Male feminists suffer from that same cognitive dissonance their female counterparts suffer from and I sometimes tend to think that their condition may actually be worse. A male feminist and mammary specialist clone, HannibalBarca  do actually believe that inane drivel they promote..

In order to put their ranting into perspective, JTO will demonstrate precisely what level of hypocrisy those liars generate, as well as showing how totally incompetent and irrelevant they really are..

JTO..

In an attempt to win the favor of amoral fact-deprived imbeciles who can't tell an argument from an assertion, dave futrelle's ugly twin brother HannibalBarca craps his pants while following in the greasy footsteps of the now discredited SPLC.

On Monday March 19, during the AVfM Radio show with Paul Elam and Dr Tara Palmatier, a listener in the show's chatroom advocated violence as a solution to personal disputes, affording the show's hosts, Paul and Dr T to demonstrate on a live show just how much patience the mens movement has for violence or its advocacy.

Male feminists just cannot come to terms with the fact that they are just not wanted in that male hating movement, but they just refuse to take the next step. That I presume would not be an option as they grovel for position in that hegemony. It is all extremely confusing, witnessing this disgusting behaviour and coming to grips with it. Again, I just cannot understand how a so called rational mind can behave in this fashion. It really is beyond my capacity and I don't mind admitting it..

I can relate to Alcuin's explanation of the male feminist and their need for acceptance by the female sex. They actually remind me of Elliot's wish at being "The most sensitive man in the world"in Bedazzled.

One can also imagine a male feminist as being one of those overweight, scruffy malcontents, stumbling blindly down some darkened back street, staying in the shade, using chopping motions with their hands and muttering to themselves, secretly ofcourse, so no one else can be party to their imaginary revelations.  Being of the opinion that only they have been given the insight into feminism's Utopia, their holy grail and only they are the select few, proudly chosen to determine it's outcome, it's inevitable theoretical destination and they will be proudly counted as the semi elect, appointed to the position of altar boy in subservience to their high priestesses..

Affirming

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: One of the more irritating things about the matriarchy is the endless stream of manginas trying to talk some matriarchal sense into you, peacocking their own politically correct horseshit in front of the staffroom Frauen.

These men are desperate for outer affirmation, so try to get qualified as a feminist. One way they do that is with the this is what a feminist looks like game, where they publicly build their feminist portfolios through public shaming of men like you and me, men who don't need that same level of affirmation.

Public humiliation is not to be considered as a negative to their enlightened mindset. They are the blessed, they are the chosen, not bypassed as they eagerly volunteered their services by enhancing their cognitive dissonance levels, suitably enhanced to entertain their delusional lofty positions..

First, they are hungry for affirmation because they have the personality of a woman and therefore need some outer force or authority telling them what's what. While we all need this at times and to a certain extent, these guys need it as much as women do rather than the occasional pat on the back.

Second, they were brought up in a feminized environment, and tend to see the woman's point of view rather than their own. They have been brainwashed by the feminist educational system, in other words. Or traumatized. Masculine men, non-compliants, make them uneasy.

Third, they like to talk about their feelings about as much as women do. They particularly love the intoxication of getting angry over some cause. They crave that anger like the lassies do. They want and need the sanctimony. These guys have little on the inside, so fill it with emotions. Notice that emotional types tend not to be big thinkers, though they think of themselves as such. Instead of reasoning through a problem or a belief, they emote and sentimentalize their way through, which leads to useless or childish conclusions.

One can be left in no doubt at all that they are happy and content in their newly appointed positions, they no longer have to behave like a man but only be the pretend version, as long as it is interspersed with Elliot's sensitivity factor and continual obeisance to the female superior. Wishing above all that they will assume the female psyche just like they did back in the Hellenistic period.  They too will be able to assuage the Hellenistic personification of the soul of female, just like they have always dreamed and fantasized..
What ofcourse they do not realise or even comprehend is that there is a different aspect to their groveling abeyance..

The ladies sit back and chuckle to themselves, both at the loser they've manipulated into fighting their fight even though he gains only in his own mind, and at the man presently between the pathetic sights of the peacock.

The self absorption of the male feminist is that intense that they have failed to listen to the command of their masters, their very own feminist female leaders, who have repeatedly informed them to "fecke" off. But their only response is in their in utter disbelieve as they mutter "Hugo", as if that would have some magic affect. They hope they can use that chant to castaway any negatives they may have witnessed their masters have already undertaken. But it won't work, it's just not working, as that echo rebounds and only reminds them where they actually stand in the Matriarchy.. 

Fifth, being second-hand means being a useful idiot, because some puppeteer is pulling the strings. These guys like being the furniture mover for die Frauen because they believe in chivalry. Again, it's about shaky identity: I'm a nice guy, they need to tell themselves - even though, in fact, they practice knifing other men, strong self-formative men, in the back, and in public as part of their public campaign to belong to the cause.

The back-stabbing highlights the lack of honor they have, the fifth reason these guys are like this. A mangina has no honor. Matriarchy has no honor.

They will be remembered and history will align them to others of equal behaviour and treat them with that same disgust, distaste and repugnance..

Might want to add this to a list of illegal activities whilst driving..

I find it amazing that we have heard very little regarding the request by radical feminists to kick all male feminists to the kerb. As I have no particular fondness of those male traitors, It appears to be a reasonable request. I mean, when you are addicted to a philosophy that demands that all men are scum, in the Scum Manifesto sense. Where it demands that all males on this planet be regarded as vermin, in that context, radical feminists are really only acting according to their inner enlightenment. In reality, what else could they possibly say. One decision obviously encourages the next, it's simple really. It's akin to Garbage Collectors or should that be Garbioligists (that job description went south as it was indeed a  bit like, you know , too trashy, ahem!) a name introduced by those politically correct infidels determined to rename all and sundry.Those same infidels then failed to comprehend that there would   be a backlog of rubbish piling up but then commence complaining about that rubbish..

It was that same mentality the radfem's faced and it was simple to just foist that same mentality onto all men and the elimination of all men, including male feminists ofcourse. But the problem with that request was that they would in return have no breeding stock to ensure only females(murder the males) were incubated in order to grow their Utopia, that also meant,  in order to fulfill their version, the complete and total razing of everything, buildings and all (I am not quite sure where they will house the 3.9Bil yet). Their total hypocrisy and it demonstrates exactly how their mentality works, is the fact they would have to have some sperm donors. Now in their moment of brilliance, they decide that "Alpha Males" would have to be preserved for that privilege, tamed by force and indoctrinated ofcourse, kept around as they actually realised that Alpha Males are the preferred sperm donors option, female  intuition at work again. I have explained that level of cognitive dissonance before I think, that mentality that feminists generally rely on to justify their lunacy..

So we have on one side of their much thought out argument, that all men need to be removed from the planet but on the other side of that same coin, they would require to keep Alpha Males around to be able to breed with the remaining women. Yes I know. But apparently it makes sense to them, we the unbleached, unwashed and rational members of the human race just don't get it. They do not consider themselves to be the end product of several conditions that one would find on the Psychology Today website, their severe conditions requires treatment, but that's another study. Again, that is not obvious to radical feminists..

On my travels on this planet among the myriad of people whom I have met, been involved with, in conversation and worked with. I have yet to meet an Alpha Male who would consider their wish as a viable option. Most, if not the majority of Alpha Males are self reliant, solid and no-nonsense individuals, who would not even spare a minutiae of thought on this triviality, yet entertain any idea of being dominated by any female, let alone a radical feminist version, as in the majority of cases, the women they automatically attract, line up at their door just for some attention and in return offer whatever they want. They pick and choose whoever they want and are not limited in any way. They have no time to accommodate the wet dreams of radical feminists, let alone be held prisoner by them just to be used as breeding stock. They would take over in no time at all and have them so wound around their finger that they would not have time to breathe, let alone carry out their "female superiority/majority fetish"..

It is just so laughable and impracticable, one can only glance at this type of dreaming as being the ludicrous nonsense that it really is..

I had the fortunate experience of working with one fine example a few years ago on a one year contract as a consultant. This Alpha was a millionaire in his own right, an individual focused and fixated on doing everything right and in order, which is where I came in. He had a string of customers of which quite a few were women, who would fawn over him and practice their well honed flirting procedures with abandon even though the majority were married. It was a sheer joy watching him operate. He had a huge selection of females in his little black book who were always on call, regardless of the notice and would erase any who did not comply. He would go out on about three nights a week with a different female, so let's do some sums --

Those radicals want to dispose of 70% of all males and keep 30% Alphas as breeding stock. So in today's figures we are looking at about 900 Million (3Bil Men @ 30%, Simplified 10% @ 3Bil=300Mil x 3).

One Alpha @ 3 females per week = 144 per year, means 6,250,000 Alphas would complete their quota in one year. Now try and convince me those girls would not be eating out of their hands in no time at all, lead the revolt and eliminate those radfems for screwing up their pleasure, and totally eliminate the rafems's Utopian dream. Easily..

It's back to the drawing board..

Which leads me to male feminists and their assumption at being the possible future breeding stock and I ask if you can identify one single male feminist who could be regarded as being within a bulls roar of being an alpha. Show me one who is above the whiny, self absorbed, female worshipping, self delusional stage and wonder if they stand, even a remote possibility of being included as breeding stock. Male feminists are party to, and promoters of, that radical feminist outcome and heartily agree that it should be the outcome. They promote feminism's Utopian concept with all their heart and whining, promoting a male hating doctrine that will eventually, if they get their wish, destroy the majority of males but at the same time demand by their actions, that they should also be part of that  Utopia. They actually stand no chance whatsoever. The writing is on the wall for their own destruction and yet they continue to promote a doctrine that will eventually eliminate themselves..

What does that tell about the mindset of male feminists. Better still, why have they totally ignored the claims made by radical feminists and thereby the general cadre of feminists, concerning their own sex and why have they ignored the wishes of the radical women they so heartily promote..

They have been told to get out, mind their own damn business and told to stop interfering in the serious female feminist business of abuse and annihilation, it's their "female only" hegemony, but yet they persist, ignore their own doctrinal leader's commands and continue their actions like nothing has be stated. They do so at their own risk. I wonder if the radfems will commence their actions against them first by eliminating them from the planet, now there is a thought and it should be something they should consider. Being eliminated by the same members of the doctrine they fawn over has a certain level of justice as well as immense irony attached, does it not..

It should also indicate how serious those radical feminists really are..

Where does one start with the whole disaster that is the biased and bigoted Wikipedia..

Wikipedia has been demonstrated to be edited, manipulated and overrun by feminists and their enablers. I can remember reading an article that stated they had college "females"feminist students editing Wikipedia and from a feminist perspective. So I wondered if that was either true or just imagined..

The topic I checked was MRA. An obvious topic for the misandric, delusional and bigoted feminists to wallow in and make some spurious claims instead of being unbiased and concentrate solely on that subject. One would imagine that to be the case..

Counter Feminist

Meet Michael Flood -- Anti-Male Scumbag

Michael Flood : Fraudster and Liar..

It would appear that a male feminist, Michael Flood, whose name has been associated with the SCUM Manifesto Conference participants. Flood was caught using a Father's Rights Site to try and coerce politicians to ignore Father's Rights Issue of equal parenting rights by making spurious and unfounded remarks about their motives. Flood used their mailing lists under the false guise of helping, used a different name and was caught out by the site's owner, who confronted him about the issue. This is how   male feminists work and this same individual is located at one of the same Universities that trained and educated the same radical feminists who have lectured and attended the SCUM Manifesto Conference in Perth, Western Australia in September 2011.

It goes without saying that Dr Michael Flood cannot be trusted, he has a specific bias towards radical feminism and it's male-hate, male-destroying agenda..

5. Men's Studies, Men in academia

(Excerpted from The Men's Bibliography: A comprehensive bibliography of writing on men, masculinities, gender, and sexualities, compiled by Michael Flood. 19th edition, 2008. Home URL: http://mensbiblio.xyonline.net/)

What Flood has done is introduce his biased, sexist, feminist, male hating book list and introduced it into Wikipedia and placed it into the MRA section. Anyone who edits Wikipedia listings should  remove that entry as it has absolutely nothing to do with MRA activities or actions. It is just another attempt by feminists to introduce their slanderous male bashing books into an area that is nothing of their concern..

Comment from Jovan B.

You are right about anti-porn activists wanting to take away our porn. What you fail to mention is the fact that fewer and fewer feminists support a total ban of porn. And then, I gotta get to this and pick apart the lies. 1. Men’s on the job death rate: 97% True. 2. Men’s shorter life expectancy [+- 5 years depending on country ] True. 3. Selective military service True. 4. Exclusion of consideration in anti-violence PSAs - LIE. 5. Exclusion of protection of legal due process - Another LIE. 6. Routine depiction in media as inferior humans - LIE again. 7. Discrimination by businesses catering to women only - LIE again. 8. Routine male-vilifying falsehood promoted by government - LIE #5. 9. Routine male-vilifying falsehood promoted by charitable organizations - LIE #6. 10. Promotion and endorsement of male-targeting rape by prison system - LIE #7. 11. Treatment of male sexual victimization as comedy - Mostly true, but patriarchy is to blame for this. 12. Culture-wide prioritization of rescue resources away from men (women and children first) - LIE #8. 13. Female dominance and affirmative action in education - LIE #9. 14. School-endorsed hate rallies in major universities - LIE #10. 15. Male targeting murder-advocacy - LIE #11. 16. Male targeting eugenics advocacy - LIE #12. 17. Anti-male hatred promoted openly by online communities - LIE #13. 18. Mainstream television’s celebration of male-targeted sexual mutilation - LIE #14. 19. Female cosmetics industry use of male infant mutilation in beauty products - LIE #15. 20. Male-hatred promoted in mainstream clothing design (boys are stupid) - True. You also fail to mention that female-hatred is also promoted in clothing design (i.e. credit card panties for girls, and I'm too pretty to do math/homework). 21. Cultural prohibition and eradication of male space in western society - LIE #16. 22. Murder of male sexual nonconformism (gay bashing, gay murder) - True, but gay bashing and gay murder is NOT limited to just gay men. Lesbians, transgendered people and bisexuals are also killed because of their orientation. 23. Courts ignoring fathers and children in favor of mother’s convenience - LIE #17. 24. Male reproductive responsibilities without rights - LIE #18. 25. Debtors prison for only fathers - LIE #19. 26. 90% of homeless are male / Female focused homeless aid - LIE #20. 27. female-only health initiatives - LIE #21. 21 out of 27 items on this list are lies. And then at least three times did you omit that women are also victims of hatred. Fail, fail, fail.By jovan b. on Dworkin and Wolf both Get it Wrong.. on 11/26/11

This male feminist, like all the others, never bother to back up their arguments with facts. They are of the opinion that, whenever they claim anything to be "untrue" or "lie" then it must be so just because they claim it to be the case..

Anyone wanting factual responses to the denials above only has to Google the information to totally destroy the male feminist's assertions or spend a couple of hundred hours checking this blog as all the information that he refutes is there. Not just my assumptions or opinions but facts from peer reviewed studies plus government department quantifiable information..

Where is the proof, JB. Where are your facts, the real unbiased, non-feminised, untainted facts to back up all those inane and obviously exaggerated, erroneous opinions and assertions..

It was not that long ago when Paul Elam from AVfM debated one of these tunnel visioned enablers and sent him packing as that feminist male could not back up any of his comments or statements without resorting to fictional feminist deconstructed dogma and literature, which has about the same level of truth as the claim that women have reached perfection (special, just like everyone else). Male feminists like JB are not only loathed and hated by feminists as I have demonstrated repeatedly via MP3's and actual feminised female commentary and articles. Not only do they see male feminists as the enemy but they are quite happy to exclude them from any rational (if that's possible) input into the maelstrom of feminist hate and rage against one half of the population. That they do on their own accord

So here we have another one of these loathsome, traitorous and hypocritical examples who comments here under the claim that they have some revelations to expose when in reality, manginas like this have absolutely no credibility at all. Not recognised by female feminists to be of any consequence or any members of his own sex to be taken seriously..

Male feminists are of the opinion that lying and misrepresenting any information, is paramount to speaking the truth, selective opinion is fact. One can only feel pity and repugnance for this type of human being as no one really wants to have anything to do with them. They are a wasted individual, who by choice has decided to promote a male hate doctrine in order to find excess to his fetishes and questionable behaviour. The only reason male feminists exist is to appeal to the female sex in the hope of being excepted while they pursue their "female organ" worshipping fetishes..

With the "credentials" below, he assumes that he will be taken seriously. JB, you are wasting your time commenting on this blog. Your infected thought processes and behaviour dictates that you cannot be taken seriously or to be trusted..

So here is your fifteen minutes of fame..

jovan b.

• Gender: Male
• Astrological Sign: Pisces
• Location: Williston : South Carolina : United States

I am a 2002 graduate of Williston-Elko High School and live in western Barnwell County, 20 miles east of Aiken. I am a nudist, sex-positive feminist man and prog-rock fanatic. Favorite musicians include Dixie Chicks, 

I may on the odd occasion, caste the occasional aspersion at male feminist (oh, alright, I do that quite a bit)  and in that same vein, I do hand out the web's most celebrated award, The "Mangina Award", which recognises the inherited stupidity and hypocrisy those girlie men indulge in. I was so impressed by those traitorous, female worshipping enablers that I even produced an MP3 stating why feminists just loathe the sight of those hypocrites and it would appear that I underestimated that attitude as I have come across even more examples..

Even with my fertile imagination, I could not make this stuff up. They loathe and hate male feminists like they're a plague and wait until you hear the radical feminist version. They literally are taking their life into their own hands. Maybe they should volunteer for another one of those videos they recently made in Sweden (shoot, lick and orgasm). The only problem would be if feminists get their own way, then there won't be any pretending..

They hate them to such a degree they complain about male feminists paying and organising those childish "no accountability" Slut Walks..

The entire saga should make an excellent comedy program where they could justify their sorry excuse of a life and demonstrate precisely how needy they really are..

More SlutWalk Asshattery

BY FCM

Traitors of Men

Traitors of Men is a new blog exposing those male misanthropes who "feel" compelled to stab their own sex in the back under the guidance and direction of female feminists. Those delusional traitors have decided that their own sex is solely responsible for anything that women moan and bitch about. A bit like a child complaining about the cookie jar being empty..
Nothing in my opinion is worse or sets a lower standard for anyone than a male feminist. One fails to comprehend how a male can actually promote anything feminine and pretend to empathise on issue when they would no be able to comprehend how a female mind works, her  thoughts, her acts, I wonder how they would compensate for those monthly events, make them up as well.
They confess to being of one mind with females as feminists, sensing their needs and worries, delving the mysteries of their endless suffering and pain while enduring...(I have to stop there as even I am making myself sick) this whole charade is downright ridiculous..

I can understand why female feminists hate and loathe those female pretenders, those same individuals continually bashing their own sex and one wonders what their reward would really amount to. Do they phone in every week to the NOW Head Office for a customary "good boy", congratulational comment or do they actually personally appear for some gratuitous praise from the same lips who want them dead and gone. Having exposed feminists over the last week recommending that genocide would be a practicable answer to reduce the male population down to anywhere near 10 to 30% of the current  population, may actually cause them some mirth. In their confused state

 ofcourse, they would be spared as they are one of them. The chosen..
They obviously didn't get the memo!..

Traitors of Men..

Josh Jasper: Still Up To His Old Tricks

Back in February, Paul Elam and A Voice For Men rightfully targeted an Iowan feminist stooge named Josh Jasper for creating a disgusting local TV commercial which portrayed baby boys as potential rapists. In response, Jasper claimed that he had "re-evaluated" his core values andpromised to not neglect male victims of violence and abuse in the future.
Not unexpectedly, a cursory glance at his blog reveals that Jasper has failed to live up to his word. In a late September entry, he summarizes the backlash against him like this:
Jasper received literally hundreds of intelligent, reasonable comments criticizing his baby rapist commercial. He chose to ignore every single one of them and instead recounts only "death threats from around the planet". (Somehow, whenever a particular feminist is heavily criticized by men's rights supporters, mysterious, unseen death threats are sure to be involved.) It appears that victim fetishes are not confined only to female feminists.

I started the year receiving death threats from around the planet due to a commercial that I created that spoke of ending men’s violence against women.

H/t Fidelbogen, The Counter Feminist.. 

It would appear that naval gazing Hugo Schwyzer has finally bitten off more than he can chew. This feminist hypocrite bleated about the fact that he shagged some female who got pregnant and SHE decided without proof or DNA test, that her boyfriend is the Father and thereby given wimp boy an opportunity to forgo his responsibility of even identifying the child as his own. Not that he actually gave a damn ofcourse. He thought that was funny and crowed about it on his site..

Not only is it a precondition of being a male feminist to be infected with a severe case of cognitive dissonance but other conditions must also be absent such as honour, dignity, reliability, foresight, responsibility and a copious amount of other characteristics of what makes a man, the man he is. Obviously, male feminists are exempted..

Some comments to Schwyzer's article..(no link)

Here he tries to justify his disgusting stance by introducing the standard feminist strawman argumentation methodology which consists of imaginary and misleading suppositions..

Hugo Schwyzer

Girly-Man Hugo Schwyzer

It’s telling that the atavistic fear of cuckolding still runs so strong in the men’s rights activists. And given that so many of them are associated with the “father’s rights” movement, it’s telling as well that their definition of “father” is so fragile, so contingent, so limited, and so utterly narcissistic.

This feminist clone does appear to have a major issue on his hand as his rant did receive a few responses..

239 Responses to ““Cuckolding is the worst thing that can happen to a man”” and here are some of them..

I’d like to see how you would react if it was a female being similarly deceived about her progeny, future, emotions and fiances by her male partner. 

Anyway, the men’s movement has rejected your position, most of the readers at Jezebel have rejected your position. Rad-fems have dismissed you as a rapist and “just another overprivileged dilettante”. The only support you are get is from Tom, who is another woman firster and some the naive kids that come here with you from your classes.

You Hugo like many feminists are a flat out liar and you go out of your way to misrepresent the mens and father rights movement and its member. I identify as an MRA (we are the real egalitarians, not woman worshipers like you) I was adopted, I have considered bringing another mans child up as my own and I have paid for an other mans abortion, which is the flip side of that I suppose.

I feel the one with narcissistic traits here is you. Your preaching, your judging, your re-framing of your bad behaviour as heroic behaviour, apparent lack of empathy, warping of reality and the truth and need for constant approval from women all point to traits of personality disorder.

I just don’t want my life to be based on a lie, why is that bad? Yes, I have insecurities. So what? Men can have fears and insecurities as well. I am EXTREMELY bothered that Hugo’s behavior is not punishable by law and some even understand it. If I were Ted, my life would be destroyed. ‘Cuckolding Is the Worst Thing That Can Happen to a Man’ is 100% accurate for me. 

Hugo and Jill did to another man what is one of the most horrible things that I can imagine happening to a man. And he is proud of it, not any sympathy towards Ted. YUCK. He should be in prison.

I have been trying to comprehend, maybe even understand why male feminists exist. One does not see any females trying to destroy themselves for being female but we do have these traitors in society and one does wonder what their motives are. Are they today's Brutus or Iscariot or just traitors to all ?..
I am of the opinion that those miscreants have decided that the only way they are going to enjoy copious amount of sex is to empathise and try to convince women that they are really on their side. We have already read the  confessions of Prof. Scwhyzer, bragging about his access to young, nubile members of the opposite sex and has no problems stretching them out on his office table. We have examples of other feminist she-males like JovanB(a blogger and feminist she-male contestant) displaying on their web sites that they support PORN as well as BDSM activity and one does have to wonder whether their motives are dishonorable as well as devious. They both apply ofcourse and I have a sneaking suspicion that if these male imitators were out in the public sphere they would be irrelevant, insignificant and whimsical, not real men but pathetic imitations, not alphas but third grade betas who's relevance would be questionable, ignored and dismissed as being juvenile..

We have such sites and orgs like Nomas ( Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men's lives.) which is obviously just another attempt by feminists at ensuring all men and boys are neutered as soon as possible as a neutered males can be controlled a lot easier.

It’s true that too many feminists point the finger at “men” in general—as if “men” were no more than a homogenous mass of beer-swilling, crotch-scratching sexists. Books like Natasha Walter’s Living Dolls read rather like long lists of unanswerable complaints, punctuated by moralising tales about prostitution. If feminism is to remain useful, a more coherent and courageous approach is needed. Only through a radical reorganisation of men and women’s economic participation at home, at work, in life and in love will we begin to address the damage that regressive gender roles continue to inflict on both sexes. If feminism has failed in its objectives, it has failed men too. If it is not to fail again, it must achieve them in collaboration with men—not in spite of them.

The idiom that feminists have determined is that there is something wrong with Men per se, without actually balancing out the positives. They are determined to malign and destroy anything male, due to the fact that a minutiae break the law and deserve to be throw into prison, which I have no problem with. But, they blame the behaviour of a few on the entire sex while at the same time ignoring and denying that women are just as abusive and capable of breaking the law. That's the hypocrisy ofcourse, women do nothing wrong, only men do..

It does not matter to them that that double-think is beyond comprehension, totally without verification while the majority of men just get on with their daily lives and thereby improving the lives of those around them.
The other point is that the only "benefit" that feminism have had on men is something that they (men) have introduced themselves, feminism has in no way benefited men as they claim, men have decided that marriage and being a financial wage slave to the opposite sex is not a realistic option ever since feminists have manipulated a myriad of laws and demands that is designed to destroy our existence rather than benefit it. Women on the other hand have grasped the male-hating nettle that feminists have instituted with wanton abandon and are only now realising by the many articles we read from women complaining that the feminist claim that women can "have it all" is not only detrimental to their very existence by placing untold pressure on them to perform but realise that it was just a dream to think that women were capable of such intense behaviour without affecting their health and well-being.Their brainwashing is complete and a few are finally waking up..

So male feminists do not have any affect on any benefit for males. Their own capitulation to the sexism that they promote is not only abhorrent and detrimental, it does nothing to enhance, even slightly, the lives of man and boy. They are hypocrites of the first degree and traitors to their own sex and should be declared persona non gratis by all and sundry. Even female feminists have continually voiced the opinion that they should not be part of the "women's movement" as their motives demonstrate that they are only interested in promoting themselves and are only in it for own benefit..

Feminism has already poisoned the male sex to such a degree that potential sex changes should be viewed as a preferred option..

Is it possible that an individual so hated the sex they were born with that it sparked a life long academic quest to deconstruct it into something that did not disgust them? Is it possible that the fruits of those efforts were easily embraced by others who may have had issues of their own with traditional masculinity? Not intellectual issues, but intrapersonal ones. And is, as Nathanson alluded to, the misandry being bred by feminists, just part and parcel to the ideology itself, as it is practiced in the halls of higher education and in society at large?
One thing is certain. Raewyn Connell’s view of masculinity is not a product of scholarly pursuit, but of mental illness; a pathological hatred of a particular sex, in this case male. And when that is true of the preeminent authority in a field of study with such far reaching sociological ramifications, then it is time to make a change.

The academic's pursuit of this topic would appear to have an ulterior motive as it permits them to malign and demonstrate their anti-male stance without recourse, demonstrating that it may be a viable option that some individual suffering from GID (gender identity disorder) will want to identify as the other. There are no limits to the amount of female imitators as far as I am aware but I don't see them line up to have their organ butchered for the sake of relieving some psychological condition..

Here we have more of their cognitive dissonance..

 The interesting thing is that I produced an MP3 (on Male Feminists) in which I quoted an article from "Janice Erlbaum is the author of GIRLBOMB:"  about male feminists being Oxymorons or simply Morons..
That article has disappeared (erased) for obvious reason as feminists say one thing and mean the other..
But ofcourse, nothing disappears on the web..


No courage of their conviction and I would imagine that the whining male feminists were offended by female feminists stating the obvious. I do wonder just how effective that MP3 was..