The Reality Blog

One does have to wonder if feminism does actually breed stupidity as we already are aware of the fact that cognitive dissonance is a requirement for membership as that allows you to partake in the "groupthink" mentality. Not normally attributed to rational thinking human beings but quite "normal for feminist's doublethink( refer George Orwell's 1984 for more information) mentality..

Allow me to give an example of cognitive dissonance..

 Martin was told that she would attract unwanted attention from men and her safety was at risk.

Knowing ofcourse how easily these feminists are offended and also feel the need to moan and bitch about irrelevances, we have this CD female complaining that she was not permitted to walk around in her underwear. Obviously, it did not dawn on her victimhood mentality that maybe it was probably not that great an idea as the security dude informed her..
Feeling victimised is another emotion that feminists encourage and ofcourse this female having read all those appropriate paragraphs in women's studies, would have known that being a victim, any type of victim, for any unperceived impost was apparently quite valid for this privileged princess, "I just want to walk in my underwear because I protested last week that I wanted to dress like a slut" did apparently not dawn on the security service either..

As was the case when that constable in Canada that dressing like a slut may not be a good idea and would attract the attention that you may not want, was the same advice this child received and like the previous example, feminists got all hyperventilated and suffered an attack of the vapours, with no smelling salts on hand..

Toronto woman told to put her top on'Plain normal black bra not okay' 

CBC News Posted: Aug 9, 2011 5:59 PM ET  

Back to accessibility linksJeanette Martin enjoys herself at Toronto's annual beer festival. A short time after this photo was taken security officials told her to put her shirt back on
More than two decades after a woman from Guelph, Ont., won the right to take off her shirt in public, a Toronto woman is complaining that organizers at a local beer festival told her it wasn't allowed.
Jeanette Martin was at the annual Toronto beer gathering on Sunday when she took up a dare from one of her friends and took off her shirt. She was wearing a bra but apparently that wasn't enough for organizers.
"Within 10 seconds flat I had a security guard telling me to put my top back on or else I'd be escorted out of the grounds," Martin told CBC News.
Martin was told that she would attract unwanted attention from men and her safety was at risk."I didn't feel unsafe," she said. "I just wanted to be comfortable."
Martin said she was shocked. "Hot pink string bikinis are okay — a plain normal black bra is not okay."
The incident comes 20 years after Gwen Jacobs took off her shirt while walking in Guelph on a 33 C day. Jacobs, who was not wearing a bra, took her fight all the way to Ontario's Court of Appeal where she was vindicated.
The court struck down a lower court ruling.
In part, the Appeal Court decision said "there was nothing degrading or dehumanizing in what the appellant did. The scope of her activity was limited and was entirely non-commercial. No one who was offended was forced to continue looking at her."
Since that 1996 decision it has been legal for women to remove their tops in public in Ontario.
Martin said the people who told her to cover up were looking at the problem the wrong way.
"Deal with the guys if there is a problem," she said, "but don't come over and pre-emptively tell me that I'm going to start a problem."
"This is the reason we have events like SlutWalk now — to bring attention to the fact that we're not just sexual beings, we're just out having a good time."
Martin's not sure why she got so much attention at the beer fest. The security team apologized and she's had lots of support, even from her parents.
"I actually think they'll be very proud of me for standing up for my rights — and it is an issue of rights for women to be able to do this without being sexualized," Martin said. http://www.cbc.ca/ne...ess-martin.html

Give me a "YouGoGirrrllll"..
Another for the "Women are not violent" file as this canard that feminist ignorantly promote once again demonstrates their "economical with the truth" ability. Their other canard is ofcourse that "women do not lie about rape" and we already have plenty of information, facts and studies which demonstrates clearly that feminists are just plain liars. Feminists have demonstrated already that lying is just a consequence of their efforts at utilising oxygen and thereby it can only be regarded an automatic involuntary muscular response..

from Dr. Tara's site (Shrink 4 Men)..

Woman Physically Assaults Judge During Divorce Hearing
On July 13, 2011, Melissa Harvick, a Wayne County, Kentucky woman, attempted to physically assault Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards during a domestic violence hearing for a complaint filed by Harvick’s estranged husband.
Harvick received the contempt order and accompanying 10-day jail sentence from Judge Edwards because she talked over her ex and continuously interrupted him and the judge during the proceedings.
Upon receiving the contempt order and jail sentence, Harvick leapt over the bench at Judge Edwards. Three deputies were required to restrain Harvick and remove her from the courtroom.
WKYT reports:
Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards was hearing a domestic violence complaint against Melissa Harvick from her estranged husband.
“Things have been escalating since the first of the year,” the woman’s ex-husband is heard saying in the courtroom recording, obtained by 27 NEWSFIRST.
Not long after that is said, Harvick is both seen and heard arguing with the judge.
“That’s got nothing to do with it,” said Harvick during the July 13 family court hearing, referring to her estranged husband’s comments about their personal life.
“Ms. Harvick, you will be held in contempt of court,” Judge Edwards told Harvick, after several profanities were said by Harvick.
“I don’t care. I haven’t done anything to this court,” Harvick said. “Haven’t done anything to him.”
“She’ll be held in contempt,” said Judge Edwards.
Harvick is then seen jumping over the bench, in what appears to be an attempt to physically attack Judge Edwards.
Three deputies are then seen grabbing Harvick and pushing her to the floor. She was then taken away in handcuffs, allegedly threatening the judge as she was being taken out of the courtroom.
“You’ll be sad when it happens, Jennifer!” Harvick is heard saying.
Harvick is in jail on contempt of court charges now, but officials say more will be added.
Harvick seemed to feel empowered enough by the judicial system to argue with a judge, to physically attack a judge and then, as she was being forcibly dragged from the courtroom, to threaten a judge.
Wow. Wonder who created this Frankenstein’s monster?
Here’s some video of the kerfuffle:

The Truth Will Set You Free: Women are More Sexual..

The above statement was met with quite a few dissenting comments as some are of the opinion that it's only men who fancy a roll in the hay and that women are basically in the position of either taking it or leaving it. Some would even go so far as to say that the wedding cake was the number one deterrent of sexual favours after slipping on the ring..

Let's have a look as some generalities regarding female sexual behaviour and then see which way she really looks at and behaves towards sex..

Here is an excerpt from some of Marc Rudov's Books..

Myth #1: Women don’t like or need sex as much as men do. It is laughable how many men and women actually believe this myth. Worse is when they insist on clinging to it. Let me tell you that healthy women—those without emotional hangups or medical problems—definitely like and need sex as much as their male counterparts; often their cravings supersede those of men. On one hand, many demonstrative women have told me that men they had dated rejected them for being too sexually expressive.

On the other hand is the woman involved with a secure man, who encourages her, perhaps for the first time in her life, to be as free as she wants to be—emotionally and physically. Frequently, this woman was raised to be sexually passive or even to believe that sex is bad, and she expends a lot of energy in the act of self-repression. After behaving uninhibitedly, “like a man,” she almost cannot believe the difference and is never again the same. Numerous times I have witnessed this sudden metamorphosis first-hand, usually hearing the refrain: “Yes, my mother was definitely wrong! Why did I wait so many years to experience this?”

Now, we hear almost daily from anthropologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed psychotherapists, so-called life coaches, movies, books, magazines, TV, radio, parents, friends, lovers, and standup comics that men and women are wired differently and hopelessly incompatible. We are coached to accept, embrace, and gingerly navigate these differences. Nonsense, I say. If you believe this propaganda, you are part of the problem.

1. If in doubt that women are not that interested in sex then why is there a major world market for vibrators ?

Meet the Tri-Phoria, created by the condom company Trojan after a 2008 study with the Center for Sexual Health Promotion at Indiana University revealed that over half of American women had used vibrators,

And also this. Just to demonstrate that dildos are not a new phenomenon as they have been around for quite a few years..

The world's oldest known dildo is a siltstone 20-centimeter phallus from the Upper Palaeolithic period 30,000 years ago that was found in Hohle Fels Cave near Ulm Germany.^[10] Findings of the archaeologists show that ancient Egyptians used dildos 2,500 years ago. Also, these sex toys were known to the ancient Greeks and sometimes depicted in art (see Dildos in Culture).

Sex toys for women are a huge market as the sales for this ONE outlet grossed over 5 Million dollars in one year..

Dr. Berman, a prominent sex and relationship expert, also has a line of sex toys (drlauraberman.com), which she said grossed $5 million in 2010, up from $100,000 in 2005. After one appearance on “Oprah” that focused on adult women who had problems climaxing, one of her top-selling products, the Aphrodite, “was back-ordered forever,

2. If women are not that into sex than why the number of prostitutes ?

Women Are Sex MachinesOpen the nightstand drawer of almost every woman; what will you find? A vibrator. It’s not for mixing concrete. If she just wants to be held and cuddled, while all he wants is sex, why does she own a vibrator? You figure it out.
Listen to stories about raunchy bachelorette parties, replete with sex toys, sex games, and one-night stands. It sounds so romantic, doesn’t it?
Ask women the main reason they cheat on their boyfriends and husbands: better sex. That’s right. Better sex. Women can’t get enough of it — but they won’t readily admit it.
Cosmopolitan advises women never to settle for “action” that’s less than amazing — and they don’t mean betting on sports teams.
Getting the picture? Women are sex machines, more sexual than men — a source of great embarrassment to many — as I teach in my book, Under the Clitoral Hood.

Name me one instance of either yourself or anyone you know who had a relationship with a female who did not indulge in consensual sexual activity once they bonded ?

Also, why do women always show plenty of skin at any or every opportunity apart from demanding attention plus why is that attention demanded if it's not for sex ?

If the truth about female sexuality were to become common knowledge, the economy would collapse to depths never seen — as men’s magazines, ladies’ nights, Valentine’s Day, wining/dining, and engagement rings would be history. We can’t have that! Nope. People will cling to the false beliefs that reinforce their current lifestyles.

So who is the bigger sucker then ?