Just another demonstration of their caring and sharing nature..

Second installment and another example of the repulsive behaviour of the opposite sex, as well as the crap men put up with.  From an ever increasing and growing list of privileged princesses just wanting to demonstrate precisely where they stand on the abuse delivery scale. After viewing these two presentations, one would serious wonder why anyone would ever really bother to make their acquaintance. This is one time that I am glad to say that there are exceptions, thank goodness for that, otherwise it would be a never ending full-on abuse session from breakfast to dusk..

The main problem about all of this is ofcourse the fact that the majority of men had absolutely no idea how bad female behaviour really is. We would see it or witness it but only occasionally, either at a party or outside a nightclub. But now with the advent of that hate movement promoting and giving all women, free license and encouragement to be as abusive as possible without any accountability. This is what women are going to be like on a regular basis, this type of behaviour will be the norm as they know they can get away with it. This will just be the tip of the iceberg, as we will witness more and more of these examples of their obnoxious and abusive behaviour, all due to the existence of the web..

This will definitely identify and demonstrate clearly, who the greater abusers really are and from where I am sitting, it certainly does not bode well for the opposite sex, does it.

Holy mackerel.. 

WIP: Women in Power, the greatest abusers..

Oh yes, women in power and one could not wish for any greater example of what these women do when they have unlimited power. They abuse it ofcourse. They abuse it as usual. It would appear to be an endless failing they are possessed with, one wonder if it is not permanently ensconced in their DNA. We have witnessed copious examples of their actions to ensure that it is indeed a fact..

If you're wondering where you could witness such an excessive and abusive personality ?

Try the divorce courts, where revenge tops the menu or the family courts, where copious examples can be witnessed on a daily basis. They have been saturated with power and they know exactly how to apply that abuse on a regular basis..

ME Bar Counsel Recommends Discipline for ADA Mary N. Kellett

April 12th, 2012 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

The attorney for the Board of Overseers of the Maine State Bar has recommended that Assistant District Attorney Mary N. Kellett be disciplined for her legal and ethical misconduct in her prosecution of Vladek Filler.  On April 6, 2012, Bar Counsel J. Scott Davis recommended discipline for Kellett based on her violation of nine separate codes of conduct for Maine attorneys.
As readers of this blog will recall, Vladek Filler is the father who was accused by his wife Ligia Filler, during the course of their custody battle, of sexual assault and child abuse.  Despite the complete absence of evidence against him apart from his wife’s say-so, ADA Mary Kellett not only prosecuted Filler, but violated numerous ethical codes in doing so.  She managed to get a conviction which was overturned by the trial court due to her prosecutorial misconduct.
Amazingly, despite having been convicted of sexual assault, the Maine family court gave Vladek custody of his two children before the conviction was overturned.  It did so because it was clear to all – the police and the judge – that Vladek was a good and responsible father and that Ligia had severe mental/emotional problems.
I say it was “clear to all,” but that doesn’t include Kellett who prosecuted a clearly innocent man.  At his retrial, Vladek was convicted of a single misdemeanor count of throwing water on his wife.  That the Ellsworth, Maine district attorney’s office would pursue such a case through two separate trials plus appeals speaks volumes about (a) Mary Kellett’s anti-father bias and (b) the DA’s Office’s willingness to waste taxpayer funds for the sole purpose of covering up Kellett’s bias.  After all, why else would the DA prosecute a man for allegedly tossing water on his wife?
Kellett’s conduct of her prosecution of Vladek Filler was truly egregious.  Although prosecutors are required by law to turn over evidence to the defendant’s counsel, Kellett refused despite being requested to do so multiple times by Filler’s attorney, Daniel Pileggi.  Worse, she told Pileggi to get the records himself from the various police agencies that had possession of them.
That’s clearly an ethical violation, but what I’d call a criminal one came next.  Having told Pileggi to contact the police, she then told the police to refuse to comply with Pileggi’s subpoenas.
Eventually, Pileggi got the court to order her to produce the documents, audio and videotapes, but Kellett simply ignored the order.
At trial, Kellett engaged in multiple acts of prosecutorial misconduct mostly involving her argument to the jury that was based on “facts” she hadn’t put into evidence.
The 18-page findings of the Bar Counsel against Kellett are all about her attempt to railroad Vladek Filler into prison, deprive two children of their fine and loving father and place them in the hands of an unstable mother.  The case was about Kellett’s using her office to promote the cause of a mother in a custody case.
But, as we’ve seen before, Kellett’s misbehavior is scarcely confined to the Filler case.  Indeed, time and again in the past, appellate courts have overturned convictions of men when allegations of sexual misconduct have been levelled at them by Kellett.  Put simply, Kellett seems to have a mission in life – putting men behind bars for sexual offenses whether they committed them or not.  Her prosecutorial misconduct is well known.
Therefore, whoever else has experienced what Vladek Filler has at the hands of Mary N. Kellett, should now come forward and file a grievance with the Overseers of the Maine State Bar.  She’s a loose cannon and needs to find another job.
Further, I’d like to know if Maine has a statute providing for appointment of an independent or special prosecutor.  Some states do and Mary Kellett needs to be prosecuted for her apparently criminal behavior toward Vladek Filler.  Specifically, instructing the police to withhold evidence from a defendant in a criminal case looks like a criminal act to me.
Obviously, the District Attorney of Ellsworth likely won’t prosecute one of his/her own lawyers, but, if there’s an independent prosecutor statute, someone else can.  They can and should.
In the meantime, congratulations to J. Scott Davis for recommending that Mary N. Kellett be disciplined by the Overseers of the Bar.  We’ll see how it turns out.

Here is a video on how women are NOT abusive or violent, according to slut-feminists denials. This is most probably the best indication on how that hate movement has promoted and ensured this level of violence and abuse, is not only present, but will be worse as time goes on. One does not like seeing this type of behaviour by anyone and there is no justification for it. But females have an obvious resistance to just walking away from any potential issue, being of the opinion that they are always in the right and that their behaviour can always be justified..

One wonder how that violence and abusive behaviour pans out in the home. Another issue that slut-feminists have longed claimed to being non-existent. The females, two of whom are single mothers by choice as far as I can tell, would ofcourse be rewarded for that decision by the state as it encourages these type of females and encourages it via copious benefits and special privileges. The other issue which arises, which I find rather humorous, is that they felt insulted by the fact that they were called "sluts", a term that the "Slut" feminists have been promoting and wanted to "reclaim" for some inexplicable reason that only they can vaguely explain and justify. It just demonstrates how out of touch they are with the general consensus of what women want and what they are trying to shove down their throats..

So what level of role models are these women to the general younger population and "their" children. What were these "party" girls, who have been in fights before, doing out partying and getting drunk while they have a young children at home. It has already been demonstrated beyond argument that these single mothers will ensure that "their" children will go on to be violent and abusive, just as they are. End up in jail as the stats already show to be at 80% and also ensure their offspring join gangs, do drugs and drop out of the education system at a younger age. One has to wonder why such policies are encouraged and why these women are being paid to raise future criminals, why are taxpayers footing the bill so these selfish females ensure that our futures will be encumbered by ensuring more criminals will be out there destroying the lives of many decent people and their families..

What was the reason why slut-feminists promote and encourage single motherhood again. Oh yes, that's right. "You go girl". It demonstrates how "strong" and "Independent" they are. I forgot..

Here they are justifying their behaviour and the video that exposes the slut-feminist's denial on how women are "NON VIOLENT" and also demonstrates how the "Women are Always Victims", mantra is such a blatant and obvious lie..

How much longer can slut-feminists continue spreading that lie and when when will they finally except the fact that DV, for example, is a societal issue and not a gender issue as they have always claimed it to be and when will they actually admit that "women are violent". Admitting just that one single issue would of itself be a pleasant realistic change..

Meanwhile, we will demonstrate what level of lies slut-feminists extoll, on a daily basis..

Women are NEVER violent. Police Bias. World Wide..

So Reddit, I called the cops on my GF after an argument we had got violent, the cops come and arrest ME, I come back 2 days later and 6000$ worth of stuff is either stolen or broken, what can I do?

Here is the standard procedure that the Police follow whenever any male calls the Police on a violent female..This happens in EVERY western country..

We have been raising the issue of female violence for a long time now as it hits plague proportions, as well as it being a topic that can longer be ignored. The problem with exposing female violence is ofcourse that it demonstrates what level of liars feminists really are as they have always claimed that women are never violent, never make false claims and ofcourse would never lay a finger on anyone, even their partners or spouses unless it was in self defence. Lairs that feminists are, will always be exposed as the truth stands on it's own and does not require the assistance of millions of dollars and PR spin to make it work..

So we have even more added to the "Women are Violent" database as time goes on. Maybe you have witnessed some of this type of behaviour, I know I have, which is why anyone alive failed to understand or comprehend it when the feminist hegemony promotes such an outright falsehood. But it's what they do..

Video here..

Schools probe video of girls in wild brawl

LYNN, Mass. -- Two girls, apparently with a grudge, wailed on each other in a Lynn park. Many people stood by and watched, even recording the fight. Police saw the fight online and alerted the mayor. “There will be consequences for this. Not only for the girls in the fight, but also for the ones who stood by and videotaped the fight. The ones who were complacent and watching the fight and the ones who were refereeing, for lack of a better term,” said Mayor Judith Kennedy Flanagan.

Now just in case you are wondering at what age they may start that type of behavior, well, it's birth actually but that has never been looked at either but we are aware that little girls do practise manipulating techniques at an early age and finely hone them as they age..

This next one would appear to be more of a precondition than as a result of the brawl as they are waiting for the autopsy report. But ofcourse one cannot fail to see that it was obviously the boy's fault that accounted for their behaviour as the headline suggests. We cannot have the obvious victims of their own behaviour being blamed..

11-Year-Old Girl Dies After Fight With Classmate Over Boy

ABC News

Health officials and police in Long Beach, Calif., are trying to determine how an 11-year-old girl died after getting into a fight with another girl over a boy.

Joanna Ramos, a fifth grader at Willard Elementary School, died Friday night in the hospital after complaining of a headache.

"She was so nice to me; she was like a sister to me," said classmate Stephanie Soltero, crying. "They were fighting over a boy, just for a boy. It's just stupid."

The two girls and seven onlookers went to an alley off campus after school on Friday, where they had planned to fight, according to Deputy Chief Robert Luna of the Long Beach Police Department. No weapons were used and no one was knocked to the ground.

Police are waiting for autopsy results to determine Ramos' cause of death.

For more video on females smacking the crap out of each other, just in case you are of the opinion that it's rare, have a look in the side bar, down the bottom, for a list of about a dozen or so videos. I personally derive no pleasure in having to expose this type of behaviour but it needs to be shown and demonstrated to stop the feminist lies and disinformation..

What is your reaction when you read this and see the female who was party to it, in the photo. What is your automatic response. Is it one of sadness or one that feels that the woman was unjustly treated. Do you think that the lad was lucky to be able to get some sexual attention from this older female.

Do you look at this female and wonder why she would sexually abuse a minor while considering why she did not have a normal relationship with a grown up. This woman could approach a group of any males and get a positive response from at least 80%. There is absolutely no doubt about that as most men are amused, in the right way, whenever a woman commences a conversation or approaches them because it is so friggin rare..

So what excuse does this woman have and what excuses do they give this woman in order to justify her actions..










Now it is not an eyesore neither is she ugly. If anything, she would attract quite a few members of the opposite sex with no problem what so ever..

A teacher has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for having sex with one of her former students, who was just 15 at the time.Amanda Watkins' mother asked for leniency, saying: 'My daughter is not a bad person, but she is a sick person.'Watkins, 39, was a teacher at Sheffield Junior High School in Alabama when she was found having sex with the teenager in the back seat of her car in December 2009.She admitted to police that the pair were engaging in sexual activity, according to the Times Register, and was fired the next month.In November last year, she was convicted of second-degree rape and second-degree sodomy, but her lawyer says she might appeal that verdict.During sentencing, Watkins took the stand to apologise to the youth and ask for forgiveness.Family members and two psychiatrists also testified on behalf of the former teacher, claiming that she was mentally ill and a custodial sentence would endanger her recovery.

Read more:

Your reaction would be mixed, I would imagine..

Now change the sex and reassess your reaction. If it was a male shagging a 15 year old female, what would your reaction be then and why do you think you total attitude would completely change from one of either amazement or mixed to one of malice and revenge ? 

What a charming human being they are. 70% single mothers plus highest divorce rate across all samples..

Cincinnati-resident Kierra Reed, 22, got into a verbal altercation with partner Henry Brown just before midnight on the evening of February 14 when she learned he did not have a Valentine’s present for her, FOX19 reports.
Police allege she pushed and scratched Mr Brown until he locked himself inside a bedroom in her apartment.
Reed reportedly took a knife to the door, trying to slash her way in as she yelled that she would cut Mr Brown and kill him.
Police were then called to the scene and Reed was arrested and charged with aggravated menacing.
She was released on a $2300 bail yesterday.

The unreasonableness continues as we witness even further abuse and violent action from the same sex who deny that any of it actually happens at all. In come the feminists and their automatic denial methodology regarding violent and abusive women. Feminists blatantly state that ALL women are victims regardless of their actions or deeds. Well, explain these then you hypocrites and liars..

 When the boy spoke to the responding officer, he told him:  "Please don't take me home. Mother will beat me," the police report said.

 No, well that cannot be correct as feminists tell us constantly. It must be the boy lying, how could the victim be accused of harming anyone when in actual fact she is the victim because she is being charged. There is obviously no justice on this planet. They do it so damn hard..

Also we see the boy pleading for the abuser as is normal for abused victims..

Mom Faces Jail for Making Son Walk to School

An Arkansas mother is being charged with a misdemeanor count of endangering the welfare of a minor after she made her son walk 4.6 miles to school in order to "teach him a lesson."
Valerie Borders, 34, told police her 10-year-old son had been suspended from the bus for a week and she was making him walk to school as punishment.
A bank security guard spotted the boy walking alone in 30-degree weather on Monday and called police. (Ed..30 degrees Fahrenheit is Minus 1 degree Celsius)
When the boy spoke to the responding officer, he told him:  "Please don't take me home. Mother will beat me," the police report said.
The officer took the boy to his mother's workplace, only to be told she was on vacation. They found her at home, where she was cited for child endangerment.
"There were a number of things that could have happened to the child," said Lyle Waterworth, a spokesman for the Jonesboro Police Department. "The child could have been injured, abducted."
ABC News affiliate KAIT spoke with the boy, who made an impassioned plea on camera to keep his mother out of jail.
The boy's mother did not speak on camera.
If convicted, she faces up to one year in jail and a maximum fine of $1,000.

Don't even think about defending yourself as you will go to jail without question. Women can abuse at will.

What is that saying again, ask and shall receive, seek and you will find. Words of wisdom apparently as I posed something similar not that long ago about whether or not there are any women left on the planet who have any idea or can give any indication that they actually give a damn about what is going on. One continually wallows need deep in the usual "what women want/demand" as that has been the topic to ad nauseam for the last 40 odd years..

One wonders if anything else dares to break through that heightened wall of victimhood. But alas, we have a slight clearance in the fog as a request is forwarded for some input into issues apart from their own mountain of doom..

One does have to be carful whenever asking this question as the response may not be what one expects. Once the floodgates are opened there will be no closing them again.

My response to this question would simply be to direct the request here (the online compendium of Men's Issues)  . All or most of the issues are covered, it is still in the process of being updated as TDOM has stated. But it does give the gist of what is ailing society today and where the sexism, discrimination and bias really is..

So we have this request..

AW - Greetings and salutations, forum members!
A few disclaimers:1. I'm an American woman, but I'm not here to promote myself. I'm telling you to put my post in context.2. I don't want to pull focus from the issues. If you find my post disruptive, I'll take a hint from the silence and leave.3. This forum is primarily for men to exchange ideas, rant, and support one another. I've posted under "Opposing Views" out of respect for that mission, not to challenge it.4. These disclaimers aren't to paint myself as a good American woman; I just worry about not saying exactly what I mean. My apologies if it sounds tedious or self-promoting.
I'm not so much posting from an opposing view but a limited view. I appreciate men's plight, but I as a woman can never fully understand it. And since words don't do much, I want to actively address whatever sexism I see -- walk the walk, I suppose. Of course, there are probably thousands of little sexisms I don't pick up on. I can pay my half at meals, write letters advocating against false rape charges, etc -- but there's probably so many things I won't catch from my perspective.
So here's my question: aside from major issues like paternity fraud and women using sex as leverage, what small acts of misandry to you see regularly? And how can well-meaning women avoid them -- as girlfriends, sisters, coworkers, wives, etc? We can't make things equal, but we can still do our best to be fair.
You now have the floor. I greatly appreciate any and all contributions (and will understand if I receive none). 

Maybe a few of the followers or readers may like to express their opinion and respond to the question and I will update as we go along. Meanwhile, here are a few responses on that forum where the question was originally posed..

Opening Pandora's Box..

Man 1 - Seen any MacDonald's ads recently? 


AW - I haven't seen any McDonald's ads recently. Is one you're referring to available online? 

Man 2 -How about all the Progressive ads on TV with cute, lovable Flo and the men who come in her insurance store? They're always fat, balding, and wearing glasses except for one male character I saw. And they're always shown as either sexist, stupid, crazy or amazingly immature, while the female customers are always attractive and witty and mature. Think how feminists would react if it were the reverse.

Or how about the sit-coms on TV today which almost all follow the "Simpson's" formula, with the husband as totally incompetent and bumbling, cowardly, selfish and immature but their wives are intelligent and hard working, unselfish, etc.

Or the beer commercials, I forget the beer, where men go into a bar and are friendly with the pretty bar maid but she ridicules them mercilessly just because their pants aren't in style or they say the wrong thing. And they probably drink the wrong beer too.

And on and on. This is common is today's media. What effect does this have on young boys growing up today? How about news reports about a story where 20 male miners died in a tragic mine disaster? The reporters will never say it was 20 MEN who died. They'll say that 20 WORKERS died or that there were 20 VICTIMS of the disaster. But if there was one woman who got killed, all the reports would be "19 men and one woman killed". There's a great video about this on manwomanmyth.com, among many others that go into other topics, like how so many of the laws today are anti-male and pro-female, and how schools are biased against boys and toward girls. 

The most common ones I see on a regular basis:

1. The appropriation of men as "useful objects" to women who are either lazy or have no interest in performing certain duties if they can simply require men to do these things for them. The examples of this are countless, but are not limited to "borrowing" money from men (which, in my experience, is almost never paid back), commanding men to carry heavy shit, making jokes about responsbilities that they simply pass off to men (IE telling their girlfriends "that's what men are for"), asking men to fill their shifts at work for no intrinsic benefit/reward, and asking men to fix things that they broke instead of using google to figure it out themselves.

2. Creating false dichotomies involving polar opposites of men where neither extreme is viewed favorable - like the niceguy/badboy. Women tend to denigrate both of these parties even though they are loosely defined and highly pidgeonholed, despite the tendency for American women to be attracted toward the latter group. In other words, men are always viewed as guilty/flawed even when he fits the bill perfectly. This is some combination of paranoia/entitlement among women, but it is clearly evident because women try to take advantage of even those men who they perceive to be the most attractive.

3. Using legal/social leverage to manipulate men through false allegations (if you don't do XYZ for me then I'll report you for crime/offense ABC). While this is rarer than the above two embodiments of misandry, it is perhaps the most foul. Since men are presumed to be guilty when their accuser is a woman (who often employs other friends or fake witnesses to persecute the man) it can be extremely difficult for a man to beat. Your post implies that you are somewhat familiar with this already, so I'll leave it there.

4. Intentional emotional abuse of men for personal sense of power. Taunting, nagging, manipulation, teasing/controlling men with sex, suggesting competition from other men and implying superiority are all part of this. Most men in relationships can reiterate this better than I can.

I personally do not see an easy solution to these dynamics because many of them are enforced legally (IE promoting women to divorce a rich man because its a faster way to wealth than working through the corporate ladder) and can therefore profit from the objectification and disposal of men. If individual men and women decide to genuinely reject this sort of behavior, that is perhaps the best response without systemic changes. And it is precisely the focus of this particular forum. 

The lies that feminists tell always get exposed, one way or the other. It is akin to that saying "Sit on a river bank and watch the bodies of your enemies float by".
Feminist lies are those bodies and here we have an example on how much they lie about women not being violent..

This guys cannot even defend himself against this monster even if he had the guts to do it. He would be arrested and jailed. That they way it goes these days. Thanks to feminists like Harman and her male hating ilk..

 If this does not convince you, then I suggest you just bugger off and live your ignorant life somewhere else..

As reality just does not do it for you..

I could wax lyrical on this subject for the rest of the year and not have to repeat one single item, study or article.

Women Are Aggressors in Household Violence Too

The notion among feminists, lesbians - among women in general - is that this is a male problem. It's part of an older lesbian-feminist paradigm which says most of the problems in the world come from men and if we could isolate ourselves from them, then things would be kind of idyllic. It's not true. But people in lesbian communities don't want to talk about that publicly. It's like airing dirty laundry. Source: Ros Davidson, " Gay-on-Gay Violence: The gay community's dirty secret - domestic violence - is finally coming out of the closet," Salon Magazine, February 27, 1997.

Feminists destroy anti-abortion protest..

"Perhaps it began with early female action figures. Perhaps with "Charlie's Angels." Or maybe with scores of elementary girls playing soccer, or with older girls playing contact sports at elite levels."

Erm, NO. It is not like females have all of a sudden become abusive, they have been abusive all along. It is recognised more as MRAs have continually demonstrated and exposed, unquestionable facts. But it's not the part of reality that feminists and female journalists want to highlight, they prefer to bury it under the carpet and live in denial as they have done all along..

Most likely we will never know exactly how or when it became okay to talk about female aggression--female-to-female aggression and female-to-male aggression. Whatever its origins, this new narrative is challenging the once omnipresent scenario of the male violent aggressor–passive female victim scenario. It is now increasingly acceptable to talk openly about female aggression and to conduct serious research on this topic.

So realisation has finally surfaced and the truth must now be stated..

We now know that women-on-women aggression is far from rare and that women are often the initiators of male-female aggression. Surveys of U.S. households have found rates of wife-to-husband violence "remarkably similar" to those of husband-to-wife violence. And an early cross-cultural survey did not find that men were significantly more aggressive than women.

 So we have the responses to the article, laying out the truth -

Submitted by Janet Women could surely find ways to actually physically harm their male partner, but, do not,..

But we are angels, do you know..

Violent women have been around as long as history was being enacted but now we finally have the "revelation" that it is really just a new phenomena, bullshit. Women have been abusing and bashing the crap out of all and sundry for so long that they had to finally confess it to be true.  In the past it was just swept under the carpet and ignored, especially by feminists.
The main culprits are feminists ofcourse, their blatant lies and disinformation have endlessly denied and fought against the truth being exposed. As feminism would die a great big death if they stopped promoting females as perpetual victims along with their endless denial, that they are aggressors at all, guaranteed endless funding for promoting their hate movement would be at risk..

The entire feminist hegemony relies heavily on government funding and it receives billions of dollars every year from known manginas(males for female supremacy) like Obama and feminist leaders like Gillard in Australia, who have no issues with their anti-male bias as well at their general hate for society and all things family..

What appals me the most is not that these confessions finally surface, as its about time, but the "Oh gosh, did we do that" whitewashing mentality is galling and unnecessary as well as being completely artificial. No one on this planet is surprised that women are abusive as we have witnessed that from our youth. It has always been the case that female aggression has been grossly understated.

Women's Enews: Women Are Aggressors, Too

"Make it Up as You Go, Feminism". II..

Regardless of the fact that feminist adherers witness, read and believe; eat, breathe and sleep it, there will always be some individuals who wallow in some fairyland version where all is warm and fuzzy and their beloved version should be promoted to sainthood.  They seriously believe that the feminastie movement is really not that bad. They reason, because in their opinion, that movement may actually have an odd member or part time believer, who is convinced that it's for the equality of both sexes. The "make this up as they go", pound that hegemony mercilessly into an acceptable meme. Ignoring facts and previous atrocities as they never existed. Such as bomb threats, death threats, verbal and physical abuse and these are only what surfaced. They claim it also permitted both sexes to reconstruct themselves or some other inane fallacy that only makes sense to themselves. They are totally convinced that they are correct, even when it is clearly demonstrated beyond argument, that their movement is sexist, hypocritical and devious. To this caution, they just close their ears and refuse to hear it or read it and cannot even be bothered to check or research it. You can just imagine them sitting on the floor, in the corner with fingers in both ears "nah..nah..nah, I am not listening"..

Here is an example (no link as I would not give this commenter the time of day)..

In my experience, feminists are open to and aware of male victims of domestic violence. They're well aware of the social stigma their gender roles puts them in, and that there's little help. They applaud help lines for men. They hate how violent women are excused because of traditional gender roles.
I don't think there's a man-hating conspiracy even among this official feminism. 

What has it to do with "gender roles" is beyond me as that sex smacks and abuses just about anyone under any circumstance (sidebar videos links prove that beyond doubt -------------->). 
I fail to see why they would even try to justify this hate movement to be considered as even remotely benevolent or why bother to demonstrate there is an iota of consideration of either sex as their motives have already demonstrated that their aim and goals do not include anything else besides their female supremacy doctrine at the expense of men and boys regardless of the damage it causes society, families or individuals. The more money feminists pull out of the system for their own use, the less to go around for more important issues like Health, Education etc..The more they gain the more people die. A bit morbid but that's the way it is..


Response to previous comments..

"Your feminism" is not the feminism that is setting policy in this country.
"Your feminism" is not the feminism that is dictating the behavior of courtrooms across the US.
I get it.
But what we are saying is that there is a nebulous movement out there that also goes by the name of "feminism" that is causing untold harm to men across the US and several countries in Europe. This "other feminism" is supporting the concept of false rape accusations, hampering young boys in education, using flawed child support laws to keep men in poverty, as well as supporting quite a few other serious issues that bring harm to men.

Update..Feminists Bomb Store

How feminists tried to destroy the family

You know how women have generally demonstrated they are no longer marriage material (they should really just "Woman up"),by also demonstrating a few other obnoxious habits that will make them persona non gratia to just about any real men except those desperate pretenders, feminised manginas and other desperate fellows whose life's wish is to either end it prematurely or transfer some foreign unidentifiable bug to his own anatomy..
However that is not even close to what these darling vagina carriers are concerntrating on becoming. Nope, after relentlessly whining, harping and moaning about how life is just so difficult and how their lot in life is just so hard and how they face countless imaginary discrimination and just to finish that of they are just not appreciated enough and how they are now just so "strong" and "independent" they can now find their own way into prison without really trying..

 Gee, next thing you know we will have some documentary about women in jail where "Jail affects women the most", oops, they are working on that already eh!!..

The fascinating issue about this article is that it is actually released by Yahoo, can you believe it. AN article, critical of a woman, on a Yahoo site. Will wonders never cease..

Will the Pussy Pass work this time ?

WOMAN FACES JAIL FOR GRABBING CROTCH OF AIR STEWARD

Yahoo!7October 29, 2011, 9:20 am

A woman executive is facing a jail sentence after she admitted groping a male flight steward while drunk on a plane.According to The Daily Mail, Katherine Goldberg, 25, grabbed the cabin crew member's crotch after drinking a pint of whiskey on a Virgin Atlantic flight.Goldberg, of Ealing Common, London, was told by the that her attack was too serious to be dealt with by a magistrates’ court and she now faces a maximum jail term of 10 years. 

She pleaded guilty to sexual assault and being drunk on an aircraft at Uxbridge Magistrates Court.The alleged incident took place on August 24 on a Johannesburg –London Virgin Atlantic Airbus A340-600.South African Goldberg was understood to have been returning to London after visiting relatives and made "strong sexual advances" to her victim during the journey, the court heard."The defendant was drunk in mid-air and groped a male member of the cabin crew. She had made strong sexual advances towards the man during the flight. Goldberg then groped the groin and testicular area," prosecutor Kevin Christie said. 

According to The Daily Mail, lawyers for Goldberg, of Ealing Common, London, had attempted to avoid the charge going to court and have the sexual assault charge dealt with by a police caution.

Ignorance is a wonderful thing especially if you are a feminist, also helps if you suffer from delusions. The delusional part being that women are just helpless victims of all and sundry and would not raise a finger to murder, rape, molest, abuse or maim children or their partners. The delusional mind goes even deeper into that level when they are of the opinion that women are the epitome, the sole centre of love and cuddles and that could be the case if they were not so bloody violent. Women display this ability even more when they are in a relationship together. Demonstrating to all and sundry that they are the winners when it comes to murdering, maiming and abusing one of their own..

Not convinced ?

I find it fascinating that we never ever hear about lesbian domestic violence or barely touch on violence by women in general although the proof is way past the denial stage and yet they continue to sweep it under the carpet and pretend it does not exist. It is the exact same situation about female violence and we have not got started on female sex abusers which is an entire topic of it's own..

Violent betrayal: Partner abuse in lesbian relationships.
Renzetti, Claire M.
Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. (1992). 202 pp.
Based on a nationwide study of violence in lesbian relationships, this comprehensive, accessible volume derives from a common theme expressed by the subjects: the sense of having been betrayed, first by their lovers, and subsequently by a lesbian community which tends to deny the problem when victims seek help. Renzetti skillfully addresses several central issues: consequences for victims, batterers and the community as a whole; and what we can learn about domestic violence in general by studying violence in lesbian relationships. The research offers a fresh look at domestic violence by examining the phenomenon of women as perpetrators of intimate violence against women,

Partner violence in lesbian relationships

By Janice Ristock, Ph.D., Associate Vice-President Research and Professor, Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Manitoba

Research examining woman-to-woman intimate partner violence lags behind research on heterosexual domestic violence. As a result, many assumptions and stereotypes continue to exist, which can minimize and/or misrecognize violence between women.  Anti-violence interventions based on heterosexual domestic violence research are often inappropriately applied to lesbian women. 

What does current research tell us?

Several studies have confirmed a pattern where abuse is more likely to occur in a woman’s first intimate relationship with another woman. This suggests that abuse often happens in a particular context of vulnerability and isolation.

Current research continues to document the barriers that remain for lesbians trying to seek services for partner abuse. Having access to formal supports often depends on where you live (geographic area, urban or rural locations). Research has found that lesbians are more likely to turn to friends than professionals for support.

Finally, in addition to findings on partner abuse, research has established that lesbians experience higher rates of public violence (for example, assault, harassment and/or robbery) compared to heterosexual women. 

Family Violence Prevention E-Bulletin: July 2011

Violence by Women and Girls

Feature Articles

Women, Girls and Violent Offences

Women and girls have more commonly been involved in the criminal justice system as victims rather than offenders. While females make up half of violent crime victims, they represent a minority of offenders.  Most data on offenders in Canada are based on incidents reported to police, yet we know that a number of crimes go unreported.

Based on Statistics Canada reports, we know that:

1. Females made up 28% of youth (under 18 years of age) and 22% of adults accused of an offence by police.
2. Female youth crime rates were generally three times higher than those of adult women.
3. Girls were half as likely to self-report violent delinquent behaviour, compared to boys (15% vs. 30%, respectively).
4. Adult females were most commonly accused of: theft under $5,000; administration of justice offences (e.g. failure to appear in court); and assault level 1 (least severe form).
5. The overall rate at which women have been charged by police for Criminal Code offences has fallen since 1992, but rates of women charged with violent offences have increased over the past 30 years.
   1. These rates almost tripled between 1979 and 1997 and continued to rise until 2001. Since then, rates have remained relatively stable.
   2. The higher rates were largely due to a rise in charge rates for assault level 1.
6. Adult women were more likely to be violent toward an intimate partner, whereas young women were more often violent toward friends or acquaintances.
7. Females account for 10% of those accused of homicide, with victims most commonly being spouses and children. For roughly 75% of women who killed their spouse, there were previous incidents of violence between the couple.

References:

Kong, Rebecca and Kathy Au Coin. (2008). “Female Offenders in Canada ” Juristat. Vol. 28, no.1. Statistics Canada Catalogue no.85-002-XIE. Ottawa.

Hotton Mahony, Tina. (2011). Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report: Women and the Criminal Justice System . Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 89-503-X. Ottawa.

Savoie, Josee. (2006). “Youth Self-Reported Delinquency, Toronto, 2006 ” Juristat. Vol. 27, no. 6. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 85-002-XIE. Ottawa.

Just as doctors and midwifes will lift the newborn at birth and declare it's sex, that same method will be used your entire life. Yep, it's a girl, welcome to a life of special treatment, government largess and every other possible privilege that can be bestowed on an individual is already in place, installed to ensure your life will be special. Automatic selection for employment, your selection for colleges and universities is just about guaranteed, promotion assured, even over much better qualified individuals and should on any occasion, someone even accidental pierce that halo, then you are given automatic preferential treatment under law, and the outcomes will be in your favour even if you lie about it, just on your word, no evidence required..

JTO.
Okay, there are laws – sure, and you’re governed by them, but you’re not protected by them.

Should the new born be that other sex, you know, cannon fodder for the female howitzers, then you are already doomed as a third class citizen after woman, child and then you. I bring you these facts so when you are thrown into that maelstrom of endless work, injustice and anti-male bias, you have at least been warned..

There are no laws

There are no laws. If you’re a man, you can be murdered with impunity. You can be charged and convicted with rape based on nothing but anonymous accusation. Not just in a court of law, but hey, in a court of kangaroos cooked up by college students. Laws? Bill of rights? Ha! If a woman accuses you of misconduct, your conviction for sexual assault – on no evidence – means increased funding for people who depend on your utility and disposability.Okay, there are laws – sure, and you’re governed by them, but you’re not protected by them. We are now living in postlegal culture. Laws are selectively interpreted and enforced. This is nothing new obviously, the rich and the famous have always enjoyed privilege. However the legal system now operates along sexual lines, with you, my brothers, on the bottom tier. You’re not even a human being, buddy. Nope, you’re a disposable dispenser of labor, money, sperm, and on behalf of anyone but yourself – violence. The law says so.
Speaking of disposability, the appellation of “hero” in our culture depends on you sacrificing your future, and potentially your life on behalf of people who discount your humanity.
In spite of this, most men sleep-walk through life thinking they’re living in a culture which treats them as humans with rights. A listing facts which show this to be false is beyond the scope of this discussion. Link in this article’s footer for those interested[1].
Certainly many people are aware that their government illegally tortures both foreigners and Americans, arrests and indefinitely detains citizens without trial or charge, wire taps the population in violation of the bill of rights, steals private property through eminent domain, but people still sedate themselves with 4 hours of television per day and mumble something about it being a “free country” while they know it is not.
However, systemic financial fraud and personal destruction by illegal private courts operating with the complete endorsement of government seems conceptually difficult to grasp. Perhaps it’s just too similar to dystopian science fiction to recognize. When people are informed of these doings, because is is so far removed from popular understanding of living in a nation governed by laws – they dismiss factual reporting of the phenomena.
Another reason for public ignorance and apathy is that people still believe they’re enfranchised citizens. They believe they’re protected by the civil liberties encoded into law. These assumptions are wrong, of course, but the illusion persists, re-enforced by the momentum of a formerly democratic society and by cultivated misdirection in mainstream media. The unfortunate truth is that men are effectively peasants; chattel without legal rights. This isn’t reflected in the formal structure of law in our culture, which is now mostly ignored as a matter of convenience, and that’s partly why it goes mostly unaddressed by men.
The maintained illusion of legal enfranchisement is vitally important, because if men understood consciously they are peasants – they would do what disenfranchised and abused peasant populations has always done through history.

Rest of the article here..

Here we have an example of cause and effect. Society in general, treat women like children by giving them permission to behave anyway they please and not hold them to account. Rape by females/mothers on male victims would be a prime example on how white knights and women in general, grant women open slather in areas of sexual abuse and then turn around and claim that it's all someone else's fault. We have witnessed one example after another where female pedophiles, child molesters and abusers are given a customary smack on the wrist and told to go home and not to be naughty again. That it the extent of justice our feminised justice system now hold women to account. The simple truth is they don't..

I have no doubt that if you abuse a child, you have a very good chance of producing a future monster and this article explains just how that task is completed.
Step one begins in the home and the main perpetrator is the mother..

The sad fact about all this is that the MRM has been pointing this out for decades and it's fallen on the usual deaf ears that any complaint against women usually does. Just sweep it under the carpet and let's pretend it does not exist..

Not always the 'gentler sex' 

Barbara Kay, National Post · Oct. 12, 2011  

Last Saturday's Post featured an interview with Shannon Moroney, the wife of a supposedly rehabilitated Jason Staples, who in 1988 murdered a woman in a fit of rage and spent 10 years in prison. A month after their marriage, Staples sexually assaulted and kidnapped two women. He's back in prison as a "dangerous offender."
Mentioned, but not elaborated on in the interview was the revelation that Staples had been sexually abused as a child. You're not surprised. By his mother. Now perhaps, you are.
Most rapists were subjected to some form of sexual abuse in childhood. A startling amount is perpetrated by females. Peer-reviewed studies conclude that between 60% to 80% of "rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men" were sexually abused by a female.
And yet it is commonly understood that, except in rare cases, women don't harbour such impulses. As McGill professor of social work Myriam Denov, who did her PhD thesis on female sex offenders, notes, as recently as 1984, a study proclaimed that "pedophilia does not exist at all in women."
It exists in spades. According to a 2004 U.S. Department of Education mass study of university students, 57% of students reporting child sexual abuse cited a male offender, and 42% reported a female offender. Interestingly, 65% of the survivors of female abuse who opened up to a therapist, doctor or other professional were not believed on their first disclosure. Overall, 86% of those who tried to tell anyone at all about their experiences were not believed.
According to a 1996 report from the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN), about 25% of child sexual abuse is committed by women, but that figure may be low, because survivors are far more conflicted and shamed in admitting abuse by their mothers than by fathers. In one study of 17,337 survivors of childhood sexual abuse, 23% reported a female-only perpetrator and 22% reported both male and female. A U.S. Department of Justice report finds that, in 2008, 95% of all youths reporting sexual misconduct by staff member in state juvenile facilities said their victimization experiences included victimization by female personnel, who made up 42% of the staff.
Public acknowledgement of female sex abuse remains a social taboo. BBC Radio 4 broadcast a film called When Girls Do It, following which a TV show, This Morning, opened its lines to survivors of female sex abuse. The studio was overwhelmed by over 1,000 calls, 90% women, none of whom had ever before disclosed their secrets.
Dr. Paul Fedoroff, a forensic psychiatrist and co-director of the Sexual Behaviors Clinic at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, says that "there are a lot of women who do sexually abuse children, but they get away with it." Daycare centres, schools and homes make propitious terrain for predators. One study found 8% of female perpetrators were teachers and 23% were babysitters.
There are three types of female sex offenders: those who are predisposed to it and will abuse very young children, exactly like men; those who are "male-accompanied," like Karla Homolka (alive and well, and the mother of three children in Montreal); and the "teacher-lover" type, like the infamous Mary Kay Letourneau, who seduced and, after a stint in prison, married her former student.
While the first two types are universally detested, the third type is problematic, because it is often assumed, even by law enforcement, that older women cannot coerce sex, or that teenage boys are flattered and empowered by an older woman's sexual mentorship. Boys do act out their confusion and anxieties differently than girls do, but that doesn't mean many of them aren't damaged by the relationships, or that the law should be applied to women abusers with any less rigour.
Even mental-health professionals and social service agencies avoid facing up to the phenomenon. I spoke at length with an adult survivor of a mother's sadistic sex abuse. "Nina," not her real name, told me that although she has attempted many times to deal with her past therapeutically, "I have never found any social service agency willing to acknowledge this or speak about it."
Victorian chivalry and 21st-century feminism would seem to make strange bedfellows, but in their equally unrealistic characterization of women as the always "gentler sex," they condemn both male and female victims of femaleperpetrated abuse to silence and second-class social status.
To err is human. Are women fully human? Then stop treating them like saints or permanent moral infants.
bkay@videotron.ca