Along the same lines, feminist Ludy Wadham writes for CNN:The real issue here is that feminists have always claimed that they are not a male hating hegemony, which ofcourse is just another oversight on their part, as far as they are concerned and readily denied by even the smallest, most insignificant, irrelevant, lowest, member at Facebook or even {gasp} Yahoo Answers level, still totally claim that to be completely untrue. It does make one wonder how feminist manginas can actually justify their even lower position on the bottom rung on that hysterical ladder..
". . . the Strauss-Kahn case has uncovered the divide, not between men and women so much as between old and new feminists. Old feminists, from Genevieve Clark to Erica Jong, believed that the goal was political and sexual freedom for women, not the political and sexual subordination of men.
"I cannot accept the idea that womanhood automatically implies victimhood, nor do I think that it is a desirable state of affairs when women see men as the enemy.
"The man-hating tirades of my female colleagues are nothing but puritanism in disguise and I suspect that our feminist forebears would be dismayed by the climate of inquisition that seems to dominate relations between men and women today." (Read the entire piece here)
The full article is here on FRS and explains a little more about the infighting that we have witnessed so often from this hate machines that hides it's true goals under the guise of doing something noble..