Latest Posts
Showing posts with label male hater. Show all posts
Showing posts with label male hater. Show all posts

This is what a feminist looks like.. Fabian-Weber.
An update on Nicole Fabian Hyphen Weber, don't they just love those triple names, the last bigot used a triple as well but without the hyphen, I am almost disappointed..

The site "The Stir" is part of the cafemom network, has to also be held to account for promoting violence, hate, misandry in particular, so it is worth the effort to mark those comments as offensive and lodging a complaint. Easy enough to do. No waiting in line..
Cafemom guidelines as follows --
Slurs, stereotyping, and hate speech are not tolerated.
Slurs, hate speech, and attacks aimed at any race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation are not tolerated at all on CafeMom. Don't stereotype people. It isn't funny and it isn't acceptable.
Here are the people who own and run Cafemom..

To refresh the memory on this bigot, it is the feminist female who, just like Sharon Osbourne, had a really good laugh about a men having his penis severed and removed by some psychotic female. However, this piece of nastiness does not even bother commenting in response to the outrage from both man and woman regardless of her macabre topic and her vitriolic rage on that site..


Wife Cuts Off Husband's Penis & Chucks It in the River

Just like a child has no sense of dignity or honour or demonstrates some obvious acknowledgement of care, so are these women the same. When queried if the tables were turned and a man severed a breast or a clitoris and "chucked" that into the river, could we all have a good howler like those cretins on umpteen daily girly programs. What manner of animals are they where they delight in the suffering and violence of another human being. What manner of adult are you when you delight in the knowledge that someone has removed some part of another person's body and you just laugh about that. What level of sick human being does that..

So Nicole Fabian-Weber has definitely earned her place on the bigot list. This is not an honour and it should serve as being shameful and dishonourable but I doubt she is even capable of that..

So it gives me great pleasure in demonstrating where that nasty attitude ends up on Google and exposed even higher than most of her own grasping efforts for attention. Enjoy..

Let's have a look at one of the comments and the type of fan this nasty bit of work attracts..

Snarkymom ummm, where can i get scissors that are sharp enough to cut off a PENIS!!!
 on Oct 18, 2011 at 3:05 PM

Those woman are just pure class aren't they. I can understand why men are happy just being on their own and making their own way instead of putting up with another one of these weirdos..

This is the result of the Google main search page on bigot number one taken just a half an hour ago, it demonstrates how affective the MRM is at exposing those male haters and there will be more coming, that's for sure. We have the major MRA sites listed in ManWomanMyth, AVfM, Register Her, Antimisandry and ofcourse this humble blog as the fifth entry. Well done All..


As you can see JMK has now been outed for the bigot she is and recorded in posterity and rightfully so. It would appear that other male haters are lining up with their usual male hating bigotry which has until now just been ignored. But no longer. We will do whatever it takes to expose those nasty violence and hate promoters and give them exactly what they deserve. Exposure..

Here is your part of the bargain..

Report Inappropriate Content

and let's see if we can have this bigot removed, permanently..

Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registry

According to her profile at CafĂ© Mom’s The StirNicole Fabian-Weber, a “Mommy Blogger” with some spotty writing credentials, describes herself in the following way:
Not that long ago I moved to New York from Los Angeles, where I wrote and worked for shows like What I Like About You and The Big Bang Theory. I’ve written essays for McSweeney’s and Hackwriters, blogged for a bevy of websites, and even had a short-lived affair with copywriting.
I live in a dimly-lit Brooklyn brownstone with my husband and shih tzu.
Spend lots of time online. Don’t eat dairy. Big fan of puppies.
Sipping on: Gin and juice
Let’s add something else to her bio: Virulent bigot glorifying and promoting violence and sexual mutilation. Oh yeah, let’s also add her sorry ass to register-her.com.
In a post recently written on her blog space at The Stir, Fabian-Weber said the following:
A 29-year-old Vietnamese woman, only identified by her surname, Pan, was sick and tired of her husband’s philandering ways and his physical abuse. So she did what any scorned, ballsy woman would do: She waited until he was passed out from drugs and sleeping pills and cut off his penis — with a pair of scissors. Then she threw the severed member in a Taiwanese river like it ain’t no thang.
Afterward, she turned herself into police and allegedly told them that she felt no regret for what she did to her unemployed, drugged-out dirtbag of a husband. Bad. Ass.
There is so much glaringly wrong with this post. I need to point out first that drug addiction is a problem for which many people need help. I know, I spent a significant part of my adult life counseling people affected by drug addiction and alcoholism. I never considered sexual mutilation as a possible intervention, nor do I think most of my peers would have approved of that. Well, most of them.
But aside from that I would also have questioned the circumstances of any male client so unfortunate as to be connected with a woman capable of doing what Pan did.  Anyone capable of that, I assure you, was a terror in other ways long before she made this heinous attack. It is entirely possible that doing drugs and drinking was a coping mechanism the husband fell back on as a reaction to an abusive wife, and that his alleged violence, if it ever happened at all, was in self-defense.
In this I digress a bit, because it is Pan’s sick and disgusting American counterpart that is the real subject of this post. And I am not done with her yet.
After calling the victim of a sexual mutilation a “dirtbag of a husband,” and inferring that his lack of income was part of the rationale for severing his penis from his body and throwing it in a river, she further exposes her own psychopathology with the following:
Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long, and cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power seems like the best option. And it probably is.
Notwithstanding this depraved rationalization, the only proven physical abuse in this case thus far was from this woman, who waited till her husband was unconscious and defenseless, then savagely attacked and disfigured him.
And the post reflects, some female bigots, disabused of the notion that there are any real consequences for violence perpetrated by women (that much is true), are moving past just committing such acts on their own behalf, but into open advocacy in public forums.
At the end of her blog post, she queries her readers with the following:
Do you think cutting off a man’s penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?
It is clearly a question that this particular bigot wishes to be answered in the affirmative, as she illustrates with saying “I must admit, I’ve always admired a woman who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus. [sic]”
Fabian-Weber, in the spirit of Sharon Osborne and other low-rent versions of humanity everywhere, has just joined the ranks of violence advocates elevating their hatred into the public limelight.
Is this disgusting person going on to register-her.com? You bet your ass she is.  Are we going to have a protracted debate on whether to take her off that registry, should she decide to remove her post, or apologize? NO.
Nicole Fabian-Weber has volunteered to out herself as a hateful ideologue that supports the most deplorable forms of violence, against men, for whatever grievances women might allege to have. She will remain on the registry as long as that unfortunate man does not have a penis.

I really do not have say too much about this obnoxious feminists as it has already done the damage herself. One of the most loathed male hating feminist I have ever come across..



Harman is the male hater in the middle of the picture..

http://order-order.com/2011/08/13/harriet-harman-is-gangsta-mutha-1/

It was Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first refuge for battered women, who in the late eighties identified Labour's then radicals Harriet Harman and Patricia Hewitt as dangerous feministideological enemies of the family. 
Harman and Hewitt were in those days leading lights of the loony left's radical feminist wing, arguing in pamphlet after pamphlet that "It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony and cohesion." 
After decades of agitation, which influenced social policy as well as social workers, their attack on men and their role in modern life has reached its nadir in Tottenham. Local MP David Lammy put it bluntly last week: "We are seeing huge consequences of the lack of male role models in young men's lives.." Harriet Harman is the ideologicalsingle-mother of those gangsta rioters.
Peter Oborne correctly identifies that behind the scenes New Labour's party policy was captured by the likes of Harman and Hewitt who viewed the traditional two-parent family as an instrument of male, patriarchal oppression. The riots are the toxic legacy of such poisonous "progressive" attitudes.
In government Iain Duncan Smith has perhaps only until the next election to reverse decades of progressive social policies, he has to make work pay for people who have known only inter-generational worklessness and rebuild the traditional family as the prevailing societal norm. 
That task first starts in the think-tanks, moves onto the broadsheet editorial pages, before becoming a stated policy objective eventually leading to changes in the infrastructure of social policy. There is also a necessity for a reversal of the secular kulturkampf which progressives have waged to make non-judgemental, moral relativism the only acceptable official view. We are currently only at the think-tank and broadsheet editorial stage.
Harman's 1990IPPR pamphlet “The Family Way”, was described by Feminist Review as "An attempt to combat stultifying, traditionalist concepts of ‘the family". We have reached the end of that decades long struggle by Fabians and feminists to undermine the family; with 40% of children born outside marriage and a minority of childhoods completed in the household of both biological parents. It is now apparent to all that few if any of Harriet Harman's fatherless gangsta progeny come from those supposedly stultifying traditional families.
Add a comment to this post

Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter
Labour figures' bizarre link to paedophile groups
Their involvement with an organisation to which two groups campaigning for the legalisation of paedophilia were affiliated has come back to challenge three leading Labour Party figures.
Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Miss Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.
more within link21st Century British Nationalism: Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter

Bill from The Spearhead as many others having been involved in a toxic marriage would agree that some people just do not deserve to be married as their interpretation is that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence and once you get there, alone and without any chance of a relationship, that green grass was just an illusion that feminists created in order to destroy the good relationships that men and women had carved out for each other over aeons. A method that worked really well until feminist lies and exaggerations were screamed from lofty heights to inform all women that the life that you are enjoying at the moment is not really a life at all. So the feminist hegemony went to work destroying that compatibility with outrageous lies and continue to this day to malign and denigrate both sexes for having the temerity to actually co-exist with a member of the opposite sex and enjoying that, just not on.

So they convinced women in particular that they should become wage slaves just like them men, sacrifice your life in the pursuit of money and lower the wage level in the process. A method heartily supported by business leaders who saw an opportunity to lower wage bills, increase turnover as a broken homes requires more stuff, donated millions of dollars to the feminist hegemony on the condition that they ensure men and women work their butts off and not have a life. Did that work or what ?

Meanwhile, it took some women a while to catch onto that plot, they actually realised that nothing is gained without the cost being paid. Also, some men noticed their lifestyle totally destroyed by maniacal divorce court judges who cowtowed to the feminist utopia. It is a lot easier giving away someone else's money than your own. It was the right thing to do ofcourse. Women ofcourse came under scrutiny as well as they fell victim to that same lunacy that men had already faced for many years, and when they faced the same hypocrisy and lies that divorce courts allow as well as the family courts when deciding "for the sake of the children" they also came to the realisation that this system sucked. Not only did it discriminate against all men which was just fine as far as they were concerned but when the same thing happens to them by a doctrine that claims to be for equality only then did it open some eyes and women started moaning and whining out loud, how is it possible for the fallacy that is feminism, destroy both financially and psychological the sex that it was supposed to help..

Feminism screwed up in major fashion. Those middle class dysfunctional, self interested, white females actually got it wrong. Now they have enemies on all sides as they start to duck for cover and hope they don't face well deserved charges of crimes against humanity..

Meanwhile back at the ranch -

Marriage Reform Page Up In the first step in my effort to make a positive change, I’ve started collecting and linking material relevant to marriage reform. I’d like to invite others who have some interest in the issue, especially those who have written on the subject, to visit the page and post links. Attorneys with experience writing prenups or simply in contract law are also very much welcome.
The goal is to give people who want a better form of marriage the guidance and tools to make it possible. Default civil marriage as it exists today has become an evil and destructive institution that must be changed. People who remain in civil marriages do so despite the incentives to divorce and engage in gender warfare. For the weaker and less sensible it is too often a disaster that literally ruins lives, including those of the most innocent — our children.
Feminism may have done a wrecking job on the Western family, but I am optimistic that this can be turned around. The fight against feminists must continue, but it’s time to start discussing reconstruction, and reforming the devastated institution of marriage is where it should begin.
I have yet to meet any female who does not regret the divorces they have introduced and still claim to "love" the former partner and also make the claim that it was the worst decision they have ever made..
There are people who would have been better off not indulging in marriage and for proper reasons. Some people just do not get along and that is just fine, I have no problem with sparring partners finally calling it quits but I do have a major issue with women (make 70% of divorces happen) making decisions on "feelings" and according to the "sage" advice of their hypocritical (yes I am not married) sisters who are determined that she should be as miserable as her. So recommends accordingly. They have swallowed the feminist lies and wallowed in the "you can have it all" mantra and all indications today show that women are starting to wake up and decided that in order to stay married you have to work at it and not take it for granted. "You don't know what you've got till it's gone", has to be the most profound statement applicable to that situation..

So, just to ensure total dysfunctionality, we have Amanda Marcotte (feminist Bigot and Male Hater) tosses in her usual cognitive dissonance into the fray. It akin to someone spitting into a waterfall and as usual with Marcotte, it has the same affect even if you can understand or even detect the reason for the post for which it is paid, for crying out load..
Amanda Marcotte 
Women, on the other hand, are the sellers in the heterosexual economy.  Our job is to make sure the product is worth buying.  We are no more entitled to partner sex than a company is entitled to move all its widgets when customers aren't buying.
Dating advice tends to get gendered along these lines.  When women aren't getting any action, it's pretty much standard to tell them to look at themselves and see if they're charging too high a price for the product they have on offer.  The advice from there is to either improve the quality of the product or lower the price.  Granted, upbeat American society being what it is, most of the advice industry aimed at women is about improving the quality of the product.

We need a campaign against this woman who obviously has no problem having a really good laugh about mutilating males..

Why not use one or all the links and give her a piece of your mind and just remind her that abuse is abuse regardless of sex..
If you are on Twitter give her a serve on http://twitter.com/MrsSosbourne
also use whatever links below and spread the word..

They do not hide their glee at all, in fact Sharon Osbourne (the wife of Ozzy) even makes mixing motions with her hands, simulating a garbage disposal, and calls the whole thing 'delightful'.



http://www.sharonosbourne.com/


http://www.myspace.com/sharono​sbourne

http://www.twitter.com/MrsSOsb​ourne

http://www.cedars-sinai.edu/64​08.html

http://www.nbc.com/Americas_Go​t_Talent/

Also, here is the Facebook page to add your comments to CBS..

http://www.facebook.com/pages/We-demand-an-apology-from-CBS-for-their-sexism/242540452430511