Latest Posts
Showing posts with label abusive mothers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abusive mothers. Show all posts

Women Are Aggressors : Deny, Deny, Deny..


I could wax lyrical on this subject for the rest of the year and not have to repeat one single item, study or article.


Women Are Aggressors in Household Violence Too

It is a know fact to everyone except those ignorant feminists who choose to ignore that issue as they pursue the "All Women are Victims" mantra. A subject that does appear to be a losing reality as more and more studies and facts hit the public arena. Those of you who have witnessed female violence at home or when out and about (Nightclubs etc.) already know the truth of it. The feminist hegemony is saturated with lesbian feminists, they too would be well aware of the fact that lesbians (they would be females too, I am thinking) smack the bejesus out of each other even more than heterosexual couples do, and that's a fact as well..
The notion among feminists, lesbians - among women in general - is that this is a male problem. It's part of an older lesbian-feminist paradigm which says most of the problems in the world come from men and if we could isolate ourselves from them, then things would be kind of idyllic. It's not true. But people in lesbian communities don't want to talk about that publicly. It's like airing dirty laundry. Source: Ros Davidson, " Gay-on-Gay Violence: The gay community's dirty secret - domestic violence - is finally coming out of the closet," Salon Magazine, February 27, 1997.
Feminists destroy anti-abortion protest..

But they keep promoting the lies and misinformation like there are still people around who are stupid enough to believe their biased erroneous claims..

The interesting part about the article is the responses as that particular article makes some spurious claims as female journalists do, like 
"Perhaps it began with early female action figures. Perhaps with "Charlie's Angels." Or maybe with scores of elementary girls playing soccer, or with older girls playing contact sports at elite levels."
Erm, NO. It is not like females have all of a sudden become abusive, they have been abusive all along. It is recognised more as MRAs have continually demonstrated and exposed, unquestionable facts. But it's not the part of reality that feminists and female journalists want to highlight, they prefer to bury it under the carpet and live in denial as they have done all along..
Most likely we will never know exactly how or when it became okay to talk about female aggression--female-to-female aggression and female-to-male aggression. Whatever its origins, this new narrative is challenging the once omnipresent scenario of the male violent aggressor–passive female victim scenario. It is now increasingly acceptable to talk openly about female aggression and to conduct serious research on this topic.
So realisation has finally surfaced and the truth must now be stated..
We now know that women-on-women aggression is far from rare and that women are often the initiators of male-female aggression. Surveys of U.S. households have found rates of wife-to-husband violence "remarkably similar" to those of husband-to-wife violence. And an early cross-cultural survey did not find that men were significantly more aggressive than women.
 So we have the responses to the article, laying out the truth -


Submitted by gwallan 
What saddens me is the aggressive rejection experienced by victims whose only crime is being the wrong gender or, even more pitifully, being abused by somebody of the wrong gender. What clinically depresses me is victims being called liars and/or laughed at by services promising to help victims. What angers me is the ongoing parade of female sexual abusers being treated as a victim and NEVER punished. What makes me borderline murderous is the woman who rapes a twelve year old boy and then gets child support from her victim with the help of government agencies and lawyers.
I hope you and others enjoy your political and legal shenanigans way up there in your air conditioned ergonomic offices. I get to see and deal with the real casualties and it is not pretty. We're sick to death of the lies. We're sick to death of gender political doctrine erasing victims from view. Look inside yourself critically for a change. If your allegiances to women are what drives you rather than concern for all victims then get the h*ll away from ANYTHING to do with victims. Every lie you allow inevitably hurts another victim somewhere.
"Blaming women is such a cottage industry I guess it's hard not to make money on it when we can."
This did the trick though. Eusticia must be weeping at the cynicism done in her name.



Submitted by fondueguy 

" Women could surely find ways to actually physically harm their male partner, but, do not"
This dialogue is simply false.
According to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10989615/
women are only somewhat more likely to be injured, and constitute 62% of those injured in dv.
It is strange to see you to juggle the idea of women being weak/helpless while at the same time realizing that women are not incapable idiots. Surely you can put two and two together, and see that the since women are capable of hurting a man, and some of them are aggressive, that some women will injure men by means of surprise, weapons, drugs, or sleep.
And I hope you do not seriously mean to say that hitting someone without injuring them is not damaging. Not only is that bad in and of itself, but it can lead to escalation and it will damage the children who see it.
You only help men and women by being honest about the problem and stopping the cycle.

The other interesting issue is, as Kim Kardashian demonstrates, if a male were to hat a female as hard as she does to him, I would imagine the end result being different as well. It comes down to the bulk and strength issue. Most women have a problems squatting lies and therefore are seen to be weaklings. They would be in the minority as not all are fawning doves but that's the image they preserve and protect for self preservation..

They were responding to this usual bit of misandry. It is part of large response but one does not have to guess which hegemony she comes from..
Submitted by Janet Women could surely find ways to actually physically harm their male partner, but, do not,..

Abusive Women: Finally, a Confession..

But we are angels, do you know..
Violent women have been around as long as history was being enacted but now we finally have the "revelation" that it is really just a new phenomena, bullshit. Women have been abusing and bashing the crap out of all and sundry for so long that they had to finally confess it to be true.  In the past it was just swept under the carpet and ignored, especially by feminists.
The main culprits are feminists ofcourse, their blatant lies and disinformation have endlessly denied and fought against the truth being exposed. As feminism would die a great big death if they stopped promoting females as perpetual victims along with their endless denial, that they are aggressors at all, guaranteed endless funding for promoting their hate movement would be at risk..

The entire feminist hegemony relies heavily on government funding and it receives billions of dollars every year from known manginas(males for female supremacy) like Obama and feminist leaders like Gillard in Australia, who have no issues with their anti-male bias as well at their general hate for society and all things family..

What appals me the most is not that these confessions finally surface, as its about time, but the "Oh gosh, did we do that" whitewashing mentality is galling and unnecessary as well as being completely artificial. No one on this planet is surprised that women are abusive as we have witnessed that from our youth. It has always been the case that female aggression has been grossly understated.
Women's Enews: Women Are Aggressors, Too
Caryl Rivers and Rosalind C. Barnett
December 4, 2011
(WOMENS ENEWS)– 
Times are changing. Girls aren’t so “girly”anymore.
Perhaps it began with early female action figures. Perhaps with
“Charlie’s Angels.” Or maybe with scores of elementary girls
playing soccer, or with older girls playing contact sports at elite
levels. 
Most likely we will never know exactly how or when it became okay to
talk about female aggression–female-to-female aggression and
female-to-male aggression. Whatever its origins, this new narrative is
challenging the once omnipresent scenario of the male violent
aggressor–passive female victim scenario. It is now increasingly
acceptable to talk openly about female aggression and to conduct
serious research on this topic.
We now know that women-on-women aggression is far from rare and that
women are often the initiators of male-female aggression. Surveys of U.S.
have found rates of wife-to-husband violence
“remarkably similar” to those of husband-to-wife violence.
And an early cross-cultural survey did not find that men were
significantly more aggressive than women.Aggression, as opposed to anger,  conveys an intent to hurt or harm and can be expressed physically, verbally or by withdrawing. There is general agreement that men exhibit higher levels of physical aggression than women,but the differences are small to moderate.
After a thorough review of the literature on who initiates violence in
couples, Murray Straus, of the University of New Hampshire, reports:
“It is painful to have to recognize the high rate of domestic assaults
by women. All six major studies which have investigated this topic found
that women initiate violence in a large proportion of the
cases.” 
Research Example 
For example, of the 495 couples in a 1985 Family Violence
Survey for whom one or more assaults were reported by a female
respondent, the man was the only violent partner in 25. 9 percent of
the cases, the woman was the only one to be violent in 25. 5 percent
of the cases and both were violent in 48.6 percent of the cases. Of
446 women who reported that they were involved in violent
relationships, their partners struck the first blow in 42 percent of
the cases. The women hit first in 53 percent of the cases, and they
could not remember who hit first in the remaining cases.
The great difference here is that women are far more often seriously
hurt or killed than men. A woman may start a fight with a slap, which
is mildly painful to the man, but he retaliates by punching her and
throwing her against the wall, breaking her jaw.But it is important to recognize that although men are predominantly
the murderers, rapists and batterers in human society, relatively few
men ever perpetrate these acts. If you discount the extremely violent
behavior of those few, the behavior of most men resembles that of most
women.Source: http://www.womensenews.org/story/books/111203/women-are-aggressors-in-household-violence-too

Mothers: The Illegal GateKeepers..

Endless blame has been placed on Fathers while mother's questionable behaviour is totally ignored. Obama, Cameron, as well as a few other "leaders" never waste any time castigating Fathers for not being involved with their children but what they fail to comprehend and mention is the fact that Fathers have to circumnavigate the GateKeeper. That relentless and unending battle one has with the one who has sworn to love and cherish, that only applies when it's to her advantage, something has to be in it for HER, otherwise forget it..
Countless Fathers, after divorce, have to contend with the ever avenging women that chose to end the marriage, who in most cases has deserted her vowels at the behest of her "girlfriends", with her never ending complaints about how she feels and how everybody and everything else has to fall into place according to her mindset. Fathers face relentless obstacles after divorce when it comes to seeing or visiting his own children. Those children would not even exist if it were not for the Father..

Somehow, that is all forgotten and discarded and the "woman" decides, regardless of court notices, what she wants to do and the main parent can go to hell or fall into line with her wishes or loose out. Charming human beings, those mothers..
  The unspoken truth about fatherlessness is that in most cases a woman chose to remove the father from his children’s lives. Fatherlessness is not, when it comes down to it, about a problem with men, but rather a problem with women. There may be some men who willingly abandon their children, but these are a small minority compared to those who have been disposed of by the mother.
Demanding that a woman be accountable for her actions is unheard of in today's society. One can take court action against the mother to stop her from denying access to your children or to stop her alienating your children against you, only to find out that the courts are so biased as to just ignore any lawbreaking undertaken by those uncaring and vengeful culprits. Do the courts follow up on their actions. Only if the actions are against the Father, mothers have a free hand to do whatever she wants..
The entire system sucks to high heaven and it's the mothers flaunting the laws and stopping Fathers from doing what they do best, caring for his own children, which in reality is the real issue at hand..

So what is wrong with women ?
No accountability, they can and do whatever they like, whether illegal or not, appears to have no significance to the story. It's all about her and it has always been. Only now that has been put into law..
Our society needs to stop asking “what’s wrong with men?” and start inquiring into what’s gone wrong with women. Fatherlessness is a major crisis in our civilization, and the blame for it lies almost entirely at the feet of our women.
My Daddy..
Women being held accountable is not part of the feminist agenda, treating them like children is. This is ofcourse reflected quite clearly in the ever increasing laws instituted under the false claim of "for the  children". Under this guise they have found copious methods to introduce anti-father laws and automatically donate the prize, the kids, to the gatekeeper, to their detriment..


Absent Fathers — Whose Fault?

by W.F. PRICE on DECEMBER 3, 2011
Having just finished up a parenting plan for my kids’ relocation, I’m feeling pretty drained. The process is slow, painful, expensive, emotionally draining and time-consuming. As a father, it was almost entirely up to me to put the effort into keeping my time with my children. In Washington state, there is a “presumption” that the custodial parent (i.e. the mother) can have her way, and whatever parenting plan she submits upon a relocation, even one that removes the father entirely from the children’s lives, becomes law if the father does not oppose it within 30 days. Previous custody agreements are irrelevant.
This law gives women the ability to erase fathers from their children’s lives as easily as submitting a new parenting plan and moving to the next school district. If the father is too poor or too busy to show up and fight it in court, he’s out of luck. If he already lives elsewhere, he’s pretty much screwed. And even if he can fight it the first time, the mother can simply repeat the process until he gives up.
For all the talk of progress in father’s rights and equality, the brutal reality is that a determined woman can still remove her children from their father’s life simply with some persistence and knowledge of the law. Men have the option to fight it, but realistically speaking, most men don’t have the means. The typical separation and/or divorce happen when both parents are young. All the young single mothers clogging up the hookup/dating sites are clear evidence of how common this is. In most cases, they left their children’s father; they were not abandoned.
Young men in particular, especially these days, do not generally have the wherewithal to fight for their children, and I’ve learned from personal experience that if you don’t fight for them you will lose them. I count myself one of the lucky ones. I was tenacious, and would have been no matter what the circumstances, but friends and family, which I have an abundance of here in my hometown, were essential to my ability to persevere. I really feel for young men without this advantage — there’s often nothing they can do. This is why I will always give the benefit of the doubt to men who are estranged from their children.
And yet we still have politicians, pundits and producers bemoaning the plight of the poor, abandoned single mother and fatherless child, pointing the finger of blame at men, despite the fact that women are given options all along the way. They have the option to leave their children’s father, they have the option to continue to demand support from him, and they have the option to cut him off from his children. Not one of these options results in a penalty, so a great many women pursue them.
The unspoken truth about fatherlessness is that in most cases a woman chose to remove the father from his children’s lives. Fatherlessness is not, when it comes down to it, about a problem with men, but rather a problem with women. There may be some men who willingly abandon their children, but these are a small minority compared to those who have been disposed of by the mother.
Our society needs to stop asking “what’s wrong with men?” and start inquiring into what’s gone wrong with women. Fatherlessness is a major crisis in our civilization, and the blame for it lies almost entirely at the feet of our women.