Everyone is or should be well aware of the lies that are being told about rape and how much rape is actually carried out. The entire subject has become a comedy, a circus..
Anyone involved in this action already has the law to ensure they are held accountable but it has been the case that over the last five years of so, women have been using false rape as a tool to excuse their own bad behaviour, this despicable behaviour does not appear to be reducing at all and while that is the case, the hysterics over the 1 in 4 lie that feminists propagate will continue and will stop legitimate victims from coming forward and that is certain..
Feminists use those false rape claims as real rape statistics to increase their funding levels to all colleges and universities and don't forget the women's shelters as well which are breeding grounds for radical feminists, subsidised by the tax dollars to the tune of billions each year..
Bernard Chapin here with Volume of Chapin's INFERNO 898
They'll Lie about AnythingArticles:http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/index.html
I did rat this from Just a Man Writing excellent blog as it is not one article to be ignored. The ever escalating false rape claims have reached epidemic proportions as we all already know and the power that be refuse to stamp it out or discourage it by even holding most of those recalcitrants to account. Using endless excuses about what ever they can think of at the time. But they never miss out on that other comment about not being able to help "real" victims as if they actually existed. No mention ofcourse about the man who was falsely accused and who's life was just destroyed.The whole party has been taken over by lying bitches who for no other reason than seeking attention, as no one in their right mind wants a bar of them, come out of the woodwork and make these ludicrous false rape claims..Personally, I am waiting for another lying feminist to make some spurious claim or any claim as to why, so we can ridicule their usual childish response.. Waiting..
How Big A Percentage Of Rape Allegations Are False?
Austrian Police Chief Claims That Four Out of Every Five Rape Accusations Are False
4 out of 5 sexual abuse accusations are false, reports the chief of the vice department in Lower Austria. This region of Austria had become infamous for sex maniac Josef Fritzl who had imprisoned and raped his own daughter for 24 years. The following report is translated from major, authoritative (Google Pagerank 7) regional newspaper Niederösterreichische Nachrichten (Lower Austrian News).
“We carefully pursue every single accusation, so absolutely no case will get left out,” stresses Leo Lehrbaum, chief of the Lower Austrian state criminal police’s vice department. Every day he is confronted with varying tragical forms of sexual abuse and he knows how much the victims suffer from the consequences, even decades later. Many only dare to file complaints to the executive branch years after it happened. “We try, of course, to clear up everything, but many cases are already prescribed so that the perpetrator can no more be charged in court.” Lehrbaum knows. This is why he advises: “Always file a complaint immediately. The less time has passed, the better the chances to catch the perpetrator due to traces of DNA.” Women and children should not be afraid to file because everyone has the right to be interviewed by a female police officer. Nevertheless, independent of all real abuse cases, he has noted a disconcerting development during his investigations. “On average, four out of five police complaints turn out to be pure invention.”
Psychological Problems or Fear of Pregnancy
The youngest accuser that faked such a crime was only 12 years old. Such fabrications are especially frequent during puberty and adolescence. Motives vary. Lehrbaum: “In some cases there are profound psychological problems that need to be analyzed by an expert.” Often it is simply a cry for attention because the accuser has problems in school, with parents or at work. Here he appeals to the parents, to take more time to talk with their children and not to abandon them, saying “I have no time right now, let’s talk tomorrow.” He is even more concerned about cases where young women pretend to have been raped to get even with an acquaintance, because they were rejected or because a relationship did not proceed the way she wished it would. “Often such accusations are white lies, because after a party or disco visit – and usually under heavy influence of alcohol – unplanned and unprotected intercourse has occurred, and now they are concerned about a possible pregnancy or other personal consequences,” said the detective officer. He is particularly saddened when in divorce or custody disputes, the fake abuse accusation is used as a means to an end. “In the course of the inquiry, if we speak in detail about the incident, it turns out very soon that the accuser gets entangled in contradictory statements, and they admit that the whole thing has not taken place or not in the form they claimed. They often come to their senses and realize that the entire story was very improper, “says Lehrbaum. The accusers frequently are unaware that their “fantasy” is a serious crime. “A complaint against an unknown perpetrator is a simulation of a crime, punishable with up to 6 months in jail, and a complaint against a particular person is libel, punishable with up to 5 years in jail,” admonishes Lehrbaum to be more responsible with both accusations and sexuality.
Today is the twentieth anniversary of something that didn't happen, an imaginary rape that turned the teenage boys of the bucolic college town of Davis, California into creatures more loathsome than pariahs. On August 2, 1991, Janet Berger, 44, who was then a circulation manager for a local Davis newspaper, falsely claimed she had been raped on July 29, 1991 at 10 p.m. by five skateboarding boys in one of the city's park-like greenbelts.
Berger said the supposed rape was in retaliation for her act of accidentally brushing up against one of the youths on her bicycle earlier in the evening. On her return trip along the same path, she claimed that a wilding gang of skateboarding teen males in tank tops, ages 13-17, wrestled her from her bike and proceeded to rape her.
Two weeks later, Berger told a rape counselor and police that it was a lie: she had merely fallen from her bicycle and had made up the rape story. She furnished neither an explanation nor a motive.
But it's what happened during those two weeks to one particular class of citizens -- the teen male skateboarding community -- that makes this story so instructive. Immediately following the spurious allegation, the news media took the woman at her word. One headline solemnly announced: "Rape shatters illusions in Davis."
Anonymous flyers were circulated calling for a curfew for all men and boys.
Threatening, anti-male graffiti was scrawled on an overpass favored by skateboarders. It read: "Dead Boys Don't Rape."
Other graffiti repeated the "Curfew for All Men" sentiment; still other graffiti demanded: "Get the Skateboard Rapists."
Apoplectic women's groups ran out of synonyms for the word "shock."
The newspaper where Berger worked reported that a rally was planned in "support of the rape victim and other rape victims." But then the rally was canceled at Berger's request.
A local chapter of the National Organization for Women held a news conference to denounce the alleged crime. And townsfolk demanded arrests, even though the only evidence of the putative assault was the word of one then-unidentified woman whom the townsfolk knew nothing about.
Police questioned 75 completely innocent boys in connection with the rape that never happened.
Skateboarders kept a low profile once the woman's story became public. "After it happened, there wasn't a skateboarder in town," said Bill Gray, a Yolo County youth counselor at Davis High School.
One of the innocent boys taken in for questioning was then-16-year-old Josh Fernandez, who is now a mid-30s married man and a writer. Josh, then an avid skateboarder, knew as soon as he heard the allegation that he and his friends would be targeted.
"Once, when we were taking a break from skateboarding in the parking lot of Carl’s Jr.," Josh recalled, "a car pulled up. In the car was a man, about 40, who had a ratlike face with a patchy mustache. 'Hey, you fucking rapists,' he said, with his window rolled halfway down. He tried to spit on me, but the saliva didn’t quite make it out of his car."
Josh told the man, "Fuck you," but was glad that the man sped off, "because, frankly, he would have pummeled me to death with his white-trash methamphetamine arms."
This was typical, according to Josh: "For a couple of weeks, wherever we went, something of that nature would happen: A truck full of UC Davis jocks threw a dozen soda cans at us and screamed, 'Rapists!'; Butchy Davis women in hemp dresses glared us down with their murderous eyes as we rolled past on the sidewalk—and so on."
"I don’t know about my friends," Josh wrote last year, "but there were moments that summer when—even in my gangly, 5-foot frame—I felt like a big, lumbering, greasy rapist."
Finally, police decided Berger's story was filled with holes, so they confronted her with inconsistencies. One key failing in her story was her refusal to reveal the name of a doctor she claimed examined her.
"The reason I can't give you a doctor," Berger finally told police, "is because there is none."
Police officers and a rape counselor spoke to her for 3 1/2-hours, and she finally acknowledged the fabrication.
Davis Police Chief Phil Coleman called a news conference to announce the jig was up. Flanked by politicians, two detectives, and two rape counselors, the Chief said the rape never occurred.
Mayor Maynard Skinner offered an olive branch to the skateboarders, calling them "an important group in our community." He announced that the city planned to open a skateboard park.
The mayor also called on the woman, Jan Berger, 44, to publicly apologize. (I can find no indication whether she did.)
Councilwoman Lois Wolk said: "It's a tragedy for this community, We were very ready to point fingers and make accusations and stereotype groups--men (and) skateboarders." But then Wolk proceeded to call Berger a "victim," and said she hoped Berger would receive therapy.
Some local women identified as feminists would not accept the fact that a rape did not occur, and they worried that rape victims might not come forward because people did not believe a rape occurred. "I don't think any one of us (is) convinced that it didn't happen," said feminist Sherilyn Adams. "It's not uncommon for women to recant out of fear of retaliation . . . or denial--make this thing go away."
Police confirmed a report that Berger ran a small day-care center that was shuttered after children were molested there in 1986. She was never prosecuted for the crimes, but felt responsible. Before she recanted her rape lie, she told a detective "what happened now [the supposed rape] was punishment for what had happened" at the day-care center.
A rape counselor, who told reporters that she only uses her first name (Cheryl), said that Berger did not "act out of malice." Rather, she had experienced unspecified traumas in her life. "She does deserve a great deal of compassion."
There is no indication that the newspapers were at all interested in Josh Fernandez's back-story, or that of the other 74 boys picked up for questioning by police.
For Berger's lie, for pitting an entire community against a group of some of its most vulnerable citizens--children--Berger was charged with a misdemeanor of filing a false police report, carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $500 fine. (The newspapers aren't clear if she was convicted.)
The boys questioned by the police seemed to have bounced back and put it behind them, but they didn't forget. Josh Fernandez, the writer, and his skateboarding friends who were also questioned by police, have done pretty well for themselves. One is an ophthalmologist; another writes jokes for Jay Leno; another is a chemist.
When Josh got married last year, he got the old gang together to be his groomsmen, and they skipped the traditional bachelor party. Josh rented out an indoor skate park, and these guys now in their mid-30s--who, 20 years ago, were taken to the police station to be questioned for a rape that never happened just because they were skateboarders--skated like they were 16 again.
This is what Obama and his feminised cronies was aiming at when they introduced different rules to prosecute young male college students, who according to common law are found to be not guilty but the feminised Universities decide under their own guidelines that it has decided otherwise, which goes to show that the new rules introduced are so biased that the law itself does not even recognise it..
If you are contemplating sending your SON to University or even College, I would suggest you find out how biased they are towards males and how feminised they are as Men at Universities are just regarded as access fodder for that male-hating cabal that is feminism..
At the University of North Dakota (UND) the unthinkable has become a reality. A student has been found guilty of sexual assault despite the fact that local police refused to charge him with a crime – any crime. In fact, the police have charged his accuser with lying about the very incident that led to his campus conviction. And the punishment is not insignificant. Former student Caleb Warner has been banned by UND from setting foot on any North Dakota public campus for three years. Meanwhile, his accuser has been wanted by the Grand Forks Sheriff's Department for more than a year on the charge of making a false report to law enforcement. This tragic incident raises two fundamental questions: 1) How much evidence must UND administrators see before they admit they have made a mistake? and 2) Why are campuses like UND adjudicating rape cases in the first place? The alleged incident took place back in December of 2009. Sometime in early February of 2010, Warner's accuser reported an allegation of sexual assault to both the university and the Grand Forks Police Department. UND held a hearing for Warner on February 11, 2010. On February 16, he was informed that he had been found guilty of the broad charges of "Violations of Criminal or Civil Laws, Sexual Assault, and Interference.” In order to find Warner “guilty”, UND had to use the "preponderance of the evidence" standard, which is the “probably” standard used in civil cases. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or FIRE, has been the national leader of the opposition to a federal Department of Education mandate, which is forcing more universities to adopt the preponderance of evidence standard in rape cases. Under this mandate, universities cannot receive federal funding, including financial aid for students, unless they adopt the lower standard of proof in rape cases. FIRE predicted it would result in more wrongful convictions. And FIRE was right. In Warner's case, the police and the university arrived at completely different conclusions when analyzing the same incident. Evidence gathered by the professionals in the Grand Forks Police Department showed that Warner's accuser had not told the truth about being sexually assaulted by Warner. The deception was so clear that, on May 13, 2010, the Grand Forks County District Court formally charged Warner's accuser with filing "False information or report to law enforcement officers or security officials." A warrant for her arrest was issued on May 17, 2010. To date, she has failed to appear to answer the charges against her. In other words, she has been a fugitive from justice for more than a year. Warner's attorney, Steven Light, wrote a letter to UND General Counsel Julie Ann Evans on July 28, 2010, asking for a rehearing in light of this unusual turn of events. UND's student code allows re-hearings with no time limit when substantial new information unavailable during a prior hearing is uncovered. Yet on August 26, then-UND Vice President for Student Affairs Robert H. Boyd denied the request, erroneously calling it an "appeal" – rather than a request for re-hearing - and disallowing it because more than five days had passed since the guilty finding. For the record, most of my eighteen year old “Introduction to Criminal Justice” students understand the different between a motion for retrial, based on new facts, and an appeal, based on old law. On May 11, 2011, my good friends at FIRE wrote UND President Robert O. Kelley pointing out the university's serious procedural errors and its failure to reconsider the case. FIRE added an even more important point; namely, that Warner's name could not be cleared by the courts so long as his accuser persisted in her flight from the law. FIRE further noted that it was unfair for UND to deny Warner a rehearing simply because his accuser had not been convicted of lying to the police. That conviction is not likely so long as she is a fugitive from justice not meeting her legal obligations. On May 20, University Counsel responded to FIRE - once again denying Warner's request for a rehearing. Evans admitted in the letter that the university used the very same evidence to find Caleb Warner guilty of sexual assault that the police and prosecutor used to charge his accuser with lying to law enforcement. Evans further insisted that the fact that Warner's accuser had not responded to the charge against her was meaningless and that she could not even assume that his accuser knew about the charge against her. Evans states in part: “Clearly, the only ‘new testimony’ would be that of the opinion of Officer Vigness, i.e. that the victim lied to the police. This would not be substantial new evidence. This would be an unproven allegation.” But since there has been an arrest warrant issued there must, at minimum, be probable cause that Warner’s accuser lied. According to the 4th Amendment to the Constitution – made binding on North Dakota through the Fourteenth Amendment - no warrants can be issued on less than probable cause. But that is not enough for Evans. She wants the charges “proven” under the standard of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” The situation may be roughly summarized as follows: The justice system must abide by “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” when dealing with accusers. But UND may use “preponderance of evidence” when dealing with the accused. There is no indication whatsoever that Evans has contemplated the possibility that there is something very wrong with the UND judicial system – legally or morally speaking. Her smug arrogance and condescension provide little hope for a quick remedy to an obvious injustice. Nonetheless, I would strongly urge everyone reading this column to call President Kelley’s office and demand justice for Caleb Warner. And UND alumni should also write Kelley’s office and announce that they are ceasing all donations until Caleb Warner is both cleared and compensated for his mistreatment at the hands of the UND administration. Those interested in doing so may simply follow this link: http://und.edu/president/.
One does have to wonder how feminists and women in general could become even more offensive than they have demonstrated right now. Laughing about a man being drugged, handcuffed and mutilated appears to be the level has been reached.. How they roared with laughter when they made fun of a man who has his penis cut off, would appear to be just another moment of hilarity. Can it get any more offensive..
Hence the title of this post. When a woman severs a penis, the standard comment from women, any women, is that he must have done something to deserve that. No need for proof required, if that happened to a male then whatever the women does is somehow justified, she is blameless even though she has physically abused, drugged and imprisoned a male is besides the point..
If we apply that same mentality to Rape, than any woman who is raped must have encouraged it herself. What is a rape compared to this type of mutilation ?
Trivial?..
How Funny is A Mutilated Vagina
By Dan Moore
There are many who deny we live in an age where maleness, where masculinity has been so devalued as to be commonly regarded as Subhuman. Where male sexuality is treated with such revulsion and contempt, that major television personalities feel completely free to make light...no, to outright revel in glee at a man being poisoned, tied up, and having his penis cut off, then ground to a pulp, by his wife, because he wanted a Divorce.
These same major television personalities that ROUTINELY cry about 'Battered Women' are making light of the poisoning, kidnapping, and torture of a man for wanting a Divorce. In an age of No Fault Divorce, which was instituted at Feminist behest. They do not hide their glee at all, in fact Sharon Osbourne (the wife of Ozzy) even makes mixing motions with her hands, simulating a garbage disposal, and calls the whole thing 'delightful'.
The appalling hatred of men is not only not hidden, but outright FLAUNTED.
This can only be the result of a Society that has so dehumanized men, so demonized male sexuality, that men can be literally tied up and tortured, have their lives permanently altered (by removing the ability to fulfil the most basic of drives)...and these women LAUGH.
And not just the Hosts, but the entire audience...rolling in glee.
And, I suspect, a good deal of women in everyday life.
Every last one of them represent the truly disgusting in human nature. No, none of it is 'innocent', and no, it is not 'just a joke'. Anyone taking pleasure in this shocking crime should be ashamed of themselves, and take a SERIOUS look at how they perceive men, and how that looks from THIS side of the fence. And the women 'hosting' this show? Every last one of them should lose their jobs.
Will they? Of course not. Because they obviously know what appeals to their audience. Which is comprised of women. The audience certainly seemed pleased with the show, and enthusiastically joined in, as a matter of fact. Truthfully, the ONLY time the audience gave pause, was when Sara, near the end of the segment, mentioned that 'it's kinda weird' to be taking so much glee in something they would be horrified at the reverse of.
But then the show quickly moved on, much to the audience's relief.
If this isn't proof of widespread, generalized female hatred of men, I don't know what is.
Because I could NEVER see a man taking so much pleasure in the removal of a woman's ability to have sex. Not even one.
And women LOVE to hear about it happening to men. So much, in fact, that these hateful bigots will keep their jobs. Probably won't even get a reprimand either. They've got feminists to defend them, after all.
And the beat goes on....
Here is the address for those people responsible for that obnoxious "The TALK" program, where they joined in to laugh at this abuse so please send them an email to demonstrate your disgust at the CBS network Sharon Osborne. Use this letter example if you like..
We need to tell them what we think and we need to demand an apology, retraction or the removal of those people involved..
RE: “The Talk”, Segment on Male Genital Mutilation Dear Sir, I am appalled and sickened by the attitude of the panel with respect to the genital mutilation of a drugged and bound man, especially Sharon Osborne and the presenter. To make light of and agree with the action of this woman is beyond comprehension. If the situation was reversed with men making light of say corrective rape my guess is they would be fired immediately and their TV careers would be rightfully ruined for ever.
I feel Sharon Osborne should be immediately removed from this and all other CBS shows and a public apology made by the producers. I also think it appropriate that CBS and “The Talk” air a show about male victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse at the hand of female abusers.
If CBS does no take any action on this matter it is tantamount to CBS agreeing with and promoting the genital mutilation of males. As a National media outlet who affects public opinion we have the right to expect better of you.
