Latest Posts

Latin Phrase:varium et mutabile semper femina

"Woman is always a changeable and capricious thing". 

I have always found it fascinating how philosophers and other great men would make statements concerning women which at first hand you would scoff at, ignore, because it would delve into the realm that would be so far removed from reality that rejecting it would make sense. How could you say such a thing as "
Woman is always a changeable and capricious thing". It appears as character assassination of the worst kind, writing off a total sex just because of some minor affliction hardly seems warranted..

That is until you spend quite a bit of time researching the female, that is. I found that the more I discovered about their psychology and their general mindset and behaviour of the opposite sex the less I wanted to know. Here is an observation by Arthur Schopenhauer's famous essay On Women - 

Female truth
The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.
See what I mean about finding out about the opposite sex. We are now automatically comparing those comments with the women in our lives and come to the realisation that -

a. Wow, that is just too close to the mark..
b. Maybe some of that is true but I need to check it out some more..
c. Can't see it myself as my girl is not like that at all..

Well to all of those I would say that maybe you need to have had a look or you will have a look or just ignore the behavioural patterns of women and face the consequences some time in the future..

You will be on your own. It is probably why men generally do not have any sympathy for guys who get screwed both financially and mentally by women when they should at least have learnt some lessons from the process of chasing skirt and thinking with the big head and not the little one..

The original Latin statement above "Woman is always a changeable and capricious thing", capricious meaning "subject to, led by, or indicative of caprice  or whim; erratic", 
In reality, they really are..
Should indicate how and why women have followed and are quite intent on ensuring that the feminist dogma and doctrine will be exploited even though they don't support that hate movement directly. They are more interested in it's end result where they can strip any male of all his assets and set herself up to keep doing the same thing over and over again as there are no restrictions on divorces, no limitations. Just the way women like it. It also demonstrates how callous and what a base savage she really is when you realise that she has sworn loyalty to someone whom she has just totally screwed and thrown away on a whim. That alone should tell you right there what it is you are really dealing with.

A little more from  Schopenhauer - 
The nature of the female
One needs only to see the way she is built to realize that woman is not intended for great mental or for great physical labor. She expiates the guilt of life not through activity but through suffering, through the pains of childbirth, caring for the child and subjection to the man, to whom she should be a patient and cheering companion. Great suffering, joy, exertion, is not for her: her life should flow by more quietly, trivially, gently than the man's without being essentially happier or unhappier.
Women are suited to being the nurses and teachers of our earliest childhood precisely because they themselves are childish, silly and short-sighted, in a word big children, their whole lives long: a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the man, who is the actual human being, ‘man.’ One has only to watch a girl playing with a child, dancing and singing with it the whole day, and then ask oneself what, with the best will in the world, a man could do in her place.
Like I said originally. you will walk away thinking either that you were appalled and really did not want to know that shit because now I have to study it further or you will walk away thinking that you were already well aware of the capricious nature of women and have taken steps to protect yourself against their entrapment procedures..
Either way you will build the armour to stave off their professional antics and soul destroying methodology..