I have never been a fan of Obama as he is just too close to Marxism for me to be comfortable with. He has confirmed my fears by granting high government positions to his fellow marxists as well. That cannot not be for the good of the country, I would have thought.
Marxism is directly opposed to the capital market system which works that well that the communists dictators in China even promoted it, but are now in the process of winding it back if they can. Watch for some interesting activity in China in 2012..
This post may indeed come close to being a "conspiracy theorist dream", which I resist and definitely do not promote. Too many about already. But I have been following the Obama "Birthers"(started by Hillary Clinton) arguments about Obama's right to office, if he is not an actual US citizen and I have found the MSM avoiding any mention of it or just presenting some indifferent commentary on such an important topic.
So for the sake of argument, have a peak at the case in Georgia this week, where the Judge failed to fined against the defendant Barack Hussein Obama, and here is a running commentary on the case which I found rather interesting, to say the least. It is third party assessment and commentary, so it can be taken with a pinch of salt. But interesting just the same..
Thursday,January 26, 2012
OBAMAELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
ByCraig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
Giventhe testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lotof explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as ofcourse, was Obama.
Thefollowing is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility casewere called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a veryinteresting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
Thecase revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution andwhether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012ballot in Georgia.
Withthe small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seenfanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return ofthe attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obamahimself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowherenear Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in LasVegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over thelast several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, hadattempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. Hefirst tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevantto Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, underthe law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later,that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
Afterall these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski,in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting toplace Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to heheard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretaryof State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later tellingJablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate butthat he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Gameon.
5 minutes.
10minutes.
15minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20minutes.
Itappears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, allgo to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’schambers.
HasObama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate?
Is he directly ignoring the courts subpoena? Is he placing Obamaabove the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear incourt, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, nonaction?
Certainlynot.
Courtis called to order.
Obama’sbirth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’sfathers place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” enteredinto evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states thathis father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leaveKenya.
ImmigrationServices documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s fathers statusshown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gottenthrough the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding thedefinition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs.Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875.The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and“Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs.Happersett opinion.
Itis also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter thedefinition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointedout that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Courtopinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs. Happersettopinion.
Thepoint is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who,at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the UnitedStates. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is thatObama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judgenotes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be takenaccordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimonyis presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, lawsapplicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and thechallenge to it by Swinson.
2ndwitness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimonyregarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on theGeorgia ballot and his candidacy.
Courtrecords of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Officialcertificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNCcertificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNClanguage does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified whilethe RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying toestablish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was notqualified.
Jablonskiletter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desirethat these proceedings not take place and that they would notparticipate.
DreamsFrom My Father entered.
Mr.Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Discoveryreceived from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered intoevidence. This discovery contains information regarding the status ofObama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
Thisinformation states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S.Citizen.
Atthis point, the judge takes a recess.
Thejudge returns.
DavidFarrar takes the stand.
Evidenceshowing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality asIndonesian. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
OrlyTaitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Entersinto evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing arenewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’slast name something other than Obama.
StateLicensed PI takes the stand.
Shewas hired to look into Obama’s background and found a SocialSecurity number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given thatthis number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that thenumber was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
SameSS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Nextwitness takes the stand.
Thiswitness is an expert in information technology and photo shop.. Hetestifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public islayered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates thatdifferent parts of the certificate have been lifted from more thanone original document.
LindaJordan takes the stand.
Documententered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is notverified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. Thisis the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Nextwitness.
Mr.Gogt.
Expertin document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr.Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, issuspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by“unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showingthis, is considered to be a fraud.
Statesthis is a product of layering.
Mr.Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would notshow such layering.
Alsotestifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not bein exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped.Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the sameindicating they were NOT hand stamped but layered into the document bycomputer.
Nextwitness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigrationofficer specializing in immigration fraud.
RanObama’s SS number through database and found that the number wasissued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided inMA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serialnumber on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued atthat hospital. Also certification is different than others anddifferent than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr.Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe,who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual withregards to immigration records.
Suggestsall records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth recordsbe made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed ornot. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr.Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should bearrested and deported and until all records are released nobody canknow for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitzshows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he residesin Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitztakes the stand herself.
Testifiesthat records indicate Obama records have been altered and he ishiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitzleave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitzstates that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented,ineligible to serve as President.
Andwith that, the judge closes the hearing.
Whatcan we take away from this?
Itsinteresting.
Now, all of this has finally been enteredOFFICIALLY into court records
