Latest Posts
Showing posts with label anti male sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti male sexism. Show all posts

Making One's Choices..


Here we have a documentary, professional presentation, by a Norwegian journalist who goes about finding out what the differences are between males and females. What determines our behaviour, interests and life's choices, based on our sex..
Feminists have been lying to everyone in this regard by claiming that our sex has nothing to do with our behaviour, thought processes our choices, it's all influenced by our environment. Feminists have been claiming that "we are the product of our environment and NOT our sex"..
The Norwegian researchers the journalist first approaches, echo those exact same delusional believes and make those statements on camera and on audio recording equipment which he takes with him as he travels around the globe speaking to other specialists in their chosen fields in America and England..

All those specialists have spent their lives studying their specialty and produce studies and facts that they themselves have instigated and verified. One scientist explains a study done in 59 different countries and explains that there were no differences with the same sexes in their choices regarding work and lifestule. The sexes in those countries demonstrated that same level of interest in undertaking the same type of work in regards to their sex. Studies from the middle east, Asia, America and Europe all showed the same results..

Females choose work that ensured they had contact with people which they found fulfilling and males went into technical areas which satisfied their interests, there were the usual crossovers ofcourse but they were negligible. A flat line for both sexes across all the different countries. Rather fascinating but nothing new to anyone who has spent more than a few years on this planet..

But try and explain that to the ignorant tunnel visioned social scientists back in Norway. Even when they were confronted with the facts and studies via video they still refused to accept the evidence..

 Mind boggling ignorance is clearly demonstrated but then again what would you expect from ignorant feminists wearing their tunnel vision glasses. Incredible..

The video is extremely interesting, it is in Norwegian but has subtitles, it is also 38 minutes long but well worth a look..

Here is the link to the Video Site and here is the Password  hjernevask  (which means Brainwash)  to watch it on their site in Lounge Option (Full Screen) if you like..

Or Just enter the password into the Enter Section.. Password..   hjernevask


Brainwash 1:7 - The Gender Equality Paradox from Harald Eia on Vimeo.


All the Single Ladies, erm,Women 


One would imagine that the term ladies is a definite misnomer in this day and age. We really need to find a better description for the opposite sex as that one no longer really applies anymore, does it..
The great news is that finally women will stop leaching of the guys and screwing their lives up via needless divorces, they instigate in the majority. This is great news, leave them on their own and just get on with your own life. Who in his sane mind would want a bar of a feminist anyway, I mean,  really..

Now I am well aware that I have already posted on this article before and one has to wallow through copious pages of feminist waffle reminding all and sundry that the "strong" and "Independent"woman   does, does not, sometimes occasionally, maybe eventually, requires the attention of a man in her life. I would imagine that it is no longer fashionable to regard that as one of life's choices amongst the sisters of the hegemony as one does not want to stand out from the crowd let alone loose face when not failing their fellow sheeple by opposing the consensus. Feminists have decided amongst themselves that being "man-less" is the ideal way to spend one's life as those privileged princesses can no longer snare one who makes more money than they do and thereby limiting their options when marrying up as women have always done. They are in a quandary..

Not one single word about the fact that not one single female in the western world can lay claim to being in her position or the amount of her pay packet was by her own effort as way too many laws are in place that women in general receive the preferred option in whatever they do. The will be the first to be employed according to government legislation instituted over a decade ago. They will also be the first to be promoted for the same reason, even promoted over a male with better credentials and experience because she is the carrier of that free pass vagina..

The same methodology works for them in College and especially in Universities which guarantees a place for their selfish butts at the expense of men, not because men are not interested, no, because they want to ensure that the majority of students are that privileged sex by rejecting male applicants..

All that is conveniently ignored while bragging how great they are and how everyone else is well, you know, dumb. Amazingly, whenever you point out this obvious fact to any woman they stoutly refuse to comprehend or even believe that level of sexism even exists. Their standard response is the usual "well, I had to work hard to get where I wanted to be" like the other sex was somehow given a free pass. Their degree was included with their application for railway tickets. The arrogance and deliberate ignorance is absolutely breathtaking. There are so many special privileges for women in effect today that you would need a ten volume book to list them all but when you ask them how it feels to be able to get so many free passes, they look at you in blank disbelief..

"You don't know what your are talking about" is the standard response. I do not even have to link or demonstrate this as you and I come across it everyday. One simple Google question would demonstrate it quite clearly as well but do they own up to it or even recognise it to be the case. You must be joking. There are no bragging rights when one has to confess to the well know fact that their privileges got them where they wanted to go and not their "brilliant" and "sassy" attitude. It was more like government money, legislation and filling the sexist female majority quota..

How embarrassing is that and what level of child would receive that same treatment, you may well ask. I would reply "Not One Single One"..


Blame the Sexual Revolution, Not Men

Long time ago, when newspapers could be relied on to bring you not only the facts but also the truth and not just biased feminist endorsed worthless opinion pieces. One would have imagined that the next article here would be some kind of joke or even humour..

Those days are well and truly gone..

Sadly, in this day and age where criticising women is verboten as well as uttering anything negative will be condemned by the usual self appointed, auditors of free speech and a paying member from the ranks of the  feminist gestapo action group, we have what today is loosely termed as news and sadly can only be interpreted as an excuse for wasting ink on paper..

I wonder how close to the truth this is..
Anti Male News – The Making
AUGUST 2, 2011 BY 
All characters in this article are imaginary but inspired from real life. Any resemblance is purely co-incidental and non-intentional 
Making News is a news-publication agency. It has a reporter whose name is Naïve Journalist and an editor whose name is Shrewd Editor. We will refer to the reporter as NJ and the editor as SE.
SE: You are not getting any interesting news these days. Get me the truth of the society. We have to publish facts.
NJ: I have sir; here is a case of a wife who was murdered by her husband as she was caught red-handed with her lover in bed by her husband. It will be a sensational story sir – “Wife caught red-handed committing adultery, killed by husband”.
SE: Hey, hold on your horses. While I understand we need to be as true as possible while printing, but we also need to keep in mind the interest of our readers. Such news can be extremely disturbing for the society.
NJ: Then, what do we do sir; I spent 2-3 days getting details about the case from the police and neighbors. Even neighbors confirmed, they have seen some 2-3 other men also visiting the house when the husband was gone. Sir, no man will tolerate such a wife. We have to write about the circumstances that made him a criminal.
SE: Hmmm, I see. Do one thing, write that he killed the wife after she refused to bring any additional dowry and later brought up the adultery allegation to cover up his crime.
NJ: But Sir….
Editor puts a hand on the shoulder of the reporter and tells him,
SE: Look, reporter, you are barely six months into this line. I am 10 years into it. Are you trying to tell me how to publish the news?
NJ: Definitely not sir, you know better but I am not sure dowry is the issue here.
SE: Well, as long as the story is sellable, it’s always an issue. We need to increase our circulation, don’t we; after all, our bonus depends on that, right?
Reporter has no more arguments.
Next day story appears in the media – “Wife killed over dowry demands; hubby alleges adultery to escape punishment.

Here we have the usual drivel the anti-male media keeps pilling on whenever the male pill is introduced as a topic..

It would be nice that one day they would actually ask a male for an opinion, instead of the male haters as they usually do and hopefully not some Mangina. That would be a nice change..

Oh look!-another commentary on the male pill.
Talk of the male pill comes up in the news and someone wants to do a commentary on it. Okay, so whom do they ask to give a commentary? An advocate for men's birth control options? Or for that matter even a man? No! They bring on an ex whore to be the commentator. And then they go on to spout out the oh so predictable bigoted drivel that we hear from the gynocentric press when talking about the male pill: men will lie, men will forget, men are too stupid to realize that taking an oral contraceptive doesn't prevent STDs etc......
Every time I see something like this I want to puke. Just for once I would like to face these bigots on camera and tell them what a MAN thinks about the male pill.

CNN.com
 We can always rely on CNN to give the usual anti male, biased crap as we have witnessed for so long. So why would it change now eh!!
 Percy..
men will lie, men will forget, men are too stupid to realize that taking an oral contraceptive doesn't prevent STDs etc......
Lying? What possible reason could a man have for lying about taking the pill?
It is not in his best interest to get a woman pregnant.
Forget? The only people from whom there is any evidence at all about forgetting to take the pill, are WOMEN.
Men Stupid? This from the gender that thinks jumping up and down will prevent pregnancy and taking a homoeopathic 'medicine' will cure cancer.
Gordon friggin' Bennett.