One does have to wonder what the mindset is when a married woman would have an affair for whatever reason, get herself pregnant and just continues as usual knowing full well that the child was fathered by someone else. That constant reminder of that fling would be in that child's every movement and action, it's facial construction, even eye colour, speech, everything this child did would be a constant reminder. Yet women make the claim of being the self appointed arbitrators of public conscience, the feminist fake high horse claim(women should never be held accountable). An act demonstrated by their endless harping and scolding about issues they consider to be a negative representation on how things should be, it always appears to benefit them though. The tea totalers from the early 1930s come to mind as does the copious and unlimited organisation on the web today..

A great example of this attitude has been demonstrated clearly by Sotomayor..

Judging Sotomayor by Mike Adams..

Sotomayer is of the opinion that she is a higher level of being because it is a female and a "non-white". The ego here just does not get any bigger than this..

We have copious examples about the opposite sex, in the course of writing this blog, necessitated that I study, probe and expose the behavioral patterns and thinking processes of the opposite sex, which I have always stated was a pursuit that I wish I had never started or undertaken, as the more I uncovered, the worse it gets. It was the original intention of this blog to demonstrate to that same sex what it was like for man and boy to be abused on a constant daily basis for just being male as feminists and general society have now adopted as normal thatnks to feminist collusion and instigation..
In that pursuit of knowledge about the opposite sex, there is one major character flaw that they demand to be excluded, which they undertake and promote either maliciously, knowingly and specifically and that is that their actions should never be held up for inspection or explanation but always easily justified because they are who they are. Feminists having realised that this character flaw was prominent in the majority women, they demanded that they should never be held accountable for any of their actions at all. Feminists went so far as to ensure that to being the case by changing jurisprudence of every law that could somehow excuse that current reality. They have ensured that women are given a free ride, wherever possible and continue to this day to achieve that goal and aim. We have already witnessed that to be the case on a daily basis as women are never given the same punishment as men and it can be perceived it is for just that reason..

It has become an obvious fact that women require the same training in knowing the difference between right and wrong, good and evil, just like everyone else and that they are not the arbitrators they make claim to be. They often behave as if they have zero conscience concerning any of their decisions, which in turn may call into question their justification or stance. This is the same topic covered by Joanna and I in regards to "what women want" as well as "What women offer". It is sadly the case that showing the worst that human beings are capable of is definitely a much more emotive argument and feminists have refined that; then showing how most people life in harmony and trust. It comes back to that wallowing in the pigpen with the charlatans, harridans and toxic beings that will change one's purview of the opposite or both sexes. An act and aim that feminists and feminism has concentrated on in their false pursuit of non-existent equality..

When listening to this video below, you will hear how a woman, split up for a month with her husband, had a fling, got pregnant and reunited with her husband even though she did not want to, just because she knew that he had the better income and could SUPPORT HER better than the guy who made her pregnant. The confession by this woman demonstrates my case clearly and entirely. No consideration is made whatsoever about the affect this would have on the husband, nothing matters more than HER living standards and ensuring HER lifestyle does not change. There is no visible level of regret, of conscience or living the lie. She even states that when approached by her husband about the child that she responded in a fake and forced reaction that was designed and ensured the topic was never broached again..
How dare he suggest that the child may possibly not be his, the damn cheek, the bastard..

The endless argument between Social Scientists, Behavioural Scientists and Evolutionary Psychologists (EP Scientists, are the scourge of the feminists and their inane disproven "product of your environment, not your sex" mentality) have been sampling, testing, pocking and prodding the population for a very long time. Issues like erotophilia are explored and answers are needed to determine whether or not the Feminist induced puppet scientists are actually capable of telling the truth. That would take an almighty effort as lying to feminists is akin to sucking oxygen on demand. Regardless of previous studies demonstrating clearly that the majority of behaviour has been accumulated over eons and fixed into our DNA, that is not their goal or aim, as it does not fit nicely into their gender, sexuality and behavioural mentality and biased doctrine..

They much prefer to wander into the unknown to demonstrate their newly found dyslexic interpretations than to actually find out the truth about human behaviour. A bit like those two cretin parents refusing to divulge the sex of their (son) child. They would be finding out about now precisely what his sex preferences are unless ofcourse they force him to behave like a girl, which rather defeats their inane intentions of not identifying as either sex. The greatest, riotous result would be for the lad to be expelled from school for aiming a gun shaped slice of pizza as some permanently offended plodder..



I digress.

Michelle and Terri wanted to have a look at why men claim to have more sex than women were prepared to admit to. That is basically the entire content and result of this study. It just really demonstrates that when the sexes are told that their response to specific questions regarding sex and sexual activities is being monitored, they tend to tell the truth more so than when asked the same questions face to face. Apparently, the girls lie about that as well and we have these two studious members of academia wondering why that is the case in the hope, I would imagine, to demonstrate that somehow the girls are really just victims of another imaginary slight.

Also, the attitude that women take when lying about humping is because it does not sit well with anyone knowing that riding the cock-carousal should be a favoured option and have determined that being called nasty names is not their end goal, better to lie about that. Even though fibbing about it all appears to be an irrelevancy. These two students of social discipline assumed that shaming anyone about being naughty behind everyone's back, was just another recently introduced methodology society uses to brow beat girls about their behaviour.
Claiming that men do not receive the same bias, boohoo. What was missing from the commentary was ofcourse the fact that women are more inclined to cane the piss out of each other and call each other sluts and whores than men normally do, as they compete for partners and deride each other if they determine them to be any competition as demonstrated by a previous study I posted a while back. But that outcome really had nothing to do with anything, apparently..

So, if you're into reading new words and spending an hour reading about the obvious, have a look by all mean (link in the title) otherwise the sun will still rise tomorrow and human nature will just be the same..