It does not take any normal thinking human being too long to conclude what a useless, arrogant and ignorant rabble these feminists and their enablers really are. Their relentless attacks on the MM (Mens Movement) can only be seen as some pathetic attempt at refusing to even bother to justify or answer the most basic queries or questions that we put forward..
The have steadfastly refused to even consider or answer any grievance or bothered to answer any questions without so much as given any legitimate response. Their standard response is ridicule and the automatic assumption that those questions will just disappear or if they stall long enough and goad enough and bluster enough, they will not have to supply any coherent responses at all..
Instead they ignore their own level of malice and hate while trying to point or accuse everyone else. They ignore their own hate language, while having the temerity to claim that we behave the same way they do. Their accusation of hate have never been justified but they have absolutely no issue what so ever about supporting their own hate speech. They promote and support radical feminists eugenics and murder, while never uttering a single word against it. They support hate by the very words their own leaders have stated, while never speaking out on one single occasion against it. Yet, we have left winged lunatics, who are the main supporters of the slut feminist hate movement, like Maher, sprouting his vile hate messages, while not one single member of that hate movement uttering a single word of condemnation or protest, while they continually claim members of the MM indulges in..
From JTO, AVfM
However, rather than logical rebuttals or evidence based arguments, the majority of oppositional rhetoric falls squarely into the category of ad-hominem and straw-man argument, along with other formal logical fallacy. One recent “cracked.com” article stated “no REAL MAN has ever come out as an MRA” [emphasis mine] as well as claiming that opposition to feminism is equivalent to burning down a house in response to an infestation of ghosts. The implication in that metaphor being possibly that feminism doesn’t actually exist?
Other commentary condemning the rising mens rights movement focuses in on the obvious and overwhelming privilege of white males, and the clear absurdity of any complaint about unequal treatment in the family court system, the criminal courts system, higher education, employment, homelessness, suicide, criminal victimization, prison rape, life expectancy, sexually-specific health funding, misrepresentation in domestic violence education, and general disposability based on sex.Their baseless claims and endless inane rhetoric has and is becoming so repetitive and boring that one would have to wonder if they are just now on the "Repeat and Rinse" cycle. Could it well be the case that they are finally aware of the fact that they have lost the argument and are now just amusing themselves with their mundane repetitive actions, out of habit. Was that why they had the SPLC and Cracked sites instigate those attacks, out of desperation, one last attempt to shut the MM up..
As the MM grows and receives ever widening coverage, our coherent message begins to surface in the MSM (main stream media) as we can no longer be ignored, even after a concerted attack by those additional feminists sympathisers have raged over the past month or so..
So, keep up the good work..
Isn't It Romantic? Feminism's latest triumph: Boys are afraid of girls.
By JAMES TARANTO, Wall Street Journal.
At the same time, there is good reason for males (men as well as boys) to be more fearful of sex than females. Contemporary reproductive technology and law place all the burden for unwanted pregnancy on them. Between the pill and abortion, women have complete control over the reproductive process. They can avoid or end any unwanted pregnancy, and the man involved has no say in the matter. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court went so far as to hold that a married woman has the constitutional right to abort her husband's child without even telling him.If the MM is involved in, how those haters from the feminastie movement have falsely accused, why would a recognised journalist and a major news outlet like the Wall Street Journal and the WND even bother with any issues that the MM have raised. Would they not just write us off as you have tried to do. Now is the opportunity to give some thought to all those lies and all that misinformation you have spread and maybe create a conscience and show some dignity and honour, by actually answering obvious legitimate arguments instead of generating strawman arguments which you already know just does not work and only demonstrates your own bigotry, bias and sexism. If that does not dawn, then just keep up the good work as we need the additional exposure..
A woman's "reproductive rights" also include the right to carry a pregnancy to term. The crucial point here is that while the decision belongs entirely to her, in the event that a child is born the law assigns financial responsibility to the male involved. That is what the boy in her study means when he worries about being "screwed for the rest of my life." Short of sterilization, the only way for a male to be sure of avoiding this fate is to abstain from sex.