Why am I not surprised ?
What surprises me the most is the lack of information concerning sexually transmitted diseases of all types. Those nasty disease like HIV or those others that munch your body at random. Not really something you want to be told after a night of debauchery with some slut feminist ( they promote themselves to be sluts now) willingly spreads her legs for some horizontal tango..
More gender equality leads to more sex, global study shows
WASHINGTON – Equality leads to more sex.
That's the gist of a new study about the sexual marketplace that used global data and found there's more sex in countries with higher gender equality than in those with less.So I guess my previous question on a previous post has been answered, "why do women demand men pay for dinner" is because she needs some confirmation that if she is giving away pussy, someone has to pay, something, anything. That is ofcourse after she has decided that she was going to have sex with you after the first five seconds of meeting you. That precondition very rarely changes..
The study is part of a big-picture look at sexual behaviors worldwide using "sexual economics," in which supply and demand are key elements.
It's a "notoriously unromantic theory," said Roy Baumeister of Florida State University in Tallahassee Sunday at the American Psychological Association meeting here.
In his presentation, "Sexual Economics: A Research-Based Theory of Sexual Interactions, or Why the Man Buys Dinner," Baumeister, a psychologist, explained how applying economic principles helps understand people's sexual decision-making, especially when they're just beginning a relationship.
"Women's sexuality has a kind of value that men's sexuality does not," he says. "Men will basically exchange other resources with women to have sex, but the reverse doesn't work. Women … can trade sex for attention, for grades, for a promotion, for money, as in prostitution or sex with a celebrity."
Interesting, as it is something that I think we already knew but could not quite explain, why was it such an important demand that even hardcore feminasties demanded it, even though the chance of anyone lining up to dating any of them was about as slim as someone lining up for free lobotomies even though such an operation would benefit feminists..
Supply and demand rule, so whichever sex is more scarce has more power. The theory focuses on heterosexual interactions only. When women outnumber men (as on many college campuses today) there's more competition among women for those guys, says Mark Regnerus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas-Austin
He addressed that in the book he co-wrote, Premarital Sex in America, out earlier this year.
Regnerus says Baumeister's theory of sexual economics was a key element. "It's a perspective through which to understand sexual relationships and sexual behavior," he says.
Regnerus' research attributes the rise of the "hookup" culture on campus to the fact that there are so many more women in college.
He says Baumeister and Kathleen Vohs "wrote the key work on the subject" in 2004. Because a woman's sexuality has a value to men, a man who wanted sex typically had to give her something of value, such as a marriage proposalSo demand at college exceeds supply, interesting. I have not heard any complaints from male students but I do for some unfathomable reason that campus rape is taking place in gigantic proportions according to exaggerating feminists even though the male students are being well serviced. I wonder where they get all that energy from..So, count back a few decades ago and you would understand why there were so many marriages as women were not giving it away free to no one, they were well aware that guys were going to offer the magic license in order to get them into the sheets and procreate as well. Apparently worked out pretty well too, as both parties obviously enjoyed their roles in those situations..
The situation today is full of paranoia and uncertainty as both sexes don't have a bloody clue how to go about meeting and greeting each other as feminists continually keep screwing that part up by their relentless inane demands for more laws and inane commentary about women victimhood and how it's impossible for any female to walk anywhere without (Gasp) being looked at. More laws thanks..
Dating sites are full of women and desperate to attract more males as aging is the main deterrent to a relationship as if everyone is not already well aware of it. The stupidity of divorcing at 40+ appears to be the current hype and trend and relationship death wish, but they do not comprehend that at that age that the admirers are gone and desperate measures need to be taken like facial surgery or a boob job just to compete with the younger women who are also looking at a shrinking market of men who have choosen to go their own way..
If in doubt ?
This fairly typical response that appeared at the Seattle Post Intelligencer website: “Sorry ladies. In the age of PlayStation 3s, 24-hours-a-day sports channels, and free Internet porn, you are now obsolete. All that nagging, whining, and stealing our hard earned cash have finally caught up to you."Even Hymowitz has a go at explaining the aversion..
Shocked? I wasn t. During the last few years researching this age group, I’ve stumbled onto a powerful underground current of male bitterness that has nothing to do with outsourcing, the Mancession, or any of the other issues we usually associate with contemporary male discontent. No, this is bitterness from guys who find the young women they might have hoped to hang out with entitled, dishonest, self-involved, slutty, manipulative, shallow, controlling—and did I mention gold-digging?