Latest Posts

The Australian public have been treated to another example of the moronic drivel that feminists contemplate on a daily basis. So desperate are they to keep the worst Prime Minister in Australia's History in power, Julie Gillard, that all stops have been pulled in an all out effort to malign the next PM of Aus. if the polls stays they way they are now. As a matter of fact, it will be a landslide of ginormous proportions which should just about witness the end of the Labour Party as we know it. No members of parliament, no money for their re-election.To me it's just another example of what happens when you put a feminist female in office who is way over her head. It has no experience and was not voted in by the Aus. public as she knifed the former leader to get at the position. It really is a case of good riddence to bad rubbish..

And so the comedy continues..

Andrew Bolt

Sunday, October 02, 2011 at 06:09am
image
Here’s the most damning picture of Tony Abbott that Susan Mitchell’s publisher could find to brand him as a dangerous misogyist. Who knew that barbecues were such a statement of an ideological position?
Female Abbott-haters are a particular type. Like Mitchell, they cling to a 1970s view of feminism, still resent the patriarchy, and sneer at red-blooded blokes. The photograph on the cover of Mitchell’s book, of Abbott barbecuing sausages, encapsulates what they loathe.

A muscular, sweaty meat-eater wielding tongs. Ugh. Her book is the first shot by the progressive Left to stop Abbott taking office.

They fear that his confident conservatism, mellowed by time in office, is beginning to resonate with an electorate that thinks much like he does, and is fed up with political correctness.

They fear that his combination of good-natured, unpretentious authenticity and ferocious intellect will have wide appeal as soon as it gets clear air.

In the end, all they have left is the anti-Catholic dog whistle.

But if Mitchell and Burnside think Catholics shouldn’t aspire to high office, they should say so, openly.
Miranda Devine also joins in the fray against the feminasties..
Women see Abbott as "a relic of an old-style male: pugnacious, aggressive, arrogant. Very few women find it appealing. They have been subjugated and disempowered by such men for too long".Seriously. Anyone who knows Abbott knows he is far from a misogynist. A loving husband and father of three girls, he has two sisters, and a mother who love him, and women in key roles in his office. 
When it comes to opinion polls, the leader with woman-trouble is Julia Gillard. She has lost the female vote by eight percentage points, from 38 per cent to 30 per cent, in the past three months, according to Newspoll.Blokey Abbott is more popular with women by five points.Female Abbott-haters are a particular type. Like Mitchell, they cling to a 1970s view of feminism, still resent the patriarchy, and sneer at red-blooded blokes. The photograph on the cover of Mitchell's book, of Abbott barbecuing sausages, encapsulates what they loathe. 
A muscular, sweaty meat-eater wielding tongs. Ugh. Her book is the first shot by the progressive Left to stop Abbott taking office.They fear that his confident conservatism, mellowed by time in office, is beginning to resonate with an electorate that thinks much like he does, and is fed up with political correctness.They fear that his combination of good-natured, unpretentious authenticity and ferocious intellect will have wide appeal as soon as it gets clear air.

I find it totally incomprehensible that feminists can criticise women for being traitors when in actual fact feminists have crafted and created that same female right from the start. Not only have they encouraged women to originally "burn the bra", which apparently never really happened but was more inferred but have of late encouraged, enforced slut behaviour for all women around the world. Where do these hypocritical feminists get off ?
They have never ever recommended or suggested alternative behaviour, they have never recommended anything besides spending money and doing your own thing. They have indeed encouraged women to pursue a life of narcism and greed by demanding they be paid more than men which they do in most capitol cities. They have encouraged women to not want a man (like a fish needs a bicycle) plus instituted an unrelenting hate program against the only sex on this planet who can and will put up with their shit but the signs are showing that to be coming to an end. So really, what have women got to look forward to. To want to be a stay at home mother is history as far as the feminists are concerned, to be in a relationship with a member of the opposite sex on a permanent basis and not shagging oneself silly is frowned upon..

Lesbianism is promoted as being the right alternative and working 24/7 should be the aim of every woman and behaving like one, well, that's just not on. They hate feminine women with a passion..

I have yet to see ONE single feminist come out and say "this type of behaviour is bad for your health" or "you should not be screwing yourself silly because it will affect your health" or "abortions can psychologically affect you for the rest of your life" or " be a caring, loving human being and share your life with someone who cares about you and make it work otherwise you will be on your own when you get older"..

No positive advice or feedback is forthcoming from any feminist as they have demonstrated already how much they truly hate their own sex. No alternative lifestyle choices are offered because that would mean it to include them men, whom they loathe even more. But care, they do not, as long as their outcomes are reached, they will sacrifice their own with about as much feeling a farmer has when he crops his harvest..

Want a life of misery and hopelessness, become a feminist. It's their best advertisement yet..

Girls in the gutter and a betrayal of feminismBy AMANDA PLATELL
Last updated at 10:34 AM on 1st October 2011 

No one blinked an eye at newspaper pictures of semi-clad young women in the gutter this week — women who were bragging they’d ‘got wasted’ on £1 in Warrington.We have become inured to the sight of girls with their breasts tumbling out, their skirts so short they leave nothing to the imagination, and so drunk they can’t stand. In this case, they’d been taking advantage of a ‘Two-Bob Tuesday’ event at a pub, where shots of vodka could be bought for 10p. Even the scenes of them being pawed by strangers in the street seemed par for the course.Yet when you actually encounter this kind of behaviour, it is horribly shocking. Last Saturday night, I was in Liverpool — the 2008 European Capital of Culture — for the Labour Party conference. In the shadows of the Liver Building, I saw a group of expensively — but barely — dressed young women standing in a circle on the city’s famous promenade.
‘What’s going on?’ I asked. ‘It’s a p*** ring,’ one replied. She stepped away from the circle to show me what she meant. One of her friends had her skirt around her ears and was urinating in the street. It was 8pm.Later that night, I returned to the Hilton, the city’s poshest hotel, and another group of girls was sitting outside at the hotel’s alfresco tables, smoking and drinking.As I passed, one of them started shrieking that she needed the loo. She could have walked to one just yards away inside the hotel’s foyer — yet she decided instead to straddle the flowerpot beside the table, lift her skirt and go in full view of passers-by. She didn’t need to drop her underwear as she wasn’t wearing any.
All week inside the Labour Party conference hall, Harriet Harman had been championing women’s rights in the workplace, and Ed Miliband had been thinking of reshuffling his shadow cabinet so he could have more women on the frontline.Yet what is the point of giving young women like this more rights if they behave in such a way?


Picture of Amanda Marcotte

Profile

Amanda Marcotte blogs every day at Pandagon.net, and contributes a weekly podcast to RH Reality Check. She lives in Austin, TX with her two cats, boyfriend, and environmentally correct commuter bicycle
To be honest I was always of the opinion that Marcotte was a lesbian. I kid you not. What level of mangina would you have to be to be attached to a female or in this case a snarky, self righteous, male hating, feminist who spends the entire day downgrading, abusing and humiliating all men and boys and in her hypocritical way, claim to be actually applying a  tourniquet of unreality on what is obviously the neck of integrity, honesty and dignity..

Marcotte even tried it's hand at making recommendation to men on how they should behave in relationships (akin to asking a cobra to care for your pet mice) amongst other hopelessly blinkered advice that would have been as useful as a " how to survive a kidney stone" when a tornado is headed in your direction. Marcotte's passion for the ridiculous and practiced  innuendo were exposed for what it really is. A load of supercilious crap that only a moron would swallow. To use that kind of advice, it would have been simpler to just hand over a whip, take off your shirt and take it like a man because that was exactly where it was heading. She will tell you what to do and assumes that it is not only totally sufficient and correct but has the temerity to bask in it's candlelit ambience although it did only try that type of advice once as far as I am aware as most who read that inane drivel are still smirking, getting over their splitting side aches and muscle strain..

This spiteful narcissistic individual is another one of the proud authors on the "good men project" and that should indicate precisely where the GMP alliances lie. Just another example of another capitulating fake site paying abeyance to feminism. Their where every word has to be authorised by Ms.Magazine as they are their main supporters if not the owners of that wimp infested site..

Marcotte also jumped onto the Testosterone Wagon and as usual, gets it wrong, what a surprise. A female telling men what to do with their sex live is bad enough but when she wandered into relationships it was completely out of it's depth for obvious reasons..

Marcotte concludes:

For men who, whether it’s because they’re married or they aren’t high performers with the ladies, don’t get to be in the game and seriously resent it, these theories might have a lot of emotional power that is clogging up their ability to be rational. Link to HUS..
Marcotte likes nothing more than throwing in strawman argument so she presents an opportunity to rant and rage in her usual fashion to once again demonstrate and remove all doubt that she was hiding in the corner when the reality gene was being handed out..

So we have - married men, high performers, game, resent, theories, emotional, power, clogging,  ability and rational. See what I mean about taking any and every opportunity to downgrade and humiliate men whenever it raises a finger on the keyboard. Now going by her remarks in relation to testosterone which is the topic of discussion but as far as Marcotte is concerned, you may as well be holidaying on the moon before she will even bother mentioning what the original topic is about, so far has she drifted out of context..

So what does Testosterone actually do, obviously not what feminists have been lying about..


Functions of testosterone
The major androgenic hormone is testosterone. Some of the functions of testosterone in the male body include:
  • Starting and completing the process of puberty
  • Bone and muscle development
  • Growth of body hair, including beard
  • Change of vocal cords to produce the male voice
  • Sexual drive (libido) and sexual function
  • Prostate gland growth and function
  • Sperm production. Link to Androgen..
Now what is the point of all this, where does the "violence" gene or affect that feminists have been lying about for so long, all and sundry ignorantly see it as such. Why have they maligned testosterone when both sexes cannot basically live a normal life without it..    
A girl's hormone too
Testosterone is also well known for its role in the hormonal hotbed that is male puberty. It promotes the growth of the reproductive tract, increases in the length and diameter of the penis, development of the prostate and scrotum, and the sprouting of pubic and facial hair.
As well as these androgenic, or masculinising effects, testosterone also drives anabolic, or tissue-building, changes. These include thickening of the vocal chords, growth spurts, development of sexual libido, and an increase in strength and muscle bulk.There's no denying these powerful physical effects which continue well into adulthood, and their driving force, hormones. But we feel compelled to box our hormones resolutely into those that belong to men, or to women.
Estrogen and progesterone are the so-called female sex hormones, and testosterone, the so-called primary male sex hormone. With that we assign our hormones impossible gender roles. But of course gender ain't that simple, and nor are our hormones.It turns out men and women produce exactly the same hormones, only in different amounts.
Men's bodies generate more than twenty times more testosterone than women, an average of seven milligrams per day. Women, via mainly their ovaries and adrenal glands, make a tiny three tenths of one milligram of testosterone per day (1). But it may come as a surprise to know that women's ovaries primarily produce testosterone, from which estrogen is then made. This ovarian production accounts for one-quarter of the total circulating testosterone in a woman's body.
Conversely, men's bodies produce their own all-womanly estrogen, converted by their tissues from their all-manly testosterone.Psychiatrist Dr Susan Rako, believes testosterone is as much a woman's sex hormone as it is a man's. She argues that the "amount of testosterone, tiny as it is, that a woman's body is continually producing is an essential amount." Rako's book, provocatively titled, The Hormone of Desire, is one of a growing wave of publications about the importance of androgens like testosterone to women's health. In calling it the hormone of desire, Rako maintains "testosterone is the hormone most critically implicated in the maintenance of libido, or sexual desire, in women just as it is men".

One could imagine those feminists sitting in their mother's cellar, whispering to each other, wondering what they could do to malign all men and boys and raise the "woman's downgraded image" and imply that all men are so inferior because they possess a certain hormone, in their opinion should be maligned as being the main problem women face because it causes all the "women are victims" situations but failed to study the fact that women carry that same androgens and without it they would end up to be just like them..