The Reality Blog

The most suitable poster applies..

I am completely fascinated by the comparisons of the feminist movement and the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) hoax that all and sundry have now been thrown into via some outright lying and the dishonesty demonstrated of the last few weeks..
The fact that feminists have been undertaking that same path for decades does indicate that it is an effective way to make claims that otherwise would be so comprehensible, that you normally would not in your wildest dreams entertain any part of that nonsense..

But it continues just as Girlwriteswhat states in her video and especially in regards to male feminists who seem to live in a constant realm of fantasy as they make up stories that are along similar as the great lies told by the AGW fanatics. Reality and factual provable evidence is apparently all besides the point as they introduce one strawman argument after another. In order to straighten out those lies and erroneous stats, one would have to constantly monitor their sites to even get within a bull's roar of countering them and calling them to account. But that would require them to have a conscience..

But on and on it goes as more fallacies and inventions are introduced and those enablers are left to continue without any chance of prosecution or being held accountable for their brazen behaviour. Unlike Gleick, another Global Warming fanatic, who decided that lying and cheating was the best way to win against his self invented enemy, so it is with feminists of all sex, colour and sizes. It would appear that honesty and integrity are the first to suffer while they take the same steps to try and malign and denigrate the MRM as well as MRAs..

Some great examples of their hubris and agitprop is constantly on show without apology or facts to back it up. A prime example is from this usual feminised delusionary - Shani Hilton and it's article on "Street Harassment". These women are laughable. Incredible claims made and followed up with questionable studies as usual..

Kearl, the author of Stop Street Harassment: Making Public Places Safe and Welcoming for Women, is an expert who's surveyed more than 800 women in 22 countries on the kind of threatening, persistent harassment I wrote about a few days ago. One of her findings? That 1 in 4 women say they were harassed by a strange man in public before the age of 12.

Bear in mind as well that those Transit companies have installed security guards and every female has in their possession a mobile phone, which they can use at any time(mostly have it attached to their ear as it is) plus there are hundreds of people around who would help at the drop of a hat should anyone demonstrate they were even annoying anyone, plenty of white knights about. All any of those women would have to do is raise their voice or make some hysterical response as they usual do when they "feel" threatened. Also bear in mind that most of those claims have been made in cities like New York where feminists abound and are well versed in their discriminatory methodology..

 Toward the end of her testimony before Councilmember Muriel Bowser yesterday, Holly Kearl made a point to note that "sexual harassment is not mutual flirting or compliments."

Nope, sexual harassment is whatever a feminist determines it to be..

The entire event is ofcourse to ensure that women are given even more privileges along the lines of what they are doing in India, where they have their own Privileged Princess Carriages, which only the PP are permitted to use (Animal Farm anyone?) and they will be thrown off as has been the case by one man who accidentally strolled into one. It is another opportunity that feminists use to slander and malign all men and lob us all into one basket by claiming that all men behave in that fashion and that it is only females who have to run the gauntlet. This is typical feminist agitprop at work and sums up precisely what feminism is all about, detect any "equality" in their aims and goals, anyone?

The sexism and hypocrisy is right there for all to see, it's palpable and so obvious and yet we have these women claiming segregation is the only answer and apartheid it's only goal. Talk about dragging the world back to the 1800s. It demonstrates how retarded and destructive it really is while at the same time make the claim that it's for equality. I mean really. Daily they demonstrate their obvious sexism and discrimination on a world wide scale and still they have the ear of the law makers who are more than happy to reintroduce the Animal Farm at the behest of those sexist individuals..

Why would feminists as well as radical lesbian feminists, demand that men become more female..

Surely, when we have a look at the dysfunctional behaviour of female feminists and their penchant for minutiae management, one would wonder why any member of either sex would want men to behave like a woman..

The  argument is ofcourse absurd as it is not possible for a male to be a female and vice versa, for several reason.

1. Female's brains are connected differently, just in case you wanted that explanation.
2. Female's biology is sufficiently different from males, for it to be noticeable..
3. Females have always coerced men to take care of any issues they have with other men.
4. The obvious ignored factor about women is that they have a menstrual cycle which physically and emotively affects their purview to life from radical to minor. This is one issue feminists prefer to totally ignore and do so deliberately, cannot admit a flaw..
5. The female's world is based on responses and reactions. Their entire mental makeup is tuned to such a degree as to notice an imperceptible (to men) change in physiology in the person she is communicating with. Introducing a complete change in responses..
6. Females preferences for the now, the present and the past is directly opposite to men's long term and overall view.
7, Females demand for social interaction, where a male can easily be a hermit, naturally.
8. Females ongoing and endless demand for validation from their social circle and others in her contact cycle..
9. Females endless penchant to justify and blame others for her own bad or indifferent behaviour.
10. Females total indifference to anyone outside their own sex unless it is to her benefit..

A Male needs to be a female has got to the be the longest stretch anyone could possibly demand. How would a male work out how to automatically, emotionally, manipulate a partner if the physiological signatures cannot be identified. How could a male learn to manipulate when women use their vaginas as a bargaining tool to achieve their own selfish outcomes..

All those questions are not answered by feminists as they pursue a direct course to feminise males in  being "more female", under the guise that women somehow are not the obnoxious manipulators and controllers they deny them to be. Feminists own action belies that exact point..

The circus that is feminism totally ignores the fact that women are violent, abusive, manipulating specialists and have been for millennium and yet they want to introduce the blatant lie that women are or is, the superior being when in actual fact they do not match in intelligence, fitness, strength or honour and dignity, within a bulls roar of any male. As a matter of fact, honour and dignity are foreign to the majority of their sex..
Privilege, self promotion and narcism replaces any traits that would dignify that sex.

Even women will admit to be indifferent to their own sex and prefer the company of men as the difference is noticeable and wanted. Women are also very aware of the behaviour and abuse other women are capable of. This lesson can be learnt at the next sale..

The Feminist's Redstocking Manifesto..

Over the past week I have come across this title and wondered whether or not I actually knew anything about it. I realised that I should brush up as I, quite honesty can say that I have not come across this recently, so a little study was in order.
This Manifesto from the outset could be viewed as feminisms version of the "Human Rights Charter" only you replace the word human with "woman", as they are only ever interested in their own sex and how much they can get out of it. This manifesto is pure feminist hyperbole, it's only emphasis ,which I could tell was that "feelings" are the first and only consideration that feminism should concentrate on and what a subject that is. The manifesto ofcourse waxes lyrical about the usual "It's all men's fault" and that goes without even saying it, but this bit of hysterical naivety emphasises precisely where the feminist hegemony has and will be headed in the future..

The "feelings" stage has already delivered a copious amount of results that ensures whenever any woman "feels", someone has to pay and you can guess which that someone is. The "feelings" manifesto already plays a major part in the continued jailing of men via false rape charges and fake sexual assault charges, false child abuse charges, false sexual child abuse charges, parental alienation, etc...etc.. It is also responsible for such illegal and draconian government introduced bills as the "Safe at Home" legislation (Pdf) which at the moment is being played out in one of Australia's smallest state of Tasmania, where this legislation is already responsible for 50% plus of men being jailed at the behest of women's feelings. This legislation includes such childish inclusions as "if you "feel" threatened" you can call the local constabulary and have the culprit who has instigated that "feeling" change to be arrested and jailed, served with a one year AVO without any chance or possibility of fighting or demanding a court appearance to prove you are innocent, his rights are totally discounted. Those feelings do not require any witnesses in order for it to be corroborated, no lie detector test to be determined if in fact it's true or just lies. Nope, all it needs and requires is for the "woman" to make one single phone call and automatic arrest and incarceration follows, guaranteed..

That is the power women have today, that is what feminists (feminist Judy Jackson) have installed and determined to be a jail worthy punishable offence. This is just a small inclusion in that Redstocking Manifesto that feminists are following down to the last letter and in it's application have maligned, denigrated and stamped any rights any man had in the past (human rights laws) into the ground..

Feelings, as the title of multiple versions of the songs are named do not even closely resemble the utter and complete nastiness that feminists and their enablers have instigated into society but it does indicate that marxism and feminism rides in the same barrel and the suckers who support feminism support their own slippery ride into the new version of old communist Russia's inane existence into their own country..

Also that Redstocking Manifesto despises the gay community, which is an interesting turn of events as they now line up to pay homage just to get them onside. Hypocrisy has never been resisted in that movement either..

My journeyman Fidelbogen explains it some more..

How the Oppressed Became the Oppressor..

Feminists would be the last on this planet to admit that their so called fight against an imaginary oppressor is actually creating an oppressed minority and that they are responsible. I have already heard the howls of disbelieve from those male haters as they are still living in the past, about early 19th century, as they continually and without cessation, doom all men and boys to a world of poverty and lower education. No one needs to remind anyone of the fact that men are in the highest level of unemployment for the first time in decades and also that women enjoying their positions in government departments or government backed jobs especially created for them, do not share that same misery and debilitating uncertainty..

They have targeted all males and ensured their place in society is and will be regulated to third person status while justifying their action with the claim that all men are responsible when they are well aware of the fact that men are mostly just work fodder for the elites and that includes women elitist as well..

Neither do I have to explain the fact that the majority of students at college and Universities are females, they are deliberately holding back male students by allowing more females into colleges and Uni. by keeping to that ever decreasing level for male students well below the level of female students. It's not a matter of no interest, it's a matter of deliberately bypassing males to ensure their quota of females are met..

For every dollar spent on the well being of men and boys, ten times more is spent on women via special programs, unlimited assistance and relentless effort in introducing more privileges while at the same time ensuring that all men and boys are libelled, denigrated and humiliated at every turn. Apart from those obvious facts, they wonder why we are pissed off to such a degree that we dare to speak up and actually mention those issues while the feminist movement declares that men's issues are irrelevant and unnecessary..

Jobs Bill excludes men

The American Jobs Act, which President Obama sent to Congress two weeks ago, is vital for our country’s women. It would keep 280,000 teachers — most of them women — from losing their jobs due to budget cuts. It would put hundreds of thousands of unemployed women back to work. It would put more money in the pockets of almost 80 million working women, by cutting their payroll taxes next year. As the president has said, Congress has a responsibility to pass this bill.

Feminist Philosophy "Fear Beats Hope"..

I for one did not vote for feminism, did you, I would never vote for any doctrine that is determined to take away my rights as a human being and I do believe that every country where feminism has taken over the Judiciary, educational system and government law making facilities, you will find this Marxist ideology was forced into place. Not by popular demand and that's a given, but by force, abuse, threats and coercion including the standard approach of threatening politicians and law makers with possible replacement if they did not toe the line, falsely accusing them of being potential misogynists (world's most overused word) without proof, substance or facts, just lies and false claims which would expose them to derision or humiliation.
The politician we have voted into office via a democratic system called voting, has been put into place for the safety and protection of society and at least we could call on them if we should have any issues worthy of discussion, they were open to input of it's citizens. It's not a perfect world but this method appeared to be the best we came up with for the time being. Try approaching them now and you will witness the fear in their eyes as thy already know what would happen if they dared to question that hegemony and demand answers. Something that will change in the near future as the MRM expands and grows. Politicians are and will be on notice that they will have to decide that they are either for us or against us but they will not survive the next ballot if they sit on their hands as they have been while half of their voters are screwed and jailed without even a proper trial or chance to defend themselves....

So, along comes feminism, nothing and no one was consulted in public or society and no discussions. Not one feminist declared an open debate or joint discussions with anyone who may wish to question their doctrine and their ever increasing mantras which appear and grow exponentially depending on the latest hysterical nonsense they raise..

Have you ever noted on your "How to Vote Card" any suggestion or mention or name or description to suggest that any person your are voting for was a feminist. Liberal/Reps and Labour/Demos Party politicians are forced to include their political stance. Anyone speaking or representing any political party has to declare that interest whenever they push their favourite barrow in the media. Yet, NOT ONE single feminist has ever declared their doctrine or theology in any fashion or form. Nothing, zilch, nada. Not one single feminist had the courage of their convictions to be honest about what they support or what policies they will introduce when it started out to raise it biased, hypocritical and superficial aims and goals..

Feminists were well aware of the fact that they had to hide that fact as no one would vote for their hate movement if it was ever declared. They preferred to hide that fact for very good reason and that was they wanted in via the back door, hiding inside other political parties like predominantly socialist/regressive (supposedly progressive) parties which we can witness daily, (just ask Obama or Biden), so they could contaminate from the inside and it would eventually bleed externally and then, like any well established hidden disease, it would show itself but the treatment would be too late. Feminists have managed to infiltrate society to such a degree that Universities have actually declared a hate movement to be a "philosophy". My response to that absurdity was that Feminism is to philosophy what Nazis were to Jews, which I think sums up that hate movement entirely even though to some it may be over the top. The connection between both can easily be tackled and traced by spending an half an hour on the web and comparing doctrines and while you are at it, marxism as well. You will walk away a different person..

One sentence I came across sums up the attitude of feminism nicely, it's meaning does apply to that movement..


"Fear Beats Hope" would be the most appropriate explanation about how it went about escalating their aims and societal infiltration without ever having been given express authority to do so from the people it would affect the most, you and I..