like nothing has be stated. They do so at their own risk. I wonder if the radfems will commence their actions against them first by eliminating them from the planet, now there is a thought and it should be something they should consider. Being eliminated by the same members of the doctrine they fawn over has a certain level of justice as well as immense irony attached, does it not..

It should also indicate how serious those radical feminists really are..

But we are angels, do you know..
Violent women have been around as long as history was being enacted but now we finally have the "revelation" that it is really just a new phenomena, bullshit. Women have been abusing and bashing the crap out of all and sundry for so long that they had to finally confess it to be true.  In the past it was just swept under the carpet and ignored, especially by feminists.
The main culprits are feminists ofcourse, their blatant lies and disinformation have endlessly denied and fought against the truth being exposed. As feminism would die a great big death if they stopped promoting females as perpetual victims along with their endless denial, that they are aggressors at all, guaranteed endless funding for promoting their hate movement would be at risk..

The entire feminist hegemony relies heavily on government funding and it receives billions of dollars every year from known manginas(males for female supremacy) like Obama and feminist leaders like Gillard in Australia, who have no issues with their anti-male bias as well at their general hate for society and all things family..

What appals me the most is not that these confessions finally surface, as its about time, but the "Oh gosh, did we do that" whitewashing mentality is galling and unnecessary as well as being completely artificial. No one on this planet is surprised that women are abusive as we have witnessed that from our youth. It has always been the case that female aggression has been grossly understated.
Women's Enews: Women Are Aggressors, Too
Caryl Rivers and Rosalind C. Barnett
December 4, 2011
(WOMENS ENEWS)– 
Times are changing. Girls aren’t so “girly”anymore.
Perhaps it began with early female action figures. Perhaps with
“Charlie’s Angels.” Or maybe with scores of elementary girls
playing soccer, or with older girls playing contact sports at elite
levels. 
Most likely we will never know exactly how or when it became okay to
talk about female aggression–female-to-female aggression and
female-to-male aggression. Whatever its origins, this new narrative is
challenging the once omnipresent scenario of the male violent
aggressor–passive female victim scenario. It is now increasingly
acceptable to talk openly about female aggression and to conduct
serious research on this topic.
We now know that women-on-women aggression is far from rare and that
women are often the initiators of male-female aggression. Surveys of U.S.
have found rates of wife-to-husband violence
“remarkably similar” to those of husband-to-wife violence.
And an early cross-cultural survey did not find that men were
significantly more aggressive than women.Aggression, as opposed to anger,  conveys an intent to hurt or harm and can be expressed physically, verbally or by withdrawing. There is general agreement that men exhibit higher levels of physical aggression than women,but the differences are small to moderate.
After a thorough review of the literature on who initiates violence in
couples, Murray Straus, of the University of New Hampshire, reports:
“It is painful to have to recognize the high rate of domestic assaults
by women. All six major studies which have investigated this topic found
that women initiate violence in a large proportion of the
cases.” 
Research Example 
For example, of the 495 couples in a 1985 Family Violence
Survey for whom one or more assaults were reported by a female
respondent, the man was the only violent partner in 25. 9 percent of
the cases, the woman was the only one to be violent in 25. 5 percent
of the cases and both were violent in 48.6 percent of the cases. Of
446 women who reported that they were involved in violent
relationships, their partners struck the first blow in 42 percent of
the cases. The women hit first in 53 percent of the cases, and they
could not remember who hit first in the remaining cases.
The great difference here is that women are far more often seriously
hurt or killed than men. A woman may start a fight with a slap, which
is mildly painful to the man, but he retaliates by punching her and
throwing her against the wall, breaking her jaw.But it is important to recognize that although men are predominantly
the murderers, rapists and batterers in human society, relatively few
men ever perpetrate these acts. If you discount the extremely violent
behavior of those few, the behavior of most men resembles that of most
women.Source: http://www.womensenews.org/story/books/111203/women-are-aggressors-in-household-violence-too

Following the expose of feminist sociopathic behaviour, one does have to wonder what it is that motivates them and how they can justify their inhumanity towards everyone else..Dr T, will enlighten your purview and on some occasion, explain that you may well be under influence of one of them. It is worth a listen, just to ensure that you are free of one  them..
Does your wife, girlfriend, ex or partner's ex have a Dr. Jekyll and Ms. Hyde personality?Does she have a "good mask" that she shows the outside world while subjecting you and/or the kids to her cruel and abusive side?Does she have little to no empathy or selective empathy?Does she throw a temper tantrum, rage, pout or allege "Abuse!" when you try to hold her accountable for her bad behaviors?Does she value you (and others) based on what you can do for her or what she can get from you? In other words, does she see people as objects of utility?Does she lie, cheat, use violence and other forms of intimidation and manipulate to get her way or to "win?"Does she have scorn and contempt for the people she victimizes or "pulls one over on?"Has she ever threatened to destroy you and/or tried to make good on her threats?Does she only recognize her rights and believe she's entitled to violate the rights of others?Does she have a gross sense of entitlement?Does she blame others for her own failures, bad decisions and bad behaviors?If so, your wife, girlfriend, ex or partner's ex may have sociopathic traits or be a full-blown sociopath.
Historically, men have been diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder far more than women. Female sociopaths exist, it's just that we use different terminology to identify them.
It's time to rethink the qualifiers of female sociopathic behavior, which Dr Tara J. Palmatier of Shrink4Men will be discussing during this Shrink4Men Radio episode.
The telephone lines will be open, so if you have questions, stories or thoughts on this topic, please call in (310 388 9709) or Skype in. And Happy Halloween!
Dr T Behind the Mask Rethinking Female Sociopathy 10/31 by AVoiceforMen | Blog Talk Radio