Feminists did not like this one..

Let's have a round-up for the past couple of weeks just to demonstrate how busy the MRM is at fighting the scourge that is feminism and the obvious biases and hate that movement pursues..

First is the Rights of Men article with translation to demonstrate that the male hating is not just in your country but world wide while every one just ignores it..

Derechos de los HombresSólo es sexista si lo hacen los hombres - Vean este vídeo con subtítulos los que lo necesiten. Rights of Men It is only sexist if men do - Watch this video with subtitles that need.

Next the ever present German MRA ..

Gedanken zum Osloer Anschlag -Das schreckliche Ereignis vom letzten Freitag hält immer noch halb Europa in Atem (die andere Hälfte ist damit beschäftigt, gegen "Rechtspopulisten" zu het

 Thoughts on the Oslo stop the terrible events of last Friday's semi-occupied Europe is still holding its breath (the other half is so against "right-wing populist" to het ..

Next we have Englands Number MRA in AngryHarry who would have to be granted as the main instigator of the MRM..
Left wing feminists and toadies are trying everything they can to malign all men and cast them into some lunatic's mold..

 HUGELY IMPORTANT ISSUE of the moment.
The recent massacre by Anders Behring Breivik in Norway is being portrayed by the left-wing media (such as the BBC) as being motivated by extreme right-wing groups - the idea, as ever, being to demonise and, hence, to intimidate, as much as possible, anybody who does not support their malicious self-serving agenda.
But if you look more closelyat the evidence, it is quite clear that, if anything, it was the various machinations and rhetoric engaged in by the deceitful LEFT that infuriated this man.

Here is another Spanish site..

FEMILISTASE scandaloso caso de discriminación por ser hombre - Juan Acacio lleva ocho meses sin ver a su hija, desde que la madre la sustrajera con el beneplácito judicial y la impunidad feminísima de la perspectiva de...

Fighting Feminism is another example of the broad network that the MRM movement have developed..

Fighting Feminism Suicide - Suicide rates in countries throughout the world As you can see, from data lifted from the World Health Organisation in 1999, male suicides by far outweigh...

ManWomanMyth have a huge collection of videos they have produced and generated promoting the anti-male bias that permeates the world..

Man Woman & Myth
Latest YouTube: Man’s Penis Cut Off: What is a Man Worth? -Addressing the cutting off of a man's penis by Catherine Kieu Becker, July 2011.

And ofcourse we have Men Going Their Own Way..

MGTOW The Delusion Women Continue to Perpetuate - Below is an article published by the Times of India that attempts to reinforce the delusion that females-tending-towards-a-more-mature-disposition continue...

The False Rape Society does an excellent job of pointing out that horrendous crimes thirves against mankind..

The False Rape SocietyNews report of rape that turned out to be false suggests that news media needs to proceed with greater care - The following news story raises critically important issues about the way rape claims are covered by the mainstream news media. The issues are complex, and...

We the Men on the Rape of Men, a topic completely ignored by feminised governments and Gov. departments who are supposed to give a damn..

We the Men "The Rape of Men" - Will Storr Sexual violence is one of the most horrific weapons of war, an instrument of terror used against women. Yet huge numbers of men are also victims...

 We have "Things are Bad" look at -

What is a mangina?
First of all, I'll say I didn't really care for the term "mangina" at first. It didn't sit right with me because it seemed like a cheap insult. But in fact, it's the best, most efficient way to describe a man who worships women and hates men.
Things Are Bad

We have the females lining up as well taking potshots at feminism and their inane behaviour..
Women Against Men: Women Less Likely To Multitask Than Men - Over the years we have been hearing the myth than women are supposedly better at multitasking than men. The source of this myth has sometimes been explaine...

And ofcourse Alcuin,

Alcuin - What do they eat for breakfast? - A feminist "Christian" theologian discussing - or should I say "whining about"? - Islam, talking in class with her retarded feminist students about how ter...

 The Antimisandry Forum, always full of good discussions and good people trying to make a difference, no topic is ignored, even this one..

antimisandry.com - Melodic Death Metal: Omnium Gatherum - This is one of my new favorite bands and I love this song by them: The Return http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ybdN0P9wgc The Lyrics: Pick...

Toy Soldier, another member of the battalion and justly so..

Toy Soldiers‘Terrorist’ does not equal ‘madman’ or ‘insane’ - When a tragedy like the Olso killings happens, people have a bad habit of writing off the killer as crazy or insane. They do this even when the person clea...

I could go on and on but I will do a few more of these to demonstrate beyond doubt that the MRM is a force to deal with and the sooner you come onside the better, we will defeat those male hating feminists, it's that simple..

This is how toxic feminists have made all men and boys..

Bear in mind also that feminists have no interest in boys except maybe to allow female teachers sexually abusing them as they voice not a single protest on that point..

Those bigots and feminist enforcers follow that group-think that philosophers have predicted many years ago would be the case and feminist leaders would be well aware of that warning. It's akin to the same group-think that eventuated in the Nazi era against the Jews and I use that example only because it is the only recent comparison that comes to mind that compares precisely what feminists have encouraged..

From FRS.. 

'. . . It’s a wonder I allow myself near my sons'by ArchivistIconoclast Chad Hermann has no use for ideological purity, political correctness, or partisanship. His political views are all over the map, and his Pittsburgh Post-Gazette blog can best be described as a repudiation of bullshit.  He's the guy who demolished the one-in-four lie: see here.  Among other things, this is what he wrote today:
"• This past Tuesday in Pocatello, Idaho, some parents saw an old man taking pictures of children in a public park. They approached him, yelled at him to stop, and immediately called the police. When officers arrived, they discovered the man had been taking pictures of his grandson, whom he had brought to the park to play. An updated media report — that’s right; a local television station ran a story about a suspicious man before anything had been confirmed or investigated — eventually declared that police [were] no longer worried about the man, and he is not suspicious. Which is doubtless a relief to grandfathers, aged uncles, and prematurely gray-haired men everywhere.
"• Forget that none of those paranoiacs bothered to talk to the old man before calling the cops or verbally assaulting him, and just ask yourself: what was the more likely outcome there? That the man was related to one of the children? Or that he was some sort of stark-raving, playground-stalking pedophile?
"• It’s a wonder I allow any of my male friends or relatives near my sons. For that matter, it’s a wonder I allow myself near my sons."

Amazingly, women have absolutely no problem with exposing their relationship with men at the drop of a hat or should I say "Money". It is fascinating how men very rarely mention anything about their relationships, men like Clooney will toss any female who does, which they still apparently fail to comprehend. But we have the endless cycle of women "exposing" their inane behaviour for all to see and do not realise that their episode is just a constant source of amusement and hilarity. One does have to have a screw loose when they keep repeating the same problem over and over again like some mindless lemming whose dive off the cliff did not do what it was suppose to and goes back to attempt that again hoping for a better result..

I thought Dunce was an absolute pain in the arse in the Spiderman movies and it was just another "hero" movie to destroy that character as they have done with nearly all the heroes. They have refashioned them to be wimps and cow-towers to women who are sooo strong and in control of their feelings. The whole Hollywood propaganda machine has been exposed for what it really is. Designed to spread the feminist hate-fest and people are falling for it left, right and centre..

'I cried a lot over bad boys': Kirsten Dunst on break-up with Razorlight's Johnny Borrell
By Daisy Dumas
Last updated at 5:43 PM on 30th July 2011
Read more:
She's a top Hollywood actress, has dated some of the world's most desirable men and she is about to star in another hit movie. But Kirsten Dunst is as human as any of us.
Speaking candidly to Elle, the actress, 29, reveals that she 'has cried a lot over boys' and reminisces about her former flame, Razorlight frontman, Johnny Borrell.
She said: 'We all want the bad guy who doesn't give you what you want. I did a lot of sitting in my car, listening to sad music, crying over boys.'
Bad boy: Kirsten dated Razorlight frontman Johnny Borrell for seven months in 2007

So some rather succinct comments trying to interpret the female mind and thought process which is ofcourse mostly incomprehensible, apparently to both sexes..

If intelligence is defined as that which is centered around logical reasoning I don't see any reason that this shouldn't be true. When a woman creates drama she willingly decides to change her own emotions in order to try to be the center of attention. In most logical contexts emotional security (or even a sense of being noticed) is a short-term illusion thus women lack foresight, and the logic required to think of the universe they live in instead of themselves

She said: 'We all want the bad guy who doesn't give you what you want. I did a lot of sitting in my car, listening to sad music, crying over boys.'

So she's saying all women want a man who doesn't give them what they want in a relationship. Makes sense. How many guys would say about a woman they've been dating "She's a real bitch who doesn't have anything I want in a woman. She's perfect. What man could resist her?" Am I missing something or is Ms. Dunce psychotic? 

They have to fight them off more like it. They are in such high demand that they have to protect themselves from the female predators..


It is fascinating how I have NEVER heard a well off or rich dude, regardless of age, looks, weight or ability to communicate, complain that he could not find any woman to date or have a relationship with. Yeah, I know, It all comes from one side of the track and from the same malcontent who spends most of her time on Eharmony or Plenty of Fish trying to reel in another sucker to cover costs as the last relationship, she was in, she screwed up royally and here you are trying to find someone else to replace it. Sadly though, those women come from a society who not only demonstrated that their slut level is just fine but have installed copious laws protecting their unlimited sensibilities and enshrined it into law while our sex can just run the gauntlet..

I came across this topic, which interested me, as I didn't really give it much thought as it was really a non-issue. It's the women moaning, whining and complaining that they cannot find a partner or have a relationship and it's mostly from the countries where the feminasties have controlled their little minds..

Doing it for Money. The Biggest Sex Farm in Texas..

Now they are paying for it and they just don't like it. They were sucked into the "euphoria" vortex without giving it any consideration and now it payback time and they are, well, almost speechless. We hear the usual " why doesn't someone want me as I am such a loveable person", which may well be the case but you also come with so much excess baggage that no one can afford you. A man would be better off hiring people to perform the work that an American Woman (wife) would turn her nose up at. It would be cheaper in the long term as one does not have to be reamed dry in the divorce courts (a simple method of transferring cash from any male to the privileged princesses)and that is one major obstacle that all men face whenever they indulge in a relationship with any female. Although, women from overseas appear to be a better bargain as they have not so far been contaminated by the feminist hate-fest that makes any western female distinctly avoidable..

This is a post from J.Curry's Cimate Etc site where a study demonstrates that white cons. dudes are the ones forcing the scientific community to get their shit together and tell the science the way it is instead of theorising or using manipulated computer models to spread their AGW according to their preconceived religion, which by the way is coming unstuck as I speak..

It is just another condescending study by those learned elites whose comprehension of reality relies on someone else's opinion as they don't get out much. Anaemia is their main complaint and the sun is something they study in their spare time..

Gladly, I can confess and state that there are more guys not convinced that feminism is the utopia that those lying feminists claim it to be, I am glad also to say that the MRM is chock a block full of people from countries all over the world. It's easy to join, confessions held right here. The only request is that you admit how much feminism sucks and how much it has screwed up your life, see, easy..

JC comment:  you think that this relationship would give them a clue about what “denial” is actually about.
It is also important to note the effects of the other social, demographic, political, and temporal variables we employed as controls in our models. Age generally has no effect on climate change denial, but older adults are more likely than are younger adults to believe there is no scientific consensus. Lesser educated adults are more likely than are their more highly educated counterparts to believe human activities are not the primary cause of recent warming and that there is no scientific consensus. Adults with higher socioeconomic status (both educational attainment and annual income) are more likely than are their lower SES counterparts to believe the media exaggerates the seriousness of global warming. Employment status and parental status have no direct effect on climate change denial. For each of the five denial items, more religious individuals, people unsympathetic to the environmental movement, and self-identified Republicans are more likely to express climate change denial than are their respective counterparts. Finally, climate change denial has increased over the time period between 2001 and 2010.
From the conclusions:
The positive correlation between self- reported understanding of global warming and climate change denial among conservative white males is compelling evidence that climate change denial is a form of identity-protective cognition, reflecting a system-justifying tendency.
Our results relate back to earlier work on the political mobilization of conservative elites and organizations in the US to challenge climate science and policy . Conservative think tanks, conservative media, corporations, and industry associations (especially for the fossil fuels industry)—domains dominated by conservative white males—have spearheaded the attacks on climate science and policy from the late 1980s to the present. The results presented here show that conservative white males in the general public have become a very receptive audience for these efforts. When mobilized, these conservative white males may constitute a key vector of climate change denial in their own right via their online and offline social networks and through participation in various protest and campaigning events.
Since the mid-1990s, organized climate change denial has diffused from the US to other Anglo nations with established conservative think tanks that promote free-market conservatism and front groups promoting industry interests, most notably Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand . This spread of climate change denial has been driven to a significant degree by key actors—and their resources, strategies, and tactics—in the U.S. climate change denial machine. Throughout these Anglo countries organized denial seems to be dominated by politically conservative white males, and this suggests that a similar conservative white male effect might be emerging in the general publics of these nations with regard to climate change denial. Clearly the extent to which the conservative white male effect on climate change denial exists outside the US is a topic deserving investigation.
JC conclusion:  This article is notable primarily for coining the term “cool dudes” in the context of climate change “denial.”    My main reaction to this is to question how social scientists, who actually study this, can be so clueless about the whole thing.  Perhaps someone needs to develop a demographic and behavioral theory about social scientists who write about climate change “deniers.”    I look forward to the reactions of the “cool dudes” to these ideas.

The results of the likelihood ratio tests (1 df, x2 distribution) in Table 6 indicate that the confident conservative white male dummy variable improves model fit more than does the conservative white male dummy variable. Further, for each denial indicator, the odds ratio for the confident conservative white male dummy variable is greater than the one for the conservative white male dummy variable. For example, while conservative white males are 1.43 times more likely than other adults to believe the effects of global warming will never happen, confident conserva- tive white males are 3.39 times more likely than other adults to do so. Thus, confident conservative white males are much more likely than are other adults to report climate change denial. Building  upon the results presented in Table 3, the patterns revealed in Table 6 further suggest that climate change denial is a form of identity-protective cognition, reflecting a system-justifying ten- dency.

A good video to explain precisely how much the Americans are in debt..

I have often found it amazing how women could just jump from one boyfriend to the next just like changing underwear. I have witnessed females go into hysterics, throw stuff around, get pissed after breaking up with boyfriend just to notice the next day she has hitched onto someone else. So this little confession does not surprise me one iota, nothing that women do surprises me anymore as I have had to study and investigate their behaviour and what makes them tick. An exercise that I would have preferred to not have undertaken as I have found, much to my disgust that the general malaise women indulge in where guys are concerned is just not something you want to know about. Thank goodness there are still the odd sane, caring and understanding females out there as we all know. At least it does allow us the opportunity to not completely write that sex off for what the majority appear to do..

There is a minutiae of hope but it appears to be dwindling faster than I care to admit..

Hang on...no, wait...we're about to cut the cake...has anybody seen my wife?

I cheated on my husband a night before our wedding...

Hello Nicole,

I got married about 2 years ago to an amazing guy I had been together with him for about 10 years. I love my husband , he is such gentleman and a perfect guy. Years ago I used to date this Mexican guy named Jose, the best looking guy ever, I was in love with this guy for a long time, I wanted to marry him, but things didn't work out as I expected

I wasn’t terribly excited about getting married but I definitely didn’t want to break up and be alone [wait - read that line again] so I went ahead w/ the marriage. Not really the right thing to do but people aren’t perfect so whatever.

I had cheated on him a few times before with his friend who also happened to be one of the groomsman in the wedding. An hour or so after the ceremony, in between the other scheduled events, I went back upstairs to one of the bride rooms to “rest and fix my makeup.” I guess his friend saw me go up there and he came up a few minutes later. Admittedly, the sex while still wearing a wedding dress and to not look like JBF was a little difficult but it was so hot. 15 minutes later we were both back downstairs like nothing had happened. We never hooked up again but, for me, that is the highlight of my wedding day.

xhttp://nicolessecret.blogspot.com/2011/03/i-cheated-on-my-husband-night-before.html

Remember Lads...if you marry her, she'll love you forever....you, and only you.

THE RING.

Here we have two feminist females who are both on the nose. One is Gillard, Australia's most loathed prime minister ever and whose incompetence has been clearly demonstrated. A compulsive liar and hypocrite.
The we have feminist Nixon, another example of incompetence whose effort while serving as police commissioner (political appointment by Labor Gov in Victoria) was to ignore violence and criminals at large and treat them as poor suffering souls who did not mean what they were doing. Her mentality regarding upholding the law was to change the whole force and introduce political correctness which ofcourse ensured the privileged princesses were promoted over men even though they were incapable of fulfilling their duties, just like her..

Feminists and women in general just hate the idea of accountability as they believe they are above that trivial action. In their own minds they are giants and beyond criticism. If and when they are criticised they claim sexism, that old pathetic feminist canard that no one believes anymore..

Welcome to the world run by women..

Miranda Devine

Saturday, July 30, 2011 at 09:47pm

It is always great to witness a little justice now and again, especially when we find another conniving "mother" playing her old tricks just like the rest just to get some revenge and try every which way to try and destroy him both financially and alienate the kids ofcourse just for the sake of it. Kids only have value to these type of women as bargaining tools apart from that they are really just a hindrance as they return to the "dating" scene saga in the hope of nailing another sucker stupid enough to wander down that same path..

A MOTHER in the middle of a custody dispute has been caught boasting on her Facebook page how she thought about ripping her husband off for another $20,000.
“Felt like being a smart arse,” she wrote, signing off “Bwahahaha lol.”
Lawyers are now advising their clients locked in Family Court fights to take down their Facebook pages as the networking site has become both the latest weapon and target for warring spouses.
In one case a woman discovered her husband was a bigamist when she was tipped off to look at wedding photographs of him with another bride on the other woman’s Facebook page.
In another case a husband discovered he had been set up by his wife with a woman he thought he met on an internet site. He discovered the woman was a “friend” on his wife’s Facebook page.
“I tell my clients just don’t bloody do it, don’t be silly” family law expert Michael Taussig QC said.
The woman who boasted she had thought about dragging out the Family Court case to cost her ex-husband an extra $20,000 in legal bills found it backfired on her.
Justice James Barry granted custody of the two children, aged nine and eight, to their father with the mother getting visiting rights.
He then ordered the mother to pay $15,000 of her ex-husband’s estimated $35,000 legal bill, saying the mother’s behaviour had been the “stuff of nightmares”.
She had already strung the case out by falsely claiming her ex-husband had been sexually assaulting their children after one judgment went against her. Then she falsely claimed the father’s new wife had been assaulting them.
“The mother has over the years attempted to manipulate the court system,” Justice Barry said.
http://www.news.com.au/ugly-feud-fought-on-facebook/story-e6freuzi-1225942450541#ixzz13BHkaDt4

I don't know about you but I am rather taken back when I was pulled over by a blond female cop who only came up to my shoulder (I am 6ft) and would be lucky to push 50 kilo in weight. The shock being that in the past most of the cops were over six foot and weight in at least 100 kilos plus. But at the moment we can see that the girls are just not capable of matching up even though they have already changed the rules to make it easier for the privileged princesses to join..

So, another example of what the world would be like when run by women. It would definately include short arse female cops incapable of upholding the law and when it comes down to that as at the moment they can and do rely on their male counterparts to do the hard stuff. They may break a fingernail and that would be, you know, sore..

Women police not fit enough 

Link..
 ONE in three female police recruits have failed the basic physical tests at the NSW police academy.
Statistics show 152 of 414 females failed the Physical Capacity Test (PCT) on assessment day.
In the same nine-month period from mid-2010 to March, only 3 per cent of the 787 men who signed-up to the force failed the basic fitness test.
Police academy fitness unit supervisor Sergeant Paul Sowden said testing was "rigorous" to ensure recruits could perform their duties after graduation.
"When the recruits arrive we don't have individual assessments but we do basic physical sessions which includes sit-ups and core strength exercises. In their first session they will also complete a 3km run," Sgt Sowden said.
Sgt Sowden would not discuss why 37 per cent of female recruits had failed the course.

How many more variations can there be. This warped mass murderer via his manifesto states that he was being feminised and that affect or attempt which ever version you prefer, demonstrates how destructive feminism is towards the male Psyche as well as to the state of mind..

Feminism has been driving society to the edge and I have a feeling that this may only be the beginning. One does not have to stray far from feminism to realise it's violent and destructive force that they have unleashed. Having exposed people to their cognitive dissonance may be okay with normal thinking minds which can determine what a hate fest it is and work out some defence towards that but they fail to comprehend the affect it has on an unstable mind and here is a prime example on how it affects unstable people..

Feminism can now make to be the promoters of mass murder apart from their mass murdering of the unborn. What a claim to fame for this sickening and demented doctrine..

Well done..

Link..

Breivik is critical of the influence of women in his life saying: 'I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminise me to a certain degree.'
Breivik describes his childhood as a happy one with no 'economical troubles' - although he does complain that he was given too much freedom.
He says he had a good relationship with his half-siblings but in particular, Elisabeth who moved to Los Angeles 14 years ago, married and has two children.
He describes disagreements with his half-brother's girlfriend about feminism when 'she almost physically strangled me'.

Allure magazine offered support for this new trend when their 2011 Beauty Survey found "64 percent of all our respondents think women of mixed race represent the epitome of beauty."...In 2011, Allure also announced that Angelina Jolie had replaced Christie Brinkley as the new face of beauty, proclaiming there was "no longer such a thing as an all-American look." Americans, they said, "have branched out beyond the Barbie-doll ideal and embraced something quite different."

-While 73 percent of women said that a curvier body type is more appealing than it had been in 1991, 85 percent still said they wish their own hips were narrower.

-93 percent of women said the pressure to look young today is greater than ever before.

-In the 1991 beauty survey, men said women were at their most beautiful at age 31. In 2011, that ideal age had been reduced to 28.

-86 percent of men said that they wanted to weigh less as compared to 97 percent of women.

The above article is the usual bit of nascent belief that those childish glad mags promote as they do, really have a religious following to such a degree that it's almost akin to a drug habit, those magazines repeat over and over again the same inane message they promoted 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago and still the record player is stuck on stupid. But their addicted audience still pay their abeyance while absorbing the drivel and change their lives accordingly..

All I have noticed over the last ten years is that one of the preconditions of the front cover is to have at least one diet with questionable results, if not downright unhealthy and the other condition is to have either some member of royalty or some narcissistic example of womanhood lacking a good feed..

So to the survey we go and immediately we notice the narcissism arise as it just demonstrates how unhappy everyone is generally about their weight, their hip size, the age of their anatomy, it's not as if the plastic surgeons are not busy enough implanting, cutting and dicing, vacuuming and filing as well as readjusting bodies to smaller sizes..

I was always of the opinion that beauty was in the eye of the beholder plus it's only skin deep. Character and behaviour in my opinion is much more important than the shape of the nose or eyebrows. But heh, I may just be a realist rather than a follower of fairy tales. I cannot see the benefit of trying to achieve the impossible goals set by magazines whose sole object in life is to sell advertising..

I find it fascinating how feminists can claim not to be sexist or even to be non-male-hating when their every action, every word ushering from their mouths and even the explanation of their doctrine permeates hate like stench seeping from a carcase. Feminists would be better of claiming that the sea is red and the sky is chocolate rather than trying to demystify their hate message..

Have a look at any feminist site if ever you are in doubt or wish to take some mystic viewpoint. Go ahead, have a look at feministe or Salon or feministing just to whet your appetite. Misandry (male hate) reigns supreme in that movement and it warrants zero clarification or evidence as they have demonstrated that beyond doubt..

But still they lie about that just as they do about the power women have generally. In their version women have no power at all because their doctrine does not want to recognise that as the funds, the millions, relies on women being sole victims on this planet. A planet by the way, occupied by two sexes and not just one..

The ever thinking Snark..

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Oops! Feminists Admit That They Are Vulgar Sexists

One common form of attack used against those who point out misandry is to state that "it's not sexism when it's against men, because sexism is hatred plus institutional power."

The implication being, that women do not possess institutional power, therefore one of the two conditions required for behaviour to be deemed sexist is not fulfilled.

Leaving aside the absolutely laughable assertion that women do not possess institutional power - in fact they possess far more than men - this is an entirely arbitrary definition of sexism, which is invoked only to defy those who wish to hold women morally accountable.

However, they make one notable admission - that indeed, they do hate men.

In response to the accusation "that is sexist," they do not say, "no, it is not sexist, because we do not hate men."

What they say is, "no, it's not sexist, because sexism is hatred plus institutional power. And women have no institutional power."

Oops!

If they didn't hate men, they would be denying the accusation of hatred - wouldn't they?

They wouldn't be suggesting some alternative, arbitrary definition of sexism that exculpates them from the charge.

They would be saying "we don't hate men," not "hatred of men is not sufficient for this behaviour to be deemed sexist."

They are outright admitting that the hatred of men is there.

But they think that hatred is okay, because it's not paired with institutional power - so they think.

Only, feminists are very clear on one thing: that they want to give women that institutional power.

Yes, a feminist would never deny that she wants to give women "the same institutional power" as men - although, in fact, they already possess far more.

Still, if men can be sexist - because they possess institutional power, supposedly - then the same would be true of women, if or when they possess institutional power - correct?

So, feminists have admitted that they hate men; and they have also admitted that they want women to possess the institutional power that would turn this hatred into 'sexism', as they themselves have defined it!

Whoops!

Every time they bring up this argument, feminists admit that they are vulgar sexists.

Disgusting, vile pigs.

Each and every one of them.

Without exception.

Of course, those of us who have been paying close attention know that women already possess far greater institutional power and privilege than men have done at any point in history.

And so, even on the feminists' arbitrary and self-serving definition of 'sexism', they are the most egregious sexists of all time.

Laughing at an innocent, elderly man who was drugged, stripped, tied to a bed and genitally mutilated because he asked for a divorce? Mocking him on national television? Referring to his mutilation as "delightful"?

As if this isn't sexism.

As if this isn't hatred.

As if this isn't institutional power that is being used intentionally to persecute those who have already suffered the most abominable cruelty.

And you must keep this in mind: if ever such a horrible crime were to be perpetrated against you, they would be laughing just as hard at you.

Not just the women on talk shows.

But women on the streets.

Women at work.

Even the women in your own home.

Why?

Because they can.

And because they get off on the cruelty.

And because, like the feminists that they take their lead from, many of them are vulgar sexists.

So, the question is: what are you going to do about it?

- Snark

This is how the anti-male hysteria all started, by lying cows just like this, and it has not stopped since..

 

Twenty Years Ago Today: The Imaginary Rape That Prompted Calls for a Curfew for Men and Boys

by Archivist

Today is the twentieth anniversary of something that didn't happen, an imaginary rape that turned the teenage boys of the bucolic college town of Davis, California into creatures more loathsome than pariahs.

On August 2, 1991, Janet Berger, 44, who was then a circulation manager for a local Davis newspaper, falsely claimed she had been raped on July 29, 1991 at 10 p.m. by five skateboarding boys in one of the city's park-like greenbelts.

Berger said the supposed rape was in retaliation for her act of accidentally brushing up against one of the youths on her bicycle earlier in the evening. On her return trip along the same path, she claimed that a wilding gang of skateboarding teen males in tank tops, ages 13-17, wrestled her from her bike and proceeded to rape her.

Two weeks later, Berger told a rape counselor and police that it was a lie: she had merely fallen from her bicycle and had made up the rape story. She furnished neither an explanation nor a motive.

But it's what happened during those two weeks to one particular class of citizens -- the teen male skateboarding community -- that makes this story so instructive.  Immediately following the spurious allegation, the news media took the woman at her word. One headline solemnly announced: "Rape shatters illusions in Davis."

Anonymous flyers were circulated calling for a curfew for all men and boys.

Threatening, anti-male graffiti was scrawled on an overpass favored by skateboarders. It read: "Dead Boys Don't Rape."

Other graffiti repeated the "Curfew for All Men" sentiment; still other graffiti demanded: "Get the Skateboard Rapists."

Apoplectic women's groups ran out of synonyms for the word "shock."

The newspaper where Berger worked reported that a rally was planned in "support of the rape victim and other rape victims." But then the rally was canceled at Berger's request.

A local chapter of the National Organization for Women held a news conference to denounce the alleged crime. And townsfolk demanded arrests, even though the only evidence of the putative assault was the word of one then-unidentified woman whom the townsfolk knew nothing about.

Police questioned 75 completely innocent boys in connection with the rape that never happened.

Skateboarders kept a low profile once the woman's story became public. "After it happened, there wasn't a skateboarder in town," said Bill Gray, a Yolo County youth counselor at Davis High School.

One of the innocent boys taken in for questioning was then-16-year-old Josh Fernandez, who is now a mid-30s married man and a writer. Josh, then an avid skateboarder, knew as soon as he heard the allegation that he and his friends would be targeted.

"Once, when we were taking a break from skateboarding in the parking lot of Carl’s Jr.," Josh recalled, "a car pulled up. In the car was a man, about 40, who had a ratlike face with a patchy mustache. 'Hey, you fucking rapists,' he said, with his window rolled halfway down. He tried to spit on me, but the saliva didn’t quite make it out of his car."

Josh told the man, "Fuck you," but was glad that the man sped off, "because, frankly, he would have pummeled me to death with his white-trash methamphetamine arms."

This was typical, according to Josh: "For a couple of weeks, wherever we went, something of that nature would happen: A truck full of UC Davis jocks threw a dozen soda cans at us and screamed, 'Rapists!'; Butchy Davis women in hemp dresses glared us down with their murderous eyes as we rolled past on the sidewalk—and so on."

"I don’t know about my friends," Josh wrote last year, "but there were moments that summer when—even in my gangly, 5-foot frame—I felt like a big, lumbering, greasy rapist."

Finally, police decided Berger's story was filled with holes, so they confronted her with inconsistencies. One key failing in her story was her refusal to reveal the name of a doctor she claimed examined her.

"The reason I can't give you a doctor," Berger finally told police, "is because there is none."

Police officers and a rape counselor spoke to her for 3 1/2-hours, and she finally acknowledged the fabrication.

Davis Police Chief Phil Coleman called a news conference to announce the jig was up. Flanked by politicians, two detectives, and two rape counselors, the Chief said the rape never occurred.

Mayor Maynard Skinner offered an olive branch to the skateboarders, calling them "an important group in our community." He announced that the city planned to open a skateboard park.

The mayor also called on the woman, Jan Berger, 44, to publicly apologize. (I can find no indication whether she did.)

Councilwoman Lois Wolk said: "It's a tragedy for this community, We were very ready to point fingers and make accusations and stereotype groups--men (and) skateboarders."   But then Wolk proceeded to call Berger a "victim," and said she hoped Berger would receive therapy.

Some local women identified as feminists would not accept the fact that a rape did not occur, and they worried that rape victims might not come forward because people did not believe a rape occurred. "I don't think any one of us (is) convinced that it didn't happen," said feminist Sherilyn Adams. "It's not uncommon for women to recant out of fear of retaliation . . . or denial--make this thing go away."

Police confirmed a report that Berger ran a small day-care center that was shuttered after children were molested there in 1986. She was never prosecuted for the crimes, but felt responsible. Before she recanted her rape lie, she told a detective "what happened now [the supposed rape] was punishment for what had happened" at the day-care center.

A rape counselor, who told reporters that she only uses her first name (Cheryl), said that Berger did not "act out of malice." Rather, she had experienced unspecified traumas in her life. "She does deserve a great deal of compassion."

There is no indication that the newspapers were at all interested in Josh Fernandez's back-story, or that of the other 74 boys picked up for questioning by police.

For Berger's lie, for pitting an entire community against a group of some of its most vulnerable citizens--children--Berger was charged with a misdemeanor of filing a false police report, carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $500 fine. (The newspapers aren't clear if she was convicted.)

The boys questioned by the police seemed to have bounced back and put it behind them, but they didn't forget. Josh Fernandez, the writer, and his skateboarding friends who were also questioned by police, have done pretty well for themselves. One is an ophthalmologist; another writes jokes for Jay Leno; another is a chemist.

When Josh got married last year, he got the old gang together to be his groomsmen, and they skipped the traditional bachelor party. Josh rented out an indoor skate park, and these guys now in their mid-30s--who, 20 years ago, were taken to the police station to be questioned for a rape that never happened just because they were skateboarders--skated like they were 16 again.

Sources:
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-20/news/mn-1241_1_davis-enterprise

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/skateboard-bachelor-party/content?oid=1810692

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=lpszAAAAIBAJ&sjid=sjIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=5152,4943016&dq=skateboard+and+rape&hl=en

http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-30/news/mn-1507_1_false-police-report

It would not be too often that I would list anything from the prominent feminist moan sheet of Huffington post. In my opinion not only is it misandric to the extreme but if you have a look at the comments you could only witness nasty little feminists and their lunatic supporters waxing lyrical on how everything wrong on this planet is not women's fault..

So I was surprised to read an article even remotely sane and considerate towards our sex and actually not taking the "victimhood specialists" side. It is quite a shock to actually read any article that claims that women are the obnoxious and violent bitches we all know them to be without excuse or denial..

Refreshing to say the least and probably as rare as well..

Are Men Society's Scapegoats?

Vicki Larson

Journalist, mother, thinker

Gabriel Aubry is being a bad dad. Well, we don't know that for a fact; all we know is that actress Halle Berry, with whom the model had a daughter, now 3, is claiming that he's been neglectful. She may be right, she may be wrong, but in the eyes of much of the world, Aubry's already guilty.
People can -- and do -- say anything they want in a nasty custody or divorce battle. And as a society, we often tend to assume the worst about men. But what if we're wrong?
We're used to men being violent. Literature, movies and video games are full of heroes and antiheroes who kill and maim their way into our hearts and nightmares. At the same time, we tell boys to "suck it up" instead of expressing pain, leaving them few emotions but anger. Then we chastise them when they actually get angry -- or live in fear of their anger. And sometimes we use the one emotion we've allowed them to our advantage.
Men, of course, aren't the only ones who can do damage; statistics show that women can be just as violent as men. But while the Violence Against Women Act provides millions of dollars for shelters for abused women, you don't see too many shelters -- any, actually -- for abused men. "It's often been taken for granted that women can't really do that much damage, so it's OK to maybe slap your boyfriend or do something of that nature," says Kellie Palazzolo, an assistant professor at Arizona State University's Hugh Downs School of Human Communication who is overseeing research on how college students perceive female and male perpetrators.
That may be why so many women applauded Elin Nordegren's alleged golf club attack on then-hubby Tiger Woods -- we just don't like to think of women being violent except in self-defense. He cheated on her; he made her do that!
And in the "he said-she said" of so many marital breakups, like that of Hulk and Linda Hogan, where she claims he was violent and abusive and he says she's "delusional," or of actress Meredith Baxter, who claims in her memoir, "Untitled", that she was physically and psychologically abused by ex David Birney, while he says her book's "an appalling abuse of the truth," whom do we believe?
Same when it comes to sexual violence. In the "he said-she said" of former International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who was released from house arrest last week, and the 32-year-old hotel maid he allegedly raped, the maid has a history of lying and Strauss-Kahn has a history of sexual predation. Whom do we believe?
Hélène Périvier, co-director of the gender program at Paris' Institut d'Etudes Politiques, worries the fallout of the DSK case may hurt women; while false reports of rape and sexual violence are statistically rare, she says, "it suffices to cement doubts and discredit the word of women going to the police in the future."
But women, like men, lie, and the results can be devastating. And false reports of rape and sexual violence are not as statistically rare as Périvier and others may believe, according to many experts, including Dr. Warren Farrell, chair of the Commission to Create a White House Council on Boys to Men, who details the results of numerous studies in his books "Father and Child Reunion" and "The Myth of Male Power." In fact, they occur often during divorce.
As Farrell writes:

"Men are about 19 more times more likely than women to say they have been falsely accused of sexual abuse. About 85 percent of these abuse allegations are made by women during battles over parent time, during the throes of divorce, or when a live-in situation is failing. ... "(A) sex-abuse charge -- even if false -- often costs the father his job, his health, his friends, his reputation, and his relationship with his child."

Like the hotel maid who allegedly discussed the possible benefits of pursuing charges against Strauss-Kahn, we're all -- men and women -- able to exploit each other. When it comes to custody cases, however, the odds are often stacked against dads. "Some women are coached to make false allegations of domestic violence, rape and child abuse," says Dr. Tara Palmatier, the no-nonsense founder of A Shrink 4 Men, in an email exchange with me. "Their attorneys may file baseless restraining orders to raise the stakes on men in the divorce or custody cases. These tactics don't just hurt men: they create widespread cynicism about the family court and the efficacy of the justice system."
Oregon took a bold step to address that last week when Gov. John Kitzhaber signed into law HB2183, which comes down hard on anyone knowingly making a false case of child abuse. The key is "knowing," says the bill's sponsor, Rep. Wayne Krieger, who acknowledged that false accusations often arise between divorcing couples.
But, how often is that? The U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Administration for Children & Families says of the percentage of the 3.3 million referrals for child abuse and neglect in 2009 it investigated, "Two-thirds of reports found all allegations to be unsubstantiated or intentionally false (64.3% and 0.1%, respectively)." But child abuse or neglect is just a small part of false claims in custody battles.
Many high-conflict custody cases don't start out that way, Farrell says, because most about-to-be divorced moms recognize that kids need their dads, too. But divorce offers a chance to start over -- maybe move closer to one's parents or to a new love, or relocate for a new job. If a savvy lawyer informs a woman that her ex could get equal custody, thus putting the kabosh on her plans, and then asks if she ever feared him, whether he ever cursed at her, called her names, raised his voice or screamed in a fit of rage, "I'm so angry at you, I could kill you" -- and what marriage doesn't have some sort of anger, yelling or threats? -- well, there's a false case of abuse in the making, he says. Divorces can become high conflict if a dad, realizing that his ex's plans may cause him to lose his kids and he doesn't want to lose them, cries, "No way!"
In the custody battle between champion fighter Chuck "The Iceman" Liddell and his ex, Lori Geyer, over their 12-year-old son, accusations are flying on both sides. Who knows who's telling the truth? But one thing Geyer may have on her side is fear; she says Liddell tried to intimidate her by "pacing back and forth and staring her down." And fear is enough to raise the shadow of a doubt, Farrell says. Most judges would rather take the safe route -- after all, who wants to make a mistake and put a child or woman back in an abuser's control?
And so men walk around somewhat guilty until proven innocent. And sometimes, no one's too interested in proving them innocent.
Farrell is. He gets weekly calls from men who say they're being falsely accused. So is Palmatier. The clinical psychologist has worked with numerous men in abusive relationships who feel unheard. Men, she tells me, are often default scapegoats. A woman hits a man and we assume he did something to her to justify it. A father doesn't see his kids so he must be a deadbeat dad, even if the truth is that his ex has done everything in her power to keep him from them. A woman screams and neighbors call the cops who arrest the husband when it was the wife who assaulted him.
"As a society, we don't typically think of men in the role of a victim. We can't even recognize it when we're confronted by physical evidence," Palmatier writes. "On the other hand, we're inclined to believe accusations about men."
Not only is it unfair and dishonest, she says, but it's "damaging to boys and young men, gender relations, relationships, families and 'the best interests of the children.' And it gives the women who are predators a free pass."
Automatically assuming the worst of men is a form of discrimination, she, Farrell and others say. And they're right.
Halle Berry says Gabriel Aubry is being a bad dad, just as many women say about their exes. Whom do you believe?

One must point out the irony in this particular case where a female makes a "False Rape Claim", as many have done in the past without any of them receiving even a slap on the wrist for their evil, life destroying effort, which is slowly changing ofcourse via pressure from the MRM..

At last we can witness an example where the sexes are exchanged, a woman can actually see and know what it's like being falsely accused and then loosing everything she has in the process while bigotted law enforcers wallow in dereliction of duty just so they can have bragging rights at claiming that they have done their feminised politically correct job and justifed their weekly income. Gee, well done. If I carried out my work methodology in that same way I would not last a single day but apparently it's fine to be braindead when working as an officer of the law and take shortcuts wherever you want just so the stats. look good at the end of the year..

It does demonstrate clearly that competence and attention to detail is totally irrelevant but making the charge stick via whatever means, does..

One does have to ask how many men are imprisoned the same way ?

Woman is victim of elaborate revenge plot, and the lessons for false rape cases

by Archivist

This isn't a false rape case, it's the story of a classic rush to judgment that is, in many ways, typical of the cases we feature here. It holds an important lesson for the kinds of cases we normally cover here, but you have to read to the end to get to it.

The New York Times reports that a woman named Seemona Sumasar accused her ex-boyfriend of raping her, and in retaliation, he concocted "one of the most elaborate framing plots" police had ever seen that left Ms. Sumasar's life in tatters.

"One night, Ms. Sumasar was pulled over by the police. Before she could speak, detectives slapped handcuffs on her. 'You know you did it,' she said one later shouted at her. 'Just admit it.'” Sumasar was charged with carrying out a series of armed robberies, supposedly based on credible witness statements and proof that her car was the getaway vehicle. A despondent Sumasar sat in jail for seven months, helplessly watching as she lost her restaurant franchise and saw her house go into foreclosure. 

Finally, the plot unraveled. It was, of course, all a lie.  Prosecutors defended their actions in proceeding against her by noting "that the web of false evidence presented by [the ex-boyfriend] was so detailed they had little reason to doubt it."

Anthony Grandinette, Ms. Sumasar’s former lawyer, said law enforcement was negligent, and he posited an explanation that is instructive for this case, and others: "Why would a tiny woman with no criminal record, who worked 10 years on Wall Street, randomly hold up people at gunpoint at night dressed as a policewoman?” Mr. Grandinette asked. 

That is a plausible explanation in Ms. Sumasar's defense, but it's also instructive for the typical false rape cases we feature here: the sort of explanation proffered by Mr. Grandinette is simply not readily available to the vast majority of men and boys featured on this blog.  When an ex-girlfriend, ex-wife, or acquaintance accuses a guy of rape, we never hear this excuse:  "Why would a guy with no criminal record, who worked 10 years on Wall Street, want to rape this woman?”  The widely held, albeit markedly dubious, presumption, which is actually a shared cultural tenet, is exactly the opposite--"men will hit on/screw/f*ck anything that moves."  And not just for consensual sex.  Professors, legal scholars, and people taken seriously by mainstream news outlets instruct us that rape is rampant and, in fact, "normalized to the point where men who are otherwise decent guys will rape and not even think that it's wrong." (Jessica Valenti)  Throw all that together and what you're left with is that the rape of any female by any male above a certain age is deemed plausible.

And that plausibility is why false rape claims are much more common than cases like Seemona Sumasar's.

This is probably a good reason for not trying to outrace a cop on a motorbike. I could only dream to ride this good but I do ride a beamer rather than a harly. Bear in mind that those bikes weight over 300 kilos and they aren't that easy to handle as I have ridden about three of them before..Outstanding effort..

If they can ride like that, what hope have you got of escaping ?

It is without doubt that when anyone sends an email, letter or makes a phonecall to any recalcitrant, stupid enough to stick their head out into the open by making deliberate and obnoxious remarks against any and all men or boys, they deserve the HORDE AFFECT. This method was utilised very well by Glenn Sacks whenever he came across any issue that was either totally biased against all men, obviously anti-male or just plain sexist without any consideration to the Male opinion of this world..

Glenn perfected his "Horde Mode" to such a degree that the recipients would indeed stand up and notice, that affect was overwhelming, any business or gov. department whenever they receive around 5000 Plus emails or faxes or phone calls or letters via snailmail, it will have the appropriate affect due solely to it's number. It was and still is a very affective method to change the anti-male bias that now permeates society without those culprits even giving it any consideration. The anti-male bias is entrenched and we, the public, the society, the holder of public opinion, should and will make every effort to change that mentality so those people involved will sit up and listen and PAY ATTENTION. Our time is long overdue and the rise of public opinion, especially on the Internet, is achievable, operational and highly affective..

We need to develope it, as we have done regarding that obnoxious program called "The Talk" where we garnered resources and affectively made them sit up and pay attention. The removal of Sharon "mutilating a man is funny" Osbourne was a direct result of that effort and I do not think that is making any assumption. We are public opinion and we need to concentrate that effort and work against the feminists and their male-hating doctrine..

So all those of you who participated in removing Osbourne and making your opinion count, a big thank you from all in the MRM. It works and it's highly affective..

We will wait for the next issue to arrive and we will call out to the "MRM Horde", the warriors, to remove and change public opinion. It's long overdue..

FEMALE PAEDOPHILES 

Posted by themaurdian on February 15, 2011
BE WARNEDThis was an essay and is extremely long…. And not a little disturbing. 

Femininity is created within our society as an almost mystical experience – even now women will claim their right to be free and independent, but the man still has to pick up the cheque and open the door. Women are still viewed as more nurturing, more of the mothers, more emotional, more intuitive and better at multi-tasking then men.
But how does this portrayal truly assist in any sort of demand for equality between the sexes? Does raising femininity to the site of a sacred state, the implication that if women ran the world it would somehow be more wholesome, with less wars, is a further extension of negative feminization of the simple nature of being female.
Negative because it is extremely limiting – just as not all men are meat-eating football players, nor are all women nurturing, giving and ultimately peaceful.
The very definition of an aspect of human behavior as ‘natural’ raises immediate concerns – is the opposite then to be unnatural? We are raised to think of women as vessels of goodness, light and all things maternal. Yet time and time again, women prove that, just as much as men, they too are capable of committing base crimes.
Take for example the case of Myra Hindley who lured young children to their murders at the hand of her then partner. In all the articles pertaining to her, and the studies been done, extraordinary amounts of emphasis is placed on her damaged childhood, with a violent and overbearing father and her subsequent relationship with Ian Brad.
In her 30,000-word plea for parole, written in 1978 and 1979, submitted to Home Secretary Merlyn Rees, Hindley said:
Within months he had convinced me that there was no God at all: he could have told me that the earth was flat, the moon was made of green cheese and the sun rose in the west.
And there is an implication that his power was what drove her to commit these atrocities – she was damaged, young, a woman with a terrible past. But so are hundreds and thousands of other women across the world – and it seems an extremely small number of them that are willing to engage in murder.
During the 1990s, Hindley claimed that she only took part in the killings because Brady had drugged her, was blackmailing her with pornographic pictures he had taken of her, and had threatened to kill her younger sister, Maureen. She in essence arguing that his perceived power, or the power that she had given him over her, was the impetus to drive her to murder.
Whether or not this is the case it links into Foucault’s idea that body and sexuality are cultural constructs – if we accept Foucault’s belief, then in effect Myra Hindley is showing us that the perceived social superiority of men over women – this idea that she had to do as she was told or be punished and exposed and shamed, that his power over her in the social construct of a heterosexual relationships can form the drive, and the bond and the need to continue being with someone even after they have exposed themselves as being the worst of humanity.
But there is another argument – that for whatever reasons, despicable, twisted and horrific to all of those with social awareness they may be, that Myra Hindley did what she did because she wanted to.  That if we are to accept true equality between the sexes – we must remove these bodies of ideals that shape our perceptions. As Foucault discusses our obsession over the shaping of the cultural and social body to meet our expectations, the shaping of a person to fit our expectations there is a realization that to change this we cannot simply accept all the good and take none of the bad.
Myra Hindley is a prime example of the great challenge to the extremely sanitized version of feminism that we accept each day – her horrific crimes are more horrific because she is a woman, and she was a young woman at the times the crimes were committed. We are taught to believe, even perhaps by feminists, that women are less capable of acts of evil then men. However how are we to ever truly get a sense of equality, of truly throwing off the shackles of inequality, of our bodies of cultural and social creation, if we do not accept that all humans – regardless of gender, are mixtures of the divine and the impossibly cruel.
It is not only in the case of Myra Hindley that such disparity, such creation of myths and images can be found – the issue of the possibility and activities of female pedophiles is another little explored area of research and media coverage.
With every story that appears there are comments and cries that too much is being made of the activities of female pedophiles, that they are a tiny minority. But in this argument then we should ignore the activities of serial killers and male pedophiles – groups that form tiny, tiny percentages of the population of countries – but whose activities ruin lives and receive extensive media coverage.
In Pedophiles, child abuse and the Internet, Adrian Powell presents graphs gleaned from the helpline ChildLine’s recordings showing the incidents found recorded of female pedophiles. And his results found, that while much much lower then the incidence of male offenders, the results were equal to those who had been abused by their neighbour. These were the two lowest groups in the graph, and yet the image of the predatory neighbour stalking children has been much, much more prevalent in media coverage of attacks on children.
In the report on familiar abuse, the mother was found to have been the perpetrator in 5% of the cases reported in the Childline Annual Statistics of 2005. All told, including the category of both parents – women were perpetrators of sexual abuse in 14% of the cases reported.
However, a BBC documentary, The Ultimate Taboo: Child Sexual Abuse By Women (Panorama BBC1 October 6th, 1997) had experts who claimed that 25% of all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by women. More shockingly, they released statistics and a survey by children’s charity KidSpace revealing that of the 127 survivors interviewed 86% were not believed when they said their abuser was a woman.
In Child abuse, gender, and society By Jackie Turton explores the difficulty of accepting this sort of behavior from women.
We need to find some way of conceptualizing female offending rather then resorting to denial or pathologising events, since such reactions only serve to perpetuate myths about what it is to be a woman.
The BBC online news site completed a detailed news piece on female pedophiles, where they interviewed a number of victims.
One victim, Colin, told them, “I couldn’t sleep at night and I’d get flashbacks of my mum on top of me. I couldn’t hold down a job and I was scared of girls. I found it hard to even say it was sexual abuse because of the way society views mothers.”
This is a powerful example of our stereotyped ideals of sexual roles damaging people’s lives – far more then the trite teen movie where a boy doesn’t fit in because he loves to sew, or a girl who wants to be an athlete. Our societies demands upon us to confirm to what it has decided are social norms are damaging those caught up with individuals who don’t confirm to those beliefs. Who would ever believe a man who said a woman had raped him? And who find it easy to accept that a mother could have sexually abused her own child?
Our images, our created expectations of sexuality and the roles gender plays in shaping our lives, have given those who do not confirm to the system an easy means to escape. Prosecutors and police will have to work doubly hard to convince a jury a mother is guilty of molesting her son, the son will face triple the scrutiny and disbelief of a child who says he or she was abused by, say, a step-father.
The BBC also created the following list:
2007: Tennis coach Claire Lyte, 29 at the time, sentenced to two years in jail for sex with a 13-year-old girl
2007: Margaret Martin, then 47, put on probation for sexually abusing a 10-year-old
2003: Mother-of-four Joanna James jailed for having sex with a 13-year-old boy
2002: Hazel Hallam, then 36, jailed for sexual assault of two boys
1999: First woman goes on Northern Ireland’s sex offenders’ register after admitting abusing seven boys aged 11 to 14
Which details the most recent crimes of female sex offenders. The numbers are much smaller then the male perpetrators – as was also shown in the graph mentioned earlier. However the shame Colin mentioned, and he never went to the police with his mother’s abuse, also shows that there is a huge possibility that the abuse by women is simply not being reported. Perhaps it is being mistaken for love, or comfort and then the victim is left wondering if there is something wrong with the way they feel, rather then in the situation they were placed in.
This has also been mentioned in a news report by a Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten.
“A boy who is sexually abused by his mother is the ultimate taboo,” said Endre Førland, leader of the Incest Center for Men.
A third of the men who call the center now report that a woman assaulted them during childhood. The number has risen quickly, just six years ago the center had no registered calls accusing a woman of incest.”
The BBC documentary  The Ultimate Taboo: Child Sexual abuse by women aired in 1997 by the Panorama program aired harrowing cases of children’s abuse, a case of a girl abused between 8 -13 by her mother, while her father filmed.
Margaret Harris, a South Wales Probation officer described the ordeal of the child:
The older child was naked. Mother was naked. They strung up the older child and tied her, gagged her and string her up from a hook in the ceiling and beat her something like 100 times in about four minutes. They then laid her on the bed and further abused her. All the time mother was doing this, father was videoing the actual abuse. At the end of it all, at one point when the child was lying on the bed almost unconscious, mother and father sat on the edge of the bed and had a cup of tea together. I think that portrays very graphically the awful nature of this. To give it the name sexual abuse belies what actually happened in that house. It was torture. It was the most abhorrent torture I have ever seen.The documentary went on to describe a young boy, who was filmed during theraputic play with the Sexual Abuse Child Consultancy Service, who had been molested by a lesbian couple and a man.
Therapist: His abusers were involved in a lesbian relationship and he was also abused by men too, so actually he’s quite a confused little boy, which is shown very often in his play where he doesn’t really know whether he’s a woman or whether he’s a manThe conception that the act of being female, of knowing and understanding femininity or masculinity as an inherit gender with conformant social norms seems to be undone by the terrible abuse suffered by this child – he was shaped and changed by intense and deeply inappropriate sexual contact at an age where his identity was still being shaped and formed. Changing the nature of his sexual identification to the society pressured image of masculinity and blurring it into something else.
Foucault’s argument that it is our docile bodies which will shape our socially accepted gender roles  as society deems fit seems to come into play here – this abused child was not born with an inherent set of ideals of what it is to be male or to be female – he was taught, as all those who dwell in the socially constructed sphere are taught, that certain behaviors correspond with certain genitals.
The abuse that the child has suffered has changed the behaviours that he expects to enact, thereby challenging our perceptions of appropriate activities for a young male child.
The other implication that somehow if a woman is offending then it seems to be a lone woman, a damaged woman, is immediately blown aside upon examining the phenomenon of online pedophile rings and networks run exclusively for women, by women.
There is even a female arm of the male pedophile group NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) known as NAWGLA (North American Woman Girl Love Association).   NAWGLA runs a website known as Butterfly Kisses . Butterfly kisses was known online by a variety of abbreviations of the phrase butterfly kisses – bk-girls.org was the sites name for a time, and various others with similar themes. The site was formerly closed in 2007 but who many believe lives on in the Internet under a different name.
The website was for a time one of a host that have since been found and closed, all the remains is www.ipce.info.
However a similr organisation aim can be found through NAMBLA. NAMBLA’s introduction: NAMBLA’s goal is to end the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships by: building understanding and support for such relationships;
1.    Educating the general public on the benevolent nature of man/boy love;
2.    Cooperating with lesbian, gay, feminist, and other liberation movements;
3.    Supporting the liberation of persons of all ages from sexual prejudice and oppression.
This idea of the society being wrong in judging their activities – the coaching of the abuse in terms of love and endearment is identical to the transcript of the activities of Butterfly Kisses.  The two groups also draw on historical so-called facts to support their right to abuse children.
So again there is no disparity in the activities of female pedophiles as opposed to male ones – they act sometimes with savagery, and sometimes with a terrible faux-love, they provide the same justifications and meet and exchange information online in the same manner. However, one group receives extreme amounts of coverage, while the other does not. As statistics have shown quoted here, women while not at the same volume of offences as male predators are nonetheless still a significant portion and rank higher then the oft quoted ‘Stranger Danger’ image of the malevolent man in a dark coat the hovers in our collective consciousness.
Foucault’s ideas of power as a field of relationships between free subjects , with the ideas that the subjectivity of our understandings of sexuality as objects shaped by forces within society and the concepts of power-knowledge, helps to reveal how and why we have created out mythical images of the mother and of femininity.
The image has been thrust upon us of women as extremely different to men, beyond mere physical disparity. Our society has shaped us to believe in our nurturing, in our kindness and in our inherent physical weakness to men and ability to ‘raise a family’ and ‘deal with children’. However, to take this socially constructed perception of what it is to be female is beginning to push down the dark, destructive natures that lurk in some humans. It is not purely a male or female condition to molest and abuse children, it is not an act that can be construed in terms of gender – it is the result of a terrible shift in an individual mind.
A disservice is done, therefore, to the children who are abused by women and whom society ignores because this is an interruption to the status quo.
If a woman rapes and abuses a child she needs to be judged not as a woman, with the deep seated disbelief that she as a female could ever commit such an atrocity, but as a person whose behavior is against our laws and damaging to the development and life of a child.