The Reality Blog

Another version of what we already know to be the case. The reason I like this video is that it demonstrates how feminists unknowingly encouraged the existance of the Men's Movement and also the MRA. A claim they have denied on copious occasions. How is it possible for anyone to have negative feelings against the opposite sex, was not the question asked. The statement presented was one of "You're a misogynist" for not accepting the abuses. Those claims have been promoted and enhanced by the hate movement to try and misrepresent the actions and responses that has surfaced over the last decade or two.

No feminists has ever accepted the fact that they have actually generated the new male attitude and response to their own vitriol and decidedly toxic attitudes. They avoid admitting any responsibility and yet, when it's all said and done, they are responsible for the position they now find themselves in..

The endless complaining by female journalists as well as the occasional "white knight", pointing the finger at those recalcitrants, who have decided to opt out of the "marriage" market and simply go their own way, have been scorned and maligned just like they use to do in the old days. But this time it is more desperate, their provocative lecturing now just slide of the back like water and the overall response is one of disinterest, coupled with "I no longer give a damn". As desperation sets in with one sex and a laissez faire attitude in the other, the lecturing has turned to begging and coercion, unfortunately the circumstances have not changed and neither has the envronment to make the original proposal any more attractive..

The reasons for avoidance of marriage are still in place and they expect any man to hop aboard the bandwagon and willingly offer themselves up as some type of sacrificial offering at the hands of the state and the laws that has created this entire situation..

No compromise, No change..

It is not that hard to understand or comprehend. Why would any man consciously put his head on the chopping block for someone who has the legislated power to destroy his life. I mean really..

Drug Addict and Drunk, gone..

One does have to wonder how many more times that question will be asked without considering it's inevitable explanation plus it would be worth querying the female journalist's reason for asking that question in the first place. Most come from female journalists who are part of the feminist hegemony and that question is either posed so they can create another article that is primarily chosen just to do a little more male-bashing, as is their want..

When considering the topic of an article as pressure mounts and deadlines hone in, why not do another one of those mythical rants just so they can once again reinforce their own loneliness and desperation but suggest that and you will not get a true response, only the usual cover up..

As far as I can tell, while sex is been thrown at guys for no charge, an activity that women themselves have authorised and maintained, then why bother with relationships when you are being serviced to avoid it. The irony is in there somewhere. Feminists have long claimed that the sexual revolution was designed to ensure that women could do as they please, whenever and wherever they want. Sex should not be an issue as it should only be viewed as a normal activity, without limitation or prudish finger pointing and bugger any of those nasty side effects. It should also be available and pursued whenever the need arises, this was their "you go girl" high fiving mantra. A goal that was further enhanced by encouraging abortions at will, world wide. So the stage was set and let the games begin..  

Slate Mag.."When attractive women will still bed you, life for young men, even those who are floundering, just isn't so bad. This isn't to say that all men direct the course of their relationships. Plenty don't. But what many young men wish for—access to sex without too many complications or commitments—carries the day. If women were more fully in charge of how their relationships transpired, we'd be seeing, on average, more impressive wooing efforts, longer relationships, fewer premarital sexual partners, shorter cohabitations, and more marrying going on. Instead, according to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (which collects data well into adulthood), none of these things is occurring. Not one. The terms of contemporary sexual relationships favor men and what they want in relationships, not just despite the fact that what they have to offer has diminished, but in part because of it. And it's all thanks to supply and demand."

 The strange issue here is a feminist one only. Feminists in their usual contradictory fashion encourages sexual irresponsibility but at the same time accuse men of using the female body as sex objects. They claim that the only reason prostitutes as so prolific is that men force them to be available. Get that reasoning, as I do have an issue with that level of cognitive dissonance. But there it is. Whenever the "third wave" naggers look for imaginary issues they always fail to comprehend the doublethink analogy as well as the total hypocrisy of their claim.
A male does not get sex unless their is another member on the opposite end of the insertion point. Of that I am pretty certain. So in order for that to happen it would indicate that both adults have reached an agreement for that to happen as there is nothing more annoying than having to get out the handcuffs etc. So in the majority of cases, two consenting adult indulge. The reason that the whole "where have all the good men gone" question is now superfluous, irrelevant as they are already well aware of the answer..

More Slate Mag.."Ms. Hymowitz argues that even as gender scripts fade, women have come to expect equality in the workplace but old-fashioned chivalry in their romantic lives. Men, in turn, are growing resentful of the mixed messages."

As women make even more demands, one does have to wonder why the guys are not lining up to service those demands as requested. It's amazing how women have trashed, degraded as well as stomped on all men ensuring their privileges increased exponentially at men's expense, now turnaround and demand even more. Incredulously, they fail to comprehend the reason why. They fail to comprehend that men have decided that a relationship with some drama queen really is one to avoid. The usual disclaimers always apply as settling down with a member of that sex does not guarantee anything except an inevitable reeming in the divorce courts and that is something that should be avoided at all costs..

But can you imagine any feminist or female for that matter actually admitting that or even suggesting that maybe they have gone way to far with their endless demands and have done so with such a degree that the alternative now appears to be the preferred option..