The Reality Blog

How many ways to hate you, let me count the ways..

Women are really victims of everything..

We have always suggested, no stated, that feminists hate women just as much as they hate men, Maybe even more so. Let see how many times more. When you think about it, feminism only hate men in two different ways. and that is - everything we do and everything we say. So that's fairly straight forward except ofcourse where male feminists are concerned as their existence is rather a nonentity, an aberration, a tolerance, someone's nightmare as we have already found out. They are just tolerated purely to be used as an example of what a man could  become when swallowing their hypocritical, self adjusting mindset. A mindset that can only be installed via a deep seated loathing of one's own sex. An action of behaviour that male feminists have adopted because of their own shortcomings as members of the human race. A bit like a psychotic, delusional hermaphrodite or an indistinguishable member of neither sex and yet claim to be of both. No wonder they are so confused. They are stuck with one organ wishing they had the other..

1. Hate women being mothers in a normal family situation.
2. Want women to be single mothers.
3. Want women to rely on the state.
4. Want women to work full time.
5. Hate women being feminine.
6. Force women to behave like the opposite sex.
7. Created psychological penis envy and other psychological issues detrimental to their health.
8. Demand women associate with wimps eg: male feminists or just hookup.
9. Determined to destroy the normal family situation which includes Fathers.
10. Demand that woman stop competing in competitions or have anything to do with beauty, body or self esteem.
11. Demand that women behave like sluts and or prostitutes by promoting slutwalk.
12. Demand that women be elevated past their ability by force for political reason (increased detrimental health issues created).
13. Demand that women do not behave according to their natural, normal instincts and DNA but to be imitators.
 14. Demand that women be retrained to be agressive and impersonal.
15. Demand that women behave against their normal instincts and age old behavioural patterns.
16. Demand that all women become fat and unattractive by their continued attacks on the fashion industry. Which employs mostly women.
17. Demand that women die in order to compete with men in every way possible.

The fact that women are miserable and unhappy more now than they were 30 years again does indicate that things are just not working out the way they were promised by feminists said it should, they lied again. Women's health and wellbeing is taking a dive, depression and heart attacks in women have risen dramatically.
Sadly they have encouraged and introduced the new generation of narcissistic, self-serving, selfish and dysfunctional females we are faced with now whose only intent is to either live a life of avarice or are determined to ensure that any partner they match up with will be stripped of any and every asset, including children, chattels and family home. A pastime that the courts are more than happy to assist with..
This in return has created a new phenomena called "Men going their own way" for the first time in history as far as I am aware. A specific action or process where men will avoid marriage and cohabitation, even avoid women all together as a reaction and response to the draconian laws feminists have reintroduced in order to transfer assets from men to women without her having to actually lift a finger to make it..

So that list is not really that big is it. Just a total and complete reconstruction of the normal female entity is all that's required, really, while more the sucker are lining up and falling for it..

I am always happy to promote the stupidity that is feminism and its sell-out nature that will not only harm men but will definitely, in this case, kill women as well..

They have managed in one single day, to ensure that body bags returning from various theatres of war, will definitely contain what's left of any female soldiers. They have ensured that the ceremonies will now include your daughters as well as your sons, congratulations. What a victory..

Meanwhile the feminists who wanted this for so long will be too old to even set foot in the country, let alone strap on a uniform and lob a grenade at the nearest terrorist. I bet they are so besides themselves that they are now drowning their sorrow at the Ritz, enjoying their win/loss dilemma, sipping Bollinger and nibbling some caviar (dead female eggs) and consoling themselves for not making themselves available for the body bag ceremony. It must be so heartbreaking for them, have another glass of bolli..

Feminism's front-line killer blow 
 Clive Hamilton
30 September 2011
Sending women into battle alongside men is no victory for liberation. 

WITH women to take on combat roles in the military, it is time to sound the Last Post over the rotting corpse of feminism. It's not the moulding of women's bodies into combat readiness that gives the game away, but what has to be done to their minds. When Defence Minister Stephen Smith says the individual has to have "the right physical, psychological and mental attributes", the mental attributes he is thinking of are masculine ones, the ones needed to kill.
Putting women in the front line is a victory for feminism only if one understands feminism as the campaign to obliterate difference, as if everything women were before the advent of feminism was the creation of patriarchy. But didn't women's life experiences and history have value in themselves, providing distinctive qualities that are more needed than ever? If women have their own history, we should celebrate the uniquely female rather than bury it under the demand for equality.

How unusual is this article which is not only Main Stream Media (which has started to become irrelevant) but actually criticises a hate movement which spreads the vitriol like never before (nothing new here, move along). Amazingly enough, the article is written by a lefty who normally fall over backwards to support the feminasties every which way possible, so this comment is not by some light weight insignificant looser, but a professor of "ethics" would you believe, if that's possible at that level of politics..

Profile: Clive Hamilton. 

After more than a decade battling along as the head of a left-wing think tank during the Howard Government era, it seems surprising that Clive Hamilton has thrown in the towel, just months after the Labor Party won the Federal election. Link..

So Clive has indeed put the writing on the wall and there will be some quick and some ongoing hysterics and discussions to make him either retract or rebrand the facts, they will be re-polished as feminists are not known to accept criticism too well and if they don't get their way it will just be another case of smearing just like they did to Larry at Harvard. Suprisingly, the appropriate authority gave that once great institution a downgrading only one year after a female feminists cheated and forced her way into running it. Not a bad effort if I don't want to say so myself. A special effort in stupidity was required to be that affective..


Hamilton ofcourse does wax lyrical in the article about the "superior moral ability" that women are supposed to possess. It's not anything that I have seen so far to be honest, all I have noticed is the ever increasing female criminal activities like divorces and associated false accusations, child abuse, murder, genocide and other nefarious deeds too numerous to mention so as far as I am concerned he speak with forked tongue. See article for more..

I must confess that on a few occasions I have had a thought or two about the possibility of organising some payback to the male hating feminists who are determined to see an end to our sex, one way or the other. Their determination make movies like "Soylent Green" and "Logan's Run" seem more realistic than fantasy. A few names come to mind ofcourse and there would probably be a world-wide listing that we could circulate to encourage the lads world-wide to participate and then maybe have a site where their actions could be noted and explained..

This site could be called - Services Denied dot com or something similar..

Hopefully, there would be plenty of suggestions as well so we could generate a comprehensive list of appropriate names of known male hating feminists with verifiable records for confirmation..

 Naming just a few that I am aware of (shortened version) -

England - Harriet Harman, Lynne Ferguson,
Australia - Julia Gillard, Penny Wong, Kate Ellis, Jenny Macklin, Nicola Roxon, Tanya Pilbersek
Europe - to be generated..
Africa - to be generated..
USA - List too large to mention here..
Others..

So this would be the object of the exercise. Denial of services to each and every name on the list. Every name would have all the pertinent information applicable to each countries situation so we would be looking at a network of sites and members to ensure that these wishes were indeed carried out..

As far as I am aware, men still run the majority of trades and services and it would not take much to ensure each and everyone of those male haters all of a sudden find that all those jobs that require those services were busy, couldn't spare the time or that job will take that little bit loger or cost more than originally anticipated. The web suffered some disconnection or the smoke alarm goes off in the middle of the night due to a malfunction as it reliant on the power supply to the house which has been accidentally disconnected and so on and so forth..

They would occasionally have a card left in their letter box with "Compliments from the MRM, you have been selected for special treatment", written on it with nothing else to identify it.
Nothing would be done ofcourse that would cause either harm or cause any situation to be considered dangerous and that must be stated. No restriction to important services would be affected..

It would at least inconvenience them to hell and back and maybe demonstrate to them what life would indeed be like without having the main sex around and helping their hypocritical arses..

What do you think, would it work ?