The Reality Blog

What a liar looks like..

 Everyone, even those blessed with brain damage, would be aware of feminists endless efforts to ridicule and denigrate men for any reason, making hysterical claims that only women really work and men are really just hangers on has finally been exposed to be another grand lie. Feminists have demonstrated again, by their ongoing efforts at claiming that the poor dears just spend so much time working, child minding and working all types of hours, that it would embarrass a workaholic..

This false claim gave feminists and their mindless ilk the opportunity to concentrate all their efforts by falsely claiming that men do not or ever have, helped around the home. As a matter of fact, the whole issue was so bad that they have spent millions (not feminists but feminist based departments like the Office for Women, wasting taxpayers dollars) studying this nonsense just to get in some male bashing mileage. Just like the AGW lies are coming to grief, so are the feminist lies and exaggerations..

The most amazing issue here is that feminists actually claim to give a damn, that would be the most  relevant outcome as they have already demonstrated that they hate the family situation as well as any woman being situated so close to a kitchen, any kitchen, is regarded as a heresy as far as they are concerned. Yep, the hypocrisy reaches in there as well..

Combating myths of women's work is a full-time job
Bettina Arndt
November 23, 2011
OPINION

Apparently, the poor dears are so overworked that most of the Restaurants, Fashion Boutiques, Coffee Shops and Hairdressing Salons will have to close as they just cannot find the time to attend any of those necessary functions. All major shopping centres will be closing as well as the poor dears will just not have time to shop because they are falling asleep on their feet, from exhaustion..

Oh, but wait..

Last week yet another report was released showing that many Australians feel under time pressure. Race Against Time, produced by the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling, ticked all the usual boxes, showing everyone running around chasing their tails due to increased work hours and highlighting women's concerns about unequal contributions to childcare and housework.
The spin was remarkable. ''With many already time squeezed, women are less satisfied than men with their partner's contribution towards childcare and housework,'' the report said. But it turned out only 35 per cent of women were not satisfied with dad's contribution to childcare. Get that? It means most women, two-thirds, were happy. Given the bad press men constantly receive over this issue, why isn't that the story?

GASP, you..mean...we..were...lied...to,...again..

Women were asked how they felt about the contribution of partners to unpaid work, but naturally there was no mention of whether men felt it was fair that they do roughly three times the paid work of their partners. The report quotes the number of hours people spend commuting - an average of nearly six hours a week in Sydney and five in Melbourne - but there was no attempt to find out whether men, the group more likely to put in these long commutes, think this is a great deal.

Oh yes ! the difference between male bashing, bullshit and spin, draws a very thin line as you can read..

It is extraordinary how often reports such as these bang on about old chestnuts such as housework inequity, while ignoring the real story about men, women and work. Race Against Time fudges the data on women's workforce participation to imply more women feel time pressured through juggling more hours in paid work. But the truth is much more interesting.
One of the most stubborn characteristics of the Australian workforce is women's rejection of full-time work. The Australian National University economist Bob Gregory sums up the data: ''Despite the rapid increase in education levels, despite large changes in social attitudes towards married women working in the labour market, despite large increases in labour market rewards and despite increased labour market involvement, the proportion of women 15 to 59 employed full time is much the same as it was 35 years ago.''
It is 10 years since Gregory first raised this issue, but most commentators are still determined to pretend women are flocking into the workforce. A recent paper in the journal Public Policy by the Curtin University social researcher Alan Tapper, ''Has there been a revolution in women's work?'', quotes numerous experts who claim radical change. Tapper provides the evidence that the answer is a resounding no.
Women's labour force participation rates have almost doubled since the mid-1960s, from 33 per cent to 58 per cent, but these figures include women looking for work as well as those doing only a few hours a week. The reality is women's weekly work rate has increased by just over an hour a decade - as shown by Tapper's analysis of data on average weekly work hours from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
He cites Time Use data to show there has been no rising trend in women's work activity over the past 30 years - the revolution never happened.

The only positive from this story is that one can never believe any article from any University or NGO, to tell the truth about anything regarding the feminist induced, "sex wars". All that does is introduce another male bashing opportunity and one that feminists have taken each and every time. All to no avail as once again they have been exposed for being the liars they really are..


Read the rest of Bettina Arndt's article here.. 

The feminists deconstructionist's deconstruction continues to be deconstructed via facts and studies.  Their delusional claim that "we are the result of our social environment" takes another sound thrashing, demonstrating once again how delusional they really are and also once again confirms what a bunch of blatant liars they really are..

A study that showed the same SPECIFIC reward regions of the brain LIGHTING UP on MRI scans of, say, one hundred brains of men hailing from various globe points when they looked at photos of beautiful women, and then DEACTIVATING when the men were shown pics of ugly or fat girls, would be the sort of inarguable hard science that should, in a rational, sane world, utterly discredit the beliefs of those who say beauty is a subjective, cultural construct. The biggest joke that this plays out is more about those clowns in Sweden who did not want the sex of their child to be known. They decided that they would neutralise thier sibling in the false hope, depending on whichever sex it was, they could influence it to think and behave in a neutral fashion. Being labelled neither male or female. What a pair of morons. Another example that comes to mind was the feminist mother who did not want to give her daughter anything (aka..a doll) that would encourage her to behave like a female. In her opinion and the opinion of psychotic feminists, it would predetermine it's sex and cater to the exact behaviour that feminists having been waxing lyrical about for so long.. In the example above where the feminist mother refused to buy or supply her daughter with a doll for her to hold and cuddle, denied that it was giving way to automatic affectional behaviour booked into the DNA that girls normally possess. When refused, she simply constructed her own rag doll out of scraps of material, clearly demonstrating the need for such a toy to display her affection to. Feminist mother really are the worst dictators one can possibly imagine. Forcing children to act against their normal hard wired, behavioural patterns by denying anything that could enforce, what is already coded into their brains via a millennium of sex based ingrained behavioural patterns, it's hard wired and not constructed like those lying feminists keep pretending actually happens..   A Quantifiable, Objective Standard Of Beauty  by Heartiste

I must confess to following the AGW debate on about eight different sites and blogs on the net just to get an overview on the hype being pedalled as science and came across a blog by Prof. Judith Curry and followed it for a couple of months. Needless to say that Curry is a talented professional in the area of climate science and only commenced her blog as the science started to lack integrity and tended to wallow more in the political rather than reality..

Good so far. Interesting articles and discussions were read and had, so it came as somewhat of an almost surprise when Curry's latest article started pushing and promoting the Feminist Hegemony and it's associated inane doctrine. Some infantile ex.Don promoted a female supremacist article which was posted today. The article can only be regarded as being their usual garbage. A posting that had nothing whatsoever to do with AGW or the science,  it was about the promotion of females in the academic world. The article is the usual mishmash of incoherent feminist drivel that we have come to expect from that hate movement that moans and whines about the lack of women in academic posts and also the lack of women on teaching staff  positions at those misandric temple of indoctrination even though the majority of students are females, just demonstrates that Curry is just another female firster, pushing her own gender at the expense of all men to the detriment of science as well as the general community...

Show me, apart from the occasional rare examples of women's discoveries that outshone anything Men have invented especially over the last 50 years or so when women were free to choose and do whatever they wanted. Blaming men for their own incompetence appears to be the order of the day..

We even have this bit of soundly discounted drivel..

 It puzzles a woman that a man cannot watch television and listen to her at the same time: she can watch television, listen to him, hold the baby, make dinner and if necessary answer the telephone as well.  She is, in a temporal sense, multi-skilled.  He can do all those things, but not at the same time, and if it must be at the same time, not at all well.

That dream of superiority has been discounted as being farcical as that was only ever demonstrated to being the case when the female was at home. You know the routine. Baby on the boobs, reading a trash mag while talking on the phone is just a brilliant example of what not to do if you want to do it properly..

The recently-published study discovered that frequent multitaskers are actually worse at multitasking, because they're more easily distracted by useless information - a result, the researchers believe, of their brains losing the ability to successfully filter out irrelevant data and stay on target. Scientists at UCSF claim that more research is needed before suggesting specific remedies to this problem, but agree that spending less time being distracted and more time concentrating on one thing at a time wouldn't be a bad thing.

Multitasking is bad for you.. 

Oh dear, another feminist/female boast shot to hell. Such a shame..

What could one expect when we read the usual excuse for a degree and turning up at university just so you can pay for a course that the majority of females are doing already.

I was taught as a young social scientist

That one comment is enough for me to finish right there as you and I already know precisely what road this feminist is already heading down which surprisingly makes the whole trash piece not only unpalatable but unreadable as well..

I think it's just too much multitasking that's causing all that frontal lobe damage..

Your body, your decision, right ?

Like a previous "world domination" dictator, demanding a superior aryan race, feminism decided that they too wanted a superior female sex but the end result was nothing short of dissappointing. They won't do as they are told. unleashing women has only unleashed their base instincts and behaviour which is directly opposite to the wet dream wish feminists had in mind..

There is, apparently, a difference between manipulating DNA to achieve that result or just imagining it to be true. Femmies have been fawning over the superiority of women ever since they introduced their "stats by design" expert reports to point out that the girls were actually, well, different. Who could argue against that. The repeated assaults were dramatised by the onside mass media with theoretical imaginations designed to demonstrate exactly where those speciality genes and dna enhancements were..

Ironically, feminists have also argued that both sexes are the product of their environment and there is fundamentally very little difference between the two. Hypocrisy much ?

I will have to dregg the history a little to find their illogical claims as all were clearly demonstrated to be a figment of their imagination except one. The one ability that has escaped argument and discussion (well, not really) is the fact that women do talk more but verbal diarrhoea does not a communicator make. So the "World's Greatest Communicator" got it's assessment as femmies were indeed making all sorts of claims regarding that enhanced ability. It forced the science boffins to poke and prod for evidence and promptly released studies to demonstrate that it was just another unfathomable assertion with no grounds in reality for the assumptions they were making. Verbalising every issue and act, during one's day (sleep time was excluded as boffins wanted to be present, teddy and all), does not indicate either an increased level of intelligence, ability or better communication techniques. Basically, when faced with verbal barrage, one's brain just shuts down and wanders to that little creek in the paddock which is your "safe zone" to combat stress and strain, just like your therapist told you to..

Femmies were not happy lying about just one imaginary trait, they had to invent a few more. The next one was the "Supermom", this one came about because femmies were slanging mothers like they wanted it out of fashion and have obviously succeeded. Supermom was their capitulation to the howls and screams the moms raised in the media and feminasties relented as they were making enemies of the sex they were supposed to be supporting. Studies now reports an increase in illnesses, psychological issues, health issues and exhaustion as outcomes of the "Supermom" indoctrination methodology and do I have any sympathy for the suckers who fell for that load of cobblers, guess. Even today that support relies totally on the politics of the female, Palin, Whitman, etc.(Palin is toast) are good examples of what happens if you got a job but your politics is wrong even though you are a member of the same sex. Femmies don't care about women more than their doctrine and politics. It's what they have always done..

So we have "Multitasking" which we have done to death already on this blog and it is really is too boring going down that same pathway again, it's probably flooded by now..

So there are just a few example on how comprehensively feminists lie and how totally fooled the female sex is and how ready that same sex is to jump aboard any indication that there may be something somewhere that will elevate that deflated ego after it has been walloped and knocked about by life and it's endless demands..

Next time, hopefully, you and others will not fall for the great con just because it appeals to the ego..
Feminism is akin to those emails you receive from Nigeria where you are promised a lot for little input but end up getting screwed..