The Reality Blog

First, I think women generally care less about politics which is unfortunate. However I (a female) didn't care much about politics until I discovered Ron Paul. Once you get on the ron paul/liberty train it's hard to get off and I think that goes for both genders.
Overall I think the most prominent characteristic of Ron Paul supporters is that they are logical (liberty is the most logical answer) and from my exerience in life I think men generally think more logically.
Second, unfortunately our society is still highly sexist and women are subconsciously and flat out told that they are inferior and they cant think for themselves. They are perhaps more easily swayed by the media and more likely to go with their husband or boyfriends choice. Obviously this doesn't describe all women but I think many.
And last I would like to say that daily paulers could stand to be less sexist.
When watching the debates and on the daily Paul chat, multiple, probably every time Michelle Bachman spoke there would be a slew of comments about her hair or makeup or how she looked hot or ugly or about what she's wearing etc. among one lonely comment about what she was actually SAYING. I don't like michelle Bachmann in the slightest but as a woman I don't like seeing a woman in politics be objectified as opposed to criticized for what she's saying because lord knows there is much to criticize there.

These comments are from the Ron Paul site where there appears to be quite a few articles on or about women. Fascinating reading for anyone who is interested in the thinking of the opposite sex. It would appear that any comment about the opposite sex can be construed as being sexist as it is one word done to death whenever ignorance and gullibility rears it's head.

Comments like this "unfortunately our society is still highly sexist", highly sexist about what ?
Where do these women get this stuff from ? They make these spurious claims without so much as backing it up with facts or figures or even a reasonable argument, it's just stated and left at that, no back up information whatsoever. It is fine making some claim but can we at least see some factual information instead of hysterics and nonsensical comment.

"women are subconsciously and flat out told that they are inferior and they cant think for themselves"

What this complainer does not state is who actually does all that finger pointing and demeaning (apart from me ofcourse stating the bleeding obvious). If women are generally informed that, then who is doing it. As far as I can tell it's other women who are more than happy to cane the crap out of their own and whenever it is explained to being the case, the narrative always generalises that it is everyone who is doing it. This victimhood mentality just wallows about like delusional fog, it rears it's head continually but always fails to point the finger in the right direction.
Take the example of the one single Egyptian female who was shown the error of her ways for demonstrating and how many were besides themselves to witness that or was it just another example of the victimhood mentality rearing it's ugly head. Both I feel.. Here we had ONE SINGLE FEMALE paying the price for standing up for whatever it was they were standing up for and after hundreds if not thousands of men were beaten, jailed and maimed, we see one single female receiving the same treatment, we have an apoplectic rage and hysteria raised. Amazing, it either demonstrated that the feminist press has total control over the narrative, which I think is the case or are there are that many white knights out there (Riot control team excluded) that ramps up whenever anyone lays a finger or harms so much as a single hair on any female's head, the world almost comes to an end. This is apart from the fact that women are still cutting off men's dicks, murdering them, abusing them and having daytime fun time programs laughing it up over male mutilation, see what I mean. The hypocrisy and double standards are just beyond the pail..

 every time Michelle Bachman spoke there would be a slew of comments about her hair or makeup or how she looked hot or ugly or about what she's wearing etc. among one lonely comment about what she was actually SAYING. I don't like michelle Bachmann in the slightest but as a woman I don't like seeing a woman in politics be objectified as opposed to criticized for what she's saying because lord knows there is much to criticize there.

Here we go, now how and who would be commenting on Bachman's dress or hair or makeup, certainly not any male reporters or commentators that I can see, they usually don't give a damn about those trivialities. That would be the female's forte, but the comment does not even relate to that and they never do. All we ever get is the general "Women are such victims" but they fail to point out that they are actually doing it to themselves and then blaming all and sundry for it. It is truly sickening..

Over the past couple of days I had the displeasure of trying to knock some sense into another bunch of feminist females, most were victimhood specialists but not all so there is hope, this time on the Daily Mail site in England (the haven for radical feminist theory and male bashing). A site so over run with feminists and their hate messages that it really is beyond the pail. Their endless harping about those old and tired delusional claims about the vote in regards to women and also the issue of war and killing fields are their favourite areas of scorn. it's the "usual, well look at what men do", typical radical feminist put down mentality where anything remotely negative about men is over inflated as to try and dehumanise all men and thereby seeking to take the upper road to self-elevated god-like installation to the female psyche. Their endless hyperventilating regarding past battles and wars, regardless of the loss of lives, is set up to demonstrate anything except the reason for the action. It has been men, as witnessed in Egypt, who fight for democracy and human rights, we do it at the front line and in most cases the women stand back and claim to be part of it when they are not. That is clearly demonstrated all the time.and it is only on rare occasion that one fronts up to play the same game.

So I will leave you with these facts about the vote and the lives that were lost fighting for it. It appears that that great sacrifice that men made for it is apparently totally irrelevant to the victimhood princesses as they wallow in minutiae regarding some irrelevant past history that they continually dredge up regarding how "discriminated they were" with it's usual boring and brain numbing implications.


andrewnewbury wrote...
so let's look at some facts... 
A census was conducted and it was determined that in 1832 with passing of the first reform act, roughly 2% of the whole of the UK population was eligible to vote. 
There are many many accounts of mainly men being executed, or transported, or killed in riots but eventually after many hundreds of years struggle the 1832 Act was passed in Parliament. 
1844-1866 

In 1844 women and children under 18, working hours, were limited to 12 hours. No such restriction on men. So much for female oppression eh ? 

1847 and yet another reduction in working hours for women and children, this time to 10 hours. 

No such restriction on men. 

So which groups of people rights were considered second, Men or women and children ? 

So much for female oppression eh ? 

1867-1914 

The 1867 Reform Act gave the vote to about 1,500,000. Roughly 6%. 

The 1884 Reform Act added about 6,000,000 voters. Roughly 24%. 
I'm going to skip on now to 1914 and the Great War,,,,,When this war had finally ended there were some 10,000,000 men dead, 21,000,000 wounded and 7,000,000 prisoners or missing.As a reward for their sacrifices, had they lived to 1918 all men over the age of 21 were allowed to vote. women over 30 were given the vote.Women got the right to vote at 21 in 1928 some 10 years later at the cost of 10,000,000 men's lives. 

And its worth bearing in mind that ten years after that, from 1939-1945 British men were conscripted to fight in the Second World War, and women - who had equal voting power - had no such obligation to be sent abroad to be possibly slaughtered for their country. 

So much for women being the oppressed sex. I don't see how any patriarchy has stripped away female rights... what I do see is a lot of inaccurate feminist propaganda

The end of year school report card is not looking too healthy as we investigate some of feminism's efforts and claims, that bites them right where it hurts, the bank account, dignity, culpability and accountability for their effort..

Originally made by those seriously corrupted and self inflicting, non-emolience hegemony's claims are placed under the microscope of reality..

1. "Don't need no man", this statement ran lyrical with the lesbian feminists as it just states the obvious. Noting how lesbians cater to each others penchant for BDSM, plus other pain inducing activities, finding a partner of the opposite sex to join in their arrangements,  was deemed impossible.
Ofcourse the rest of the population just ignored their irrelevant rantings and went on their merry way and left them with some explaining to do, while abuse workshops were compulsory attended in the hope they might forget to administer their usual caring and sharing mentality..

Mark 0 out of 10

Misandric Queen Dowd..

2. "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" really belongs with the above comment as it was meant to be as offensive as a similar comment made by Maureen Dowd's myopic piece of misandry named tome "are men necessary". The answer was too slow in coming for Dowd as she started complaining about not having anyone to date under the guise that "men don't like strong women", the standard dysfunctional response from any female who has problems finding a companion. Dowd ofcourse would have that same issue as feminists like herself do, they are about as interesting as drinking the last week's bathwater but Dowd doesn't know how to change from just being a mean spirited bitch. Feminism has that affect on the opposite sex as one has to make room for all those chips on their shoulders..

Mark -1 out of 10

3. 'A woman would never lie about rape", whoa, I may just let you read that again and wonder how anyone could be stupid enough to allow the brain to force that comment to verbally escape the orifice. Needless to say that it has kept copious people employed, proving beyond doubt that feminists do actually escape from their other dimension and expose to the world their very own self improved version of waxing nonsensically, lyrical..

Mark 0 out of 10

4. "A woman can do anything a man can" except participate on a level playing field. Better add to that a copious amount of other facts as well. Sadly, in their effort to compete with men, women have lost their own identity and now wonder why misery and loneliness makes up their ever increasing, privileged lifestyles. After changing everything possible in the work place, demanding equal pay for less work and effort, ensuring automatic promotion when not warranted, lowering every possible standard in order to"compete" with men. We have the final admittance that their life sucks and now refuse to join in on the fun of being a wage slave. Their burnout rate is now set at thirty, that picket fence and those rugrats that feminists screamed at them to not want, occupies them more then ever. Meanwhile the guys are standing back, sipping their beer and going, mmmmm, let me think about it!!

Mark 1 out of 10

6. "Takes a village to raise a child", those famous words were rabbited by marxist, feminist puppeteer, Hillary Clinton, claiming ofcourse that old marxist maxim of not needing a family and better yet, no Father. Unfortunately too many incarcerated, drug addicted, gang members were drawing on their non-filtered gunge-sticks while pregnant, to realise what it was they were saying. But 51 percent of the female breeding population thought it was a great idea as it guaranteed copious government largesse and automatic withdrawals from someone else's ATM and credit card. That should have worked well except they were spending way too many hours in the company of their spawn and ensured the abuse rate increased exponentially and thereby winning the competition, if there was ever one..

Mark 0 out of 10

7.  "Women are not sex object" would have to be the most confusing statement ever made. One has to wonder whether or not they are just having a joke at our expense. It's a bit like the "slutwalk" mentality where dressing up as a slut would not set any precedence, traipsing around flashing boobs and skin is apparently meaningless, dressing in fashionable clothing along with makeup, perfume, Victorias little secret accessories, does not enter that argument at all. Behaving in any fashion without responsibility or accountability was demanded to be standard practise. But entering an elevator and breathing the same air or looking more than one third of a second too long, must be deemed to be abuse. New accessories will have to be stopwatches with microsecond measurements..

Mark 0 out of 10
Total = Nada..