If there is one single issue that we can safely, consistently and constantly argue about Feminism, it is the fact that they are compulsive liars of the first degree..
Without any fear of contradiction. Not from a rational mind anyway.
We have demonstrated that HATE is Feminism's number one priority,without fail. We have demonstrated that feminism is run by radical feminists via the RADFEM Hub forum, plus the hidden forum where they promote murder, gendercide, child abuse with systemic terrorism in either deed or words..
These are the feminists who hate all man and boy with a toxic and deadly passion as to want to see them all removed from the planet. These are the same feminists who have the ear of legislators and government department heads while they set about destroying any and all rights any male did have. These are the same male haters who can be traced to Universities, Lobby Groups, political parties promoters and enforcers. These same feminists can be traced to attend meetings where illegal activities are discussed and promoted.
For further evidence see here, here and here..
These people have to be stopped, removed from office or positions of power and separated from society as it is their single wish to destroy what we have today. A free and democratic existence which has been generated after centuries of learning and they just want to tear that all down and introduce some replacement based on lies and deception. That's what feminism is all about. Hate, malice and the war between the sexes..
They are solely responsible for this monstrous action and behaviour. It has to be stopped..
Latest Posts
Showing posts with label male hate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label male hate. Show all posts
The long night of modern feminism might be about to end. A glimmer of light is flickering in the encircling gloom.
A study published this week by Dr Catherine Hakim of the London School of Economics has found that men do slightly more work than the women they live with when employment and domestic work are measured together.
This is the first time I can remember in 40 years that an authoritative study on a key issue of so-called gender politics has come out with a self-evident truth that runs directly contrary to orthodox feminist ideology. The fact that it has been written and published by a woman makes it even more delightful.
Ever since the late Sixties, it has been an incontestable article of faith in the feminist creed that men are lazy, slobbish, barbaric, barely civilisable and incapable of switching on the vacuum cleaner without breaking it Рand eternal shame on Alistair Campbell and his partner Fiona Miller for boasting about the fact that he lives up to that mould-encrusted clich̩.
It has been an essential tenet in the feminist catechism – endlessly repeated on Woman’s Hour and in the Guardian – that men exploit and oppress women at home and in their domestic arrangements in the same way that men put women down at work and in the wider society.
Like every other tenet of modern feminism, this potty notion was always balderdash (or more frankly another word beginning with “b” – why be polite about so pernicious and poisonous a creed?). Not only did it run contrary to the evidence that British men work longer hours, for less pay, for more of their lives than any of their western European counterparts – and then spend their weekend mowing grass, cleaning cars and fixing shelves. It was, also, obvious that, as life changed so fundamentally for women in education, employment and sexual life, men changed, too.
That much was transparently clear even 40 years ago when I was at university. Not one of the young men I knew expected or even yearned to marry a woman who would be a domestic serf. Every one of them – me included – wanted a more equal partnership than our parents’ marriages and looked forward to being more actively engaged in their children’s upbringing – just as they looked forward to hearing the happy chink of coins when their partner’s monthly pay-cheque landed in the joint account.
Many of those men had lived alone, learnt to cook and run a home before they lived with women; and some of them – me included – have looked after children alone after marriages failed. More than 300,000 men in this country are the sole parents of children, fully responsible for every element of their domestic lives. Are they to be told – as Fay Weldon declared with majestic stupidity last year – that they are congenitally incapable of picking up a sock?
All my adult life, I wanted to create a family life of equal partnership with a woman and, after many failures, finally achieved it in my 50s, with the mother of our two little daughters, now seven and four.
In our home, I do most of the food shopping, more of the cleaning and some of the cooking. My wife sees to the laundry and is responsible for about 65 per cent of the childcare while I have been responsible for paying about 95 per cent of the bills. When she works, I do everything in the home and everything for the children. When I work, it’s the other way round. We share the gardening – incompetently.
Our is not an unusual arrangement. Only a body of people blinded by ideology – as feminists have been – could fail to see that millions of men and women in this country are harmoniously working out their own domestic arrangements, and that men have been active, enthusiastic partners in these changes.
What next? Might a respectable study soon reveal that, contrary to what we are always told, one in four men does not batter the woman he lives with? Or that not all men are rapists? Might the entire edifice of lies that comprises modern feminism now be about to tumble?
Hasten the day.
What amazes me the most is how on some rare occasion, I get a comment like the one below where the author is of the opinion that her hate movement is really "benign" and "caring", as it has ofcourse "helped" her achieve her own blinkered privileged lifestyle at the expense of men and boys but that ofcourse is irrelevant as "she" is worth it..
What does not amaze me though, when I check out the person's ID, is that it supports the USA's number one mangina, Obama. Needless to say but I will, Obama has no problem promoting radical feminism and promptly installed the male haters into the White House. They promptly instituted laws against men and boys to ensure their rights are removed (via the new sexual assault laws introduced at Universities and Colleges where the male is automatically guilty because "she" says so). The ignorance of these followers is astounding. Whatever ever you do crimzonite, just remain ignorant and don't bother finding out about the hate movement you support and all will be well in the land of Alice in Wonderland, while you justify your support for that malicious, hate generating, hegemony, while you justify to yourself that feminism is just a benign, caring, dictatorship in disguise..
It is precisely how I expect a feminised"woman" to behave (I love that hate movement because it give me stuff and I don't care if it destroys yours or other people"s lives). Why don't one of you for once, demonstrate otherwise and look outside your little bubble, outside your brainwashed illusions..
That would be a pleasant change..
crimzonite has left a new comment on your post "Men DO NOT Owe Women A Living..":
I'm deeply saddened to have stumbled upon this somewhat misogynistic blog. I'm a very open minded person but many of your blogposts are deeply distressing to read as a woman. It's particularly worrying that you seem to lack any true understanding of the feminist movement and how feminist ideology like political ideology varies from liberal to radical; and yet you paint the whole movement with one dirty brush by demonising the liberation of women. I personally don't believe men and women are different but neither gender is superior to the other; just like a black man and a white man may be different but no superiority of one race should legally or socially exist. However, can it not be said that the black man and the white can have the equal opportunity to live and work as they wish? If yes, why then can a woman and a man not have the same equal opportunities to live and work as they wish? And why should it offend you if a woman or a white man chooses to live and work in a manner that is not to your liking? Life is short but can it not also be a harmonious one? Thanks for reading this!
Link to Freelancer and her own bubble wrapped delusions..
It does not require much to align the feminist hate movement to other depressive movements as feminists have clearly demonstrated and are quite happy to promote that they are..
The alignment of feminism to Socialism, Marxism and Nazism are clearly defined in their literature and their ongoing promotion of the anti-male rhetoric. Below is a good example, as the link from JTO's article shows The link is to a Radical Feminist Forum whose activities included a meeting in Perth, Western Australia in September 2011. This meeting of like minded Genocide promoting, feminists included discussing the SCUM manifesto and it's benefits and hopeful outcomes.
One of the attending speakers is Susan Hawthorne as you can see below..
Fem-manifesto-ingIt does demonstrate clearly how ignorant and forgetful feminists like Hannah Mudge is when it comes to blaming all and sundry on the Men's Movement, while they in turn put up their hands and claim innocence and fawn ignorance. The NAFALT denial persists (not all feminists are like that)..Guest post by Susan HawthorneThis is based on a talk originally given at the SCUM Conference in Perth, Australia on 24 September 2011.I come to the writing of manifestoes with the interests of a poet and political activist. Political activism is obvious. But poetry? An effective manifesto is one in which the language works, the political position is clear – but above all – it has rhythm and metre. A manifesto is a bit like a poem or a song.
Let’s look at Marx and Engels. The first line of the prologue:
A spectre is haunting Europe–the spectre of Communism (Marx and Engels 1848/1967: 78).
Or the first line a Chapter 1:
The history of all hitherto existing societyis the history of class struggles (Marx and Engels 1848/1967: 79).
The most disappointing aspect of the Communist Manifesto are the last lines:
That radical feminist forum discusses the annihilation of all men and boys via DNA manipulation as well as genocide, their hatred seethes from those pages and is as sickening as anyone can ever imagine. Select the worse scenario and that is precisely what it is they propose. It's not a busy site, it does have quite a few followers whose attitudes and rantings can only be described as psychotic, bordering on lunacy..
The connection between feminism and it many variations are there for all to see. They claim to be a movement for "equality" but the Swedish example has already totally destroyed that notion as we have already witnessed. Feminism cannot be described as anything else but a hate movement, whose only aims is for the destruction of all men and boys by gradual and systemic methodology. This can also be ascertained when reading a post from one of the swedish citizens..
Regardless of their claims, feminism does nothing more than promote hate and distrust between the sexes and the only way we will rid this planet of it is to ensure that the politicians and law makers are informed (as if they did not already know) of their maniacal actions and future aims..
Be careful who you vote for. Ensure they do not have any sympathy towards this hate movement..
It should not be long before every campus will be like those same campuses in Sweden if men do not stand up and let it known that we have had enough of this level of sexism and discrimination.
No one wants to put their hand up to do something, anything about it. No one, not politicians, not educators, not students, nor anyone else and meanwhile we are heading towards that Swedish Model faster than we know. With no resistance, sooner it will appear..
October 24, 2011
The Chilly World of the Campus Male
By Warren Farrell
Males are keenly aware that when they go to college they are entering a hostile environment. Freshman orientation alone has had a distinctively anti-male cast for years: heavy emphasis on date rape, stalking, unwanted sexual attention, and sexual harassment amount to an unmistakable message that males are patriarchal oppressors and potential sex criminals. The lesson is quickly taught: only women are vulnerable, and men are the cause of their vulnerability. At one elite university, at least, the first thing a female freshman gets from the administration is a whistle to blow in the event that a rape-minded male accosts her. The freshman male is likely to acquire a new feeling about himself: he is the designated potential perpetrator until proven innocent.This message will be reinforced by a barrage of gender courses, the attitudes of a good many faculty, and on many campuses, what Charlotte Allen calls “the scorched-earth war against fraternities.” The anti-fraternity movement is ostensibly about wantonness and excess (binge-drinking, hazing, date rape), but in reality it’s about erasing the best-known male refuge from the suffocating political correctness on campus and its theory of the evil male.
The only males likely to escape this pressure are gays, African-Americans, the transgendered, or the harmlessly hetero—docile guys who agree with the standard campus view that males are dangerous. The campus environment is so hostile toward men that it doesn’t allow hostility toward men to be considered a “hostile environment.” Only established grievance groups get to detect hostile environments.
Professors in engineering and the hard sciences don’t speak out much about the politics of male-female issues. What we hear emanates strongly from departments of women’s and “gender” studies and is adapted by psychology; social work; sociology; anthropology; literature; schools of education; and the seminaries. At the prestigious universities, most of these departments are now 80% to 95% female.
Female Power
As a person who has taught in departments of women’s studies, psychology, political science and sociology in many universities (and the only man ever elected three times to the Board of the National Organization for Women in New York City), I can tell you that the core male-female message is: “we live in a patriarchal world in which men created laws to benefit men at the expense of women.” If our sons arrive on campus, they will inevitably be trying to date women who are exposed to and learning this negative attitude toward them.
“Gender” courses now study only liberal women’s view of women’s powerlessness, and liberal women’s perspective on male power. They don’t look at liberal or conservative men’s view of male powerlessness, or liberal or conservative men’s view of female power. Dissent is not tolerated and no administration will dare direct these closed courses to open up. It took twenty years for Boston College to do something about a rabidly anti-male professor who refused to allow males in her class.
As a result of the inattention to male powerlessness and female power, men are as ignorant about their own powerlessness and female power as women in the 1950’s were about their own powerlessness and male power. And as a result, men today are psychologically about where women were in the 1950’s. The last half century has not been a battle of the sexes, but a war in which only one side has shown up. Men have put their heads in the sand and hoped the bullets would miss.
As a result of the inattention to male powerlessness and female power, men are as ignorant about their own powerlessness and female power as women in the 1950’s were about their own powerlessness and male power. And as a result, men today are psychologically about where women were in the 1950’s. The last half century has not been a battle of the sexes, but a war in which only one side has shown up. Men have put their heads in the sand and hoped the bullets would miss.
When I did the research for my book, The Myth of Male Power, and began to articulate these thoughts in the university, I went from being a hero to unemployable by a top university. One way to become similarly unemployable is to challenge the misleading statistics on male and female pay. Many a social science class imparts the theme that “men earn more for the same work.” Students then have a choice: they can either think or not think. If they think, and say something like, “if men earned a dollar for each 80 cents women earned for the same work, who would hire a man?” and the gorgeous woman he is trying to attract looks at him like he’s a Neanderthal who just doesn’t “get it,” he’ll usually stop thinking.
On the other hand, he might continue thinking—or even do some research. When I did the research for Why Men Earn More I discovered, for example, that women who had never married and never had children earn 117% of what comparable males earn. Mentioning this will increase his potential for rejection—for being accused of “creating a hostile environment.”
When assumptions such as “history is men’s studies” and “the heterosexual white male is privileged” are mentioned in any class, the male will soon learn they are not statements open to intellectual investigation. If he were to make the mistake of bringing up the possibility that, throughout history, all societies that survived did so based on their ability to train their sons to be disposable (e.g., in war, or in work)—one of the themes I discovered to be common among cultures when researching The Myth of Male Power—he will not be admired for his thoughtfulness.
We have to bring back balance to male-female relations on campus. As long ago as the early 1990s, the now-dead magazine Lingua Franca was calling attention to the “chilly” attitude toward males on our campuses. Now it’s much worse, and we don’t know if the chill is a factor in the growing male aversion to higher education and the high male drop-out rate. But we do know that there are many ominous indictors. Here’s one: For the first time in American history, our sons will have less education than their fathers. When the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) studied the education attainment of sons compared to their dads in 31 countries, the U.S. ranked 31st.
Our colleges and universities can be justly proud of reaching out to women and improving their life prospects. Now they should do the same for men, and the first step will be to do something about the chilly anti-male culture they have allowed to spread on our campuses.
----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Warren Farrell has been chosen by the Financial Times as one of the world’s top 100 thought leaders. His books are published in over 50 countries, and in 15 languages. They include two award-winning international best-sellers, Why Men Are The Way They Are plus The Myth of Male Power. Dr. Farrell is currently the Chair of the Commission to Create a White House Council on Boys to Men, and is co-authoring Boys to Men with John Gray.
Dr. Warren Farrell has been chosen by the Financial Times as one of the world’s top 100 thought leaders. His books are published in over 50 countries, and in 15 languages. They include two award-winning international best-sellers, Why Men Are The Way They Are plus The Myth of Male Power. Dr. Farrell is currently the Chair of the Commission to Create a White House Council on Boys to Men, and is co-authoring Boys to Men with John Gray.
S.C.U.M. murder and dance party with credits
Normally we only place videos in our newfangled video library. But sometimes you need something front and center.PE
In November of 2010, a collection of Swedish feminists identifying themselves as followers of Valerie Solanas – by the title of her male-hating diatribe, the S.C.U.M. Manifesto ( society for cutting up men ) posted a video depicting the murder of a newspaper reading man, followed by an impromptu dance party, and the text message “Do Your Part” – a clear, unambiguous call for male-targeting homicide.
This video stayed on youtube for over a year. It received over 5000 views, and got more than 300 down-votes. It is likely that dozens of people flagged it using Youtube’s complaint system, on the grounds that it was hate speech, and endorsed murder. It remained on Youtube, along with the open endorsement of murder until the readers at AVfM took notice, and uncovered the identities of these murder enthusiasts and hate mongers. Unfortunately, the Swedish theatre group, naming themselves “SCUM” continue to present a stage adaptation of Valerie Solanas’s male-targeting hate propaganda to school children. However, thanks to the efforts of MRAs around the word, they’re no longer doing so without world-wide criticism.
In November of 2010, a collection of Swedish feminists identifying themselves as followers of Valerie Solanas – by the title of her male-hating diatribe, the S.C.U.M. Manifesto ( society for cutting up men ) posted a video depicting the murder of a newspaper reading man, followed by an impromptu dance party, and the text message “Do Your Part” – a clear, unambiguous call for male-targeting homicide.
This video stayed on youtube for over a year. It received over 5000 views, and got more than 300 down-votes. It is likely that dozens of people flagged it using Youtube’s complaint system, on the grounds that it was hate speech, and endorsed murder. It remained on Youtube, along with the open endorsement of murder until the readers at AVfM took notice, and uncovered the identities of these murder enthusiasts and hate mongers. Unfortunately, the Swedish theatre group, naming themselves “SCUM” continue to present a stage adaptation of Valerie Solanas’s male-targeting hate propaganda to school children. However, thanks to the efforts of MRAs around the word, they’re no longer doing so without world-wide criticism.
That claim may have worked had it not been the fact that we started having a really good look at the
Over the past week, females, in particular, feminists have enhanced their abusive and cold blooded anarchistic leanings by displaying precisely what they claim to have hated men for. Their actions once again clearly demonstrates their endless hypocrisy in denigrating and generating anti-male attitudes, while at the same time claiming that their sex is not shown any respect. Strange that, it's that cognitive dissonance roundabout kicking in again. Comprehension of their own hypocrisy and doublethink relies on your current level of addiction..
So one must wonder how that same sex can utter these words like it's some type of revelation..
Women: If You Want Respect from Men then Act Like You Deserve It
You think..
It's time girls started taking half of the responsibility for some men being "jerks". That's right. I said it. I can hear the guys cheering and the gals hissing and preparing to claw my eyes out. Before you start sending me nasty hate mail, take the time to read on.
Now, I've been called a feminist by many. I am all about empowering women and seeing them do great things, but with great power comes great responsibility. Maybe the comic book fan in me is showing , but I'm serious. There's more to a girl demanding respect for herself than just screaming at guys when they act like....well, guys.In order for me to address all the points made in this article, that would take way too long, apart from the fact that this journo lays some claim to being a feminist, which does not appear to being the case as she states that she is accused of it and a quick check did not expose her to be one. So there is hope as the majority are not feminists, and it's unusual to see Yahoo not cowtowing (sic) to the feminist mantra and doctrine as they normally do..
I can't express how tired I am of hearing girls whine about how they were wronged by a guy when in fact they slept with him almost immediately, after he made it clear he didn't want a relationship, or even waited until the guy was drunk to make their move. It's different if the guy has been leading you on for a while, dating you, or acting interested and only after sex disappears or tells you he doesn't want to be involved. In those cases, he deserves every name you can throw at him.
Some girls just don't get it. No matter what the "agreement" is, or how many times a guy has told them they don't want a relationship, some girls seem to have this notion that their stuff is golden and the minute they give it up, the guy will automatically be starstruck into wanting or loving them, and that he will turn into prince charming. These girls seem to think that if they have sex, it automatically means the guy has to repay them by committing. When they don't get their way, they want to throw a fit and blame the guy. I guess that's easier than admitting you did something stupid.
I, like the author, still waiting for women to do great things as this week alone can go down in history as not only being an eye opener on their disgusting behaviour, but also suffer a severe drop in popularity, it's not too often we have women raging about genocide, mass murder and child abuse against all men and boys, maybe it was just practise..
I am still trying to get over the "girls" and "accountability" comment in the same sentence. Look for the next oxymoron..
Link..
$1000 Bounty To Identify Swedish SCUM Members
Of European nations, Sweden is the country arguably farthest along the path to Orwellian nightmare. Its the home of the swedish model for prostitution, where sale of sex as a service is legal, but purchase is not. It’s a country deep in the grip of overt, totalitarian radical feminist rule.
If you don’t know by now, a group of as-yet unidentified Swedish women produced and posted a video on youtube[1] depicting the point-blank shooting murder of a man reading a newspaper. The shooting was staged with the cooperation of the portrayed victim using theatrical blood make-up. The women appeared to enact this fantasy in a state of ecstatic glee. The group of would-be murderous psychopaths identify themselves in the title of their video as SCUM, taken from the title of a famous piece of hate literature by murderer Valerie Solinas manifesto, Society for Cutting Up Men.
The portrayed murder is followed by the ecstatic giggling of a handful of other females, and an impromptu dance celebration. The woman who apparently shoots a newspaper-reading man appears to have an spontaneous orgasm following the killing. A minor discontinuity in the video shows where most of the orgasm was edited out. Killing a man for no apparent reason than his sex is nothing to hide from the public, but dampening your panties over it apparently is. The short video concludes with the text message “Do Your Part.”
While the murder is plainly staged, the sadistic glee has every appearance of being genuine. The plain endorsement of murder is also unambiguous.
That is why A Voice For Men is offering a bounty of 1000 dollars for the confirmed identity of one or more of the individuals in the video. We are asking for the full legal names, home addresses, places of employment, email addresses and contact phone numbers of the women and man who produced and starred in the video described above. We will pay 1000 dollars to any individual who provides and confirms this information, to be payed either directly to themselves or to a charity of their choice.
This is the second such reward offered for the identity of an individual, the first being a blogger advocating extralegal eugenic modification of men. This blogger has since been identified as the former lawyer and published author Pamela O’Shaughnessy. O’Shoughnessy and her followers no longer enjoy anonymity – and will be pursued by their own nefarious plans for the rest of their lives.
The group of swedish women advocating murder – and staging fantasies of murder in sadistic ecstasy will be publicly identified on this site and on Register-Her.com. Complete details of these individuals names, addresses, phone numbers, government identification numbers, drivers licences, and employers will be permanently published. It is the intent of the editors of A Voice For Men that these individuals be publicly and permanently identified.
Some individuals may criticize the intent to publish not only names, but also addresses, phone numbers, employers and other personal information – on the grounds that such exposure create a risk of retributive violence against individuals who openly advocate murder based on sex. It is the considered position of the editorial board of AVfM that any such risks are out-weighed by the ongoing hazard to the public of these individuals continuing to operate in anonymity. Open advocation of murder cannot be allowed in a civil society, without that society devolving into a culture of brutal violence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJjKJ-_d4YQ
This is what a feminist looks like
The portrayed murder is followed by the ecstatic giggling of a handful of other females, and an impromptu dance celebration. The woman who apparently shoots a newspaper-reading man appears to have an spontaneous orgasm following the killing. A minor discontinuity in the video shows where most of the orgasm was edited out. Killing a man for no apparent reason than his sex is nothing to hide from the public, but dampening your panties over it apparently is. The short video concludes with the text message “Do Your Part.”While the murder is plainly staged, the sadistic glee has every appearance of being genuine. The plain endorsement of murder is also unambiguous.
That is why A Voice For Men is offering a bounty of 1000 dollars for the confirmed identity of one or more of the individuals in the video. We are asking for the full legal names, home addresses, places of employment, email addresses and contact phone numbers of the women and man who produced and starred in the video described above. We will pay 1000 dollars to any individual who provides and confirms this information, to be payed either directly to themselves or to a charity of their choice.This is the second such reward offered for the identity of an individual, the first being a blogger advocating extralegal eugenic modification of men. This blogger has since been identified as the former lawyer and published author Pamela O’Shaughnessy. O’Shoughnessy and her followers no longer enjoy anonymity – and will be pursued by their own nefarious plans for the rest of their lives.
The group of swedish women advocating murder – and staging fantasies of murder in sadistic ecstasy will be publicly identified on this site and on Register-Her.com. Complete details of these individuals names, addresses, phone numbers, government identification numbers, drivers licences, and employers will be permanently published. It is the intent of the editors of A Voice For Men that these individuals be publicly and permanently identified.
Some individuals may criticize the intent to publish not only names, but also addresses, phone numbers, employers and other personal information – on the grounds that such exposure create a risk of retributive violence against individuals who openly advocate murder based on sex. It is the considered position of the editorial board of AVfM that any such risks are out-weighed by the ongoing hazard to the public of these individuals continuing to operate in anonymity. Open advocation of murder cannot be allowed in a civil society, without that society devolving into a culture of brutal violence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJjKJ-_d4YQ
Feminism's Criminal Element.
 |
| We are Watching Feminists and Waiting.. |
I have in my possession, copious examples, in the way of comments, discussions, site information, names of the perpetrators and plenty more information that will have you reeling in disbelief. It is akin to being present at conversations prior to Kosovo or Rwanda or that other cleansing method that was used over seventy years ago..
It was unthinkable at that time and it is unthinkable now. One does wonder what level of hate these women have introduced into society in order to plan it's destruction without so much as a second though to the survivors or the people affected. Demonstrating again that the feminist ideology is destructive to both sexes..
The whole issue has to be taken seriously for that reason and I will wait before exposing those rabid lunatics for a more opportune moment. A moment that will ensure maximum exposure plus one that the MSM can no longer ignore, copious copies have been circulated for this reason..
Conspiracy theorist have always been a source of amusement to me as they fit any given combination or series of events to their own interpretations, then go forth and try to convince everyone else of their newly fantasised revelation. It is not one thought process that I either follow or promote. Here comes the usual, but. This time though, I will allow you to make the conclusion as I will just present some relevant information and facts..
Over the last couple of days, we have bought to your attention some rather nasty if not downright sadistic news concerning the Feminist movement which the MM(Men's Movement) have continually warned everyone about. It is a hate movement that can, will and does inflict untold and unlimited misery on so many people as to make that comment incomprehensible. We have demonstrated that feminism is a hate movement for many reasons, the main one being that it is solely interested in female supremacy and they have already clearly demonstrated this by reducing men and boy's education, ensuring the courts grants the female the major share of everything a man has worked for, insured that all government funding go to "women only", while men sit on the unemployment lines and women are set up in their cosy little offices at their expense..
Those issues are facts, not something I have made up but tangible evidence for anyone to witness or study on a daily basis. Meanwhile Universities reject male students to fill their female quotas, another example, another fact. On and on it goes, where that stops will not be at the behest or inclusion of opinions from male feminists (manginas: males for Female supremacy), who appear to be determined that females get their own way regardless. They are not in my opinion, men, but imitators overdosing on estrogen and female acceptance and female attention. They will justify the actions of feminism and feminists by stating that "not all feminists are like that" and I would respond that, "you are supporting a movement that does vow to take that action"...
We have exposed feminist females planning and scheming to not only destroy the majority of men and boys on this planet but are also planning to interfere with the genetic makeup of all males, who in their opinion should be eliminated or re-adjusted to their own requirements, as if to demonstrate that women are beyond question and incapable of performing the tasks as set out here, they are perfect, where they are concerned.. They (feminists) just demonstrate that they really are sick, demented human beings, who do not deserve anything less than our total contempt and ridicule..
Hopefully, some of those feminists that visit here on a regular basis (I am well aware of it) may have felt some twinge of regret, maybe the odd one or two may even reassess their allegiance to a movement that is aiming to achieve the same outcome some dictator did over 70 years ago but that would mean that the cerebral cortex was capable of compassion which in their case which is not something that I have witnessed before. Rather than admit they were/are wrong, they will find the obvious escape route using the usual NAFALT (not all feminists are like that) but it will fall on deaf ears as that hate movement concentrates it's efforts to complete it's original aim. You are witnessing that, right now..
I have over the past seven years, since beginning this blog has demonstrated beyond doubt that some women are quite capable of all level of atrocities. They were a considerable presence as guards in those extermination camps, they were (as history shows), on the front row when France decided to remove the aristocracy, utilising a specially designed implement to remove part of the human body. we have witnessed in history that women use to get their rocks off at the Coliseums via a bit of recorded written history, translated by a witness who was appalled enough to pass on that information. We have witnessed an example this year where an African feminist female was sentenced to life in prison for her part in the genocide of over 800,000 to 1.2 million people (amount varies) without so much as demonstrating an ounce of regret or remorse. We have sites on the web that show how some women are quite happy to torture, maim, physically abuse anyone at the drop of a hat. All those sites demonstrate beyond doubt what those females are capable of and it's not what you were told about or how you think or feel about them. That opinion is apparently superfluous and in need of major re-adjustment..
This article is not to say that all women are like that as we all know of a few in our lives who would baulk at stomping of an insect, be aghast at watching an action movie be gravely insulted and upset at reading the action of feminists wanting to murder or maim their husbands or sons. There are women in my life whom I cherish and love dearly and would not want to even think about doing without, for the joy they bring into it. They are there and they are about, I am hoping, in the majority. This article is to demonstrate that some are quite capable of the above actions while smiling in your face, quite capable of twisting the knife while you think that you are given a cuddle..
I have way too many examples here on this blog that includes studies, research and eye witness reports demonstrating clearly that that same sex who claimed to love you with all of her heart, till death do you part, will, in the blink of an eye, be capable of ensuring that you walk away from that relationship with nothing but memory, no kids, no bank account, no house, no car but plenty of debt. Quite happy to screw you to such a degree that suicide would become the preferred option. Just bear that in mind before claiming that all women are everything nice and cuddly. I have news, no, some are not and feminists demonstrate that clearly..
I will leave you with the words of another feminist echoing that exact same outcome as Pamela O'Shaughnessy explores and wishes to carry out..
“The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller GearhartBy the way, the MSM (MainStreamMedia) strickly adheres to the usual "never criticise a woman", mentality so you would be wasting your time waiting for them to expose these male haters, they are way too pussy-whipped. Here we have TWO women charged and jailed for Genocide(although one got the pussy pass). Amazing what one finds when one starts looking..
Though Nyiramasukuko is the first woman to be convicted of genocide, she is not the only woman to be charged with genocide.
Former Bosnian Serb leader Biljana Plavsic was indicted in 2000 for charges including genocide for her role in Serb atrocities in the 1992-95 Bosnian war. The genocide charge was dropped as part of a plea bargain that saw her convicted by the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal in 2002 of persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, a crime against humanity. - Sapa-AP
If your son is a generation Z participant by birth only ofcourse then this is how he will be educated, humiliated, denigrated and soundly beaten into submission if he does not have the tools and knowledge to fight back. Feminism and feminists demonstrate once again their ongoing and unrelenting misandry and the indoctrination our sons and daughters must face and be part of. Whenever parents are silly enough to trust public education to non-educate or indoctrinate their children it is them who should be held accountable for the abuse and psychological issues that teenager will eventually face as they grow older..
Growing up in Generation Z
Hey, this is my first post here but it's going to be a long one as I'd like to see what the older generation of men think about this.
I was born in 1991, to a happy family, I had a sister 6 years older than me, and two loving parents, my father was the breadwinner of the family and my mother was a house wife, she used to take me and my sister to school, pick us up when we were sick, basically, all the moms stuff.
My early school years were great, my education was great, I had maximum grades at that point, I played for my school football team and used to do some boxing (my dad and his dad were both boxers, it was great bonding time for me and my dad in the gym) life couldn't of been more better, as I got towards the end of my primary school years, I did start to notice an odd trend though, my family seemed to be the minority that were like this, when I'd stay over at friends houses, it'd almost always be divorced mothers or just simply single parents looking after my friends. I never paid it much attention however as I was just 6-11 years old at the time but I always wondered "where's your dad??"
Anyways, moving on to my transition into secondary school, this is where things changed, for the worse. (Secondary school is 11-16 in England, not sure what it is in other countries).
Now, I've always wondered if this horrific change can be attributed to the fact me getting into secondary school was after 4-5 years of Labour getting into power in 1997, I can honestly say now, that's exactly the reason why.
Immediately it began, we were taught, at such a young age, all of the atrocities western men had committed against everyone else, we were literally (I'm not exaggerating here) taught to be ashamed of ourselves and of our culture, girls were taught how great the suffragettes were and that without them they'd still be under the tyranny of the evil men, I remember a particular class about this in history before, the female teachers and female students were all laughing at the stupidity of boys and men, I remember the female teacher pointing out "all the men had to fight wars, while women didn't, but it was always men that started the wars!" while the girls all laughed, I remember looking around at all the boys in my class just sitting there, quietly, blank stares on their faces, saying nothing. Then it hit me like a silver bullet, I was doing the same as them: nothing.
However after having years of political correctness and self-shame pumped into me by this so called education system, I had no knowledge of how to even discredit them, everything they said seemed true, if it wasn't for my father teaching me about the great men of our past at a young age, I actually think I'd be another sad fool indoctrinated into feminist ideology.
This experience though, was just a very minute problem that I and other boys my age experienced at this point, not only were we taught to be ashamed of our gender, they went so far as to blatently make us ashamed of our race. Yes, if you were white and male, oh boy, you were in for a treat. Hours upon hours of all the horrendous crimes our ancestors did to the africans, the native americans, the jewish people and of course, women. Not one, not a SINGLE mention of all the good we did, only the bad (and if they did happen to mention anything good a white man did they never pointed out it was a white man who did it, only when they shame do they like to point the traits of the people/person they're shaming, out). Meanwhile they had black history month celebrating the accomplishments of black culture and black people in general, which I had/have no problem with, I think it's great that people can celebrate their culture but then it bought up the question, when will I be allowed to celebrate and be proud of my culture? the answer? Never, that's racist and not politically correct, you see, that line of thinking leads to a nation of nazis, apparently.
Now, after all this, I noticed something change in me, I became apathetic, lazy, unmotivated and my grades went from the top 5% in my country at age 11, to pretty much, rock bottom. I remember at age 11 I was predicted straight A* and As for my GCSEs, I didn't leave that school with a single GCSE, not one. Why? I stopped caring about school, some days I just didn't turn up, I couldn't take it anymore, it was actually horrendous to be discriminated against like that by people who are supposed to be objectively teaching me, by the time my dad noticed what was going on (the school never notified him of my drastic drop in grades and lack of attendance) it was too late to do anything about it, I was in the last 6 months of school. These feelings weren't just felt by me either, I can tell you now, 90% of the boys in my year didn't leave with more than 1-2 GCSEs either, a lot of the girls (the majority) left that school with amazing grades, a girl I was fond of left with 3 A stars, if I remember correctly. Oh and my sister finished Primary school with high grades and carried on the trend finishing secondary school with very high grades (all As and Bs, she went on to do A levels and was on her way to becoming very successful, learning multiple languages such as german and latin when she decided to give it all up to raise a family).
To any of the older generation out there, I'd just like to tell you, this is what it was like to grow up in an education system from 1997-2006 for young British men. Now I can't say it was like this in every school, as I had no experience in other schools but if generally speaking, every school was the same way mine was, we're in big trouble. I read recently, young men get paid less than young women now from ages 20-29.
My big question is, what is going to happen when my generation has to step up to run Britain? From my experience and the facts around me at the time (the majority of boys in my year are either unemployed or doing basic jobs like stacking shelves, digging, cleaning toilets) we've literally created a generation of boys who are useless, self-hating, apathetic, lazy idiots without any father figures in their lives and even the ones who had father figures (like me) got shafted hard by the education system we had to endure. Honestly, I'm actually really interested in seeing what happens in the next 20 years, women are either going to have to step up and take all the load men have carried on their shoulders for generations and do everything or society is honestly going to collapse in on itself, as this generation of men have been destroyed and ostracized by their own government.
I was one of the few people who wasn't surprised when the UK Riots came about, it was just waiting to happen, this is the generation of young men who are supposed to be the backbone to our culture. Hah! well done feminism, well done labour, you managed to systematically destroy a whole country in just one decade, far more damaging than the "nazis", "racists", "bigots" and "sexists" ever could of done.
Personally, I can't wait to sit back and watch the mess unfold as the country frantically tries to stay above the water in a futile attempt not to drown.
I am very interested in what the older generation of men think about this state of affairs and how their sons have been treated by the education system and society in general.
Oh and before anyone accuses me of blaming my failings on the Education system, my father paid for me to go to an all male school, where I got 7 As in GCSEs on my first year there directly after mandatory school ended, then two years of A levels in which I got all 5 of them. This isn't some blame, pity me game, I'm just generally very interested in what you all think is going to happen if my scenario holds true for the majority of young men growing up?
 |
| Yep, the place is a mess and rotting away as we speak.. |
The rabid population shysters are screaming about over population and claim such farcical fallacies that it will not be long before we will be living where no man has lived before. Well gee, I watched Star Trek too..
So, feminist's answer to the so called "problem" which is one of their own making, rather than being some major earth shattering issue, prefer to reduce the population and you can already guess which half would have to make more room for the princesses and their newly formed "Insemination Centres". Designed primarily to exhaust the remaining the 10 percent that's left. Over population is of their own making and feel it necessary to offer what they originally wondered about introducing. When the world starts looking like the presented, manufactured, computer generated images like in the inverted Star Wars movies, where buildings are so tall that it is impossible to see lower levels as they are always fogged in, give me a call, until then, don't bother..
“The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart -WAF Site..And ofcourse we have the number one population control expert - feminist and human imitator, Mary Daly..
Why have any men at all?
3) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the human race."
So, for the sake of efficiency we have to have a look at how to go about the reduction without creating to much mess as that would have to be cleaned up as well. Oh, is this never ending, gasp, where is my Chai..
The current population at this point in time is
Now one can assume that the sex ratio is approx. 50/50 as some countries have an excess female population and some have an extra male population. Which would mean that the feminasties would have to exterminate about 2.7 Billion, man and boy would have to go in order to achieve their target (3 Billion at 90% = 2.7 billion). Not an easy achievement as I would imagine there would not be too many guys wanting to be involved in building such a structure except the femiwimps maybe, who lay claim to being a member of our sex and they would be aiming to be included in the 10% list which probably would happen and I would encourage that, as they are already trained to lay down, worship and take it..
2011 7 billion
The US Census Bureau has a lower estimate and predicts instead that the 7 billion mark will be reached in February 2012.
The do say that there is an 8 steps methodology a society must go through to back such extermination process which ofcourse was set into play by certain dictators or imitators thereof (we already have feminist females (rape em before you murder them) in Africa,who was already on the ground, training. She was involved in the elimination of over 1 Million people, was jailed for genocide this year (Google it)) to eliminate as many as soon as possible. So the statistics for mass elimination is really not that unachievable and if they do it right, they could even implant or better still, introduce a "Logans Run" style competition where people are conned into believing that turning 30 would be the age of rejuvenation and being reborn, but in reality, you were just eliminated and tossed in with the gardening scraps to be recycled..
It should not be long now before the first couple of hurdles have been completed. The denigration of all men and boys has been completed and all men and boys claimed to be useless members of society is now in the process of completion. So it's six steps to go, maybe you can see some more on the list, already in progress ?..
The Eight Stages of Genocide and Preventing Genocide
8 steps to genocide
1. Classification - "People are divided into "us and them"
2. Symbolization - "When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups..."
3. Dehumanization - "One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases."
4. Organization - "Genocide is always organized... Special army units or militias are often trained and armed..."
5. Polarization - "Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda..."
6. Preparation - "Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity..."
7. Extermination - "It is "extermination" to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human."
8. Denial - "The perpetrators... deny that they committed any crimes..."
Biologically Bad
The undeclared war on men has just dialled the hatred up, again. This time, it’s not merely men’s behavior and bad attitudes under attack, but male biology which is the root of evil.
You see gentlemen, you are not merely stupid, misguided, culturally stunted reprobates, you’re biologically flawed, innately broken bad-people. So says Margaret Wente, whose journalism and english literature degrees make her an “expert” on human biology and male psychology. (not really)
Wente’s recent article on the Canadian national news site theglobeandmail.com decries the recent increased availability of hormone replacement therapies for aging men. In a population of aging baby boomers – parallel treatments for women have been widely promoted for more than a decade – but obviously, when men are the target demographic for hormone based aging treatments, its a very very bad thing. After all, everybody knows testosterone is the source of all greed and violence in the world.
Everybody knows this, with the exception of those who actually study it[1]. The conclusions of actual research on the impact of testosterone on human behavior indicates “Testosterone doesn’t cause people to become aggressive or risky as many people believe but actually encourages fairness”. [2]
However, Margaret Wente isn’t letting inconvenient facts get in the way of a good story. In the world of commonly believed falsehood, testosterone is the core of male identity. That means violence and aggression is the core of masculinity, at least, according to Wente, whose journalism and literature degree makes her an obvious expert in behavioural psychology.
Starting from a foundation built on cultural myth, Wente builds a case for the innate biological inferiority of the sex whose energy, creativity and drive have levered humanity into a modern, clean, well fed civilization.
Wente continues her attack on masculinity with the bland declaration that “testosterone is implicated in the world’s financial woes.” As a subscriber to several financial newsletters, this is new on me, but I wont dispute that maleness is implicated in all the world’s woes by ideologues re-packaging cultural biases under the false pretence that hatred is backed up by data. According to our expert on matters masculine and economic:
“Perhaps you’ve noticed that not a single woman was involved with the reckless speculation that led to the debacle of 2008.” Being male, and therefore, inferior – I hadn’t noticed that no women at all work in the service sectors of finance and banking, but now I know – It was all because of testosterone.
Unsatisfied with her own professional expertise on masculine psychology and sexual biology, Wente relies on a former investment banker to deliver the knowledge that “Testosterone is the molecule that explains irrational exuberance”. Hysterical female Justin Bieber fans are clearly suffering from testosterone poisoning.
What’s interesting in the weak pseudo-science behind this article’s hate is that it focuses almost entirely on biology to vilify masculine identity. There is none of the: “you bad men would be better with some re-education” – which I’m paraphrasing from other men-are-bad feminist agitprop.
Wendy Zukerman’s New-Scientist piece on the evolutionary roots of domestic violence[3] is explicit in excluding consideration of female offenders. Zuckerman opens with some reasonable concerns that her cited researchers at University of Texas in Austin and Stockton College of New Jersey makes simplistic assumptions. However, in the following paragraph notes only the number of female reports of domestic violence – a large number with no comparison or context.
Another men-are-bad article on the Huffington Post by prostrate male feminist David Katz makes a more oblique , but equally vacuous swipe at biology as the source of masculine evil. His article can be found by googling “The Biological Basis for Behaving Badly.” A bold bit of alliteration by Katz, but the biological approach to claiming man-equals-bad has an interesting tactical component. Within civil rights movements, claims by racist organizations of biological inferiority, or superiority between ethnic demographics are among the most egregious approaches to demonizing a population, because if the idea gains currency – it suggests a biological solution.
This is how ethnic cleansing becomes palatable within a society; the idea that large scale sterilization, medical intervention, internment or extermination is actually a merciful act to the group targeted. Or simply that the targeted demographic is believed to be “not really human” and therefore, outside the consideration of human rights questions.
In 1996 Gregory H. Stanton prepared a document for the US State Department called The 8 Stages of Genocide[4].
In the document’s introduction, Stanton stated :
“Genocide is a process that develops in eight stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process. “
Stanton’s outline difers in it’s scope from the phenomenon of cultural misandry. In his paper, he focused on rising hatred within an individual society; within the context of the global community not following the path described. This differs from the escalating hatred of men in that the ideology of male hatred has growing dominance around the world, and is not limited to a small set of nation states or region.
Stanton’s identified stages are Classification, Symbolization, Dehumanization, Organization, Polarization, Preparation, Extermination, and Denial.
The trend towards male vilification as a product of natural biology – as typified by recent writing by Wente and Katz suggests our culture is in stage 3, which is Dehumanization. Biological solutions to the claimed biological evil of masculinity can be speculated, including legally mandated drugging, chemical sterilization, or tracking through RFID technologies.
At this point, I expect skeptical readers to speculate that my aluminum foil hat is too tight, and that is a reasonable reaction. Which is why I will mention the fact that ideological feminism is a non-local movement with currency in all western nations. In India[5] and Indonesia[6] – commuter trains have reserved cars for women only, but no such trains for men only. In fact, men who accidentally enter these reserved spaces are ritually humiliated and beaten in public. One man was thrown by guards[7] from a moving train sustaining life threatening injuries. This is unquestionably apartheid, exactly the same phenomena which international humanitarian organizations fought against for a decade prior to South Africa ended the practice in 1994. A law is presently proposed under which Indian wives will be paid by the government to beat their husbands[8] in public, with the payment escalating depending on the severity of the beating.
In Turkey, men are barred from attending soccer matches[9]. Rather than international protest at this new manifestation of apartheid, “humanitarian” organizations are cheering. If the argument that the majority of unruly spectators are men is a valid justification, why not stop child abuse by barring mothers from child-care.
Far from doing anything so egregious. The statistics showing female relatives as the principal perpetrators of child abuse in the 2008 Department of health and Human Services report on child maltreatment were removed from the Health and Human Services website[10]. The updated report for 2009 shows the same data re-classified identifying the relationship of victim to abuser as simply “Parent.” Elsewhere in the 2009 report victim relationship to abuser is included, although this table lists “Father” at the top of the table, while data indicates mothers as the principal offenders.
However, nobody is calling for the banning of mothers from contact with their children. Because it would be as absurd as banning man from attending soccer matches based solely on sexual profiling.
In England, the labour national labour party ran an all-party convention which expressly forbade men from attending. This too is unquestionably apartheid. In the UK, a proposed change to law would render prison for female offenders a relic of the past, replaced with state funded housing, education and therapy. In Canada – female murderers, when convicted are mandated by the provincial court of Ontario to be charged under the lesser crime of infanticide. When women are found guilty in criminal courts, they are given lesser sentences through informal favour in the courts, but this is increasingly being formalized. One reading of the law for women, another for men. The modern word privilege has its origin in the latin phrase meaning; private law for or against a specific person.
In Stanton’s catalog, which he prepared on behalf of US Congress to assist in the avoidance of mass killings in failed states, the step after Dehumanization is Organization. From Stanton’s document, “Genocide is always organized, usually by the state”.
Where are we on Gregory H. Stanton’s 8 step program? The author himself asserted that the stages are not strictly linear, and we’re also observing a phenomenon transcending national and regional boundaries. Does the tin-foil hat still fit?
One of the difficulties in writing about this phenomenon is the temptation to comparison with a specific european nation’s social transformation between the third and fourth decades of the twentieth century. Id suggest that while there are some similarities the present trend of masculine disenfranchisement has a different character. In particular, this is a world-wide phenomena, and is not occurring in a single region relatively isolated from a (relatively) sane world community. The other major difference being that cooperation and adherence to male despising ideology must continue to encompass most men for escalated apartheid to continue.
Cracks in the foundation are already appearing. The increasing mainstream adoption of men’s rights rhetoric is one such crack. The marriage strike is another noticeable sign of times changing in western nations, and the startling and game changing emergence of Japan’s version of zeta masculinity – the “ soushoku danshi” – or grass eating boys.
Western media paints these men opting out of traditional expectations as if they’re weak, but I read it differently. They’re Going Their Own Way, and giving not a single toss for anyone’s opinion. That sounds like strength to me. They’re also becoming the dominant model for masculinity in Japan, with 60% of men between 20 and 30 years old self identifying as “grass eating boys.”
This is disastrous for economies which depend on male competition for wealth, status and female access. It may – if it continues to grow – lead to the collapse of nation states. If that happens, big box feminism, which depends on chivalry and on state funding and enforcement – will collapse as well.
Western media has continued to characterize the trend of male self actualization of men unplugging from traditional “provide- protect-disposable-man” as a failure. Hymowitz’sChild Man in the Promised Land and Kimmel’s Guyland being prime examples of attempts to induce compliance with male disposability through public derision.
Sadly, for Kimmel and Hymowitz – men stepping off the treadmill are not merely the failed competitors detractors pretend, they’re men who’ve evaluated the available options for acceptable masculinity and have selected “none of the above.” Shaming based on conformance to a model of male disposability does not work on men who value themselves as humans.
In Japan, Grass Eaters are indifferent to attempts to force compliance by ridicule, and a healthier attitude is hard to contemplate. This is close to what practicing Buddhists pursue as a state of grace – un-attachment. In the decidedly non Buddhist West however, an increasing population of men adopting a zeta definition of self might be considerably less tolerant of the increasingly shrill mainstream’s effort to extract money, and force compliance. I predict it will be an interesting time.
[1] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7279/full/nature08711.html
[2] http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2009/12/08/tech-biology-testosterone-behaviour.html
[3] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20976-domestic-violence-gets-evolutionary-explanation.html
[4] http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html
[5] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8165976/Men-caught-in-women-only-train-carriage-forced-to-do-sit-ups.html
[6] http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/08/28/womenonly-train-service.html
[7] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-15/kolkata/28244162_1_constable-ladies-compartment-train
[8] http://www.deccanherald.com/content/193470/pati-patni-ten-thousand.html
[9] http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/men-banned-from-turkey-soccer-grounds-in-bid-to-stop-violence/story-e6frg7mf-1226142614442
[10] http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/cm08.pdf
You see gentlemen, you are not merely stupid, misguided, culturally stunted reprobates, you’re biologically flawed, innately broken bad-people. So says Margaret Wente, whose journalism and english literature degrees make her an “expert” on human biology and male psychology. (not really)
Wente’s recent article on the Canadian national news site theglobeandmail.com decries the recent increased availability of hormone replacement therapies for aging men. In a population of aging baby boomers – parallel treatments for women have been widely promoted for more than a decade – but obviously, when men are the target demographic for hormone based aging treatments, its a very very bad thing. After all, everybody knows testosterone is the source of all greed and violence in the world.
Everybody knows this, with the exception of those who actually study it[1]. The conclusions of actual research on the impact of testosterone on human behavior indicates “Testosterone doesn’t cause people to become aggressive or risky as many people believe but actually encourages fairness”. [2]
However, Margaret Wente isn’t letting inconvenient facts get in the way of a good story. In the world of commonly believed falsehood, testosterone is the core of male identity. That means violence and aggression is the core of masculinity, at least, according to Wente, whose journalism and literature degree makes her an obvious expert in behavioural psychology.
Starting from a foundation built on cultural myth, Wente builds a case for the innate biological inferiority of the sex whose energy, creativity and drive have levered humanity into a modern, clean, well fed civilization.
Wente continues her attack on masculinity with the bland declaration that “testosterone is implicated in the world’s financial woes.” As a subscriber to several financial newsletters, this is new on me, but I wont dispute that maleness is implicated in all the world’s woes by ideologues re-packaging cultural biases under the false pretence that hatred is backed up by data. According to our expert on matters masculine and economic:
“Perhaps you’ve noticed that not a single woman was involved with the reckless speculation that led to the debacle of 2008.” Being male, and therefore, inferior – I hadn’t noticed that no women at all work in the service sectors of finance and banking, but now I know – It was all because of testosterone.
Unsatisfied with her own professional expertise on masculine psychology and sexual biology, Wente relies on a former investment banker to deliver the knowledge that “Testosterone is the molecule that explains irrational exuberance”. Hysterical female Justin Bieber fans are clearly suffering from testosterone poisoning.
DEAR LORD, SOMEBODY HELP THEM!
Wente concludes her piece with a quote from a white knight author of yet another best-selling “women are better than men” book. “Women have only 10 per cent of the testosterone that men have. But they probably have 210 per cent of the judgment.”What’s interesting in the weak pseudo-science behind this article’s hate is that it focuses almost entirely on biology to vilify masculine identity. There is none of the: “you bad men would be better with some re-education” – which I’m paraphrasing from other men-are-bad feminist agitprop.
Wendy Zukerman’s New-Scientist piece on the evolutionary roots of domestic violence[3] is explicit in excluding consideration of female offenders. Zuckerman opens with some reasonable concerns that her cited researchers at University of Texas in Austin and Stockton College of New Jersey makes simplistic assumptions. However, in the following paragraph notes only the number of female reports of domestic violence – a large number with no comparison or context.
Another men-are-bad article on the Huffington Post by prostrate male feminist David Katz makes a more oblique , but equally vacuous swipe at biology as the source of masculine evil. His article can be found by googling “The Biological Basis for Behaving Badly.” A bold bit of alliteration by Katz, but the biological approach to claiming man-equals-bad has an interesting tactical component. Within civil rights movements, claims by racist organizations of biological inferiority, or superiority between ethnic demographics are among the most egregious approaches to demonizing a population, because if the idea gains currency – it suggests a biological solution.
This is how ethnic cleansing becomes palatable within a society; the idea that large scale sterilization, medical intervention, internment or extermination is actually a merciful act to the group targeted. Or simply that the targeted demographic is believed to be “not really human” and therefore, outside the consideration of human rights questions.
In 1996 Gregory H. Stanton prepared a document for the US State Department called The 8 Stages of Genocide[4].
In the document’s introduction, Stanton stated :
“Genocide is a process that develops in eight stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process. “
Stanton’s outline difers in it’s scope from the phenomenon of cultural misandry. In his paper, he focused on rising hatred within an individual society; within the context of the global community not following the path described. This differs from the escalating hatred of men in that the ideology of male hatred has growing dominance around the world, and is not limited to a small set of nation states or region.
Stanton’s identified stages are Classification, Symbolization, Dehumanization, Organization, Polarization, Preparation, Extermination, and Denial.
The trend towards male vilification as a product of natural biology – as typified by recent writing by Wente and Katz suggests our culture is in stage 3, which is Dehumanization. Biological solutions to the claimed biological evil of masculinity can be speculated, including legally mandated drugging, chemical sterilization, or tracking through RFID technologies.
At this point, I expect skeptical readers to speculate that my aluminum foil hat is too tight, and that is a reasonable reaction. Which is why I will mention the fact that ideological feminism is a non-local movement with currency in all western nations. In India[5] and Indonesia[6] – commuter trains have reserved cars for women only, but no such trains for men only. In fact, men who accidentally enter these reserved spaces are ritually humiliated and beaten in public. One man was thrown by guards[7] from a moving train sustaining life threatening injuries. This is unquestionably apartheid, exactly the same phenomena which international humanitarian organizations fought against for a decade prior to South Africa ended the practice in 1994. A law is presently proposed under which Indian wives will be paid by the government to beat their husbands[8] in public, with the payment escalating depending on the severity of the beating.
In Turkey, men are barred from attending soccer matches[9]. Rather than international protest at this new manifestation of apartheid, “humanitarian” organizations are cheering. If the argument that the majority of unruly spectators are men is a valid justification, why not stop child abuse by barring mothers from child-care.
Far from doing anything so egregious. The statistics showing female relatives as the principal perpetrators of child abuse in the 2008 Department of health and Human Services report on child maltreatment were removed from the Health and Human Services website[10]. The updated report for 2009 shows the same data re-classified identifying the relationship of victim to abuser as simply “Parent.” Elsewhere in the 2009 report victim relationship to abuser is included, although this table lists “Father” at the top of the table, while data indicates mothers as the principal offenders.
However, nobody is calling for the banning of mothers from contact with their children. Because it would be as absurd as banning man from attending soccer matches based solely on sexual profiling.
In England, the labour national labour party ran an all-party convention which expressly forbade men from attending. This too is unquestionably apartheid. In the UK, a proposed change to law would render prison for female offenders a relic of the past, replaced with state funded housing, education and therapy. In Canada – female murderers, when convicted are mandated by the provincial court of Ontario to be charged under the lesser crime of infanticide. When women are found guilty in criminal courts, they are given lesser sentences through informal favour in the courts, but this is increasingly being formalized. One reading of the law for women, another for men. The modern word privilege has its origin in the latin phrase meaning; private law for or against a specific person.
In Stanton’s catalog, which he prepared on behalf of US Congress to assist in the avoidance of mass killings in failed states, the step after Dehumanization is Organization. From Stanton’s document, “Genocide is always organized, usually by the state”.
Where are we on Gregory H. Stanton’s 8 step program? The author himself asserted that the stages are not strictly linear, and we’re also observing a phenomenon transcending national and regional boundaries. Does the tin-foil hat still fit?
One of the difficulties in writing about this phenomenon is the temptation to comparison with a specific european nation’s social transformation between the third and fourth decades of the twentieth century. Id suggest that while there are some similarities the present trend of masculine disenfranchisement has a different character. In particular, this is a world-wide phenomena, and is not occurring in a single region relatively isolated from a (relatively) sane world community. The other major difference being that cooperation and adherence to male despising ideology must continue to encompass most men for escalated apartheid to continue.
Cracks in the foundation are already appearing. The increasing mainstream adoption of men’s rights rhetoric is one such crack. The marriage strike is another noticeable sign of times changing in western nations, and the startling and game changing emergence of Japan’s version of zeta masculinity – the “ soushoku danshi” – or grass eating boys.
Western media paints these men opting out of traditional expectations as if they’re weak, but I read it differently. They’re Going Their Own Way, and giving not a single toss for anyone’s opinion. That sounds like strength to me. They’re also becoming the dominant model for masculinity in Japan, with 60% of men between 20 and 30 years old self identifying as “grass eating boys.”
This is disastrous for economies which depend on male competition for wealth, status and female access. It may – if it continues to grow – lead to the collapse of nation states. If that happens, big box feminism, which depends on chivalry and on state funding and enforcement – will collapse as well.
Western media has continued to characterize the trend of male self actualization of men unplugging from traditional “provide- protect-disposable-man” as a failure. Hymowitz’sChild Man in the Promised Land and Kimmel’s Guyland being prime examples of attempts to induce compliance with male disposability through public derision.
Sadly, for Kimmel and Hymowitz – men stepping off the treadmill are not merely the failed competitors detractors pretend, they’re men who’ve evaluated the available options for acceptable masculinity and have selected “none of the above.” Shaming based on conformance to a model of male disposability does not work on men who value themselves as humans.
In Japan, Grass Eaters are indifferent to attempts to force compliance by ridicule, and a healthier attitude is hard to contemplate. This is close to what practicing Buddhists pursue as a state of grace – un-attachment. In the decidedly non Buddhist West however, an increasing population of men adopting a zeta definition of self might be considerably less tolerant of the increasingly shrill mainstream’s effort to extract money, and force compliance. I predict it will be an interesting time.
[1] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7279/full/nature08711.html
[2] http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2009/12/08/tech-biology-testosterone-behaviour.html
[3] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20976-domestic-violence-gets-evolutionary-explanation.html
[4] http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html
[5] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8165976/Men-caught-in-women-only-train-carriage-forced-to-do-sit-ups.html
[6] http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/08/28/womenonly-train-service.html
[7] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-15/kolkata/28244162_1_constable-ladies-compartment-train
[8] http://www.deccanherald.com/content/193470/pati-patni-ten-thousand.html
[9] http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/men-banned-from-turkey-soccer-grounds-in-bid-to-stop-violence/story-e6frg7mf-1226142614442
[10] http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/cm08.pdf
